Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Enhancement of the excitation and deexcitation rate coefficients of ions in dense plasmas: The role of autoionizing states

Takashi Fujimoto

Takako Kato

  • Department of Engineering Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606, Japan

  • Institute of Plasma Physics, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464, Japan

Phys. Rev. A 32, 1663 – Published 1 September, 1985

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.32.1663

Abstract

In processes of excitationdeexcitation and of ionizationrecombination of ions immersed in dense plasmas, multistep processes through various intermediate states are important. In the present paper we deal with the excitation and deexcitation that have doubly excited, or autoionizing, states as intermediate states. We call these the dielectronic-capture ladderlike (DL) processes. Hydrogenlike 1s⇆2s or 1s⇆2p transitions are considered for the purpose of illustration. The DL excitation rate coefficient is obtained as a function of electron density with an approximation that is based on the picture of dielectronic capture of the 1s ion into the doubly excited states followed by the collisional ladderlike excitation-ionization chain. The DL deexcitation rate coefficient results from autoionization of the doubly excited level ions that are in local thermal equilibrium with respect to the 2l-level populations (l is s or p). Both of the rate coefficients are interpreted as an extrapolation of the excitation cross section due to lowering of the threshold energy of the 1s→2l excitation and are found to obey the principle of detailed balance. Thus, the DL processes may be regarded as enhancements of the direct excitation and deexcitation. A detailed collisional-radiative-model calculation, which includes 60 doubly excited levels and relevant collisional and radiative transitions, is performed, and the above approximations are found to be consistent with the results.

References (24)

  1. J. C. Weisheit and B. W. Shore, Astrophys. J. 194, 519 (1974).
  2. K. M. Roussel and R. F. O'Connel, Phys. Rev. A 9, 52 (1974).
  3. B. W. Shore, J. Phys. B 8, 2023 (1975).
  4. F. E. Höhne and R. Zimmermann, J. Phys. B 15, 2551 (1982).
  5. G. J. Hatton, N. F. Lane and J. C. Weisheit, J. Phys. B 14, 4879 (1981).
  6. J. Davis and M. Blaha, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 27, 307 (1982).
  7. T. Fujimoto and T. Kato, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1022 (1982).
  8. T. Fujimoto, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 47, 273, (1979).
  9. H. Griem, Plasma Spectroscopy (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964), p. 129.
  10. T. Fujimoto, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 34, 216 (1973); ibid. 34, 1429 (1973).
  11. T. Fujimoto, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 49, 1561 (1981); ibid. 49, 1569 (1981).
  12. T. Fujimoto, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 47, 265 (1979).
  13. N. Abu-Salbi and J. Callaway, Phys. Rev. A 24, 2372 (1981).
  14. D. H. Oza, J. Callaway and N. Abu-Salbi, Phys. Rev. A 25, 2812 (1982).
  15. T. Fujimoto and T. Kato, Phys. Rev. A 30, 379 (1984).
  16. D. H. Sampson and A. D. Parks, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 28, 323 (1974).
  17. W. Lotz, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 14, 207 (1967).
  18. A. Burgess, D. G. Hummer and J. A. Tully, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 266, 225 (1970).
  19. V. A. Boiko, A. Ya. Faenov, S. A. Pikuz and U. I. Safranova, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 181, 107 (1977).
  20. D. R. Bates, A. E. Kingston, and R. W. P. McWhirter, Proc. R. Soc. London 267, 297 (1962); D. R. Bates and A. E. Kingston, Planet. Space Sci. 11, 1 (1963); R. W. P. McWhirter and A. G. Hearn, Proc. Phys. Soc. London 82, 641 (1963).
  21. M. J. Seaton, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 119, 90 (1959).
  22. D. H. Menzel and J. G. Baker, Astrophys. J. 86, 70 (1937).
  23. F. J. Rogers, H. C. Graboske, Jr., and D. J. Harwood, Phys. Rev. A 1, 1577 (1970).
  24. V. L. Jacobs and J. Davis, Phys. Rev. A 18, 697 (1978).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation