Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Time-Dependent Magnetic Flux in Devices for Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics

Jacob Bryon1,*, D.K. Weiss2,†, Xinyuan You3,‡, Sara Sussman4, Xanthe Croot4, Ziwen Huang2,‡, Jens Koch2,5, and Andrew A. Houck1

  • 1Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, USA
  • 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA
  • 3Graduate Program in Applied Physics, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA
  • 4Department of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, USA
  • 5Center for Applied Physics and Superconducting Technologies, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA

  • *jbryon@princeton.edu
  • Present address: Yale Quantum Institute, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA
  • Present address: Superconducting Quantum Materials and Systems Center, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL), Batavia, IL 60510, USA

Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034031 – Published 9 March, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.034031

Abstract

Recent theoretical work has highlighted that quantizing a superconducting circuit in the presence of time-dependent flux Φ(t) generally produces Hamiltonian terms proportional to dΦ/dt unless a special allocation of the flux across inductive terms is chosen. Here, we present an experiment probing the effects of a fast flux ramp applied to a heavy-fluxonium circuit. The experiment confirms that naïve omission of the dΦ/dt term leads to theoretical predictions inconsistent with experimental data. Experimental data are fully consistent with recent theory that includes the derivative term or equivalently uses “irrotational variables” that uniquely allocate the flux to properly eliminate the dΦ/dt term.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (38)

  1. F. Beaudoin, M. P. da Silva, Z. Dutton, and A. Blais, First-order sidebands in circuit QED using qubit frequency modulation, Phys. Rev. A 86, 022305 (2012).
  2. J. D. Strand, M. Ware, F. Beaudoin, T. A. Ohki, B. R. Johnson, A. Blais, and B. L. T. Plourde, First-order sideband transitions with flux-driven asymmetric transmon qubits, Phys. Rev. B 87, 220505(R) (2013).
  3. D. C. McKay, S. Filipp, A. Mezzacapo, E. Magesan, J. M. Chow, and J. M. Gambetta, Universal Gate for Fixed-Frequency Qubits via a Tunable Bus, Phys. Rev. Appl. 6, 064007 (2016).
  4. P. Mundada, G. Zhang, T. Hazard, and A. Houck, Suppression of Qubit Crosstalk in a Tunable Coupling Superconducting Circuit, Phys. Rev. Appl. 12, 054023 (2019).
  5. Y. Lu, S. Chakram, N. Leung, N. Earnest, R. K. Naik, Z. Huang, P. Groszkowski, E. Kapit, J. Koch, and D. I. Schuster, Universal Stabilization of a Parametrically Coupled Qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 150502 (2017).
  6. Z. Huang, Y. Lu, E. Kapit, D. I. Schuster, and J. Koch, Universal stabilization of single-qubit states using a tunable coupler, Phys. Rev. A 97, 062345 (2018).
  7. J. A. Valery, S. Chowdhury, G. Jones, and N. Didier, Dynamical Sweet Spot Engineering via Two-Tone Flux Modulation of Superconducting Qubits, PRX Quantum 3, 020337 (2022).
  8. P. S. Mundada, A. Gyenis, Z. Huang, J. Koch, and A. A. Houck, Floquet-Engineered Enhancement of Coherence Times in a Driven Fluxonium Qubit, Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 054033 (2020).
  9. Z. Huang, P. S. Mundada, A. Gyenis, D. I. Schuster, A. A. Houck, and J. Koch, Engineering Dynamical Sweet Spots to Protect Qubits from 1/f Noise, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 034065 (2021).
  10. H. Zhang, S. Chakram, T. Roy, N. Earnest, Y. Lu, Z. Huang, D. K. Weiss, J. Koch, and D. I. Schuster, Universal Fast-Flux Control of a Coherent, Low-Frequency Qubit, Phys. Rev. X 11, 011010 (2021).
  11. Y. Chen, K. N. Nesterov, V. E. Manucharyan, and M. G. Vavilov, Fast Flux Entangling Gate for Fluxonium Circuits, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 034027 (2022).
  12. I. N. Moskalenko, I. S. Besedin, I. A. Simakov, and A. V. Ustinov, Tunable coupling scheme for implementing two-qubit gates on fluxonium qubits, Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 194001 (2021).
  13. I. N. Moskalenko, I. A. Simakov, N. N. Abramov, A. A. Grigorev, D. O. Moskalev, A. A. Pishchimova, N. S. Smirnov, E. V. Zikiy, I. A. Rodionov, and I. S. Besedin, High fidelity two-qubit gates on fluxoniums using a tunable coupler, npj Quantum Inf. 8, 130 (2022).
  14. D. K. Weiss, H. Zhang, C. Ding, Y. Ma, D. I. Schuster, and J. Koch, Fast High-Fidelity Gates for Galvanically-Coupled Fluxonium Qubits Using Strong Flux Modulation, PRX Quantum 3, 040336 (2022).
  15. X. You, J. A. Sauls, and J. Koch, Circuit quantization in the presence of time-dependent external flux, Phys. Rev. B 99, 174512 (2019).
  16. R. P. Riwar and D. P. DiVincenzo, Circuit quantization with time-dependent magnetic fields for realistic geometries, npj Quantum Inf. 8, 36 (2022).
  17. R. N. Rajmohan, A. Kenawy, and D. DiVincenzo, Circuit quantization with time-dependent flux:the parallel-plate SQUID (2022), ArXiv:2201.01945.
  18. J. Koch, V. Manucharyan, M. H. Devoret, and L. I. Glazman, Charging Effects in the Inductively Shunted Josephson Junction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 217004 (2009).
  19. L. B. Nguyen, Y.-H. Lin, A. Somoroff, R. Mencia, N. Grabon, and V. E. Manucharyan, High-Coherence Fluxonium Qubit, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041041 (2019).
  20. E. A. Sete, M. J. Reagor, N. Didier, and C. T. Rigetti, Charge- and Flux-Insensitive Tunable Superconducting Qubit, Phys. Rev. Appl. 8, 024004 (2017).
  21. S. Spilla, F. Hassler, A. Napoli, and J. Splettstoesser, Dephasing due to quasiparticle tunneling in fluxonium qubits: A phenomenological approach, New J. Phys. 17, 065012 (2015).
  22. M. H. Devoret, in Quantum Fluctuations: Les Houches Session LXIII, edited by S. Reynaud, E. Giacobino, and J. Zinn-Justin (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1997), p. 351.
  23. U. Vool and M. Devoret, Introduction to quantum electromagnetic circuits, Int. J. Circuit Theory Appl. 45, 897 (2017).
  24. T. P. Orlando, J. E. Mooij, L. Tian, C. H. van der Wal, L. S. Levitov, S. Lloyd, and J. J. Mazo, Superconducting persistent-current qubit, Phys. Rev. B 60, 15398 (1999).
  25. H. Goldstein, Classical Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, MA, 1980), 13.
  26. J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2017) Chap. 5, p. 345.
  27. P. Groszkowski and J. Koch, Scqubits: A Python package for superconducting qubits, Quantum 5, 583 (2021).
  28. G. Zhu, D. G. Ferguson, V. E. Manucharyan, and J. Koch, Circuit QED with fluxonium qubits: Theory of the dispersive regime, Phys. Rev. B 87, 024510 (2013).
  29. T. C. White, J. Y. Mutus, I. C. Hoi, R. Barends, B. Campbell, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, E. Jeffrey, J. Kelly, A. Megrant, C. Neill, P. J. O’Malley, P. Roushan, D. Sank, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, S. Chaudhuri, J. Gao, and J. M. Martinis, Traveling wave parametric amplifier with Josephson junctions using minimal resonator phase matching, Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 242601 (2015).
  30. D. I. Schuster, A. Wallraff, A. Blais, L. Frunzio, R.-S. Huang, J. Majer, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, AC Stark Shift and Dephasing of a Superconducting Qubit Strongly Coupled to a Cavity Field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 123602 (2005).
  31. A. Somoroff, Q. Ficheux, R. A. Mencia, H. Xiong, R. V. Kuzmin, and V. E. Manucharyan, Millisecond coherence in a superconducting qubit, 1 (2021), ArXiv:2103.08578.
  32. L. Stefanazzi, K. Treptow, N. Wilcer, C. Stoughton, C. Bradford, S. Uemura, S. Zorzetti, S. Montella, G. Cancelo, S. Sussman, A. Houck, S. Saxena, H. Arnaldi, A. Agrawal, H. Zhang, C. Ding, and D. I. Schuster, The QICK (Quantum Instrumentation Control Kit): Readout and control for qubits and detectors, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 93, 044709 (2022).
  33. F. Mallet, F. R. Ong, A. Palacios-Laloy, F. Nguyen, P. Bertet, D. Vion, and D. Esteve, Single-shot qubit readout in circuit quantum electrodynamics, Nat. Phys. 5, 791 (2009).
  34. Y. Y. Gao, M. A. Rol, S. Touzard, and C. Wang, Practical guide for Building Superconducting Quantum Devices, PRX Quantum 2, 040202 (2021).
  35. D. Ristè, C. C. Bultink, K. W. Lehnert, and L. DiCarlo, Feedback Control of a Solid-State Qubit Using High-Fidelity Projective Measurement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 240502 (2012).
  36. T. Walter, P. Kurpiers, S. Gasparinetti, P. Magnard, A. Potočnik, Y. Salathé, M. Pechal, M. Mondal, M. Oppliger, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff, Rapid High-Fidelity Single-Shot Dispersive Readout of Superconducting Qubits, Phys. Rev. Appl. 7, 054020 (2017).
  37. S. Uemura, L. Stefanazzi, K. Treptow, N. Wilcer, C. Stoughton, M. Di Federico, S. Sussman, D. Schuster, A. Agrawal, H. Zhang, C. Ding, K. Nowrouzi, N. Fruitwala, G. Huang, A. Butko, Y. Xu, C. Guinn, and A. Houck, QICK (Quantum Instrumentation Control Kit): Progress on an open-source qubit controller, Bulletin of the American Physical Society (2023).
  38. QICK Github repository, https://github.com/openquantumhardware/qick (2023).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation