- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review A

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Cavity-controlled inhibition of decoherence in accelerated quantum detectors

Harkirat Singh Sahota1,*, Shagun Kaushal2,†, and Kinjalk Lochan3,‡

  • *Contact author: harkirat221@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: shagun.kaushal@vit.ac.in
  • ‡Contact author: kinjalk@iisermohali.ac.in
PDF

Phys. Rev. A 114, 032209 – Published 14 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/cwkf-ylmg

Abstract

Vacuum fluctuations of quantum fields provide an unavoidable environment for any quantum system coupled to it. We study the interplay between boundary conditions and acceleration in determining decoherence of a two-level Unruh-DeWitt detector coupled to a scalar field in a cylindrical cavity. We show that the decoherence rate closely follows the emission profile, and exhibits Purcell-like enhancement for both inertial and uniformly accelerated detectors. The acceleration induces an effective smearing of the resonant density of states, diluting the resonance enhancement for large accelerations while replacing the inertial off-resonant decay with an oscillatory behavior for small accelerations. For moderate accelerations, this interplay between cavity-induced and acceleration-assisted effects results in an extended region of cavity parameters where decoherence is strongly suppressed, particularly in regimes where the inertial detector otherwise experience strong decoherence. Thus, contrary to naive expectations, the Unruh thermality in a suitably engineered cavity can enhance rather than degrade quantum coherence, providing a very uncharacteristic feature of quantum fields in noninertial frames.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (79)

