- Open Access
- Access by Xinjiang University
Recursive greedy initialization of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm with guaranteed improvement
Phys. Rev. A 107, 062404 – Published 2 June, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.107.062404
Abstract
The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a variational quantum algorithm, where a quantum computer implements a variational ansatz consisting of layers of alternating unitary operators and a classical computer is used to optimize the variational parameters. For a random initialization, the optimization typically leads to local minima with poor performance, motivating the search for initialization strategies of QAOA variational parameters. Although numerous heuristic initializations exist, an analytical understanding and performance guarantees for large remain evasive. We introduce a greedy initialization of QAOA which guarantees improving performance with an increasing number of layers. Our main result is an analytic construction of transition states—saddle points with a unique negative curvature direction—for QAOA with layers that use the local minimum of QAOA with layers. Transition states connect to new local minima, which are guaranteed to lower the energy compared to the minimum found for layers. We use the Greedy procedure to navigate the exponentially increasing with number of local minima resulting from the recursive application of our analytic construction. The performance of the Greedy procedure matches available initialization strategies while providing a guarantee for the minimal energy to decrease with an increasing number of layers .
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (32)
- E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, and S. Gutmann, A quantum approximate optimization algorithm, arXiv:1411.4028.
- J. Preskill, Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond, Quantum 2, 79 (2018).
- L. Zhou, S.-T. Wang, S. Choi, H. Pichler, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm: Performance, Mechanism, and Implementation on Near-Term Devices, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021067 (2020).
- S. H. Sack and M. Serbyn, Quantum annealing initialization of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm, Quantum 5, 491 (2021).
- D. J. Egger, J. Mareček, and S. Woerner, Warm-starting quantum optimization, Quantum 5, 479 (2021).
- N. Jain, B. Coyle, E. Kashefi, and N. Kumar, Graph neural network initialisation of quantum approximate optimisation, Quantum 6, 861 (2022).
- J. Wurtz and P. J. Love, Counterdiabaticity and the quantum approximate optimization algorithm, Quantum 6, 635 (2022).
- F. G. S. L. Brandão, M. Broughton, E. Farhi, S. Gutmann, and H. Neven, For fixed control parameters the quantum approximate optimization algorithm's objective function value concentrates for typical instances, arXiv:1812.04170.
- V. Akshay, D. Rabinovich, E. Campos, and J. Biamonte, Parameter concentrations in quantum approximate optimization, Phys. Rev. A 104, L010401 (2021).
- G. E. Crooks, Performance of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm on the maximum cut problem, arXiv:1811.08419.
- D. Wales, Energy Landscapes: Applications to Clusters, Biomolecules and Glasses, Cambridge Molecular Science (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004).
- Note that on physical grounds we do not consider singular Hessians that have one or more vanishing eigenvalues, see Appendix pp2.
- M. Streif, S. Yarkoni, A. Skolik, F. Neukart, and M. Leib, Beating classical heuristics for the binary paint shop problem with the quantum approximate optimization algorithm, Phys. Rev. A 104, 012403 (2021).
- E. Farhi, D. Gamarnik, and S. Gutmann, The quantum approximate optimization algorithm needs to see the whole graph: A typical case, arXiv:2004.09002.
- K. Marwaha and S. Hadfield, Bounds on approximating Max with quantum and classical local algorithms, Quantum 6, 757 (2022).
- Z. Wang, S. Hadfield, Z. Jiang, and E. G. Rieffel, Quantum approximate optimization algorithm for MaxCut: A fermionic view, Phys. Rev. A 97, 022304 (2018).
- R. Bellman, Introduction to Matrix Analysis, 2nd ed. (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, 1997).
- C. G. Broyden, The convergence of a class of double-rank minimization algorithms 1. General considerations, IMA J. Appl. Math. 6, 76 (1970).
- R. Fletcher, A new approach to variable metric algorithms, Comput. J. 13, 317 (1970).
- D. Goldfarb, A family of variable-metric methods derived by variational means, Math. Comp. 24, 23 (1970).
- D. F. Shanno, Conditioning of quasi-newton methods for function minimization, Math. Comp. 24, 647 (1970).
- Note that we restrict only to symmetric TS since we numerically find no performance gain from including the nonsymmetric TS in the initialization procedure.
- A. A. Mele, G. Bigan Mbeng, G. E. Santoro, M. Collura, and P. Torta, Avoiding barren plateaus via transferability of smooth solutions in Hamiltonian variational ansatz, Phys. Rev. A 106, L060401 (2022).
- L. T. Brady, C. L. Baldwin, A. Bapat, Y. Kharkov, and A. V. Gorshkov, Optimal Protocols in Quantum Annealing and Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm Problems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 070505 (2021).
- D. Liang, L. Li, and S. Leichenauer, Investigating quantum approximate optimization algorithms under bang-bang protocols, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033402 (2020).
- J. Wurtz and P. Love, MaxCut quantum approximate optimization algorithm performance guarantees for , Phys. Rev. A 103, 042612 (2021).
- A. Kandala, A. Mezzacapo, K. Temme, M. Takita, M. Brink, J. M. Chow, and J. M. Gambetta, Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets, Nature (London) 549, 242 (2017).
- A. Peruzzo, J. McClean, P. Shadbolt, M.-H. Yung, X.-Q. Zhou, P. J. Love, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and J. L. O'Brien, A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor, Nat. Commun. 5, 4213 (2014).
- M. Benedetti, E. Lloyd, S. Sack, and M. Fiorentini, Parameterized quantum circuits as machine learning models, Quantum Sci. Technol. 4, 043001 (2019).
- C.-N. Chou, P. J. Love, J. Singh Sandhu, and J. Shi, Limitations of local quantum algorithms on random Max-k-XOR and beyond, arXiv:2108.06049.
- J. Weidenfeller, L. C. Valor, J. Gacon, C. Tornow, L. Bello, S. Woerner, and D. J. Egger, Scaling of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm on superconducting qubit based hardware, Quantum 6, 870 (2022).
- M. Larocca, N. Ju, D. García-Martín, P. J. Coles, and M. Cerezo, Theory of overparametrization in quantum neural networks, arXiv:2109.11676.