Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

First electron-cloud studies at the Large Hadron Collider

O. Domínguez*, K. Li, G. Arduini, E. Métral, G. Rumolo, and F. Zimmermann

H. Maury Cuna

  • CERN, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Departamento de Física Aplicada, CINVESTAV, Unidad Mérida, A.P.73 Cordemex, 97310, Mérida, Yucatán, México

  • *octavio.dominguez@cern.ch Also at EPFL, LPAP, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Currently at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025-7015, USA.

Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 16, 011003 – Published 9 January, 2013

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.16.011003

Abstract

During the beam commissioning of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) [LHC Design Report No. CERN-2004-003-V-1, 2004 [http://cds.cern.ch/record/782076?ln=en]; O. Brüning, H. Burkhardt, and S. Myers, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 67, 705 (2012)] with 150, 75, 50, and 25-ns bunch spacing, important electron-cloud effects, like pressure rise, cryogenic heat load, beam instabilities, or emittance growth, were observed. Methods have been developed to infer different key beam-pipe surface parameters by benchmarking simulations and pressure rise as well as heat-load observations. These methods allow us to monitor the scrubbing process, i.e., the reduction of the secondary emission yield as a function of time, in order to decide on the most appropriate strategies for machine operation. To better understand the influence of electron clouds on the beam dynamics, simulations have been carried out to examine both the coherent and the incoherent effects on the beam. In this paper we present the methodology and first results for the scrubbing monitoring process at the LHC. We also review simulated instability thresholds and tune footprints for beams of different emittance, interacting with an electron cloud in field-free or dipole regions.

View figure in article

Article Text

References (40)

  1. F. Zimmermann, LHC Project Report No. 95, 1997.
  2. M. Izawa, Y. Sato, and T. Toyomasu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 5044 (1995).
  3. K. Ohmi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1526 (1995).
  4. M. A. Furman, G. R. Lambertson, in Proceedings of the 10th European Particle Accelerator Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2006 (EPS-AG, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2006), p. 1087.
  5. O. Gröbner, Vacuum 47, 591 (1996).
  6. O. Gröbner, in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on High-Energy Accelerators (Protvino Institute for High Energy Physics, Protvino, USSR, 1977).
  7. F. Zimmermann, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 7, 124801 (2004).
  8. E. Benedetto, G. Franchetti, and F. Zimmermann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 034801 (2006).
  9. W. Fischer et al., Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 11, 041002 (2008).
  10. J. M. Jimenez, G. Arduini, P. Collier, G. Ferioli, B. Henrist, N. Hilleret, L. Jensen, K. Weiss, and F. Zimmermann, in Proceedings of ECLOUD’02 (CERN, Report No. CERN-2002-001, 2002), p. 17.
  11. J. M. Jimenez, G. Arduini, V. Baglin, G. Bregliozzi, P. Chiggiato, S. Claudet, G. Lanza, and L. Tavian, Report No. ATS/Note/2011/NNN (MD), 2011; J. M. Jimenez et al.in Proceedings of the Chamonix 2011 LHC Performance Workshop (Report No. CERN-2011-005, 2011), p. 56.
  12. G. Arduini et al., in Proceedings of the Chamonix 2011 LHC Performance Workshop, p. 63 (Ref. [11]).
  13. G. Rumolo et al., in Proceedings of IPAC2011, San Sebastián, Spain (EPS-AG, Spain, 2011), pp. 2862.
  14. G. Rumolo, G. Iadarola, O. Dominguez, G. Arduini, H. Bartosik, S. Claudet, J. Esteban-Müller, F. Roncarolo, E. Shaposhnikova, and L. Tavian, in Proceedings of the 3rd Evian Workshop on LHC Beam Operation, Evian-les-Bains, France, 2011, edited by B. Goddard and S. Dubourg (CERN Report No. CERN-ATS-2012-083, 2012), p. 165.
  15. O. Brüning et al., in Proceedings of the 18th Particle Accelerator Conference, New York, 1999 (IEEE, New York, 1999), pp. 2629.
  16. R. Cimino, I. Collins, M. Furman, M. Pivi, F. Ruggiero, G. Rumolo, and F. Zimmermann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 014801 (2004).
  17. The measured heat-load accuracy at the LHC is about 510mW/m [18]. By contrast, at RHIC and Tevatron the accuracy was 50 and 200mW/m, respectively [19, 20].

  18. L. Tavian (private communication).
  19. W. Fischer et al., in Proceedings of the Mini Workshop on Electron Cloud Simulations for Proton and Positron Beams, pp. 63–68 (Report No. CERN-2002-001, 2002).
  20. J. C. Theilacker (private communication).
  21. G. Rumolo and F. Zimmermann, Report No. CERN-SL-Note-2002-036, 2002.
  22. G. Rumolo and F. Zimmermann, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 5, 121002 (2002).
  23. U. Iriso (unpublished).
  24. D. Schulte et al., in Proceedings of the 21st Particle Accelerator Conference, Knoxville, 2005 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2005), p. 1371.
  25. Several studies (e.g. [26]) reveal an evolution of the value of εmax with the scrubbing process. This evolution depends on the scrubbing technique (either using an electron gun or a real beam) and several parameters such as the roughness of the surface, the previous surface treatment, the electrons energy, etc. It is clear that simulations depend on this parameter. So further investigation is needed to infer its evolution in the LHC.

  26. C. Yin Vallgren, Ph.D. thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg , Sweden (CERN-THESIS-2011-063, 2011).
  27. N. Hilleret et al., LHC Project Report No. 433, 2000.
  28. B. Henrist, N. Hilleret, C. Scheuerlein, and M. Taborelli, Appl. Surf. Sci. 172, 95 (2001).
  29. M. Belhaj, in Proceedings of the INFN-LNF/INFN-Pisa/LER/EuCARD-AccNet Joint Workshop “ECLOUD’12,” La Biodola, Isola d’Elba, Italy, 2012, edited by R. Cimino, G. Rumolo, and F. Zimmermann (to be published).
  30. I. Kaganovich, in Proceedings of the INFN-LNF/INFN-Pisa/LER/EuCARD-AccNet Joint Workshop “ECLOUD’12,” La Biodola, Isola d’Elba, Italy, 2012, edited by R. Cimino, G. Rumolo, and F. Zimmermann (to be published).
  31. LHC Design Report No. CERN-2004-003-V-1, edited by O. S. Brüning, P. Collier, P. Lebrun, S. Myers, R. Ostojic, J. Poole, and P. Proudlock, 2004.
  32. V. Baglin, I. Collins, B. Henrist, N. Hilleret, and G. Vorlaufer, CERN LHC Project Report No. 472, 2002.
  33. M. A. Furman and M. Pivi, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 5, 124404 (2002).
  34. M. A. Furman and A. A. Zholents, in Proceedings of the Particle Accelerator Conference, Washington, DC, 1993 (IEEE, New York, 1993), pp. 1794–1796.
  35. E. Benedetto and F. Zimmermann, in Proceedings of the 9th European Particle Accelerator Conference, Lucerne, 2004 (EPS-AG, Lucerne, 2004), pp. 1834.
  36. K. Ohmi and F. Zimmermann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3821 (2000).
  37. K. Ohmi, F. Zimmermann, and E. Perevedentsev, Phys. Rev. E 65, 016502 (2001).
  38. G. Franchetti, I. Hofmann, W. Fischer, and F. Zimmermann, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 12, 124401 (2009).
  39. E. Benedetto, Ph.D. thesis, Politecnico Torino, 2006 (CERN-THESIS-2008-096, CARE-THESIS-06-007).
  40. G. Rumolo et al. (unpublished).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation