Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Compact in-vacuum switchable beam-dump system for radiation safety at accelerator beamlines

Sivaji Purushothaman*, Neeraj Kurichiyanil, and Ekaterina Kozlova

David J. Morrissey

  • *Contact author: S.Purushothaman@gsi.de

Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 29, 094201 – Published 16 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/58pd-c2yb

Abstract

A compact, in-vacuum switchable beam dump is proposed as a first-of-a-kind engineering solution to improve operational flexibility in high-energy accelerator facilities. The design integrates beam-pass and beam-dump modes into a single wall-embedded unit, eliminating the need for external shielding and movable components outside the vacuum system. The concept is specifically developed for the superconducting fragment separator (Super-FRS) at Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research, making use of an existing opening in a modular radiation-shielding wall between experimental areas. It employs synchronous rotation to switch between an unobstructed vacuum beamline and a fully shielded beam-dump configuration. This architecture enables personnel access to downstream experimental areas while beam delivery continues in the upstream section. Two absorber configurations were investigated: an all-iron design and a mixed configuration incorporating the high-density tungsten alloy Densimet. Iron provides cost-effective bulk shielding and strong attenuation of secondary gamma radiation, whereas Densimet enables compact energy deposition with superior stopping power. The required thickness of additional downstream boron carbide shielding to adequately suppress slow neutrons differs between the two options. FLUKA Monte Carlo simulations confirm that both configurations satisfy the stringent personnel safety limit of <3  μSv/h in all relevant scenarios. Complementary vacuum simulations demonstrate that the beamline pressure remains below 5×106  mbar during operation. The results indicate that the proposed switchable beam dump offers a viable path to enhance facility availability and throughput at Super-FRS. The compact, modular concept is scalable and may be adapted to other high-energy accelerator facilities facing similar space and access constraints.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (31)

  1. D. Baillard, E. Grenier-Boley, M. Dole, F. Deslande, R. Froeschl, T. Lorenzon, P. Moyret, R. Peron, A. Pilan Zanoni, C. Sharp, M. Timmins, and M. Calviani, Design, development, and construction of the new beam stoppers for CERN’s injector complex, arXiv:2408.01074.
  2. A. P. Zanoni, J. A. B. Monago, E. Grenier-Boley, M. Calviani, and V. Vlachoudis, Characterization and core renovation of beam stoppers for personnel safety, J. Instrum. 14, T01011 (2019).
  3. C. Kharoua, P. Sabbagh, P. Nilsson, F. Mezei, F. Plewinski, E. Noah, P. Sievers, L. Zanini, A. Takibayev, S. Kecskes et al., The rotating tungsten helium cooled target (Rotheta) concept, in Proc. International Collaboration on Advanced Neutron Sources (Centro Atomico Bariloche, Argentina, 2013).
  4. N. Tahir, M. Winkler, J. Kojouharova, P. Roussel-Chomaz, V. Chishkine, H. Geissel, D. Hoffmann, B. Kindler, F. Landre-Pellemoine, B. Lommel et al., High-power production targets for the super-FRS using a fast extraction scheme, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 204, 282 (2003).
  5. S. Péraire and P. R. Sala, Beam dumps and beam stoppers for LHC and CNGS transfer lines, Tech. Rep. CERN-LHC-PROJECT-REPORT-465, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 2001.
  6. V. Kain, R. Esposito, M. Meddahi, M. Fraser, B. Goddard, F. Velotti, A. Perillo Marcone, and G. Steele, Upgrades to the SPS-to-LHC transfer line beam stoppers for the LHC high-luminosity era, in Proceedings of the 7th International Particle Accelerator Conference (IPAC’16) (JACoW, Busan, Korea, 2016), pp. 1367–1370.
  7. H. Geissel, H. Weick, M. Winkler, G. Münzenberg, V. Chichkine, M. Yavor, T. Aumann, K. Behr, M. Böhmer, A. Brünle et al., The Super-FRS project at GSI, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 204, 71 (2003).
  8. S. Reimann, H. Albers, R. W. Assmann, P. Gasik, O. Geithner, F. Hagenbuck, A. Herlert, P. Hofmann, V. Kamerdzhiev, M. Kauschke, H. Kollmus, S. Pietri, N. Pyka, T. Radon, C. Schroeder, S. Schwarz, H. Simon, P. Spiller, and K. Vogt, FAIR commissioning—towards first science, in Proceedings of the 16th International Particle Accelerator Conference (JACOW Publishing, Taipei, Taiwan, 2025).
  9. N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki and A. Bruce, NUSTAR: Nuclear structure astrophysics and reactions at FAIR, Nucl. Phys. News 28, 5 (2018).
  10. A. Fertman, E. Mustafin, R. Hinca, I. Strašík, M. Pavlovič, D. Schardt, N. Sobolevskiy, A. Golubev, B. Sharkov, G. Fehrenbacher et al., First results of an experimental study of the residual activity induced by high-energy uranium ions in steel and copper, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 260, 579 (2007).
  11. I. Strašík, E. Mustafin, and M. Pavlovič, Residual activity induced by heavy ions and beam-loss criteria for heavy-ion accelerators, Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. Accel. Beams 13, 071004 (2010).
  12. International Atomic Energy Agency, Decommissioning of particle accelerators, Tech. Rep. NW-T-2.9, IAEA, Vienna, 2020.
  13. International Commission on Radiological Protection, Conversion Coefficients for Use in Radiological Protection Against External Radiation, ICRP Publication 74 (Pergamon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1996).
  14. B. R. Evans, J. Lian, and W. Ji, Evaluation of shielding performance for newly developed composite materials, Ann. Nucl. Energy 116, 1 (2018).
  15. J. R. Jones, Lubrication, friction and wear: Space vehicle design criteria (Structures), Tech. Rep. NASA-SP-8063, NASA, 1971.
  16. P. A. Shakhmatov, K. H. Kim, and S. G. Yoon, Solid lubricants and coatings for aerospace and vacuum applications, in Tribology in Space Applications, edited by J. R. Moraes, K. Tanaka, H. Tsuchiya, T. Matsuzaki, and S. Umeda (Springer, New York, 2017), pp. 253–276.
  17. A. Erdemir and O. L. Eryilmaz, Tribological performance of DLC coatings in ultrahigh vacuum, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A 35, 030601 (2017).
  18. Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature conservation, nuclear safety and consumer protection (BMUV), German radiation protection ordinance (strahlenschutzverordnung, strlschv), German Federal Law Gazette I (2018), bGBl. I S. 2034; last amended 18 July 2023.,
  19. S. H. Rokni, A. Fassò, and J.-C. Liu, Operational radiation protection program at high-energy accelerator facilities, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 137, 3 (2009).
  20. Safety of machinery—safety-related parts of control systems—part 1: General principles for design (2015).
  21. Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems (2010). parts 1-7.
  22. T. T. Böhlen, F. Cerutti, M. Chin, A. Fassò, A. Ferrari, P. Ortega, A. Mairani, P. Sala, G. Smirnov, and V. Vlachoudis, The FLUKA code: Developments and challenges for high energy and medical applications, Nucl. Data Sheets 120, 211 (2014).
  23. A. Ferrari, P. R. Sala, A. Fassò, and J. Ranft, FLUKA: A multi-particle transport code, CERN-2005-10, INFN/TC 05/11, SLAC-R-773 (2005).
  24. F. Ballarini et al., The FLUKA code: Overview and new developments, EPJ Nucl. Sci. Technol. 10, 16 (2024).
  25. V. Vlachoudis, FLAIR: A powerful but user friendly graphical interface for FLUKA, in Proc. Int. Conf. on Mathematics, Computational Methods & Reactor Physics (M&C2009) (Saratoga Springs, New York, 2009).
  26. A. Ferrari and M. Pelliccioni, Fluence to dose equivalent conversion data and effective quality factors for high energy neutrons, Rad. Prot. Dosimetry 76, 215 (1998).
  27. J. H. Hubbell and S. M. Seltzer, Tables of X-ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy-absorption coefficients, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 1995, https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/ XrayMassCoef/, accessed: 2026-03-18.
  28. E. Kozlova, I. Strasik, A. Fertman, E. Mustafin, T. Radon, R. Hinca, M. Pavlovic, G. Fehrenbacher, H. Geissel, A. Golubev, H. Iwase, and D. Schardt, Benchmark test of the FLUKA Monte Carlo code for residual production with 500 and 950  MeV/u uranium beams on copper and stainless steel targets, Nucl. Technol. 168, 747 (2017).
  29. R. Froeschl, The DORIAN code for the prediction and analysis of residual dose rates due to accelerator radiation induced activation, Tech. Rep., CERN, Geneva, 2013.
  30. M. Ady and R. Kersevan, Recent developments of Monte-Carlo codes MolFlow+ and SynRad+, in Proceedings of the 10th International Particle Accelerator Conference (IPAC’19) (JACoW, Melbourne, Australia, 2019).
  31. N. Petoussi, M. Zankl, G. Fehrenbacher, and G. Drexler, Dose distributions in the ICRU sphere for monoenergetic photons and electrons and for ca. 800 radionuclides, Tech. Rep. GSF Report 7/93, GSF—Forschungszentrum für Umwelt und Gesundheit, Neuherberg, Germany, 1993.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation