- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review A

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Motion of an electron through vacuum fluctuations

Anirudh Gundhi* and Angelo Bassi†

  • Department of Physics, University of Trieste, Strada Costiera 11, 34151 Trieste, Italy and Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Trieste Section, Via Valerio 2, 34127 Trieste, Italy

  • *anirudh.gundhi@phd.units.it
  • †abassi@units.it
PDF

Phys. Rev. A 107, 062801 – Published 1 June, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.107.062801

Abstract

We study the effects of the electromagnetic vacuum on the motion of a nonrelativistic electron. First we derive the equation of motion for the expectation value of the electron's position operator. We show how this equation has the same form as the classical Abraham-Lorentz equation but, at the same time, is free of the well-known runaway solution. Second, we study decoherence induced by vacuum fluctuations. We show that decoherence due to vacuum fluctuations that appears at the level of the reduced density matrix of the electron, obtained after tracing over the radiation field, does not correspond to actual irreversible loss of coherence.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (33)

  1. H. B. G. Casimir, Indag. Math. 10, 261 (1948).
  2. N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1984).
  3. L. Parker and D. Toms, Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime: Quantized Fields and Gravity, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2009).
  4. W. G. Unruh, Phys. Rev. D 14, 870 (1976).
  5. S. A. Fulling, Phys. Rev. D 7, 2850 (1973).
  6. S. Takagi, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 88, 1 (1986).
  7. H. A. Bethe, Phys. Rev. 72, 339 (1947).
  8. W. E. Lamb and R. C. Retherford, Phys. Rev. 72, 241 (1947).
  9. T. A. Welton, Phys. Rev. 74, 1157 (1948).
  10. J. Dalibard, J. Dupont-Roc, and C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Phys. France 43, 1617 (1982).
  11. E. Joos, H. Zeh, D. Giulini, C. Kiefer, J. Kupsch, and I. Stamatescu, Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory, Physics and Astronomy Online Library (Springer, New York, 2003).
  12. C. Kiefer, Phys. Rev. D 46, 1658 (1992).
  13. L. H. Ford, Phys. Rev. D 47, 5571 (1993).
  14. G. Baym and T. Ozawa, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 3035 (2009).
  15. E. Santos, Phys. Lett. A 188, 198 (1994).
  16. L. Diósi, Phys. Lett. A 197, 183 (1995).
  17. P. M. V. B. Barone and A. O. Caldeira, Phys. Rev. A 43, 57 (1991).
  18. H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, in Relativistic Quantum Measurement and Decoherence, edited by H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione (Springer, Berlin, 2000), pp. 31–65.
  19. S. Coleman, Classical electron theory from a modern standpoint, in Electromagnetism: Paths to Research, edited by D. Teplitz (Springer, Boston, MA, 1982), pp. 183–210.
  20. P. Pearle, Classical electron models, in Electromagnetism: Paths to Research, edited by D. Teplitz (Springer, Boston, MA, 1982), pp. 211–295.
  21. D. J. Griffiths, Introduction to Electrodynamics, 4th ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2017).
  22. C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg, Classical electrodynamics: The fundamental equations and the dynamical variables, in Photons and Atoms (Wiley, New York, 1997), Chap. 1, pp. 5–77.
  23. P. R. Johnson and B. L. Hu, Phys. Rev. D 65, 065015 (2002).
  24. E. A. Calzetta and B.-L. B. Hu, Nonequilibrium Quantum Field Theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2008).
  25. Lagrangian and Hamiltonian approach to electrodynamics, the standard Lagrangian and the coulomb gauge, in Photons and Atoms (Wiley, New York, 1997), Chap. 2, pp. 79–168.
  26. A. Altland and B. D. Simons, Condensed Matter Field Theory, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2010).
  27. Note that the precise choice of the basis states is unimportant since the reduced density matrix is obtained after tracing over the environment.
  28. R. Feynman and F. Vernon, Jr., Ann. Phys. 24, 118 (1963).
  29. C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg, Quantum electrodynamics in the Coulomb gauge, in Photons and Atoms (Wiley, New York, 1997), Chap. 3, pp. 169–252.
  30. D. J. Griffiths, T. C. Proctor, and D. F. Schroeter, Am. J. Phys. 78, 391 (2010).
  31. H. Spohn, Dynamics of Charged Particles and their Radiation Field (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2004).
  32. M. A. Schlosshauer, Decoherence and the Quantum-To-Classical Transition (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2007).
  33. W. G. Unruh, in Relativistic Quantum Measurement and Decoherence, edited by H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione (Springer, Berlin, 2000), pp. 125–140.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. A 107, 062801– Published 1 June, 2023
  • Received 16 February 2023
  • Accepted 15 May 2023
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2023 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation