- Editors' Suggestion
- Access by Xinjiang University
Stabilizers may be poor bounds for fidelities
Phys. Rev. A 114, 032413 – Published 8 September, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/d36t-6w76
Abstract
The defining feature of ideal Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) states is that they are unchanged by stabilizers, which allow them to detect and correct for common errors without destroying the quantum information encoded in the states. Given this property, can one use the amount to which a state is unchanged by the stabilizers as a proxy for the quality of a GKP state? This is shown to hold in the opposite manner to which it is routinely assumed because, in fact, the fidelity a state has to an ideal GKP state is only upper bounded by the stabilizer expectation values. This means that, for qubits encoded in harmonic oscillators via the GKP code, a good stabilizer expectation value does not guarantee proximity to an ideal GKP state in terms of any distance based on fidelity.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (29)
- D. Gottesman, Stabilizer codes and quantum error correction, Ph.D. thesis, Caltech, 1997; 10.7907/rzr7-dt72.
- D. Gross, Hudson's theorem for finite-dimensional quantum systems, J. Math. Phys. 47, 122107 (2006).
- L. Bittel, J. Eisert, L. Leone, A. A. Mele, and S. F. E. Oliviero, A complete theory of the Clifford commutant Quantum 10, 2171 (2025).
- D. Gottesman, A. Kitaev, and J. Preskill, Encoding a qubit in an oscillator, Phys. Rev. A 64, 012310 (2001).
- K. Duivenvoorden, B. M. Terhal, and D. Weigand, Single-mode displacement sensor, Phys. Rev. A 95, 012305 (2017).
- D. J. Weigand and B. M. Terhal, Generating grid states from Schrödinger-cat states without postselection, Phys. Rev. A 97, 022341 (2018).
- C. Flühmann, T. L. Nguyen, M. Marinelli, V. Negnevitsky, K. Mehta, and J. P. Home, Encoding a qubit in a trapped-ion mechanical oscillator, Nature (London) 566, 513 (2019).
- Y. Shi, C. Chamberland, and A. Cross, Fault-tolerant preparation of approximate GKP states, New J. Phys. 21, 093007 (2019).
- P. Campagne-Ibarcq, A. Eickbusch, S. Touzard, E. Zalys-Geller, N. E. Frattini, V. V. Sivak, P. Reinhold, S. Puri, S. Shankar, R. J. Schoelkopf, L. Frunzio, M. Mirrahimi, and M. H. Devoret, Quantum error correction of a qubit encoded in grid states of an oscillator, Nature (London) 584, 368 (2020).
- J. Hastrup and U. L. Andersen, Improved readout of qubit-coupled Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill states, Quantum Sci. Technol. 6, 035016 (2021).
- P. Marek, Ground state nature and nonlinear squeezing of Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 210601 (2024).
- K. Takase, F. Hanamura, H. Nagayoshi, J. E. Bourassa, R. N. Alexander, A. Kawasaki, W. Asavanant, M. Endo, and A. Furusawa, Generation of flying logical qubits using generalized photon subtraction with adaptive Gaussian operations, Phys. Rev. A 110, 012436 (2024).
- H. Aghaee Rad, T. Ainsworth, R. N. Alexander, B. Altieri, M. F. Askarani, R. Baby, L. Banchi, B. Q. Baragiola, J. E. Bourassa, R. S. Chadwick, I. Charania, H. Chen, M. J. Collins, P. Contu, N. D'Arcy, G. Dauphinais, R. De Prins, D. Deschenes, I. Di Luch, S. Duque, et al., Scaling and networking a modular photonic quantum computer, Nature (London) 638, 912 (2025).
- M. Banić, V. Crescimanna, J. E. Bourassa, C. González-Arciniegas, R. N. Alexander, and K. Heshami, Exact simulation of realistic Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill cluster states, Phys. Rev. A 112, 052425 (2025).
- M. V. Larsen, J. E. Bourassa, S. Kocsis, J. F. Tasker, R. S. Chadwick, C. González-Arciniegas, J. Hastrup, C. E. Lopetegui-González, F. M. Miatto, A. Motamedi, R. Noro, G. Roeland, R. Baby, H. Chen, P. Contu, I. Di Luch, C. Drago, M. Giesbrecht, T. Grainge, I. Krasnokutska, et al., Integrated photonic source of Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill qubits, Nature (London) 642, 587 (2025).
- O. Solodovnikova, U. L. Andersen, and J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen, The loss tolerance of cat breeding for fault-tolerant grid state generation, arXiv:2508.06193.
- K. Noh, V. V. Albert, and L. Jiang, Quantum capacity bounds of Gaussian thermal loss channels and achievable rates with Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill codes, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 65, 2563 (2019).
- B. M. Terhal, J. Conrad, and C. Vuillot, Towards scalable bosonic quantum error correction, Quantum Sci. Technol. 5, 043001 (2020).
- I. Tzitrin, J. E. Bourassa, N. C. Menicucci, and K. K. Sabapathy, Progress towards practical qubit computation using approximate Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill codes, Phys. Rev. A 101, 032315 (2020).
- J. Conrad, Twirling and Hamiltonian engineering via dynamical decoupling for Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill quantum computing, Phys. Rev. A 103, 022404 (2021).
- K. Noh, C. Chamberland, and F. G. S. L. Brandão, Low-overhead fault-tolerant quantum error correction with the surface-GKP code, PRX Quantum 3, 010315 (2022).
- B. Royer, S. Singh, and S. M. Girvin, Stabilization of finite-energy Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 260509 (2020).
- T. Matsuura, H. Yamasaki, and M. Koashi, Equivalence of approximate Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill codes, Phys. Rev. A 102, 032408 (2020).
- N. C. Menicucci, Fault-tolerant measurement-based quantum computing with continuous-variable cluster states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 120504 (2014).
- J. Conrad, J. Eisert, and F. Arzani, Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill codes: A lattice perspective, Quantum 6, 648 (2022).
- B. de Neeve, T.-L. Nguyen, T. Behrle, and J. P. Home, Error correction of a logical grid state qubit by dissipative pumping, Nat. Phys. 18, 296 (2022).
- K. Heshami, N. Sangouard, J. C. V. Minár, H. de Riedmatten, and C. Simon, Precision requirements for spin-echo-based quantum memories, Phys. Rev. A 83, 032315 (2011).
- G. Tóth and O. Gühne, Entanglement detection in the stabilizer formalism, Phys. Rev. A 72, 022340 (2005).
- S. Sciara, C. Reimer, M. Kues, P. Roztocki, A. Cino, D. J. Moss, L. Caspani, W. J. Munro, and R. Morandotti, Universal -partite -level pure-state entanglement witness based on realistic measurement settings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 120501 (2019).
