Yabin Fan, Paige Quarterman, Joseph Finley, Jiahao Han, Pengxiang Zhang, Justin T. Hou, Mark D. Stiles, Alexander J. Grutter, and Luqiao Liu
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 061002 (2020) - Published 15 June, 2020
Magnonic devices are important for implementing next-generation spintronics, but the adoption of such technology has long been stymied by the difficulty of integrating high-quality magnetic insulators with silicon. This study shows that highly effective magnonic spin valves can be realized at room temperature in Pt/YIG/permalloy hybrid structures grown on Si. In fact, a pronounced antiferromagnetic coupling between YIG and permalloy associated with growth on Si is the property that enables the spin valve’s functionality. Since these are two critical materials for spin-wave devices, this form of interfacial coupling between them is of great importance to spintronics.
K. Lezhennikova, R. Abdeddaim, A. Hurshkainen, A. Vignaud, M. Dubois, P. Jomin, D. Berrahou, A. Raaijmakers, N. Avdievich, I. Melchakova, S. Enoch, P. Belov, C. Simovski, and S. Glybovski
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064004 (2020) - Published 2 June, 2020
Commonly an artificial magnetic shield is used to improve antenna radiation in the far-field region, thanks to the in-phase reflection of electromagnetic waves. Here the authors study the possibility of constructive field interference with respect to the region. This effect is useful in magnetic resonance imaging, where a conductive scanned sample (such as a patient) is located in the near-field region of radio-frequency coils. The team combines the most popular type of rf coil in magnetic resonance imaging, the “birdcage”, with an artificial magnetic shield, and demonstrate the near-field efficiency improvement, even at relatively low MRI frequencies.
Fabian Böhm, Sevada Sahakian, Ann Dooms, Guy Verschaffelt, and Guy Van der Sande
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064014 (2020) - Published 5 June, 2020
Synchronization of chaotic photonic systems can be used, practically indefinitely, to create and distribute unique encryption keys ( ). However, typical photonic systems are highly susceptible to phase fluctuations and fundamentally limited in their key-generation rate. In this work, the authors demonstrate a fundamentally different approach based on chaotic optoelectronic oscillators (OEOs), with which highly stable synchronization can be achieved through commercial fiber-optic links. Contrary to current photonic systems, OEOs are limited by relaxation oscillations and allow significantly increased rates of key generation, for fast and stable data encryption.
A. Vinante, P. Falferi, G. Gasbarri, A. Setter, C. Timberlake, and H. Ulbricht
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064027 (2020) - Published 11 June, 2020
Levitation of magnetic or superconducting microparticles is a promising technology for applications such as ultrasensitive force and gravity sensors, and experiments in fundamental and quantum physics. Unfortunately, achieving very low dissipation has proven to be more difficult than expected. This study demonstrates levitation of micromagnets by the Meissner effect above type-I superconductors, with very long damping times beyond 10 s and quality factors exceeding 10. The authors furthermore investigate using a levitated micromagnet as an ultrasensitive magnetometer, pointing out the potential for magnetic-field resolution beyond the current state of the art.
Theodor S. Becker, Nele Börsing, Thomas Haag, Christoph Bärlocher, Carly M. Donahue, Andrew Curtis, Johan O. A. Robertsson, and Dirk-Jan van Manen
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064061 (2020) - Published 25 June, 2020
While laboratories devoted to wave propagation enable the study of complex wave phenomena and the discovery of physical relations, unfortunately they suffer from undesired wave-field reflections from their boundaries, and the samples under investigation are restricted in size for practical reasons. This study shows how those limitations can be overcome by fully embedding physical wave-propagation experiments in larger numerical simulations, such that waves can propagate seamlessly between both realms. This approach allows previously inaccessible wave phenomena to be investigated, and could shift the status quo of wave-physics experimentation.
Sabine M. Neumayer, Lei Tao, Andrew O'Hara, John Brehm, Mengwei Si, Pai-Ying Liao, Tianli Feng, Sergei V. Kalinin, Peide D. Ye, Sokrates T. Pantelides, Petro Maksymovych, and Nina Balke
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064063 (2020) - Published 26 June, 2020
Going against the grain: Normally, the electric polarization of a ferroelectric compound switches to align itself with a sufficiently strong applied field. Here the authors report polarization switching in ferroelectric van der Waals (vdW) crystals that is based on ion migration across the vdW gap. This ionic mechanism is complementary to but fundamentally different from the polarization rotation underpinning the usual picture of ferroelectric switching. These findings change the way we think about materials featuring both ionic and dipolar properties and enable fresh functionality in ultrathin vdW structures, to advance device physics and nanotechnology.
Christopher Sugino, Massimo Ruzzene, and Alper Erturk
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 061001 (2020) - Published 5 June, 2020
Elastic metamaterials enable broadband control of vibration and wave propagation in structures, but their capabilities are limited by their fixed effective material properties. This work uses a piezoelectric metamaterial and digital control to create a resonant band gap in a mechanical waveguide. Experiments demonstrate that the structure exhibits a resonant band gap that can be precisely tuned across a wide frequency range spanning several natural modes of the structure. This platform is expected to open doors to research on elastic metamaterials with effective properties that vary in space or time, significantly extending wave control in structures.
Yabin Fan, Paige Quarterman, Joseph Finley, Jiahao Han, Pengxiang Zhang, Justin T. Hou, Mark D. Stiles, Alexander J. Grutter, and Luqiao Liu
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 061002 (2020) - Published 15 June, 2020
Magnonic devices are important for implementing next-generation spintronics, but the adoption of such technology has long been stymied by the difficulty of integrating high-quality magnetic insulators with silicon. This study shows that highly effective magnonic spin valves can be realized at room temperature in Pt/YIG/permalloy hybrid structures grown on Si. In fact, a pronounced antiferromagnetic coupling between YIG and permalloy associated with growth on Si is the property that enables the spin valve’s functionality. Since these are two critical materials for spin-wave devices, this form of interfacial coupling between them is of great importance to spintronics.
C.A. Potts, V.A.S.V. Bittencourt, S. Viola Kusminskiy, and J.P. Davis
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064001 (2020) - Published 1 June, 2020
Abebe T. Tarekegne, Xiaodong Shi, Yulin Gan, Yunzhong Chen, and Haiyan Ou
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064002 (2020) - Published 1 June, 2020
Luca Piantanida, Amir F. Payam, Jing Zhong, and Kislon Voïtchovsky
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064003 (2020) - Published 1 June, 2020
K. Lezhennikova, R. Abdeddaim, A. Hurshkainen, A. Vignaud, M. Dubois, P. Jomin, D. Berrahou, A. Raaijmakers, N. Avdievich, I. Melchakova, S. Enoch, P. Belov, C. Simovski, and S. Glybovski
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064004 (2020) - Published 2 June, 2020
Commonly an artificial magnetic shield is used to improve antenna radiation in the far-field region, thanks to the in-phase reflection of electromagnetic waves. Here the authors study the possibility of constructive field interference with respect to the region. This effect is useful in magnetic resonance imaging, where a conductive scanned sample (such as a patient) is located in the near-field region of radio-frequency coils. The team combines the most popular type of rf coil in magnetic resonance imaging, the “birdcage”, with an artificial magnetic shield, and demonstrate the near-field efficiency improvement, even at relatively low MRI frequencies.
N. S. Nye, A. E. Halawany, C. Markos, M. Khajavikhan, and D. N. Christodoulides
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064005 (2020) - Published 2 June, 2020
Meng Xu, Ting-Wei Chen, Jian-Min Yan, Lei Guo, Hui Wang, Guan-Yin Gao, Hao-Su Luo, Yang Chai, and Ren-Kui Zheng
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064006 (2020) - Published 2 June, 2020
Andrew Hudson and James Camparo
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064007 (2020) - Published 2 June, 2020
F. Ersan and C. Ataca
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064008 (2020) - Published 3 June, 2020
Kang Wang, Yiou Zhang, and Gang Xiao
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064009 (2020) - Published 3 June, 2020
Nikolett Német, Donald White, Shinya Kato, Scott Parkins, and Takao Aoki
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064010 (2020) - Published 3 June, 2020
Yuewei Yin, Xuanyuan Jiang, Mark A. Koten, Jeffrey E. Shield, Xuegang Chen, Yu Yun, Alpha T. N’Diaye, Xia Hong, and Xiaoshan Xu
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064011 (2020) - Published 4 June, 2020
Ji Chu, Danyu Li, Xiaopei Yang, Shuqing Song, Zhikun Han, Zhen Yang, Yuqian Dong, Wen Zheng, Zhimin Wang, Xiangmin Yu, Dong Lan, Xinsheng Tan, and Yang Yu
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064012 (2020) - Published 4 June, 2020
Pei Zeng, Weijie Wu, and Xiongfeng Ma
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064013 (2020) - Published 4 June, 2020
Fabian Böhm, Sevada Sahakian, Ann Dooms, Guy Verschaffelt, and Guy Van der Sande
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064014 (2020) - Published 5 June, 2020
Synchronization of chaotic photonic systems can be used, practically indefinitely, to create and distribute unique encryption keys ( ). However, typical photonic systems are highly susceptible to phase fluctuations and fundamentally limited in their key-generation rate. In this work, the authors demonstrate a fundamentally different approach based on chaotic optoelectronic oscillators (OEOs), with which highly stable synchronization can be achieved through commercial fiber-optic links. Contrary to current photonic systems, OEOs are limited by relaxation oscillations and allow significantly increased rates of key generation, for fast and stable data encryption.
Lu Qi, Guo-Li Wang, Shutian Liu, Shou Zhang, and Hong-Fu Wang
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064015 (2020) - Published 5 June, 2020
Rasmus Høy Jensen, Erika Janitz, Yannik Fontana, Yi He, Olivier Gobron, Ilya P. Radko, Mihir Bhaskar, Ruffin Evans, César Daniel Rodríguez Rosenblueth, Lilian Childress, Alexander Huck, and Ulrik Lund Andersen
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064016 (2020) - Published 5 June, 2020
Eliska Greplova, Carolin Gold, Benedikt Kratochwil, Tim Davatz, Riccardo Pisoni, Annika Kurzmann, Peter Rickhaus, Mark H. Fischer, Thomas Ihn, and Sebastian D. Huber
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064017 (2020) - Published 8 June, 2020
Ren-Ci Peng, Long-Qing Chen, Ziyao Zhou, Ming Liu, and Ce-Wen Nan
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064018 (2020) - Published 8 June, 2020
D. L. Chesny and N. B. Orange
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064019 (2020) - Published 8 June, 2020
Qing Hao and Yue Xiao
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064020 (2020) - Published 8 June, 2020
Sneha Banerjee, Liemao Cao, Yee Sin Ang, L.K. Ang, and Peng Zhang
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064021 (2020) - Published 9 June, 2020
Bin-Bin Zhou, Wen-Jun Deng, Li-Feng Wang, Lei Dong, and Qing-An Huang
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064022 (2020) - Published 9 June, 2020
Shangming Wei, Penglong Ren, Yong He, Pu Zhang, and Xue-Wen Chen
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064023 (2020) - Published 9 June, 2020
Shimul Kanti Nath, Sanjoy Kumar Nandi, Assaad El-Helou, Xinjun Liu, Shuai Li, Thomas Ratcliff, Peter E. Raad, and Robert G. Elliman
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064024 (2020) - Published 9 June, 2020
Kazem Zafari and Homayoon Oraizi
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064025 (2020) - Published 11 June, 2020
Y. Ono, H. Minami, G. Kuwano, T. Kashiwagi, M. Tsujimoto, K. Kadowaki, and R. A. Klemm
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064026 (2020) - Published 11 June, 2020
A. Vinante, P. Falferi, G. Gasbarri, A. Setter, C. Timberlake, and H. Ulbricht
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064027 (2020) - Published 11 June, 2020
Levitation of magnetic or superconducting microparticles is a promising technology for applications such as ultrasensitive force and gravity sensors, and experiments in fundamental and quantum physics. Unfortunately, achieving very low dissipation has proven to be more difficult than expected. This study demonstrates levitation of micromagnets by the Meissner effect above type-I superconductors, with very long damping times beyond 10 s and quality factors exceeding 10. The authors furthermore investigate using a levitated micromagnet as an ultrasensitive magnetometer, pointing out the potential for magnetic-field resolution beyond the current state of the art.
Munehisa Matsumoto, Takafumi Hawai, and Kanta Ono
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064028 (2020) - Published 11 June, 2020
Xiangyu Ma, Yuejing Wang, Joshua Zide, and Matthew Doty
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064029 (2020) - Published 12 June, 2020
Woon-Shing Yeung, Van-Phung Mai, and Ruey-Jen Yang
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064030 (2020) - Published 12 June, 2020
Xiang Ni, Zhicheng Xiao, Alexander B. Khanikaev, and Andrea Alù
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064031 (2020) - Published 12 June, 2020
Ye Lin, Tianhua Feng, Sheng Lan, Jin Liu, and Yi Xu
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064032 (2020) - Published 12 June, 2020
Zhicheng Xiao, Dimitrios L. Sounas, Aravind Nagulu, Mykhailo Tymchenko, Tolga Dinc, Harish Krishnaswamy, and Andrea Alù
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064033 (2020) - Published 15 June, 2020
D. Kundys, A. Cascales, A. S. Makhort, H. Majjad, F. Chevrier, B. Doudin, A. Fedrizzi, and B. Kundys
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064034 (2020) - Published 15 June, 2020
Pyry Kivisaari
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064035 (2020) - Published 15 June, 2020
Mengting Liu, Xianjie Wang, Tai Yao, Bin Fang, Yiyong Wu, Chengyue Sun, Zhongming Zeng, and Bo Song
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064036 (2020) - Published 16 June, 2020
Fei Liu
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064037 (2020) - Published 16 June, 2020
Md Shariful Islam, A.V. Kovalev, G. Coget, E.A. Viktorov, D.S. Citrin, and A. Locquet
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064038 (2020) - Published 16 June, 2020
Moritz Kalhöfer-Köchling, Eberhard Bodenschatz, and Yong Wang
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064039 (2020) - Published 16 June, 2020
Walter Fuscaldo, Alessio Benedetti, Davide Comite, Paolo Baccarelli, Paolo Burghignoli, and Alessandro Galli
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064040 (2020) - Published 17 June, 2020
Hai-Jun Wu (吴海俊), Bo Zhao (赵波), Carmelo Rosales-Guzmán, Wei Gao (高玮), Bao-Sen Shi (史保森), and Zhi-Han Zhu (朱智涵)
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064041 (2020) - Published 17 June, 2020
Luyang Feng, Jiujiu Chen, Hongbo Huang, Shaoyong Huo, Zhuhua Tan, Xu Han, and Guoliang Huang
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064042 (2020) - Published 17 June, 2020
He Bai, L.C. Jin, Gang Li, Jian Su, Z.Z. Zhu, Ying Zhang, T. Zhu, H.W. Zhang, and J.W. Cai
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064043 (2020) - Published 17 June, 2020
Yuan Tian, Hao Ge, Xiu-Juan Zhang, Xiang-Yuan Xu, Ming-Hui Lu, Yun Jing, and Yan-Feng Chen
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064044 (2020) - Published 18 June, 2020
Chulho Jung, Daewoong Nam, Junha Hwang, Daeho Sung, Dohyung Cho, Heemin Lee, Sangsoo Kim, Kensuke Tono, Makina Yabashi, Tetsuya Ishikawa, Do Young Noh, and Changyong Song
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064045 (2020) - Published 18 June, 2020
D. Torsello, G.A. Ummarino, J. Bekaert, L. Gozzelino, R. Gerbaldo, M.A. Tanatar, P.C. Canfield, R. Prozorov, and G. Ghigo
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064046 (2020) - Published 18 June, 2020
Xiaoshi Su and Debasish Banerjee
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064047 (2020) - Published 18 June, 2020
Everton B. Lima, José P. Leão-Neto, Alisson S. Marques, Giclênio C. Silva, José H. Lopes, and Glauber T. Silva
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064048 (2020) - Published 19 June, 2020
Yali Zeng, Hao Feng, Wen Xiao, Yadong Xu, Bo Hou, Qiaoliang Bao, Longfang Ye, and Huanyang Chen
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064049 (2020) - Published 19 June, 2020
Xinyuan Dong, Diyuan Zheng, Meng Yuan, Yiru Niu, Binbin Liu, and Hui Wang
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064050 (2020) - Published 19 June, 2020
Yongjian Zhou, Chenyang Guo, Caihua Wan, Xianzhe Chen, Xiaofeng Zhou, Ruiqi Zhang, Youdi Gu, Ruyi Chen, Huaqiang Wu, Xiufeng Han, Feng Pan, and Cheng Song
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064051 (2020) - Published 22 June, 2020
Yurui Qu, Meiyan Pan, and Min Qiu
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064052 (2020) - Published 22 June, 2020
Yu-Feng Ding, Zhuo-Liang Yu, Peng-Bin He, Qiang Wan, Biao Liu, Jun-Liang Yang, and Meng-Qiu Cai
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064053 (2020) - Published 22 June, 2020
Katarina Ridzonova, Eduard Belas, Roman Grill, Jakub Pekarek, and Petr Praus
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064054 (2020) - Published 22 June, 2020
Rong Wang, Mu Lan, Jingxiu Yang, and Su-Huai Wei
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064055 (2020) - Published 23 June, 2020
Milim Lee, Seong Won Cho, Seon Jeong Kim, Joon Young Kwak, Hyunsu Ju, Yeonjin Yi, Byung-ki Cheong, and Suyoun Lee
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064056 (2020) - Published 23 June, 2020
V.B. Svetovoy, A.V. Postnikov, I.V. Uvarov, F.I. Stepanov, and G. Palasantzas
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064057 (2020) - Published 23 June, 2020
Z.-X. Li, Yunshan Cao, X. R. Wang, and Peng Yan
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064058 (2020) - Published 24 June, 2020
Adolfo Vázquez-Quesada, Marc Meléndez Schofield, Achilleas Tsortos, Pablo Mateos-Gil, Dimitra Milioni, Electra Gizeli, and Rafael Delgado-Buscalioni
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064059 (2020) - Published 24 June, 2020
Yuntao Wu, Ge Yang, Dan Han, Ming Liu, Ayman Hawari, Mao-Hua Du, Jing Peng, Camera Foster, Shiyou Chen, Merry Koschan, and Charles L. Melcher
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064060 (2020) - Published 25 June, 2020
Theodor S. Becker, Nele Börsing, Thomas Haag, Christoph Bärlocher, Carly M. Donahue, Andrew Curtis, Johan O. A. Robertsson, and Dirk-Jan van Manen
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064061 (2020) - Published 25 June, 2020
While laboratories devoted to wave propagation enable the study of complex wave phenomena and the discovery of physical relations, unfortunately they suffer from undesired wave-field reflections from their boundaries, and the samples under investigation are restricted in size for practical reasons. This study shows how those limitations can be overcome by fully embedding physical wave-propagation experiments in larger numerical simulations, such that waves can propagate seamlessly between both realms. This approach allows previously inaccessible wave phenomena to be investigated, and could shift the status quo of wave-physics experimentation.
S. Ahmad, M. Zubair, O. Jalil, M. Q. Mehmood, U. Younis, X. Liu, K. W. Ang, and L. K. Ang
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064062 (2020) - Published 25 June, 2020
Sabine M. Neumayer, Lei Tao, Andrew O'Hara, John Brehm, Mengwei Si, Pai-Ying Liao, Tianli Feng, Sergei V. Kalinin, Peide D. Ye, Sokrates T. Pantelides, Petro Maksymovych, and Nina Balke
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064063 (2020) - Published 26 June, 2020
Going against the grain: Normally, the electric polarization of a ferroelectric compound switches to align itself with a sufficiently strong applied field. Here the authors report polarization switching in ferroelectric van der Waals (vdW) crystals that is based on ion migration across the vdW gap. This ionic mechanism is complementary to but fundamentally different from the polarization rotation underpinning the usual picture of ferroelectric switching. These findings change the way we think about materials featuring both ionic and dipolar properties and enable fresh functionality in ultrathin vdW structures, to advance device physics and nanotechnology.
Ahmed Allam, Karim Sabra, and Alper Erturk
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064064 (2020) - Published 26 June, 2020
Yuriy G. Semenov and Ki Wook Kim
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064065 (2020) - Published 26 June, 2020
Juyeon Shin, Young Mo Kim, Chulkwon Park, and Kookrin Char
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064066 (2020) - Published 26 June, 2020
Yan Kei Chiang, Sebastian Oberst, Anton Melnikov, Li Quan, Steffen Marburg, Andrea Alù, and David A. Powell
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064067 (2020) - Published 29 June, 2020
Jiafan Wu, Yiwen Huang, Chuanyi Lu, Tingting Ding, Yuanlin Zheng, and Xianfeng Chen
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064068 (2020) - Published 29 June, 2020
Benjamin Sanchez-Padilla and Etienne Brasselet
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064069 (2020) - Published 29 June, 2020
Troy R. Allen, Wenkang Huang, Jack R. Tanner, Wenda Tan, James M. Fraser, and Brian J. Simonds
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064070 (2020) - Published 29 June, 2020
I. Suárez, E.J. Juárez-Pérez, V.S. Chirvony, I. Mora-Seró, and J.P. Martínez-Pastor
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064071 (2020) - Published 30 June, 2020
M. Khavronin, A. Petrov, A.E. Kazantsev, E.I. Nikulin, and D.A. Bandurin
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064072 (2020) - Published 30 June, 2020
Zarko Sakotic, Alex Krasnok, Norbert Cselyuszka, Nikolina Jankovic, and Andrea Alú
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064073 (2020) - Published 30 June, 2020
Huawen Xu, Sanjib Ghosh, Michal Matuszewski, and Timothy C.H. Liew
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064074 (2020) - Published 30 June, 2020
Tomonori Iijima and Hiroshi Akera
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 064075 (2020) - Published 30 June, 2020
M. Modarresi, A. Mogulkoc, Y. Mogulkoc, and A.N. Rudenko
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 069901 (2020) - Published 24 June, 2020
Giulio Foletto, Luca Calderaro, Armin Tavakoli, Matteo Schiavon, Francesco Picciariello, Adán Cabello, Paolo Villoresi, and Giuseppe Vallone
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 069902 (2020) - Published 25 June, 2020