- Access by Xinjiang University
Effective electric field: Quantifying the sensitivity of searches for new -odd physics with
Phys. Rev. A 107, 062823 – Published 29 June, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.107.062823
Abstract
Laboratory-scale precision experiments are a promising approach to searching for physics beyond the standard model. Noncentrosymmetric solids offer favorable statistical sensitivity for efforts that search for new fields, whose interactions violate the discrete parity and time-reversal symmetries. One example is the cosmic axion spin precession experiment (CASPEr), which can be sensitive to the defining interaction of the quantum chromodynamics (QCD) axion dark matter with gluons in atomic nuclei. The effective electric field is the parameter that quantifies the sensitivity of such experiments to new physics. We describe the theoretical approach to calculating the effective electric field for noncentrosymmetric sites in ionic insulating solids. We consider the specific example of the crystal, which is a particularly promising material. The optimistic estimate of the effective electric field for the isotope in this crystal is . The calculation uncertainty is estimated to be two orders of magnitude, dominated by the evaluation of the europium nuclear Schiff moment.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (37)
- M. S. Safronova, D. Budker, D. DeMille, D. F. Jackson Kimball, A. Derevianko, and C. W. Clark, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 025008 (2018).
- W. B. Cairncross, D. N. Gresh, M. Grau, K. C. Cossel, T. S. Roussy, Y. Ni, Y. Zhou, J. Ye, and E. A. Cornell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 153001 (2017).
- V. Andreev, D. G. Ang, D. DeMille, J. M. Doyle, G. Gabrielse, J. Haefner, N. R. Hutzler, Z. Lasner, C. Meisenhelder, B. R. O'Leary, C. D. Panda, A. D. West, E. P. West, and X. Wu, Nature (London) 562, 355 (2018).
- C. Abel, S. Afach, N. J. Ayres, C. A. Baker, G. Ban, G. Bison, K. Bodek, V. Bondar, M. Burghoff, E. Chanel, Z. Chowdhuri, P. J. Chiu, B. Clement, C. B. Crawford, M. Daum, S. Emmenegger, L. Ferraris-Bouchez, M. Fertl, P. Flaux, B. Franke et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 081803 (2020).
- B. Graner, Y. Chen, E. G. Lindahl, and B. R. Heckel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 161601 (2016).
- A. J. Leggett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 586 (1978).
- A. O. Sushkov, S. Eckel, and S. K. Lamoreaux, Phys. Rev. A 79, 022118 (2009).
- A. O. Sushkov, S. Eckel, and S. K. Lamoreaux, Phys. Rev. A 81, 022104(2010).
- K. Z. Rushchanskii, S. Kamba, V. Goian, P. Vanek, M. Savinov, J. Prokleska, D. Nuzhnyy, K. Knízek, F. Laufek, S. Eckel, S. K. Lamoreaux, A. O. Sushkov, M. Lezaić, and N. A. Spaldin, Nat. Mater. 9, 649 (2010).
- S. Eckel, A. O. Sushkov, and S. K. Lamoreaux, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 193003 (2012).
- S. Upadhyay, U. Dargyte, D. Patterson, and J. D. Weinstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 043601 (2020).
- S. J. Li, R. Anderson, and A. C. Vutha, arXiv:2207.07279.
- D. Budker, P. W. Graham, M. Ledbetter, S. Rajendran, and A. O. Sushkov, Phys. Rev. X 4, 021030 (2014).
- D. Aybas, J. Adam, E. Blumenthal, A. V. Gramolin, D. Johnson, A. Kleyheeg, S. Afach, J. W. Blanchard, G. P. Centers, A. Garcon, M. Engler, N. L. Figueroa, M. G. Sendra, A. Wickenbrock, M. Lawson, T. Wang, T. Wu, H. Luo, H. Mani, P. Mauskopf et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 141802 (2021).
- D. Aybas, H. Bekker, J. W. Blanchard, D. Budker, G. P. Centers, N. L. Figueroa, A. V. Gramolin, D. F. Jackson Kimball, A. Wickenbrock, and A. O. Sushkov, Quantum Sci. Technol. 6, 034007 (2021).
- T. N. Mukhamedjanov and O. P. Sushkov, Phys. Rev. A 72, 034501 (2005).
- J. A. Ludlow and O. P. Sushkov, J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys. 46, 085001 (2013).
- L. V. Skripnikov and A. V. Titov, J. Chem. Phys. 145, 054115 (2016).
- V. V. Flambaum and I. B. Samsonov, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023042 (2020).
- A. O. Sushkov, arXiv:2304.12105.
- R. L. Ahlefeldt, M. R. Hush, and M. J. Sellars, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 250504 (2016).
- R. B. Firestone, Table of Isotopes, edited by S. Y. F. Chu and C. M. Baglin (Wiley, New York, 1999).
- V. V. Flambaum and H. Feldmeier, Phys. Rev. C 101, 015502 (2020).
- T. E. O. Ericson, B. Loiseau, and A. W. Thomas, Phys. Rev. C 66, 014005 (2002).
- N. Yamanaka, B. K. Sahoo, N. Yoshinaga, T. Sato, K. Asahi, and B. P. Das, Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 54 (2017).
- M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, Nucl. Phys. B 573, 177 (2000).
- O. P. Sushkov, V. V. Flambaum, and I. B. Khriplovich, Sov. Phys. JETP 60, 873 (1984).
- V. F. Dmitriev, I. B. Khriplovich, and V. B. Telitsin, Phys. Rev. C 50, 2358 (1994).
- L. I. Schiff, Phys. Rev. 132, 2194 (1963).
- I. B. Khriplovich and S. K. Lamoreaux, CP Violation Without Strangeness (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1997).
- A. Bohr and B. R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998).
- P. A. Butler, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 43, 073002 (2016).
- D. Budker, D. F. Kimball, D. P. Demille, and S. K. Lamoreaux, Physics Today (Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 2005), Vol. 58, pp. 62–64.
- L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory (Elsevier, New York, 1981).
- From the NIST atomic spectra database for Eu III ion we extract the energy of the state to be and the state to be . Then we subtract these from the ionization limit of .
- F. Tambornino, P. Bielec, and C. Hoch, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. E: Struct. Rep. Online 70, i27 (2014).
- V. Antonov, B. Harmon, and A. Yaresko, Electronic Structure and Magneto-Optical Properties of Solids (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004).