  1. H. B. G. Casimir, On the attraction between two perfectly conducting plates, Indagationes Mathematicae 10, 261 (1948) (Concurrently published in Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, 51, 793–795).
  2. J. S. Schwinger, On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization, Phys. Rev. 82, 664 (1951).
  3. S. W. Hawking, Black hole explosions? Nature (London) 248, 30 (1974).
  4. W. G. Unruh, Notes on black-hole evaporation, Phys. Rev. D 14, 870 (1976).
  5. S. A. Fulling, Nonuniqueness of canonical field quantization in Riemannian space-time, Phys. Rev. D 7, 2850 (1973).
  6. N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982).
  7. B. S. DeWitt, in General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey, edited by S. W. Hawking and W. Israel (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979), pp. 680–745.
  8. L. C. B. Crispino, A. Higuchi, and G. E. A. Matsas, The Unruh effect and its applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 787 (2008).
  9. J. S. Bell and J. M. Leinaas, Electrons as accelerated thermometers, Nucl. Phys. B 212, 131 (1983).
  10. J. S. Bell and J. M. Leinaas, The Unruh effect and quantum fluctuations of electrons in storage rings, Nucl. Phys. B 284, 488 (1987).
  11. A. O. Barut and J. P. Dowling, Quantum electrodynamics based on self-fields: On the origin of thermal radiation detected by an accelerating observer, Phys. Rev. A 41, 2277 (1990).
  12. W. G. Unruh, Acceleration radiation for orbiting electrons, Phys. Rep. 307, 163 (1998).
  13. J. Rogers, Detector for the temperaturelike effect of acceleration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2113 (1988).
  14. E. Yablonovitch, Accelerating reference frame for electromagnetic waves in a rapidly growing plasma: Unruh-Davies-Fulling-DeWitt radiation and the nonadiabatic Casimir effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1742 (1989).
  15. A. Raval, B. L. Hu, and J. Anglin, Stochastic theory of accelerated detectors in a quantum field, Phys. Rev. D 53, 7003 (1996).
  16. P. Chen and T. Tajima, Testing Unruh radiation with ultraintense lasers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 256 (1999).
  17. D. A. T. Vanzella and G. E. A. Matsas, Decay of accelerated protons and the existence of the Fulling-Davies-Unruh effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 151301 (2001).
  18. M. O. Scully, V. V. Kocharovsky, A. Belyanin, E. Fry, and F. Capasso, Enhancing acceleration radiation from ground-state atoms via cavity quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 243004 (2003).
  19. A. Belyanin, V. V. Kocharovsky, F. Capasso, E. Fry, M. S. Zubairy, and M. O. Scully, Quantum electrodynamics of accelerated atoms in free space and in cavities, Phys. Rev. A 74, 023807 (2006).
  20. R. Schützhold, G. Schaller, and D. Habs, Tabletop creation of entangled multi-keV photon pairs and the Unruh effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 091301 (2008).
  21. M. Aspachs, G. Adesso, and I. Fuentes, Optimal quantum estimation of the Unruh-Hawking effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 151301 (2010).
  22. A. Retzker, J. I. Cirac, M. B. Plenio, and B. Reznik, Methods for detecting acceleration radiation in a Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 110402 (2008).
  23. K. Lochan, H. Ulbricht, A. Vinante, and S. K. Goyal, Detecting acceleration-enhanced vacuum fluctuations with atoms inside a cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 241301 (2020).
  24. D. J. Stargen and K. Lochan, Cavity optimization for Unruh effect at small accelerations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 111303 (2022).
  25. B. Šoda, V. Sudhir, and A. Kempf, Acceleration-induced effects in stimulated light-matter interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 163603 (2022).
  26. E. Martín-Martínez, I. Fuentes, and R. B. Mann, Using Berry's phase to detect the Unruh effect at lower accelerations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 131301 (2011).
  27. N. Arya, V. Mittal, K. Lochan, and S. K. Goyal, Geometric phase assisted observation of noninertial cavity-QED effects, Phys. Rev. D 106, 045011 (2022).
  28. D. Barman, D. Ghosh, and B. R. Majhi, Mirror-enhanced acceleration-induced geometric phase, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 410 (2025).
  29. D. Ghosh and B. R. Majhi, Influence of thermal bath on Pancharatnam-Berry phase in an accelerated frame, Phys. Lett. B 858, 139015 (2024).
  30. Y. Zhou, J. Hu, and H. Yu, Molecular entanglement as a signature of the Unruh effect, Phys. Rev. D 112, L021702 (2025).
  31. A. Mukherjee, S. Gangopadhyay, and A. S. Majumdar, Fulling-Davies-Unruh effect for accelerated two-level single and entangled atomic systems, Phys. Rev. D 108, 085018 (2023).
  32. N. Arya and S. K. Goyal, Lamb shift as a witness for quantum noninertial effects, Phys. Rev. D 108, 085011 (2023).
  33. N. Arya, D. J. Stargen, K. Lochan, and S. K. Goyal, Strong noninertial radiative shifts in atomic spectra at low accelerations, Phys. Rev. D 110, 085007 (2024).
  34. Y. Peng, Y. Zhou, J. Hu, and H. Yu, Extensive manipulation of transition rates and substantial population inversion of rotating atoms inside a cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 013202 (2026).
  35. A. Deswal, N. Arya, K. Lochan, and S. K. Goyal, Time-resolved and superradiantly amplified Unruh effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 183601 (2025).
  36. H.-T. Zheng, X.-F. Zhou, G.-C. Guo, and Z.-W. Zhou, Enhancing analog Unruh effect via superradiance in a cylindrical cavity, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 013027 (2025).
  37. S. J. Summers and R. Werner, The vacuum violates Bell's inequalities, Phys. Lett. A 110, 257 (1985).
  38. S. J. Summers and R. Werner, Maximal violation of Bell's inequalities is generic in quantum field theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 110, 247 (1987).
  39. B. Reznik, Entanglement from the vacuum, Found. Phys. 33, 167 (2003).
  40. B. Reznik, A. Retzker, and J. Silman, Violating Bell's inequalities in vacuum, Phys. Rev. A 71, 042104 (2005).
  41. C. Kiefer, Decoherence in quantum electrodynamics and quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 46, 1658 (1992).
  42. L. H. Ford, Electromagnetic vacuum fluctuations and electron coherence, Phys. Rev. D 47, 5571 (1993).
  43. H. D. Zeh, On the interpretation of measurement in quantum theory, Found. Phys. 1, 69 (1970).
  44. W. H. Zurek, Environment-induced superselection rules, Phys. Rev. D 26, 1862 (1982).
  45. S.-W. Han, W. Chen, L. Chen, Z. Ouyang, and J. Feng, Reliable quantum master equation of the Unruh-DeWitt detector, Phys. Rev. D 112, 085014 (2025).
  46. S. Deléglise, I. Dotsenko, C. Sayrin, J. Bernu, M. Brune, J.-M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Reconstruction of non-classical cavity field states with snapshots of their decoherence, Nature (London) 455, 510 (2008).
  47. S. Pabst, L. Greenman, P. J. Ho, D. A. Mazziotti, and R. Santra, Decoherence in attosecond photoionization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 053003 (2011).
  48. C. Bourassin-Bouchet, L. Barreau, V. Gruson, J.-F. Hergott, F. Quéré, P. Salières, and T. Ruchon, Quantifying decoherence in attosecond metrology, Phys. Rev. X 10, 031048 (2020).
  49. G. Kaplanek and C. P. Burgess, Hot accelerated qubits: Decoherence, thermalization, secular growth and reliable late-time predictions, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2020) 008.
  50. G. Kaplanek and C. P. Burgess, Hot cosmic qubits: Late-time de Sitter evolution and critical slowing down, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2020) 053.
  51. G. Kaplanek and C. P. Burgess, Qubits on the horizon: Decoherence and thermalization near black holes, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 098.
  52. C. P. Burgess, R. Holman, G. Kaplanek, J. Martin, and V. Vennin, Minimal decoherence from inflation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2023, 022 (2023).
  53. T. Colas, C. de Rham, and G. Kaplanek, Decoherence out of fire: Purity loss in expanding and contracting universes, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2024, 025 (2024).
  54. C. P. Burgess, T. Colas, R. Holman, and G. Kaplanek, Does decoherence violate decoupling? J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2025) 204.
  55. C. P. Burgess, R. Holman, and G. Kaplanek, Inflationary decoherence from the gravitational floor, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2026, 042 (2026).
  56. R. Christie, J. Joo, G. Kaplanek, V. Vennin, and D. Wands, Cosmic lockdown: When decoherence saves the universe from tunneling, arXiv:2512.14204.
  57. A. Gundhi, Decoherence due to the Casimir effect? Phys. Rev. D 110, 116001 (2024).
  58. A. Gundhi and H. Ulbricht, Measuring decoherence due to quantum vacuum fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 020402 (2025).
  59. C. Anastopoulos and B. L. Hu, Two-level atom-field interaction: Exact master equations for non-Markovian dynamics, decoherence, and relaxation, Phys. Rev. A 62, 033821 (2000).
  60. S. Shresta, C. Anastopoulos, A. Dragulescu, and B. L. Hu, Non-Markovian qubit dynamics in a thermal field bath: Relaxation, decoherence, and entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 71, 022109 (2005).
  61. W. H. Zurek, Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 715 (2003).
  62. R. Li, Z.-X. Man, and J. Wang, Probing Unruh effect from enhanced decoherence, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2026) 279.
  63. D. Kleppner, Inhibited spontaneous emission, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 233 (1981).
  64. G. Gabrielse and H. Dehmelt, Observation of inhibited spontaneous emission, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 67 (1985).
  65. G. S. Agarwal, Control of decoherence and relaxation by frequency modulation of a heat bath, Phys. Rev. A 61, 013809 (1999).
  66. G. S. Agarwal, M. O. Scully, and H. Walther, Inhibition of decoherence due to decay in a continuum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4271 (2001).
  67. A. Montina and F. T. Arecchi, Quantum decoherence reduction by increasing the thermal bath temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 120401 (2008).
  68. I. S. Gradshteyn, I. M. Ryzhik, A. Jeffrey, and D. Zwillinger, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 7th ed. (Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2007).
  69. E. M. Purcell, Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies, Phys. Rev. 69, 681 (1946); (republished in Confined Electrons and Photons, (Springer, 1995), pp. 839–839).
  70. H. Mabuchi and A. C. Doherty, Cavity quantum electrodynamics: Coherence in context, Science 298, 1372 (2002).
  71. S. Haroche and J.-M. Raimond, Exploring the Quantum: Atoms, Cavities, and Photons (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006).
  72. H. Xu, Decoherence and thermalization of Unruh-DeWitt detector in arbitrary dimensions, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2023) 179.
  73. https://github.com/harkiratss/Decoherence-cavity.
  74. See 10.23.3, DLMF, NIST digital library of mathematical functions, https://dlmf.nist.gov/, edited by F. W. J. Olver, A. B. Olde Daalhuis, D. W. Lozier, B. I. Schneider, R. F. Boisvert, C. W. Clark, B. R. Miller, B. V. Saunders, H. S. Cohl, and M. A. McClain.
  75. S. Schlicht, Considerations on the Unruh effect: Causality and regularization, Class. Quantum Grav. 21, 4647 (2004).
  76. J. Louko and A. Satz, How often does the Unruh-DeWitt detector click? Regularization by a spatial profile, Class. Quantum Grav. 23, 6321 (2006).
  77. B. L. Hu and A. Roura, Comment on “Enhancing acceleration radiation from ground-state atoms via cavity quantum electrodynamics”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 129301 (2004).
  78. M. O. Scully, V. V. Kocharovsky, A. Belyanin, E. Fry, and F. Capasso, Scully et al. reply:, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 129302 (2004).
  79. B. L. Hu, A. Roura, and S. Shresta, Vacuum fluctuations and moving atoms/detectors: From the Casimir-Polder to the Unruh-Davies-DeWitt-Fulling effect, J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 6, S698 (2004).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. A 114, 032209– Published 14 September, 2026
  • Received 13 April 2026
  • Accepted 26 August 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2026 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation