- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Accelerators and Beams

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Investigation of the dc vacuum breakdown mechanism

A. Descoeudres, Y. Levinsen, S. Calatroni*, M. Taborelli, and W. Wuensch

  • European Organization for Nuclear Research, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland

  • *sergio.calatroni@cern.ch
PDF

Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 12, 092001 – Published 29 September, 2009

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.12.092001

Abstract

Breakdowns occurring in rf accelerating structures will limit the ultimate performance of future linear colliders such as the Compact Linear Collider (CLIC). Because of the similarity of many aspects of dc and rf breakdown, a dc breakdown study is underway at CERN to better understand the vacuum breakdown mechanism in a simple setup. Measurements of the field enhancement factor β show that the local breakdown field is constant and depends only on the electrode material. With copper electrodes, the local breakdown field is around 10.8  GV/m, independent of the gap distance. The β value characterizes the electrode surface state, and the next macroscopic breakdown field can be well predicted. In breakdown rate experiments, where a constant field is applied to the electrodes, clusters of consecutive breakdowns alternate with quiet periods. The occurrence and lengths of these clusters and quiet periods depend on the evolution of β. The application of a high field can even modify the electrode surface in the absence of breakdown. Measurements of time delays to breakdown show two distinct populations, immediate and delayed breakdowns, indicating that two different mechanisms could exist. The ratio of these two populations depends on the conditioning state of the electrodes and on material. Gas release during breakdown is dominated by H2 and CO. This degassing is mainly due to electron-stimulated desorption. During the quiet periods without breakdown, gases are also released but the quantities are much smaller. All the measurements presented here emphasize the crucial role of field emission in the breakdown triggering.

View figure in article

Article Text

References (36)

  1. W. Boyle, P. Kisliuk, and L. Germer, J. Appl. Phys. 26, 720 (1955).
  2. D. Alpert, D. Lee, E. Lyman, and H. Tomaschke, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 1, 35 (1964).
  3. F. Charbonnier, C. Bennette, and L. Swanson, J. Appl. Phys. 38, 627 (1967).
  4. D. KennethDavies, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 10, 115 (1973).
  5. P. Chatterton, Vacuum Breakdown, in: Electrical Breakdown in Gases, edited by J. Meek and J. Craggs (Wiley, New York, 1978).
  6. B. Juettner, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 268, 390 (1988).
  7. High Voltage Vacuum Insulation, edited by R. V. Latham (Academic Press, New York, 1995).
  8. W. Diamond, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 16, 707 (1998).
  9. R. Fowler and L. Nordheim, Proc. R. Soc. A 119, 173 (1928).
  10. E. Murphy and R. Good, Phys. Rev. 102, 1464 (1956).
  11. Handbook of Vacuum Arc Science and Technology: Fundamentals and Applications, edited by R. L. Boxman, D. M. Sanders, and P. J. Martin (Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, 1995).
  12. P. Slade, The Vacuum Interrupter: Theory, Design, and Application (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2008).
  13. F. LePimpec, R. Ganter, and R. Betemps, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 574, 7 (2007).
  14. L. Laurent, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Davis, 2002.
  15. G. Werner, Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 2004.
  16. P. Wilson, in Proceedings of the 12th Advanced Accelerator Concepts Workshop, Lake Geneva, Wisconsin, 2006, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 877 (AIP, New York, 2006), p. 27.
  17. J.-P. Delahaye, in Proceedings of the 18th Particle Accelerator Conference, New York, 1999 (IEEE, New York, 1999), p. 250.
  18. G. Guignard et al., CERN Report No. CERN-2000-008, 2000.
  19. W. Wuensch, in Proceedings of the 4th Asian Particle Accelerator Conference, Indore, 2007 (RRCAT, Indore, India, 2007), p. 544.
  20. J. Rodriguez, in Proceedings of the 2007 Particle Accelerator Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 2007 (IEEE, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 2007), p. 3818.
  21. W. Wuensch, in Proceedings of the 11th European Particle Accelerator Conference, Genoa, 2008 (EPS-AG, Genoa, Italy, 2008), p. 2922.
  22. M. Kildemo, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 530, 596 (2004).
  23. M. Kildemo, S. Calatroni, and M. Taborelli, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 7, 092003 (2004).
  24. T. Ramsvik, S. Calatroni, A. Reginelli, and M. Taborelli, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 10, 042001 (2007).
  25. M. Taborelli, G. Arnau-Izquierdo, S. Calatroni, S. Heikkinen, T. Ramsvik, S. Sgobba, and W. Wuensch, in Proceedings of the 2007 Particle Accelerator Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 2007 (Ref. [20]), p. 2197.
  26. A. Descoeudres, T. Ramsvik, S. Calatroni, M. Taborelli, and W. Wuensch, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 12, 032001 (2009).
  27. C. Scheuerlein and M. Taborelli, Appl. Surf. Sci. 252, 4279 (2006).
  28. P. Kranjec and L. Ruby, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 4, 94 (1967).
  29. Y. Levinsen, S. Calatroni, A. Descoeudres, M. Taborelli, and W. Wuensch, in Proceedings of the 23rd Particle Accelerator Conference, Vancouver, Canada, 2009 (IEEE, New York, 2009), p. TU5PFP012.
  30. C. Adolphsen, W. Baumgartner, K. Jobe, F. LePimpec, R. Loewen, D. McCormick, M. Ross, T. Smith, J. Wang, and T. Higo, in Proceedings of the Particle Accelerator Conference, Chicago, IL, 2001 (IEEE, New York, 2001), p. 478.
  31. G. Taylor, Proc. R. Soc. A 280, 383 (1964).
  32. S. Anders, B. Juettner, M. Lindmayer, C. Rusteberg, H. Pursch, and F. Unger-Weber, IEEE Trans. Electr. Insul. 28, 461 (1993).
  33. B. Juettner, M. Lindmayer, and G. Duening, J. Phys. D 32, 2537 (1999).
  34. G. Kartsev, G. Mesyats, D. Proskurovskii, V. Rotshtein, and G. Fursei, Sov. Phys. 15, 475 (1970).
  35. R. Ramsier and J. Yates, Surf. Sci. Rep. 12, 246 (1991).
  36. C. Benvenuti, G. Canil, P. Chiggiato, P. Collin, R. Cosso, J. Guerin, S. Ilie, D. Latorre, and K. Neil, Vacuum 53, 317 (1999).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 12, 092001– Published 29 September, 2009
  • Received 14 April 2009
Creative Commons Logo

This article is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation