Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Torque Differential Magnetometry Using the qPlus Mode of a Quartz Tuning Fork

Lu Chen1,*, Fan Yu1, Ziji Xiang1, Tomoya Asaba1, Colin Tinsman1, Benjamin Lawson1, Paul M. Sass2, Weida Wu2, B. L. Kang3 et al.

Xianhui Chen3 and Lu Li1,†

  • 1Department of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 450 Church Street, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108, USA
  • 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University, 136 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854-8019, USA
  • 3Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Science at Microscale and Department of Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China

  • *chelu@umich.edu
  • luli@umich.edu

Phys. Rev. Applied 9, 024005 – Published 7 February, 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.9.024005

Abstract

A quartz tuning fork is the key component of high-resolution atomic force microscope. Because of its high quality factor, a quartz tuning fork can also be used for high-sensitivity magnetometry. We develop a highly sensitive torque differential magnetometry using the qPlus mode of a quartz tuning fork. The tuning fork is driven by an ac voltage, and its deflection is measured by the resultant ac current. We observe a sharp resonance of the quartz tuning fork at low temperatures down to 1.6 K. We calibrate our torque differential magnetometry by measuring the angular dependence of the hysteresis loop in single-crystal Fe0.25TaS2. Furthermore, we demonstrate the high sensitivity of the torque differential magnetometry by measuring the quantum oscillations of a bismuth single crystal. The extracted Fermi-surface cross sections are consistent with those of bismuth crystals.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (31)

  1. Nanonis GmbH, Piezoelectric quartz tuning forks for scanning probe microscopy, http://www.specs-zurich.com/upload/cms/user/TF2.pdf (2005).
  2. F. J. Giessibl, S. Hembacher, M. Herz, C. Schiller, and J. Mannhart, Stability considerations and implementation of cantilevers allowing dynamic force microscopy with optimal resolution: The qPlus sensor, Nanotechnology 15, S79 (2004).
  3. A. Kamra, M. Schreier, H. Huebl, and S. T. B. Goennenwein, Theoretical model for torque differential magnetometry of single-domain magnets, Phys. Rev. B 89, 184406 (2014).
  4. P. Günther, U. Ch. Fischer, and K. Dransfeld, Scanning near-field acoustic microscopy, Appl. Phys. B 48, 89 (1989).
  5. K. Karrai and Robert Grober, Piezoelectric tip-sample distance control for near field optical microscopes, Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 1842 (1995).
  6. K. Karrai and I. Tiemann, Interfacial shear force microscopy, Phys. Rev. B 62, 13174 (2000).
  7. H. Edwards, L. Taylor, W. Duncan, and A. J. Melmed, Fast, high-resolution atomic force microscopy using a quartz tuning fork as actuator and sensor, J. Appl. Phys. 82, 980 (1997).
  8. Y. Martin and H. K. Wickramasinghe, Magnetic imaging by force microscopy with 1000 Å resolution, Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 1455 (1987).
  9. M. R. Koblischka, U. Hartmann, and T. Sulzbach, Resolving magnetic nanostructures in the 10-nm range using MFM at ambient conditions, Mater. Sci. Eng. C 23, 747 (2003).
  10. F. J. Giessibl, High-speed force sensor for force microscopy and profilometry utilizing a quartz tuning fork, Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 3956 (1998).
  11. A. Kamra, S. V. Hoesslin, N. Roschewsky, J. Lotze, M. Schreier, R. Gross, S. T. B. Goennenwein, and H. Huebl, An all-electrical torque differential magnetometer operating under ambient conditions, Eur. Phys. J. B 88, 224 (2015).
  12. B. C. Stipe, H. J. Mamin, T. D. Stowe, T. W. Kenny, and D. Rugar, Magnetic Dissipation and Fluctuations in Individual Nanomagnets Measured by Ultrasensitive Cantilever Magnetometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2874 (2001).
  13. D. P. Weber, D. Rüffer, A. Buchter, F. Xue, E. Russo-Averchi, R. Huber, P. Berberich, J. Arbiol, A. Fontcuberta i Morral, D. Grundler, and M. Poggio, Cantilever magnetometry of individual Ni nanotubes, Nano Lett. 12, 6139 (2012).
  14. Franz J. Giessibl, Florian Pielmeier, Toyoaki Eguchi, Toshu An, and Yukio Hasegawa, Comparison of force sensors for atomic force microscopy based on quartz tuning forks and length-extensional resonators, Phys. Rev. B 84, 125409 (2011).
  15. Angelo Peronio and Franz J. Giessibl, Attempts to test an alternative electrodynamic theory of superconductors by low-temperature scanning tunneling and atomic force microscopy, Phys. Rev. B 94, 094503 (2016).
  16. R. N. Bhargava, de Haas–van Alphen and galvanomagnetic effect in Bi and Bi-Pb alloys, Phys. Rev. 156, 785 (1967).
  17. Boris J. Albers, Marcus Liebmann, Todd C. Schwendemann, Mehmet Z. Baykara, Markus Heyde, Miquel Salmeron, Eric I. Altman, and Udo D. Schwarz, Combined low-temperature scanning tunneling/atomic force microscope for atomic resolution imaging and site-specific force spectroscopy, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 79, 033704 (2008).
  18. Jens Falter, Marvin Stiefermann, Gernot Langewisch, Philipp Schurig, Hendrik Hölscher, Harald Fuchs, and André Schirmeisen, Calibration of quartz tuning fork spring constants for non-contact atomic force microscopy: Direct mechanical measurements and simulations, Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 5, 507 (2014).
  19. Omur E. Dagdeviren and Udo D. Schwarz, Optimizing qPlus sensor assemblies for simultaneous scanning tunneling and noncontact atomic force microscopy operation based on finite element method analysis, Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 8, 657 (2017).
  20. Franz J. Giessibl, in Noncontact Atomic Force Microscopy, edited by Seizo Morita, Franz J. Giessibl, and Roland Wiesendanger, NanoScience and Technology Vol. 2 (Springer, New York, 2009), Chap. 6, pp. 121–142.
  21. Joonho Jang, Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 2012.
  22. G. Li, Z. Xiang, F. Yu, T. Asaba, B. Lawson, P. Cai, C. Tinsman, A. Berkley, S. Wolgast, Y. S. Eo, Dae-Jeong Kim, C. Kurdak, J. W. Allen, K. Sun, X. H. Chen, Y. Y. Wang, Z. Fisk, and Lu Li, Two-dimensional Fermi surfaces in Kondo insulator SmB6, Science 346, 1208 (2014).
  23. E. Morosan, H. W. Zandbergen, Lu Li, Minhyea Lee, J. G. Checkelsky, M. Heinrich, T. Siegrist, N. P. Ong, and R. J. Cava, Sharp switching of the magnetization in Fe1/4TaS2, Phys. Rev. B 75, 104401 (2007).
  24. G. Wu, B. L. Kang, Y. L. Li, T. Wu, N. Z. Wang, X. G. Luo, Z. Sun, L. J. Zou, and X. H. Chen, Large magnetic anisotropy in FexTaS2 single crystals, arXiv:1705.03139.
  25. J. G. Checkelsky, Minhyea Lee, E. Morosan, R. J. Cava, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous Hall effect and magnetoresistance in the layered ferromagnet Fe1/4TaS2: The inelastic regime, Phys. Rev. B 77, 014433 (2008).
  26. Lu Li, Torque Magnetometry in Unconventional Superconductors (Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 2008).
  27. M. Lee, J. Jahng, K. Kim, and W. Jhe, Quantitative atomic force measurement with a quartz tuning fork, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 023117 (2007).
  28. Franz J. Giessibl, Atomic resolution on Si(111)-(7×7) by noncontact atomic force microscopy with a force sensor based on a quartz tuning fork, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 1470 (2000).
  29. D. Shoenberg, Magnetic Oscillations in Metals (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1984).
  30. Lu Li, J. G. Checkelsky, Y. S. Hor, C. Uher, A. F. Hebard, R. J. Cava, and N. P. Ong, Phase transitions of Dirac electrons in bismuth, Science 321, 547 (2008).
  31. Yi-han Kao, Cyclotron resonance studies of the Fermi surfaces in bismuth, Phys. Rev. 129, 1122 (1963).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation