Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Mapping the parameter space of double microwave shielding

Hubert J. Jóźwiak1,*, Ian Stevenson2,3, Sebastian Will2, and Tijs Karman1,†

  • *Contact author: hubert.jozwiak@ru.nl
  • Contact author: tkarman@science.ru.nl

Phys. Rev. A 114, 033315 – Published 10 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/jmnn-glrn

Abstract

Double microwave shielding employs σ+- and π-polarized microwave fields, tuned close to the lowest rotational transition, to engineer a long-range repulsive barrier between polar molecules. By preventing molecules from reaching the short range, this technique suppresses detrimental two-body losses and recently enabled the realization of molecular Bose-Einstein condensates and self-bound droplets. Yet, the optimal operating regimes of the shielding mechanism remain largely unexplored. Here, by leveraging the underlying universality of the scattering problem, we systematically map the four-dimensional microwave parameter space—spanned by the detunings and intensities of the two fields—to identify configurations that maximize both shielding efficiency and interaction tunability. We define optimal operating regimes as configurations that are strictly free of field-linked bound states while sufficiently suppressing two-body losses to exceed typical lifetimes of ultracold samples. In these regimes, we evaluate the elastic-to-inelastic collision ratios required for efficient evaporative cooling and explore the accessible tuning range of the effective dipolar interactions. Finally, to identify the best platforms for future quantum simulation experiments, we conduct a global survey of candidate molecular species under realistic field constraints. We identify heavy, strongly dipolar molecules as the most promising candidates, demonstrating that they can achieve extreme loss suppression—reaching two-body loss rates as low as 1018cm3/s—alongside robust interaction tunability using only moderate field strengths.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (68)

  1. D. DeMille, N. R. Hutzler, A. M. Rey, and T. Zelevinsky, Quantum sensing and metrology for fundamental physics with molecules, Nat. Phys. 20, 741 (2024).
  2. T. Karman, M. Tomza, and J. Pérez-Ríos, Ultracold chemistry as a testbed for few-body physics, Nat. Phys. 20, 722 (2024).
  3. Y. Liu and K.-K. Ni, Bimolecular chemistry in the ultracold regime, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 73, 73 (2022).
  4. R. V. Krems, Cold controlled chemistry, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10, 4079 (2008).
  5. S. L. Cornish, M. R. Tarbutt, and K. R. A. Hazzard, Quantum computation and quantum simulation with ultracold molecules, Nat. Phys. 20, 730 (2024).
  6. I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885 (2008).
  7. C. Chin, R. Grimm, P. Julienne, and E. Tiesinga, Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1225 (2010).
  8. T. Lahaye, C. Menotti, L. Santos, M. Lewenstein, and T. Pfau, The physics of dipolar bosonic quantum gases, Rep. Prog. Phys. 72, 126401 (2009).
  9. L. Chomaz, I. Ferrier-Barbut, F. Ferlaino, B. Laburthe-Tolra, B. L. Lev, and T. Pfau, Dipolar physics: A review of experiments with magnetic quantum gases, Rep. Prog. Phys. 86, 026401 (2023).
  10. A. Micheli, G. K. Brennen, and P. Zoller, A toolbox for lattice-spin models with polar molecules, Nat. Phys. 2, 341 (2006).
  11. M. Schmidt, L. Lassablière, G. Quéméner, and T. Langen, Self-bound dipolar droplets and supersolids in molecular Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013235 (2022).
  12. D. DeMille, Quantum computation with trapped polar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 067901 (2002).
  13. Z. Idziaszek and P. S. Julienne, Universal rate constants for reactive collisions of ultracold molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 113202 (2010).
  14. S. Ospelkaus, K.-K. Ni, D. Wang, M. H. G. de Miranda, B. Neyenhuis, G. Quéméner, P. S. Julienne, J. L. Bohn, D. S. Jin, and J. Ye, Quantum-state controlled chemical reactions of ultracold potassium-rubidium molecules, Science 327, 853 (2010).
  15. T. Takekoshi, L. Reichsöllner, A. Schindewolf, J. M. Hutson, C. R. Le Sueur, O. Dulieu, F. Ferlaino, R. Grimm, and H.-C. Nägerl, Ultracold dense samples of dipolar RbCs molecules in the rovibrational and hyperfine ground state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 205301 (2014).
  16. P. K. Molony, P. D. Gregory, Z. Ji, B. Lu, M. P. Köppinger, C. R. Le Sueur, C. L. Blackley, J. M. Hutson, and S. L. Cornish, Creation of ultracold 87Rb133Cs molecules in the rovibrational ground state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 255301 (2014).
  17. J. W. Park, S. A. Will, and M. W. Zwierlein, Ultracold dipolar gas of fermionic 23Na40K molecules in their absolute ground state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 205302 (2015).
  18. M. Guo, B. Zhu, B. Lu, X. Ye, F. Wang, R. Vexiau, N. Bouloufa-Maafa, G. Quéméner, O. Dulieu, and D. Wang, Creation of an ultracold gas of ground-state dipolar 23Na87Rb molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 205303 (2016).
  19. X. Ye, M. Guo, M. L. González-Martínez, G. Quéméner, and D. Wang, Collisions of ultracold 23Na87Rb molecules with controlled chemical reactivities, Sci. Adv. 4, eaaq0083 (2018).
  20. R. Bause, A. Christianen, A. Schindewolf, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo, Ultracold sticky collisions: Theoretical and experimental status, J. Phys. Chem. A 127, 729 (2023).
  21. M. Mayle, B. P. Ruzic, and J. L. Bohn, Statistical aspects of ultracold resonant scattering, Phys. Rev. A 85, 062712 (2012).
  22. M. Mayle, G. Quéméner, B. P. Ruzic, and J. L. Bohn, Scattering of ultracold molecules in the highly resonant regime, Phys. Rev. A 87, 012709 (2013).
  23. A. Christianen, M. W. Zwierlein, G. C. Groenenboom, and T. Karman, Photoinduced two-body loss of ultracold molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 123402 (2019).
  24. A. V. Avdeenkov, M. Kajita, and J. L. Bohn, Suppression of inelastic collisions of polar 1Σ state molecules in an electrostatic field, Phys. Rev. A 73, 022707 (2006).
  25. H. P. Büchler, E. Demler, M. Lukin, A. Micheli, N. Prokof'ev, G. Pupillo, and P. Zoller, Strongly correlated 2D quantum phases with cold polar molecules: Controlling the shape of the interaction potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 060404 (2007).
  26. A. V. Gorshkov, P. Rabl, G. Pupillo, A. Micheli, P. Zoller, M. D. Lukin, and H. P. Büchler, Suppression of inelastic collisions between polar molecules with a repulsive shield, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 073201 (2008).
  27. N. R. Cooper and G. V. Shlyapnikov, Stable topological superfluid phase of ultracold polar fermionic molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 155302 (2009).
  28. T. Karman and J. M. Hutson, Microwave shielding of ultracold polar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 163401 (2018).
  29. L. Lassablière and G. Quéméner, Controlling the scattering length of ultracold dipolar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 163402 (2018).
  30. G. Valtolina, K. Matsuda, W. G. Tobias, J.-R. Li, L. De Marco, and J. Ye, Dipolar evaporation of reactive molecules to below the Fermi temperature, Nature (London) 588, 239 (2020).
  31. K. Matsuda, L. De Marco, J.-R. Li, W. G. Tobias, G. Valtolina, G. Quéméner, and J. Ye, Resonant collisional shielding of reactive molecules using electric fields, Science 370, 1324 (2020).
  32. J.-R. Li, W. G. Tobias, K. Matsuda, C. Miller, G. Valtolina, L. De Marco, R. R. W. Wang, L. Lassablière, G. Quéméner, J. L. Bohn, and J. Ye, Tuning of dipolar interactions and evaporative cooling in a three-dimensional molecular quantum gas, Nat. Phys. 17, 1144 (2021).
  33. L. Anderegg, S. Burchesky, Y. Bao, S. S. Yu, T. Karman, E. Chae, K.-K. Ni, W. Ketterle, and J. M. Doyle, Observation of microwave shielding of ultracold molecules, Science 373, 779 (2021).
  34. A. Schindewolf, R. Bause, X.-Y. Chen, M. Duda, T. Karman, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo, Evaporation of microwave-shielded polar molecules to quantum degeneracy, Nature (London) 607, 677 (2022).
  35. N. Bigagli, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, B. Bulatovic, T. Karman, I. Stevenson, and S. Will, Observation of Bose–Einstein condensation of dipolar molecules, Nature (London) 631, 289 (2024).
  36. Z. Shi, Z. Huang, F. Deng, W.-J. Jin, S. Yi, T. Shi, and D. Wang, Bose–Einstein condensate of ultracold sodium–rubidium molecules with tunable dipolar interactions, Nat. Phys. (2026).
  37. I. Stevenson, S. Singh, A. Elkamshishy, N. Bigagli, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, C. H. Greene, and S. Will, Three-body recombination of ultracold microwave-shielded polar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 263402 (2024).
  38. W. Yuan, S. Zhang, N. Bigagli, H. Kwak, C. Warner, T. Karman, I. Stevenson, and S. Will, Extreme loss suppression and wide tunability of dipolar interactions in an ultracold molecular gas, arXiv:2505.08773.
  39. T. Karman, N. Bigagli, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, I. Stevenson, and S. Will, Double microwave shielding, PRX Quantum 6, 020358 (2025).
  40. F. Deng, X. Hu, W.-J. Jin, S. Yi, and T. Shi, Two- and many-body physics of ultracold molecules dressed by dual microwave fields, Nat. Commun. 16, 11219 (2025).
  41. S. Zhang, W. Yuan, N. Bigagli, H. Kwak, T. Karman, I. Stevenson, and S. Will, Observation of self-bound droplets of ultracold dipolar molecules, Nature (London) 651, 601 (2026).
  42. J. Dutta, B. Mukherjee, and J. M. Hutson, Universality in the microwave shielding of ultracold polar molecules, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 023164 (2025).
  43. C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg, Atom-Photon Interactions: Basic Processes and Applications (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1998).
  44. R. Napolitano, J. Weiner, and P. S. Julienne, Theory of optical suppression of ultracold-collision rates by polarized light, Phys. Rev. A 55, 1191 (1997).
  45. T. Karman and J. M. Hutson, Microwave shielding of ultracold polar molecules with imperfectly circular polarization, Phys. Rev. A 100, 052704 (2019).
  46. N. Bigagli, C. Warner, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, I. Stevenson, T. Karman, and S. Will, Collisionally stable gas of bosonic dipolar ground-state molecules, Nat. Phys. 19, 1579 (2023).
  47. S. Guérin, F. Monti, J.-M. Dupont, and H. R. Jauslin, On the relation between cavity-dressed states, Floquet states, RWA and semiclassical models, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 30, 7193 (1997).
  48. T. Karman, Microwave shielding with far-from-circular polarization, Phys. Rev. A 101, 042702 (2020).
  49. X.-Y. Chen, A. Schindewolf, S. Eppelt, R. Bause, M. Duda, S. Biswas, T. Karman, T. Hilker, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo, Field-linked resonances of polar molecules, Nature (London) 614, 59 (2023).
  50. L. M. C. Janssen, A. van der Avoird, and G. C. Groenenboom, Quantum reactive scattering of ultracold NH(X3Σ) radicals in a magnetic trap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 063201 (2013).
  51. B. Mukherjee, M. D. Frye, C. R. Le Sueur, M. R. Tarbutt, and J. M. Hutson, Shielding collisions of ultracold CaF molecules with static electric fields, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033097 (2023).
  52. J. L. Bohn, M. Cavagnero, and C. Ticknor, Quasi-universal dipolar scattering in cold and ultracold gases, New J. Phys. 11, 055039 (2009).
  53. M. L. González-Martínez, J. L. Bohn, and G. Quéméner, Adimensional theory of shielding in ultracold collisions of dipolar rotors, Phys. Rev. A 96, 032718 (2017).
  54. M. Śmiałkowski and M. Tomza, Highly polar molecules consisting of a copper or silver atom interacting with an alkali-metal or alkaline-earth-metal atom, Phys. Rev. A 103, 022802 (2021).
  55. P. J. Dagdigian and L. Wharton, Molecular beam electric deflection and resonance spectroscopy of the heteronuclear alkali dimers: 39K7Li, Rb7Li, 39K23Na, Rb23Na, and 133Cs23Na, J. Chem. Phys. 57, 1487 (1972).
  56. J. Lin, G. Chen, M. Jin, Z. Shi, F. Deng, W. Zhang, G. Quéméner, T. Shi, S. Yi, and D. Wang, Microwave shielding of bosonic NaRb molecules, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031032 (2023).
  57. C. R. Monroe, E. A. Cornell, C. A. Sackett, C. J. Myatt, and C. E. Wieman, Measurement of Cs-Cs elastic scattering at T=30µK, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 414 (1993).
  58. W. Ketterle and N. J. Van Druten, Evaporative cooling of trapped atoms, in Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1996), pp. 181–236.
  59. Z.-Y. Ma, A. M. Thomas, C. J. Foot, and S. L. Cornish, The evaporative cooling of a gas of caesium atoms in the hydrodynamic regime, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 36, 3533 (2003).
  60. B. DeMarco, S. B. Papp, and D. S. Jin, Pauli blocking of collisions in a quantum degenerate atomic Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5409 (2001).
  61. K. Aikawa, A. Frisch, M. Mark, S. Baier, R. Grimm, and F. Ferlaino, Reaching Fermi degeneracy via universal dipolar scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 010404 (2014).
  62. K. Aikawa, A. Frisch, M. Mark, S. Baier, R. Grimm, J. L. Bohn, D. S. Jin, G. M. Bruun, and F. Ferlaino, Anisotropic relaxation dynamics in a dipolar Fermi gas driven out of equilibrium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 263201 (2014).
  63. M. Olshanii, Atomic scattering in the presence of an external confinement and a gas of impenetrable bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 938 (1998).
  64. E. Haller, M. J. Mark, R. Hart, J. G. Danzl, L. Reichsöllner, V. Melezhik, P. Schmelcher, and H.-C. Nägerl, Confinement-induced resonances in low-dimensional quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 153203 (2010).
  65. V. Dunjko, M. G. Moore, T. Bergeman, and M. Olshanii, Confinement-induced resonances, Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 60, 461 (2011).
  66. D. Capecchi, C. Cantillano, M. J. Mark, F. Meinert, A. Schindewolf, M. Landini, A. Saenz, F. Revuelta, and H.-C. Nägerl, Observation of confinement-induced resonances in a 3D lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 213002 (2023).
  67. S. Sala, G. Zürn, T. Lompe, A. N. Wenz, S. Murmann, F. Serwane, S. Jochim, and A. Saenz, Coherent molecule formation in anharmonic potentials near confinement-induced resonances, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 203202 (2013).
  68. H. J. Jóźwiak, Mapping the parameter space of double microwave shielding, [dataset] Zenodo, 2026, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22083771.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation