Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Fisher information matrix as a resource measure in the resource theory of asymmetry with general connected-Lie-group symmetry

Daigo Kudo* and Hiroyasu Tajima

  • Graduate School of Informatics and Engineering, The University of Electro-Communications, 1-5-1 Chofugaoka, Chofu, Tokyo 182-8585, Japan and JST, PRESTO, 4-1-8 Honcho, Kawaguchi, Saitama, 332-0012, Japan

  • *daigo09015@gmail.com
  • hiroyasu.tajima@uec.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. A 107, 062418 – Published 20 June, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.107.062418

Abstract

In recent years, in quantum information theory, there has been a remarkable development in the general theoretical framework for studying symmetry in dynamics. This development, called resource theory of asymmetry, is expected to have a wide range of applications, from accurate time measurements to black-hole physics. Despite its importance, the foundation of resource theory of asymmetry still has room for expansion. An important problem is in quantifying the amount of resource. When the symmetry prescribed U(1) or R, i.e., with a single conserved quantity, the quantum Fisher information is known as a resource measure that has suitable properties and a clear physical meaning related to quantum fluctuation of the conserved quantity. However, it is not clear what is the resource measure with such suitable properties when a general symmetry prevails for which there are multiple conserved quantities. The purpose of this paper is to fill this gap. Specifically, we show that the quantum Fisher information matrix is a resource measure whenever a connected linear Lie group describes the symmetry. We also consider the physical meaning of this matrix and see which properties that the quantum Fisher information has when the symmetry is described by U(1) or R can be inherited by the quantum Fisher information matrix.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (42)

  1. F. Brandão, M. Horodecki, N. Ng, J. Oppenheim, and S. Wehner, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3275 (2015).
  2. M. Horodecki and J. Oppenheim, Nat. Commun. 4, 2059 (2013).
  3. J. Aberg, Quantifying superposition, arXiv:quant-ph/0612146.
  4. T. Baumgratz, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 140401 (2014).
  5. I. Marvian, Ph.D. thesis, University of Waterloo, 2012 (unpublished).
  6. C. Zhang, B. Yadin, Z.-B. Hou, H. Cao, B.-H. Liu, Y.-F. Huang, R. Maity, V. Vedral, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo et al., Phys. Rev. A 96, 042327 (2017).
  7. R. Takagi, Sci. Rep. 9, 14562 (2019).
  8. I. Marvian, Nat. Commun. 11, 25 (2020).
  9. K. Yamaguchi and H. Tajima, Beyond i.i.d. in the resource theory of asymmetry: An information-spectrum approach for quantum Fisher information, arXiv:2204.08439.
  10. M. Ahmadi, D. Jennings, and T. Rudolph, New J. Phys. 15, 013057 (2013).
  11. I. Marvian and R. W. Spekkens, An information-theoretic account of the Wigner-Araki-Yanase theorem, arXiv:1212.3378.
  12. H. Tajima and H. Nagaoka, Coherence-variance uncertainty relation and coherence cost for quantum measurement under conservation laws, arXiv:1909.02904.
  13. H. Tajima, N. Shiraishi, and K. Saito, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 110403 (2018).
  14. H. Tajima, N. Shiraishi, and K. Saito, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043374 (2020).
  15. H. Tajima and K. Saito, Universal limitation of quantum information recovery: Symmetry versus coherence, arXiv:2103.01876.
  16. I. Marvian and R. W. Spekkens, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 020404 (2019).
  17. M. Lostaglio and M. P. Müller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 020403 (2019).
  18. I. Marvian, R. W. Spekkens, and P. Zanardi, Phys. Rev. A 93, 052331 (2016).
  19. S. Zhou, Z.-W. Liu, and L. Jiang, Quantum 5, 521 (2021).
  20. Y. Yang, Y. Mo, J. M. Renes, G. Chiribella, and M. P. Woods, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023107 (2022).
  21. Z. W. Liu and S. Zhou, Approximate symmetries and quantum error correction, arXiv:2111.06355.
  22. B. Yadin, F. C. Binder, J. Thompson, V. Narasimhachar, M. Gu, and M. S. Kim, Phys. Rev. X 8, 041038 (2018).
  23. H. Kwon, K. C. Tan, T. Volkoff, and H. Jeong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 040503 (2019).
  24. K. Yamaguchi and H. Tajima, Quantum 7, 1012 (2023).
  25. Y. Kuramochi and H. Tajima, Wigner-Araki-Yanase theorem for continuous and unbounded conserved observables, arXiv:2208.13494.
  26. H. Tajima, R. Takagi, and Y. Kuramochi, Universal trade-off structure between symmetry, irreversibility, and quantum coherence in quantum processes, arXiv:2206.11086.
  27. M. P. Woods, R. Silva, and J. Oppenheim, Ann. Henri Poincaré 20, 125 (2019).
  28. C. W. Helstrom, J. Stat. Phys. 1, 231 (1969).
  29. G. Tóth and D. Petz, Phys. Rev. A 87, 032324 (2013).
  30. S. Yu, Quantum Fisher information as the convex roof of variance, arXiv:1302.5311.
  31. S. Luo, Theor. Math. Phys. 143, 681 (2005).
  32. F. Hansen, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 9909 (2008).
  33. P. Gibilisco, D. Imparato, and T. Isola, J. Math. Phys. 48, 072109 (2007).
  34. E. Chitambar and G. Gour, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 025001 (2019).
  35. N. Shimeno, Lie Groups and Lie Algebras in an Exercise Format [Ensyu Keishiki de Manabu Lie-Gun Lie-Kan] (in Japanese) (SAIENSU-SHA Co., Ltd., 2012).
  36. M. Keyl and R. F. Werner, J. Math. Phys. 40, 3283 (1999).
  37. E. A. Morozova and N. N. Chentsov, J. Sov. Math. 56, 2648 (1991).
  38. D. Petz, Lin. Alg. Appl. 244, 81 (1996).
  39. R. Augusiak, J. Kołodyński, A. Streltsov, M. N. Bera, A. Acin, and M. Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. A 94, 012339 (2016).
  40. D. Petz, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35, 929 (2002).
  41. I. Marvian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 190502 (2022).
  42. F. Albarelli and R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański, Phys. Rev. X 12, 011039 (2022).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation