Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Investigation of the flat-beam model of the beam-beam interaction

Bjoern S. Schmekel, Georg H. Hoffstaetter*, and Joseph T. Rogers

  • Department of Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA

  • *Electronic address: gh77@cornell.edu

Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 6, 104403 – Published 23 October, 2003

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.6.104403

Abstract

At the interaction point of a storage ring collider each beam is subject to perturbations due to the electromagnetic field of the counterrotating beam. For flat beams, a well-known approximation models the beam by a current sheet which is uniform in the horizontal plane, restricting the particle motion to the vertical direction. In this classical model a water-bag beam distribution has been used to find working points and beam-beam tune shift parameters which lead to a stable beam distribution. We investigate the stability of a more realistic Gaussian equilibrium distribution. A linearized Vlasov equation written in action-angle variables is used to compute the radial and angular modes of a perturbation in two-dimensional phase space to first order in the displacement from the design trajectory. We find that the radial modes, which are often neglected, can have a stabilizing effect on the beam motion.

View figure in article

Article Text

References (17)

  1. J. Seeman, in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on High Energy Accelerators, Batavia, IL, 1983 (Fermilab, Batavia, 1983).
  2. G. Arduini, R. Assmann, R. Bailey, A. Butterworth, P. Collier, K. Cornelis, S. Fartoukh, M. Lamont, G. Morpugo, G. Roy, J. Wenninger, and T. Wijnands, in Proceedings of the 2001 Particle Accelerator Conference, Chicago, IL (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2001).
  3. J. Le Duff, M. P. Level, P. C. Marin, E. M. Sommer, and H. Zyngier, in Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on High Energy Accelerators, 1980, Geneva (Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, 1980), p. 707.
  4. Ya. S. Derbenev, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Report No. SLAC-151 Translation, 1972.
  5. S. Krishnagopal and R. Siemann, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 313, 328–336 (1992).
  6. S. Krishnagopal and R. Siemann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2461 (1991).
  7. B. Podobedov and R. H. Siemann, Phys. Rev. E 52, 3066 (1995).
  8. J. T. Rogers, M. A. Palmer, A. P. Romano, and C. R. Jones, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Beam-beam Effects in Circular Colliders (Fermilab Report No. FERMILAB-Conf-01/390-T, 2001).
  9. N. S. Dikansky and D. V. Pestrikov, Part. Accel. 12, 27 (1982).
  10. A. W. Chao and R. D. Ruth, Coherent Beam-Beam Instability in Colliding-Beam Storage Rings, Particle Accelerators Vol. 16 (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1985), pp. 201–216.
  11. K. Hirata, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 25 (1987).
  12. K. Hirata, Phys. Rev. D 37, 1307 (1988).
  13. M. A. Furman, K. Y. Ng, and A. W. Chao, Report No. SSC-174, 1988.
  14. S. Krishnagopal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 235 (1996).
  15. R. Meller and R. Siemann, in Proceedings of the PAC81, Washington, D.C. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 1981).
  16. K. Yokoya, Y. Funakoshi, E. Kikutani, H. Koiso, and J. Urakawa, KEK Report No. KEK-89-14, 1989; Part. Accel. 27, 181–186 (1990).
  17. S. Krishnagopal and R. Siemann, CLNS Report No. 89/967, 1989.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation