Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Tailoring population transfer between two hyperfine ground states of Rb87

Aleksandra Sierant1,2,*, Marek Kopciuch1,3, and Szymon Pustelny1

  • 1Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Łojasiewicza 11, 30-348 Kraków, Poland
  • 2Institut de Ciencies Fotoniques, The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Castelldefels (Barcelona) 08860, Spain
  • 3Jagiellonian University, Doctoral School of Exact and Natural Sciences, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy and Applied Computer Sciences, Łojasiewicza 11, 30-348 Kraków, Poland

  • *aleksandra.sierant@icfo.eu

Phys. Rev. A 107, 052810 – Published 24 May, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.107.052810

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the coherent control over a complex multilevel atomic system using the stimulated Raman adiabatic passage. Based on the example of Rb87 atoms, excited with circularly polarized light at the D1 line, we demonstrate the ability to decompose the system into three- and four-level subsystems independently interacting with light beams. Focusing on the four-level system, we demonstrate that the presence of an additional excited state significantly affects the dynamics of the system evolution. Specifically, it is shown that, through the appropriate tuning of the light beams, some of the transfer channels can be blocked, which leads to better control over the system. We also demonstrate that this effect is most significant in media free from inhomogeneous broadening (e.g., Doppler effect) and deteriorates if such broadening is present. For instance, the motion of atoms affects both the efficiency and selectivity of the transfer.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (50)

  1. A. Acín, I. Bloch, H. Buhrman, T. Calarco, C. Eichler, J. Eisert, D. Esteve, N. Gisin, S. J. Glaser, F. Jelezko et al., New J. Phys. 20, 080201 (2018).
  2. M. D. Lukin, M. Fleischhauer, R. Cote, L. M. Duan, D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 037901 (2001).
  3. A. Smith, B. E. Anderson, H. Sosa-Martinez, C. A. Riofrío, I. H. Deutsch, and P. S. Jessen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 170502 (2013).
  4. D. P. DiVincenzo, Fortschr. Phys. 48, 771 (2000).
  5. I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and S. Nascimbene, Nat. Phys. 8, 267 (2012).
  6. J. L. O'Brien, Science 318, 1567 (2007).
  7. N. Gisin, G. Ribordy, W. Tittel, and H. Zbinden, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 145 (2002).
  8. A. I. Lvovsky, B. C. Sanders, and W. Tittel, Nat. Photonics 3, 706 (2009).
  9. K. Heshami, D. G. England, P. C. Humphreys, P. J. Bustard, V. M. Acosta, J. Nunn, and B. J. Sussman, J. Mod. Opt. 63, 2005 (2016).
  10. D. F. Phillips, A. Fleischhauer, A. Mair, R. L. Walsworth, and M. D. Lukin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 783 (2001).
  11. M. Lukin, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 457 (2003).
  12. K. Hammerer, A. S. Sørensen, and E. S. Polzik, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1041 (2010).
  13. M. Hosseini, B. M. Sparkes, G. Campbell, P. K. Lam, and B. C. Buchler, Nat. Commun. 2, 174 (2011).
  14. U. Gaubatz, P. Rudecki, S. Schiemann, and K. Bergmann, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 5363 (1990).
  15. K. Bergmann, H. Theuer, and B. Shore, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 1003 (1998).
  16. N. V. Vitanov, T. Halfmann, B. W. Shore, and K. Bergmann, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 52, 763 (2001).
  17. N. Vitanov, M. Fleischhauer, B. Shore, and K. Bergmann, Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 46, 55 (2001).
  18. K. Bergmann et al., J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 52, 202001 (2019).
  19. N. V. Vitanov, A. A. Rangelov, B. W. Shore, and K. Bergmann, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 015006 (2017).
  20. B. W. Shore, Adv. Opt. Photon. 9, 563 (2017).
  21. K. Bergmann, N. V. Vitanov, and B. W. Shore, J. Chem. Phys. 142, 170901 (2015).
  22. Y.-X. Du, Z.-T. Liang, Y.-C. Li, X.-X. Yue, Q.-X. Lv, W. Huang, X. Chen, H. Yan, and S.-L. Zhu, Nat. Commun. 7, 12479 (2016).
  23. M. A. Gearba, H. A. Camp, M. L. Trachy, G. Veshapidze, M. H. Shah, H. U. Jang, and B. D. DePaola, Phys. Rev. A 76, 013406 (2007).
  24. K. Winkler, F. Lang, G. Thalhammer, P. Straten, R. Grimm, and J. H. Denschlag, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 043201 (2007).
  25. J. G. Danzl, E. Haller, M. Gustavsson, M. J. Mark, R. Hart, N. Bouloufa, O. Dulieu, H. Ritsch, and H.-C. Nägerl, Science 321, 1062 (2008).
  26. J. W. Park, S. A. Will, and M. W. Zwierlein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 205302 (2015).
  27. J. L. Sørensen, D. Møller, T. Iversen, J. B. Thomsen, F. Jensen, P. Staanum, D. Voigt, and M. Drewsen, New J. Phys. 8, 261 (2006).
  28. G. Higgins, F. Pokorny, C. Zhang, Q. Bodart, and M. Hennrich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 220501 (2017).
  29. G. W. Coulston and K. Bergmann, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 3467 (1992).
  30. N. V. Vitanov and S. Stenholm, Phys. Rev. A 60, 3820 (1999).
  31. J. J. Fernández-Soler, J. L. Font, and R. Vilaseca, Phys. Rev. A 97, 063848 (2018).
  32. X. Yang, Y. Huang, Z. Zhang, and X. Yan, Opt. Commun. 285, 2101 (2012).
  33. M. Oberst, F. Vewinger, and A. Lvovsky, Opt. Lett. 32, 1755 (2007).
  34. A. Kuhn, S. Steuerwald, and K. Bergmann, Eur. Phys. J. D 1, 57 (1998).
  35. L. Wang, X.-L. Song, A.-J. Li, H.-H. Wang, X.-G. Wei, Z.-H. Kang, Y. Jiang, and J.-Y. Gao, Opt. Lett. 33, 2380 (2008).
  36. T. Tiecke, Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam, 2010.
  37. J. Gong and S. A. Rice, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 1364 (2004).
  38. B. W. Shore, J. Martin, M. P. Fewell, and K. Bergmann, Phys. Rev. A 52, 566 (1995).
  39. J. Martin, B. W. Shore, and K. Bergmann, Phys. Rev. A 52, 583 (1995).
  40. J. Martin, B. W. Shore, and K. Bergmann, Phys. Rev. A 54, 1556 (1996).
  41. J. R. Kuklinski, U. Gaubatz, F. T. Hioe, and K. Bergmann, Phys. Rev. A 40, 6741 (1989).
  42. C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg, Atom-Photon Interactions Basic Processes and Applications (John Wiley & Sons, 1998).
  43. M. Auzinsh, D. Budker, and S. Rochester, Optically Polarized Atoms: Understanding Light-Atom Interactions (Oxford University, New York, 2010).
  44. A. Sierant, M. Kopciuch, and S. Pustelny (unpublished).
  45. S. Pustelny, M. Koczwara, L. Cincio, and W. Gawlik, Phys. Rev. A 83, 043832 (2011).
  46. N. Davidson, H. J. Lee, C. S. Adams, M. Kasevich, and S. Chu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1311 (1995).
  47. I. H. Deutsch and P. S. Jessen, Opt. Commun. 283, 681 (2010).
  48. M. Kopciuch and S. Pustelny, Phys. Rev. A 106, 022406 (2022).
  49. I. I. Sobelman, Atomic Spectra and Radiative Transitions, Springer Series on Atomic, Optical, and Plasma Physics, Vol. 12 (Springer, New York, 2012).
  50. A. Messiah, Quantum Mechanics (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1962), Vol. 2.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation