Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Geometric mechanisms enabling spin- and enantio-sensitive observables in one-photon ionization of chiral molecules

Philip Caesar M. Flores1,*, Stefanos Carlström1, Serguei Patchkovskii1, Misha Ivanov1,2,3, Andres F. Ordonez1,4,5, and Olga Smirnova1,3,6,†

  • *Contact author: flores@mbi-berlin.de
  • Contact author: smirnova@mbi-berlin.de

Phys. Rev. A 114, 013110 – Published 13 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/cqqs-77rg

Abstract

We examine the spin-resolved photoionization of randomly oriented chiral molecules via circularly polarized light, and revisit earlier predictions of Cherepkov [J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 16, 1543 (1983)]. We will show that the dynamical origin of spin- and enantio-sensitive observables arise from two intrinsic mechanisms that are quantified by two pseudovectors stemming from the geometric properties of the photoionization dipoles in spin space and in real space, and an extrinsic mechanism which is a directional bias introduced by the well-defined direction of light polarization. These mechanisms arise solely from electric-dipole interactions. Consequently, this means that the ten independent parameters that were earlier predicted by Cherepkov to fully describe the spin-resolved photoionization of chiral molecules can be reduced as moments of these three pseudovectors. We also find that the molecular pseudoscalars describing the spin- and enantio-sensitive components of the yield can be described by the flux of these pseudovectors through the energy shell, which changes sign upon switching enantiomers. Our results provide compact expressions for these observables which provide an intuitive picture on what determines the strength of these spin- and enantio-sensitive observables. The approach can be readily generalized to photoexcitation, multiphoton processes, and arbitrary field polarizations. Regardless of the specific driving conditions, the resulting spin- and enantio-sensitive observables are still controlled by the same three pseudovectors, underscoring their universal role as the primary generators of chirality-induced spin asymmetries, emphasizing their fundamental geometric origin and the universality of the mechanism identified here.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

See Also

Enantiosensitivity of spin polarization in molecular photoionization

Anton N. Artemyev, Daniel M. Haubenreißer, Boris M. Lagutin, and Philipp V. Demekhin
Phys. Rev. A 114, 013111 (2026)

Article Text

References (51)

  1. C. Sparling and D. Townsend, Two decades of imaging photoelectron circular dichroism: From first principles to future perspectives, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 27, 2888 (2025).
  2. B. Ritchie, Theory of the angular distribution of photoelectrons ejected from optically active molecules and molecular negative ions, Phys. Rev. A 13, 1411 (1976).
  3. N. Cherepkov, Circular dichroism of molecules in the continuous absorption region, Chem. Phys. Lett. 87, 344 (1982).
  4. I. Powis, Photoelectron circular dichroism of the randomly oriented chiral molecules glyceraldehyde and lactic acid, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 301 (2000).
  5. N. Böwering, T. Lischke, B. Schmidtke, N. Müller, T. Khalil, and U. Heinzmann, Asymmetry in photoelectron emission from chiral molecules induced by circularly polarized light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1187 (2001).
  6. V. Ulrich, S. Barth, S. Joshi, U. Hergenhahn, E. Mikajlo, C. J. Harding, and I. Powis, Giant chiral asymmetry in the C1s core level photoemission from randomly oriented fenchone enantiomers, J. Phys. Chem. A 112, 3544 (2008).
  7. L. Nahon, G. A. Garcia, C. J. Harding, E. Mikajlo, and I. Powis, Determination of chiral asymmetries in the valence photoionization of camphor enantiomers by photoelectron imaging using tunable circularly polarized light, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 114309 (2006).
  8. L. Nahon, G. A. Garcia, and I. Powis, Valence shell one-photon photoelectron circular dichroism in chiral systems, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 204, 322 (2015).
  9. C. Lux, M. Wollenhaupt, T. Bolze, Q. Liang, J. Köhler, C. Sarpe, and T. Baumert, Circular dichroism in the photoelectron angular distributions of camphor and fenchone from multiphoton ionization with femtosecond laser pulses, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 5001 (2012).
  10. C. S. Lehmann, N. B. Ram, I. Powis, and M. H. Janssen, Imaging photoelectron circular dichroism of chiral molecules by femtosecond multiphoton coincidence detection, J. Chem. Phys. 139, 234307 (2013).
  11. S. Beaulieu, A. Ferré, R. Géneaux, R. Canonge, D. Descamps, B. Fabre, N. Fedorov, F. Légaré, S. Petit, T. Ruchon, et al., Universality of photoelectron circular dichroism in the photoionization of chiral molecules, New J. Phys. 18, 102002 (2016).
  12. A. Comby, E. Bloch, C. Bond, D. Descamps, J. Miles, S. Petit, S. Rozen, J. Greenwood, V. Blanchet, and Y. Mairesse, Real-time determination of enantiomeric and isomeric content using photoelectron elliptical dichroism, Nat. Commun. 9, 5212 (2018).
  13. S. Rozen, A. Comby, E. Bloch, S. Beauvarlet, D. Descamps, B. Fabre, S. Petit, V. Blanchet, B. Pons, N. Dudovich, and Y. Mairesse, Controlling subcycle optical chirality in the photoionization of chiral molecules, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031004 (2019).
  14. G. A. Garcia, L. Nahon, M. Lebech, J.-C. Houver, D. Dowek, and I. Powis, Circular dichroism in the photoelectron angular distribution from randomly oriented enantiomers of camphor, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 8781 (2003).
  15. S. Turchini, N. Zema, G. Contini, G. Alberti, M. Alagia, S. Stranges, G. Fronzoni, M. Stener, P. Decleva, and T. Prosperi, Circular dichroism in photoelectron spectroscopy of free chiral molecules: Experiment and theory on methyl-oxirane, Phys. Rev. A 70, 014502 (2004).
  16. U. Hergenhahn, E. E. Rennie, O. Kugeler, S. Marburger, T. Lischke, I. Powis, and G. Garcia, Photoelectron circular dichroism in core level ionization of randomly oriented pure enantiomers of the chiral molecule camphor, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 4553 (2004).
  17. G. A. Garcia, L. Nahon, C. J. Harding, and I. Powis, Chiral signatures in angle-resolved valence photoelectron spectroscopy of pure glycidol enantiomers, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10, 1628 (2008).
  18. M. H. Janssen and I. Powis, Detecting chirality in molecules by imaging photoelectron circular dichroism, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 856 (2014).
  19. I. Powis, Photoelectron spectroscopy and circular dichroism in chiral biomolecules: L-alanine, J. Phys. Chem. A 104, 878 (2000).
  20. M. Stener, G. Fronzoni, D. D. Tommaso, and P. Decleva, Density functional study on the circular dichroism of photoelectron angular distribution from chiral derivatives of oxirane, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 3284 (2004).
  21. A. N. Artemyev, A. D. Müller, D. Hochstuhl, and P. V. Demekhin, Photoelectron circular dichroism in the multiphoton ionization by short laser pulses. I. Propagation of single-active-electron wave packets in chiral pseudo-potentials, J. Chem. Phys. 142, 244105 (2015).
  22. U. Fano, Spin orientation of photoelectrons ejected by circularly polarized light, Phys. Rev. 178, 131 (1969).
  23. P. Lambropoulos, Spin-orbit coupling and photoelectron polarization in multiphoton ionization of atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 413 (1973).
  24. I. Barth and O. Smirnova, Spin-polarized electrons produced by strong-field ionization, Phys. Rev. A 88, 013401 (2013).
  25. K. Ray, S. Ananthavel, D. Waldeck, and R. Naaman, Asymmetric scattering of polarized electrons by organized organic films of chiral molecules, Science 283, 814 (1999).
  26. F. Evers, A. Aharony, N. Bar-Gill, O. Entin-Wohlman, P. Hedegård, O. Hod, P. Jelinek, G. Kamieniarz, M. Lemeshko, K. Michaeli, et al., Theory of chirality induced spin selectivity: Progress and challenges, Adv. Mater. 34, 2106629 (2022).
  27. N. Cherepkov, Manifestations of the optical activity of molecules in the dipole photoeffect, J. Phys. B 16, 1543 (1983).
  28. N. Cherepkov, Spin polarization of atomic and molecular photoelectrons Adv. At. Mol. Phys. 19, 395 (1983).
  29. N. Chandra, Photoelectron spectroscopic studies of polyatomic molecules: Theory for spin polarization, Phys. Rev. A 40, 752 (1989).
  30. N. Chandra, Photoelectron spectroscopic studies of polyatomic molecules: Spin-polarized electrons from Td point symmetry group molecules, Phys. Rev. A 40, 768 (1989).
  31. N. A. Cherepkov and V. V. Kuznetsov, Comment on “Photoelectron spectroscopic studies of polyatomic molecules: Theory for spin polarization”, Phys. Rev. A 44, 2220 (1991).
  32. G. Schönhense, V. Dzidzonou, S. Kaesdorf, and U. Heinzmann, Spin-polarized photoelectrons from randomly oriented halogen molecules by unpolarized radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 811 (1984).
  33. U. Heinzmann, B. Osterheld, F. Schafers, and G. Schonhense, Spin-polarised photoelectrons produced from CH3Br molecules by unpolarised and circularly polarised VUV radiation, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 14, L79 (1981).
  34. A. F. Ordonez and O. Smirnova, Disentangling enantiosensitivity from dichroism using bichromatic fields, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24, 7264 (2022).
  35. A. F. Ordonez, D. Ayuso, P. Decleva, and O. Smirnova, Geometric magnetism and anomalous enantio-sensitive observables in photoionization of chiral molecules, Commun. Phys. 6, 257 (2023).
  36. A. F. Ordonez, A. Roos, P. M. Maier, P. Decleva, D. Ayuso, and O. Smirnova, Geometry of chiral temporal structures. I. Physical effects, Phys. Rev. A 113, 013110 (2026).
  37. A. Roos, P. M. Maier, A. F. Ordonez, and O. Smirnova, Geometry of chiral temporal structures. II. The formalism, Phys. Rev. A 113, 013111 (2026).
  38. A. F. Ordonez and O. Smirnova, A geometric approach to decoding molecular structure and dynamics from photoionization of isotropic samples, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24, 13605 (2022).
  39. A. F. Ordonez and O. Smirnova, Generalized perspective on chiral measurements without magnetic interactions, Phys. Rev. A 98, 063428 (2018).
  40. P. C. M. Flores, S. Carlström, S. Patchkovskii, M. Ivanov, V. Mujica, A. F. Ordonez, and O. Smirnova, Enantiosensitive molecular compass, arXiv:2505.22433.
  41. N. Cherepkov, Theory of spin polarisation phenomena in molecular photoionisation processes, J. Phys. B 14, 2165 (1981).
  42. D. Brink and G. Sactchler, Angular Momentum (Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 1968).
  43. D. L. Andrews and T. Thirunamachandran, On three-dimensional rotational averages, J. Chem. Phys. 67, 5026 (1977).
  44. J. Samson and W. Stolte, Precision measurements of the total photoionization cross-sections of He, Ne, Ar, Kr, and Xe, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 123, 265 (2002).
  45. S. Carlström, R. Tahouri, A. Papoulia, J. M. Dahlström, M. Y. Ivanov, O. Smirnova, and S. Patchkovskii, Spin-polarized photoelectrons in the vicinity of spectral features, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 093202 (2025).
  46. A. F. Ordonez and O. Smirnova, Propensity rules in photoelectron circular dichroism in chiral molecules. I. Chiral hydrogen, Phys. Rev. A 99, 043416 (2019).
  47. X. B. Planas, A. Ordóñez, M. Lewenstein, and A. S. Maxwell, Ultrafast imaging of molecular chirality with photoelectron vortices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 233201 (2022).
  48. A. N. Artemyev, D. M. Haubenreißer, B. M. Lagutin, and P. V. Demekhin, following paper, Enantiosensitivity of spin polarization in molecular photoionization, Phys. Rev. A 114, 013111 (2026).
  49. A. N. Artemyev, R. Tomar, D. Trabert, D. Kargin, E. Kutscher, M. S. Schöffler, L. P. H. Schmidt, R. Pietschnig, T. Jahnke, M. Kunitski, et al., Photoelectron circular dichroism in the spin-polarized spectra of chiral molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 123202 (2024).
  50. U. Heinzmann, Experimental determination of the phase differences of continuum wavefunctions describing the photoionisation process of xenon atoms. II. Evaluation of the matrix elements and the phase differences and their comparison with data in the discrete spectral range in application of the multichannel quantum defect theory, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 13, 4367 (1980).
  51. D. A. Varshalovich, A. N. Moskalev, and V. K. Khersonskii, Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum (World Scientific, Singapore, 1988).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation