Pieter J. de Visser, Steven A.H. de Rooij, Vignesh Murugesan, David J. Thoen, and Jochem J.A. Baselmans
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034051 (2021) - Published 30 September, 2021
A pixel that can count individual photons and resolve each photon’s color has been a dream for astronomers and biophysicists. Dream no longer! The authors realize such detectors using superconducting microwave resonators. The team experimentally shows that spectral resolving power is strongly limited by photon energy escaping through phonon losses to the bath, early in the detection process. With this insight, they use a thin membrane to demonstrate resolving power improved by a factor of 2.5, paving the way to reaching the fundamental limit in the future.
I.A. Golovchanskiy, N.N. Abramov, V.S. Stolyarov, A.A. Golubov, M. Yu. Kupriyanov, V.V. Ryazanov, and A.V. Ustinov
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034029 (2021) - Published 16 September, 2021
, an emerging field in artificial quantum systems, considers the interactions of electromagnetic waves (photons) with magnetic oscillations (magnons). Here the fundamentally weak coupling between quasiparticles challenges the development of on-chip devices. This study demonstrates the on-chip realization of ultrastrong photon-magnon coupling, using superconducting structures with reduced photon phase velocity. Attaining a coupling ratio relatively close to unity, it is found that the studied structure obeys the Hopfield interaction model, with plasmonic contribution to the energy of the magnon-polariton system.
Rami Ezzouch, Simon Zihlmann, Vincent P. Michal, Jing Li, Agostino Aprá, Benoit Bertrand, Louis Hutin, Maud Vinet, Matias Urdampilleta, Tristan Meunier, Xavier Jehl, Yann-Michel Niquet, Marc Sanquer, Silvano De Franceschi, and Romain Maurand
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034031 (2021) - Published 17 September, 2021
Hole spin qubits are appealing for quantum information processing, because they can be coherently manipulated with radio-frequency electric fields. The underlying physical mechanism relies on spin-orbit coupling (SOC) in the semiconductor’s valence band, and operating a hole spin qubit requires accurate knowledge of SOC-dependent parameters that can vary from one qubit to another. To this end, the authors employ a two-tone-spectroscopy technique that exploits the same tools used for qubit control and readout: microwave gate-voltage excitation and dispersive gate reflectometry. Their approach will facilitate accurate quantum control of hole spin qubits in scaled semiconductor structures.
Dongxing Yu, Chaowei Sui, Dominik Schulz, Jamal Berakdar, and Chenglong Jia
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034032 (2021) - Published 17 September, 2021
Magneto-optical approaches are promising for fast, precise handling of magnetic data. This study presents a scheme for precise spatiotemporal control of magnetic vortices or skyrmions via the magnetoelectric interaction, using the electric near fields around a biased nanoscale scanning tip. By balancing the topological Lorentz force with an attractive force due to the off-center tip above, magnetic textures can be trapped, accelerated, or stopped without undesirable effects such as transverse Hall drift. The method is applicable to a wide class of noncollinear magnetic structures, and points to the potential of functionalizing near fields for information storage and processing.
Jiaxin Chen, Lishuan Wang, Wei Wu, Wei Cai, Huasong Liu, Mengxin Ren, and Jingjun Xu
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, L031001 (2021) - Published 29 September, 2021
Obtaining strong circular dichroism (CD) from planar chiral metasurfaces has been hotly pursued, to realize ultracompact circular polarizers for applications in photography, spectroscopy, and biological sensing. Many attempts have failed, due to insufficient thickness of the structures. Here the authors present efficient enhancement of the CD response from a metasurface by utilizing its topological edge state. One can foresee a direct impact of this result on engineering solutions for the applications mentioned above.
Justas Baltrukonis, Orestas Ulčinas, Sergej Orlov, and Vytautas Jukna
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034001 (2021) - Published 1 September, 2021
Dongdong Li, Hongbin Ma, Qiwei Zhan, Jie Liao, Wen-Yan Yin, Hongsheng Chen, and Haoliang Qian
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034002 (2021) - Published 1 September, 2021
George S. Barron, Bryan T. Gard, Orien J. Altman, Nicholas J. Mayhall, Edwin Barnes, and Sophia E. Economou
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034003 (2021) - Published 1 September, 2021
Yifei Hao, Tianlin Li, Yu Yun, Xin Li, Xuegang Chen, Jingfeng Song, Zahra Ahmadi, Jeffrey E. Shield, Xiaoshan Xu, and Xia Hong
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034004 (2021) - Published 2 September, 2021
Warit Asavanant, Baramee Charoensombutamon, Shota Yokoyama, Takeru Ebihara, Tomohiro Nakamura, Rafael N. Alexander, Mamoru Endo, Jun-ichi Yoshikawa, Nicolas C. Menicucci, Hidehiro Yonezawa, and Akira Furusawa
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034005 (2021) - Published 2 September, 2021
Mark A. Hughes, Naitik A. Panjwani, Matias Urdampilleta, Nafsika Theodoropoulou, Ilana Wisby, Kevin P. Homewood, Ben Murdin, Tobias Lindström, and J. David Carey
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034006 (2021) - Published 2 September, 2021
Gregory M. Stephen, Owen A. Vail, Jennifer E. DeMell, Aubrey T. Hanbicki, Patrick J. Taylor, and Adam L. Friedman
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034007 (2021) - Published 3 September, 2021
G. H. dos Santos, D. C. Salles, M. G. Damaceno, B. T. Menezes, C. Corso, M. Martinelli, P. H. Souto Ribeiro, and R. Medeiros de Araújo
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034008 (2021) - Published 3 September, 2021
Hao Zhou, Xiaoping Jia, Li-Yun Fu, and Arnaud Tourin
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034009 (2021) - Published 3 September, 2021
Maximilian M. Sonner, Daniel Rudolph, Gregor Koblmüller, and Hubert J. Krenner
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034010 (2021) - Published 7 September, 2021
Md. Mohsinur Rahman Adnan, Darpan Verma, Zhanbo Xia, Nidhin Kurian Kalarickal, Siddharth Rajan, and Roberto C. Myers
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034011 (2021) - Published 7 September, 2021
Brent Wallace, Ling-Wei Kong, Armando Rodriguez, and Ying-Cheng Lai
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034012 (2021) - Published 7 September, 2021
Kai-Niklas Schymik, Sara Pancaldi, Florence Nogrette, Daniel Barredo, Julien Paris, Antoine Browaeys, and Thierry Lahaye
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034013 (2021) - Published 7 September, 2021
I. Gnusov, H. Sigurdsson, J.D. Töpfer, S. Baryshev, S. Alyatkin, and P.G. Lagoudakis
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034014 (2021) - Published 8 September, 2021
Hong Yang, Hailang Dai, Qiheng Wei, Hongrui Shan, Zhuangqi Cao, and Xianfeng Chen
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034015 (2021) - Published 8 September, 2021
Ruslan Salikhov, Fabian Samad, Benny Böhm, Sebastian Schneider, Darius Pohl, Bernd Rellinghaus, Aladin Ullrich, Manfred Albrecht, Jürgen Lindner, Nikolai S. Kiselev, and Olav Hellwig
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034016 (2021) - Published 9 September, 2021
Anran Jin, Pei Zeng, Richard V. Penty, and Xiongfeng Ma
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034017 (2021) - Published 9 September, 2021
A. Alarcón, J. Argillander, G. Lima, and G.B. Xavier
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034018 (2021) - Published 9 September, 2021
Hiroyuki Matsui, Eiji Takahashi, Seiji Tsuzuki, Kazuo Takimiya, and Tatsuo Hasegawa
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034019 (2021) - Published 10 September, 2021
Emilien Lavie, Ignatius William Primaatmaja, Wen Yu Kon, Chao Wang, and Charles Ci Wen Lim
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034020 (2021) - Published 10 September, 2021
Nakul Pande, Jeffery A. Wood, Guido Mul, Detlef Lohse, Bastian T. Mei, and Dominik Krug
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034021 (2021) - Published 10 September, 2021
Anoop Mutneja and Smarajit Karmakar
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034022 (2021) - Published 13 September, 2021
Yuxin Zhai, Hyung-Suk Kwon, and Bogdan-Ioan Popa
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034023 (2021) - Published 13 September, 2021
Paul Heidler, Christian M. F. Schneider, Katja Kustura, Carlos Gonzalez-Ballestero, Oriol Romero-Isart, and Gerhard Kirchmair
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034024 (2021) - Published 13 September, 2021
L. Martin-Monier, P. G. Ledda, P. L. Piveteau, F. Gallaire, and F. Sorin
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034025 (2021) - Published 14 September, 2021
Antonio Mandarino, Karl Joulain, Melisa Domínguez Gómez, and Bruno Bellomo
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034026 (2021) - Published 14 September, 2021
Guangzheng Zuo, Safa Shoaee, Martijn Kemerink, and Dieter Neher
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034027 (2021) - Published 15 September, 2021
Jacopo M. De Ponti, Luca Iorio, Emanuele Riva, Raffaele Ardito, Francesco Braghin, and Alberto Corigliano
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034028 (2021) - Published 15 September, 2021
I.A. Golovchanskiy, N.N. Abramov, V.S. Stolyarov, A.A. Golubov, M. Yu. Kupriyanov, V.V. Ryazanov, and A.V. Ustinov
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034029 (2021) - Published 16 September, 2021
, an emerging field in artificial quantum systems, considers the interactions of electromagnetic waves (photons) with magnetic oscillations (magnons). Here the fundamentally weak coupling between quasiparticles challenges the development of on-chip devices. This study demonstrates the on-chip realization of ultrastrong photon-magnon coupling, using superconducting structures with reduced photon phase velocity. Attaining a coupling ratio relatively close to unity, it is found that the studied structure obeys the Hopfield interaction model, with plasmonic contribution to the energy of the magnon-polariton system.
P. Stoliar, O. Schneegans, and M. J. Rozenberg
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034030 (2021) - Published 16 September, 2021
Rami Ezzouch, Simon Zihlmann, Vincent P. Michal, Jing Li, Agostino Aprá, Benoit Bertrand, Louis Hutin, Maud Vinet, Matias Urdampilleta, Tristan Meunier, Xavier Jehl, Yann-Michel Niquet, Marc Sanquer, Silvano De Franceschi, and Romain Maurand
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034031 (2021) - Published 17 September, 2021
Hole spin qubits are appealing for quantum information processing, because they can be coherently manipulated with radio-frequency electric fields. The underlying physical mechanism relies on spin-orbit coupling (SOC) in the semiconductor’s valence band, and operating a hole spin qubit requires accurate knowledge of SOC-dependent parameters that can vary from one qubit to another. To this end, the authors employ a two-tone-spectroscopy technique that exploits the same tools used for qubit control and readout: microwave gate-voltage excitation and dispersive gate reflectometry. Their approach will facilitate accurate quantum control of hole spin qubits in scaled semiconductor structures.
Dongxing Yu, Chaowei Sui, Dominik Schulz, Jamal Berakdar, and Chenglong Jia
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034032 (2021) - Published 17 September, 2021
Magneto-optical approaches are promising for fast, precise handling of magnetic data. This study presents a scheme for precise spatiotemporal control of magnetic vortices or skyrmions via the magnetoelectric interaction, using the electric near fields around a biased nanoscale scanning tip. By balancing the topological Lorentz force with an attractive force due to the off-center tip above, magnetic textures can be trapped, accelerated, or stopped without undesirable effects such as transverse Hall drift. The method is applicable to a wide class of noncollinear magnetic structures, and points to the potential of functionalizing near fields for information storage and processing.
M. Moghaddaszadeh, R. Adlakha, M.A. Attarzadeh, A. Aref, and M. Nouh
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034033 (2021) - Published 20 September, 2021
Justin T. Hou, Pengxiang Zhang, and Luqiao Liu
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034034 (2021) - Published 20 September, 2021
Hantao Zhang and Ran Cheng
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034035 (2021) - Published 20 September, 2021
Nicolò Crescini, Giovanni Carugno, and Giuseppe Ruoso
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034036 (2021) - Published 21 September, 2021
Jiu-Xun Sun (孙久勋), Hong-Chun Yang (杨宏春), Yang Li (李杨), and Hai-Juan Cui (崔海娟)
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034037 (2021) - Published 21 September, 2021
Lorenzo Fallarino, Mikel Quintana, Eva López Rojo, and Andreas Berger
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034038 (2021) - Published 22 September, 2021
Kohei Ueda, Naoki Moriuchi, Kenta Fukushima, Takanori Kida, Masayuki Hagiwara, and Jobu Matsuno
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034039 (2021) - Published 22 September, 2021
Armin Afrough, Florea Marica, Bryce MacMillan, and Bruce J. Balcom
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034040 (2021) - Published 22 September, 2021
A. Ciattoni
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034041 (2021) - Published 23 September, 2021
Julius de Rojas, Joaquín Salguero, Alberto Quintana, Aitor Lopeandia, Maciej O. Liedke, Maik Butterling, Ahmed G. Attallah, Eric Hirschman, Andreas Wagner, Llibertat Abad, José L. Costa-Krämer, Jordi Sort, and Enric Menéndez
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034042 (2021) - Published 23 September, 2021
Anna Sitek, Kristinn Torfason, Andrei Manolescu, and Ágúst Valfells
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034043 (2021) - Published 24 September, 2021
Lina Chen, Zhenyu Gao, Kaiyuan Zhou, Y.W. Du, and R.H. Liu
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034044 (2021) - Published 24 September, 2021
Heze Zhang, Yang Zheng, Dong Mao, Chao Zeng, Yueqing Du, and Jianlin Zhao
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034045 (2021) - Published 27 September, 2021
Muhammad Asjad, Montasir Qasymeh, and Hichem Eleuch
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034046 (2021) - Published 27 September, 2021
Daehun Lee, Qiyu Liu, Lu Zheng, Xuejian Ma, Huan Li, Mo Li, and Keji Lai
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034047 (2021) - Published 28 September, 2021
R. Coehoorn, X. Lin, C.H.L. Weijtens, S. Gottardi, and H. van Eersel
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034048 (2021) - Published 28 September, 2021
Mahdi Mehrnia, Jeremy Trimble, Olle Heinonen, and Jesse Berezovsky
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034049 (2021) - Published 28 September, 2021
Ze Zhan, Chongxin Run, Zhiwen Zong, Liang Xiang, Ying Fei, Zhenhai Sun, Yaozu Wu, Zhilong Jia, Peng Duan, Jianlan Wu, Yi Yin, and Guoping Guo
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034050 (2021) - Published 29 September, 2021
Pieter J. de Visser, Steven A.H. de Rooij, Vignesh Murugesan, David J. Thoen, and Jochem J.A. Baselmans
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034051 (2021) - Published 30 September, 2021
A pixel that can count individual photons and resolve each photon’s color has been a dream for astronomers and biophysicists. Dream no longer! The authors realize such detectors using superconducting microwave resonators. The team experimentally shows that spectral resolving power is strongly limited by photon energy escaping through phonon losses to the bath, early in the detection process. With this insight, they use a thin membrane to demonstrate resolving power improved by a factor of 2.5, paving the way to reaching the fundamental limit in the future.
Xinlu Li, Yurong Su, Meng Zhu, Fanxing Zheng, Peina Zhang, Jia Zhang, and Jing-Tao Lü
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034052 (2021) - Published 30 September, 2021
S.D. Krasikov, M.A. Odit, D.A. Dobrykh, I.M. Yusupov, A.A. Mikhailovskaya, D.T. Shakirova, A.A. Shcherbakov, A.P. Slobozhanyuk, P. Ginzburg, D.S. Filonov, and A.A. Bogdanov
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 039901 (2021) - Published 21 September, 2021
