- Access by Xinjiang University
Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd algorithm without ancilla postselection
Phys. Rev. A 107, 042408 – Published 6 April, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.107.042408
Abstract
Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd algorithm (HHL) allows for the exponentially faster solution of a system of linear equations. However, this algorithm requires the postselection of an ancilla qubit to obtain the solution. This postselection makes the algorithm result probabilistic. Here we show conditions when the HHL algorithm can work without postselection of the ancilla qubit. We derive expectation values for an observable on the HHL outcome state when ancilla qubit is measured in and and show a condition for postselection-free HHL running. We provide an explicit example of a practically interesting input matrix and an observable, which satisfies the postselection-free HHL condition. Our work can improve the performance of the HHL-based algorithms.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (26)
- A. W. Harrow, A. Hassidim, and S. Lloyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 150502 (2009).
- S. Aaronson, Nat. Phys. 11, 291 (2015).
- Y. Cao, A. Papageorgiou, I. Petras, J. Traub, and S. Kais, New J. Phys. 15, 013021 (2013).
- D. W. Berry, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47, 105301 (2014).
- B. D. Clader, B. C. Jacobs, and C. R. Sprouse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 250504 (2013).
- P. Rebentrost, M. Mohseni, and S. Lloyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 130503 (2014).
- I. Kerenidis and A. Prakash, arXiv:1603.08675.
- N. Wiebe, A. Kapoor, and K. M. Svore, arXiv:1602.04799.
- Y.-A. Chen and X.-S. Gao, J. Syst. Sci. Complex 35, 373 (2022).
- Y.-A. Chen, X.-S. Gao, and C.-M. Yuan, arXiv:1802.03856.
- W. Liu and J. Gao, Quant. Info. Proc. 20, 343 (2021).
- A. Martin, R. Ibarrondo, and M. Sanz, arXiv:2207.13528.
- S. Barz, I. Kassal, M. Ringbauer, Y. O. Lipp, B. Dakić, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and P. Walther, Sci. Rep. 4, 6115 (2014).
- J. Pan, Y. Cao, X. Yao, Z. Li, C. Ju, H. Chen, X. Peng, S. Kais, and J. Du, Phys. Rev. A 89, 022313 (2014).
- X.-D. Cai, C. Weedbrook, Z.-E. Su, M.-C. Chen, M. Gu, M.-J. Zhu, L. Li, N.-L. Liu, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 230501 (2013).
- G. Brassard, P. Hoyer, M. Mosca, and A. Tapp, Quantum amplitude amplification and estimation, in Quantum Computation and Information (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002).
- J. Preskill, Quantum 2, 79 (2018).
- A. Ambainis, arXiv:1010.4458.
- A. M. Childs, R. Kothari, and R. D. Somma, SIAM J. Comput. 46, 1920 (2017).
- L. Wossnig, Z. Zhao, and A. Prakash, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 050502 (2018).
- P. C. S. Costa, D. An, Y. R. Sanders, Y. Su, R. Babbush, and D. W. Berry, PRX Quantum 3, 040303 (2022).
- Y. Cao, A. Daskin, S. Frankel, and S. Kais, Mol. Phys. 110, 1675 (2012).
- A. M. Childs, J.-P. Liu, and A. Ostrander, Quantum 5, 574 (2021).
- B. Duan, J. Yuan, C.-H. Yu, J. Huang, and C.-Y. Hsieh, Phys. Lett. A 384, 126595 (2020).
- S. Lloyd, Science 273, 1073 (1996).
- D. W. Berry, A. M. Childs, and R. Kothari, 2015 IEEE 56th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2015).