Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Comparison of two superconducting elliptical undulators for generating circularly polarized light

C. S. Hwang and P. H. Lin

  • NSRRC, 101 Hsin-Ann Road, Hsinchu Science Park, Hsinchu 30077, Taiwan

Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 7, 090701 – Published 16 September, 2004

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.7.090701

Abstract

The potential use of two planar superconducting elliptical undulators—a vertically wound racetrack coil structure and a staggered array structure—to generate a circularly polarized hard x-ray source was investigated. The magnetic poles and wires of the up and down magnet arrays were rotated in alternating directions on the horizontal plane, an elliptical field is generated to provide circularly polarized light in the electron-storage ring and the energy-recovery linac accelerator. Rapid switching between right- and left-circularly polarized radiations is performed using two undulators with oppositely rotated wires and poles. Given a periodic length of 15 mm and a gap of 5 mm, the magnetic-flux densities in the elliptical undulator are Bz=1.2   T (Bx=0.6   T) and Bz=0.35   T (Bx=0.15   T) in the planar vertically wound racetrack coil and the staggered structure with poles rotated by 35° and 25°, respectively. In maximizing the merit of the flux and the width of the effective field region in the two superconducting elliptical undulators, the trade-off rotation angles of the coils and poles are 20° and 5°, for vertically wound racetrack coil and staggered undulators, respectively.

View figure in article

Article Text

References (13)

  1. K. Halback, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 187, 109 (1981).
  2. H. Onuki, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 246, 94 (1986).
  3. J. P. Blewett and R. Chasman, J. Appl. Phys., 48, 2692 (1977).
  4. S. Sasaki, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 347, 83 (1994).
  5. R. P. Walker and B. Diviacco, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63, 332 (1992).
  6. Andreas Geisler, Achim Hobl, Detlef Krischel, Robert Rossmanith, and Michael Schillo, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., 13, 1217 (2003).
  7. C. S. Hwang, W. P. Li, P. H. Lin, and C. H. Chang, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 14, 580 (2004).
  8. S. Sasaki, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Superconducting Undulators and Wigglers, Grenoble, 2003 (ESRF, Grenoble, 2003).
  9. R. P. Walker, CERN Report No. CERN 95-06, 1995, Vol. II, p. 814.
  10. Y. C. Huang, H. C. Wang, R. H. Pantell, J. Feinstein, and J. Harris, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 341, 431 (1994).
  11. C. S. Hwang, C. H. Chang, T. C. Fan, F. Y. Lin, Ch. Wang, Shuting Yeh, H. P. Chang, K. T. Hsu, L. H. Chang, P. K. Tseng, and T. M. Uen, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 399, 463 (1997).
  12. T. Hara, K. Shirasawa, M. Takeuchi, T. Seike, Y. Saito, T. Muro, and H. Kitamura, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 498, 496 (2003).
  13. C. S. Hwang and S. Yeh, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 420, 29 (1999).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation