- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Accelerators and Beams

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Proposed continuous wave energy recovery operation of an x-ray free electron laser

J. Sekutowicz, S. A. Bogacz, D. Douglas, P. Kneisel, and G. P. Williams

M. Ferrario

I. Ben-Zvi, J. Rose, J Smedley, and T. Srinivasan-Rao

L. Serafini

W.-D. Möller, B. Petersen, D. Proch, and S. Simrock

P. Colestock

J. B. Rosenzweig

  • Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (JLab), 12000 Jefferson Avenue, Newport News, Virginia 23606, USA

  • Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Via E. Fermi 40, 00044 Frascati, Italy

  • Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA

  • Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Via Celoria 16, 20133 Milan, Italy

  • Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, Notkestrasse 85, 22603 Hamburg, Germany

  • Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA

  • University of California Los Angeles, 405 Hilgard Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA

PDF

Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 8, 010701 – Published 10 January, 2005

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.8.010701

Abstract

Commissioning of two large coherent light facilities (XFELs) at SLAC and DESY should begin in 2008 and 2011, respectively. In this paper we look further into the future, hoping to answer, in a very preliminary way, two questions. First: What will the next generation of XFEL facilities look like? Believing that superconducting technology offers advantages such as high quality beams with highly populated bunches, the possibility of energy recovery and higher overall efficiency than warm technology, we focus this preliminary study on the superconducting option. From this belief the second question arises: What modifications in superconducting technology and in the machine design are needed, as compared to the present DESY XFEL, and what kind of research and development program should be proposed to arrive in the next few years at a technically feasible solution with even higher brilliance and increased overall conversion of ac power to photon beam power? In this paper we will very often refer to and profit from the DESY XFEL design, acknowledging its many technically innovative solutions.

View figure in article

Article Text

References (26)

  1. Linac Coherent Light Source–CDR, Report No. SLAC-R-593, 2002.
  2. TESLA Technical Design Report (Supplement), DESY No. TESLA-FEL Note 2002-09, edited by R. Brinkmann , 2002.
  3. S. A. Bogacz et al., in Proceedings of the Particle Accelerator Conference (PAC03), Portland, OR, 2003 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2003).
  4. H. Weise, in Proceedings of the Particle Accelerator Conference (PAC03), Portland, OR, 2003 (Ref. [3]).
  5. P. Kneisel et al., in Proceedings of the 11th Workshop on RF-Superconductivity (SRF2003), Lübeck, Germany 2003 (unpublished).
  6. TESLA Technical Design Report, DESY No. TESLA Note 2001-23, edited by R. Brinkmann , 2001.
  7. J. Teichert, in Proceedings of the 11th Workshop on RF-Superconductivity (SRF2003), Lübeck, Germany 2003 (Ref. [5]).
  8. T. Srinivasan-Rao et al., in Proceedings of the Particle Accelerator Conference (PAC03), Portland, OR, 2003 (Ref. [3])
  9. P. Kneisel, JLab-TN (to be published).
  10. T. Schultheiss et al., in Proceedings of the Particle Accelerator Conference (PAC01), Chicago, IL, 2001 IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2001.
  11. M. Ferrario, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 472, 303 (2001).
  12. L. Serafini et al., Phys. Rev. E 55, 7565 1997.
  13. M. Ferrario et al., “An Ultra-high Brightness, High Duty Factor, Superconducting RF Photoinjector” (to be published).
  14. D. Douglas, Report No. JLab-TN-98-040, 1998.
  15. J. Sekutowicz et al., Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 2, 062001 (1999).
  16. J. Sekutowicz et al., in Proceedings of the Particle Accelerator Conference (PAC03), Portland, OR, 2003 (Ref. [3]).
  17. R. Brinkmann et al., TESLA Report No. 2000-07, DESY, 2000.
  18. L. Merminga and J. Delayen, Report No. JLab TN-96-022, 1996.
  19. A. Büchner et al., in Proceedings of the Particle Accelerator Conference (PAC03), Portland, OR, 2003 (Ref. [3]).
  20. M. Liepe, Report No. DESY-Thesis-2001-045, 2001.
  21. M. Liepe et al., in Proceedings of the Particle Accelerator Conference (PAC01), Chicago, IL, 2001 (Ref. [10]).
  22. R. Neutze et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 195508 (2001).
  23. S. Techert et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2030 (2001).
  24. G. L. Carr et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3001 (2000).
  25. Z. Ren et al., Biochemistry 40, 13 788 (2001).
  26. V. Strejer et al., Biochemistry 40, 13 802 (2001).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 8, 010701– Published 10 January, 2005
  • Received 16 December 2003
Creative Commons Logo

This article is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation