Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Novel optimization methodology for designing unequal-split hybrids toward circulator-free accelerator rf systems

Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 29, 084501 – Published 11 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/b51c-k168

Abstract

It is significantly challenging to protect the power source against the reflected power when standing-wave rf structures operate, in particular under overcoupled conditions. Conventionally, nonreciprocal circulators, usually operating under pressurized SF6 atmosphere, are employed to isolate the power source from the reflected power. However, breakdowns, rf losses, and thermal stress make these devices unusable in rf structures operating at high frequencies (6–12 GHz) and can limit the maximum power or the repetition rate, all of which are critical aspects for next-generation accelerators or rf photoinjectors, as an example. Furthermore, the use of SF6 gas is becoming increasingly problematic due to its environmental impact. In this paper, two novel rf networks are proposed to compensate reflections from standing-wave structures, thus avoiding the use of circulators. They are based on specifically designed hybrids that, combined with rf structures, allow to strongly reduce the reflected power. The design of hybrids with arbitrary power ratios between different ports constitutes a multiobjective optimization problem. To address this challenge, a new optimization methodology is proposed to simplify the optimization process into a single-objective problem. These novel rf networks are then applied to a new C-band photoinjector recently developed at the Italian National Institute of Nuclear Physics INFN (Frascati, Rome, Italy) and to a new proposal of X-band rf photoinjector for National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory (NSRL).

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (30)

  1. L. Rigon, X-ray imaging with coherent sources, Compr. Biomed. Phys. 2, 193 (2014).
  2. D. Angal-Kalinin et al., Design, specifications, and first beam measurements of the compact linear accelerator for research and applications front end, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 23, 044801 (2020).
  3. R. R. Robles et al., Versatile, high brightness, cryogenic photoinjector electron source, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 24, 063401 (2021).
  4. B. E. Carlsten, New photoelectric injector design for the Los Alamos National Laboratory XUV FEL accelerator, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 285, 313 (1989).
  5. F. Zhou et al., Commissioning of the SLAC linac coherent light source ii electron source, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 24, 073401 (2021).
  6. T. G. Lucas et al., Toward a brightness upgrade to the SwissFEL: A high gradient traveling-wave rf photogun, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 26, 103401 (2023).
  7. M. Schaer, A. Citterio, P. Craievich, S. Reiche, L. Stingelin, and R. Zennaro, Rf traveling-wave electron gun for photoinjectors, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 19, 072001 (2016).
  8. J.-X. Wang, K. Zhou, P. Li, D.-X. Xiao, L.-J. Shan, X.-M. Shen, Y. Liu, Z. Zhou, H.-B. Wang, and D. Wu, High-brightness photo-injector with standing-wave buncher-based ballistic bunching scheme for inverse compton scattering light source, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 33, 44 (2022).
  9. C. Weil, Overview of high power ferrite devices and key considerations for the design, operation and high-power testing of ferrite circulators, in Proceedings of 12th CW and High Average Power RF Workshop (JACoW Publishing, Geneva, Switzerland, 2022).
  10. C. Mi, C. Zhao, Z. Liu, T. Luo, C. Huang, D. K. Agrawal, Y. Zhang, and K. Huang, Compact four-port waveguide circulator using discrete ferrites for injection-locking magnetron system, Electronics 13, 997 (2024).
  11. Y. M. Jain, P. K. Sharma, K. Ambulkar, P. R. Parmar, A. R. Jadhav, and H. V. Dixit, Steady-state operation of high cw power circulator: Challenges and solutions through simulation and experiments, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 48, 1290 (2020).
  12. E. Schlomann, J. Green, and J. Saunders, Ultimate performance limitations of high-power ferrite circulators and phase shifters, IEEE Trans. Magn. 1, 168 (1965).
  13. V. Shiltsev and F. Zimmermann, Modern and future colliders, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015006 (2021).
  14. L. Schoeffel, C. Baldenegro, H. Hamdaoui, S. Hassani, C. Royon, and M. Saimpert, Photon-photon physics at the LHC and laser beam experiments, present and future, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 120, 103889 (2021).
  15. J. B. Rosenzweig et al., An ultra-compact x-ray free-electron laser, New J. Phys. 22, 093067 (2020).
  16. P. Niknejadi, J. M. D. Kowalczyk, M. R. Hadmack, B. T. Jacobson, I. Howe, S. Kan, S. Smith, E. B. Szarmes, G. Varner, and J. M. J. Madey, Free-electron laser inverse-compton interaction x-ray source, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 22, 040704 (2019).
  17. R. W. Schoenlein, W. P. Leemans, A. H. Chin, P. Volfbeyn, T. E. Glover, P. Balling, M. Zolotorev, K.-J. Kim, S. Chattopadhyay, and C. V. Shank, Femtosecond x-ray pulses at 0.4 Å generated by 90° Thomson scattering, Science 274, 236 (1996).
  18. C. Tang et al., Tsinghua Thomson scattering x-ray source, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 608, S70 (2009).
  19. K. Dupraz et al., The ThomX ICS source, Phys. Open 5, 100051 (2020).
  20. L. Faillace et al., High field hybrid photoinjector electron source for advanced light source applications, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 25, 063401 (2022).
  21. C. D. Nantista et al., Planar waveguide hybrids for very high power rf, in Proc. Particle Accelerator Conf. (IEEE, New York, 1999), p. 1432.
  22. A. Grudiev, Design of compact high power rf components at x-band, CLIC Note 1067, 2016.
  23. A. Giribono et al., Dynamics studies of high brightness electron beams in a normal conducting, high repetition rate C-band injector, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 26, 083402 (2023).
  24. D. Alesini et al., Design, realization, and testing of a brazing-free C-band radio frequency photogun, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 29, 012001 (2026).
  25. D. Alesini and F. Marcellini, Rf deflector design of the CLIC test facility CTF3 delay loop and beam loading effect analysis, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 12, 031301 (2009).
  26. Z. Farkas, SLED: A method of doubling SLAC’s energy, in Proc. Int. Conf. High Energy Accelerators (U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Washington, DC, USA, 1974), p. 576.
  27. X. Lin et al., Two-stage rf pulse compression system with correction cavity chain, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 25, 120401 (2022).
  28. T. P. Wangler, RF Linear Accelerators (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2008).
  29. ANSYS HFSS, ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, PA, USA.
  30. CST Studio Suite, Dassault Systèmes SIMULIA, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation