Attosecond pulses at work: Timing physical processes through a pump-probe scenario
Attosecond science brings new insights into the dynamics of ultrafast processes in matter. Almost from the beginning, there have been two strands of attosecond research: The first one has aimed at exploiting the obvious “timing” capability of ultrashort pulses, namely to start and stop a clock for timing ultrafast processes. Up until recently one could only generate a single attosecond pulse but not pairs of such pulses with variable delay as needed for a clock. Therefore, the second pulse has been replaced by an alternative indicator—the instantaneous amplitude of a (longer) femtosecond pulse which is encoded in the momentum of the electron ionized by the attopulse, a method called streaking [Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 173903 (2002)]. The streaked electron momenta can be used to measure the attopulse. Since the femtosecond pulse is used to generate the attopulse, they are both phase locked, rendering this setup also convenient for a pump-probe streaking scheme. Equivalently, one can employ the sidebands [Phys. Rev. A 54, 721 (1996)] generated in a setup called, nowadays, RABBITT (“Reconstruction of Attosecond Beating By Interference of Two-photon Transitions”).
More recently, the so-called attoclock has been invented [Nat. Phys. 4, 565 (2008)] where the extreme nonlinearity of the ionization process in strong laser fields is exploited to start the clock with a known direction of the rotating polarization vector of the light at a given time. If the ionized electron momentum at the detector points into a different direction, the difference can be converted into a delay of typically some tens of attoseconds. Measuring time delays in all kinds of targets — from atoms to molecules, clusters, solids and even liquids — became a popular tool in several active lines of research on their own, also in photoionization by streaking or RABBITT. However, the interpretation of measured attosecond delays is a matter of current debate [Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 113202 (2020), Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 203201 (2022)].
Attosecond Streak Camera
J. Itatani, F. Quéré, G. L. Yudin, M. Yu. Ivanov, F. Krausz, and P. B. Corkum
Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 173903 (2002)
Phase dependence of (N+1)-color (N>1) ir-uv photoionization of atoms with higher harmonics
Valérie Véniard, Richard Taïeb, and Alfred Maquet
Phys. Rev. A 54, 721 (1996)
Proper Time Delays Measured by Optical Streaking
Ulf Saalmann and Jan M. Rost
Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 113202 (2020)
Reconciling Conflicting Approaches for the Tunneling Time Delay in Strong Field Ionization
M. Klaiber, Q. Z. Lv, S. Sukiasyan, D. Bakucz Canário, K. Z. Hatsagortsyan, and C. H. Keitel
Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 203201 (2022)
Probing Time-Dependent Molecular Dipoles on the Attosecond Time Scale
Ch. Neidel, J. Klei, C.-H. Yang, A. Rouzée, M. J. J. Vrakking, K. Klünder, M. Miranda, C. L. Arnold, T. Fordell, A. L’Huillier, M. Gisselbrecht, P. Johnsson, M. P. Dinh, E. Suraud, P.-G. Reinhard, V. Despré, M. A. L. Marques, and F. Lépine
Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 033001 (2013)