Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Tomographic completeness and robustness of quantum reservoir networks

Tanjung Krisnanda1,2,*, Huawen Xu1, Sanjib Ghosh3,†, and Timothy C. H. Liew1,4

  • 1School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 637371 Singapore, Singapore
  • 2Centre for Quantum Technologies, National University of Singapore, 3 Science Drive 2, 117543 Singapore, Singapore
  • 3Beijing Academy of Quantum Information Sciences, West Building 3, No. 10 Xibeiwang East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, China
  • 4MajuLab, International Joint Research Unit UMI 3654, CNRS, Université Côte d'Azur, Sorbonne Université, National University of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

  • *tanjung@nus.edu.sg
  • sanjibghosh@baqis.ac.cn

Phys. Rev. A 107, 042402 – Published 4 April, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.107.042402

Abstract

Quantum reservoir processing offers an option to perform quantum tomography of input objects by postprocessing quantities, obtained from local measurements, from a quantum reservoir network that has interacted with the former. We develop a method to assess a tomographic completeness criterion for arbitrary quantum reservoir architectures. Furthermore, we propose a figure of merit that quantifies their robustness against imperfections. Measured quantities from the reservoir nodes correspond to effective observables acting on the input objects, and we provide a way to retrieve them. Finally, we present examples of quantum tomography for demonstration. Our general method offers guidance in optimizing implementations of quantum reservoir processing.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (41)

  1. J. Biamonte, P. Wittek, N. Pancotti, P. Rebentrost, N. Wiebe, and S. Lloyd, Nature (London) 549, 195 (2017).
  2. N. Kouda, N. Matsui, H. Nishimura, and F. Peper, Neural Comput. Appl. 14, 114 (2005).
  3. K. H. Wan, O. Dahlsten, H. Kristjánsson, R. Gardner, and M. Kim, npj Quantum Inf. 3, 36 (2017).
  4. K. Fujii and K. Nakajima, Phys. Rev. Appl. 8, 024030 (2017).
  5. S. Ghosh, A. Opala, M. Matuszewski, T. Paterek, and T. C. H. Liew, npj Quantum Inf. 5, 35 (2019).
  6. K. Beer, D. Bondarenko, T. Farrelly, T. J. Osborne, R. Salzmann, D. Scheiermann, and R. Wolf, Nat. Commun. 11, 808 (2020).
  7. G. Montavon, G. Orr, and K.-R. Müller, Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade (Springer, 2012), Vol. 7700.
  8. G. Tanaka, T. Yamane, J. B. Héroux, R. Nakane, N. Kanazawa, S. Takeda, H. Numata, D. Nakano, and A. Hirose, Neural Netw. 115, 100 (2019).
  9. A. Kutvonen, K. Fujii, and T. Sagawa, Sci. Rep. 10, 14687 (2020).
  10. P. Mujal, Condens. Matter 7, 17 (2022).
  11. S. Ghosh, A. Opala, M. Matuszewski, T. Paterek, and T. C. H. Liew, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learning Syst. 32, 3148 (2020).
  12. T. Krisnanda, T. Paterek, M. Paternostro, and T. C. Liew, arXiv:2209.14565 (2022).
  13. T. Krisnanda, K. Dini, H. Xu, W. Verstraelen, and T. C. H. Liew, Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 034010 (2023).
  14. Q. H. Tran and K. Nakajima, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 260401 (2021).
  15. S. Ghosh, T. Paterek, and T. C. H. Liew, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 260404 (2019).
  16. T. Krisnanda, S. Ghosh, T. Paterek, and T. C. H. Liew, Neural Netw. 136, 141 (2021).
  17. S. Ghosh, T. Krisnanda, T. Paterek, and T. C. H. Liew, Commun. Phys. 4, 105 (2021).
  18. T. Krisnanda, S. Ghosh, T. Paterek, W. Laskowski, and T. C. H. Liew, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 034011 (2022).
  19. S. Ghosh, K. Nakajima, T. Krisnanda, K. Fujii, and T. C. H. Liew, Adv. Quantum Technol. 4, 2100053 (2021).
  20. P. Mujal, J. Nokkala, R. Martínez-Peña, G. L. Giorgi, M. C. Soriano, and R. Zambrini, J. Phys.: Complexity 2, 045008 (2021).
  21. H. Xu, T. Krisnanda, R. Bao, and T. C. H. Liew, New J. Phys. 25, 023028 (2023).
  22. L. C. G. Govia, G. J. Ribeill, G. E. Rowlands, H. K. Krovi, and T. A. Ohki, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 013077 (2021).
  23. W. D. Kalfus, G. J. Ribeill, G. E. Rowlands, H. K. Krovi, T. A. Ohki, and L. C. G. Govia, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 033007 (2022).
  24. H. Xu, T. Krisnanda, W. Verstraelen, T. C. H. Liew, and S. Ghosh, Phys. Rev. B 103, 195302 (2021).
  25. R. Martínez-Peña, G. L. Giorgi, J. Nokkala, M. C. Soriano, and R. Zambrini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 100502 (2021).
  26. W. Xia, J. Zou, X. Qiu, and X. Li, Front. Phys. 17, 33506 (2022).
  27. M. Negoro, K. Mitarai, K. Fujii, K. Nakajima, and M. Kitagawa, arXiv:1806.10910 (2018).
  28. R. A. Bravo, K. Najafi, X. Gao, and S. F. Yelin, arXiv:2111.10956 (2021).
  29. J. Chen and H. I. Nurdin, Quant. Inf. Proc. 18, 198 (2019).
  30. J. Chen, H. I. Nurdin, and N. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 024065 (2020).
  31. J. Nokkala, R. Martínez-Peña, G. L. Giorgi, V. Parigi, M. C. Soriano, and R. Zambrini, Commun. Phys. 4, 53 (2021).
  32. Z. Denis, I. Favero, and C. Ciuti, Phys. Rev. Appl. 17, 034077 (2022).
  33. R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson, Matrix Analysis (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
  34. A. Ben-Israel, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 3, 585 (1966).
  35. H. Labuhn, D. Barredo, S. Ravets, S. De Léséleuc, T. Macrì, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Nature (London) 534, 667 (2016).
  36. P. Scholl et al., Nature (London) 595, 233 (2021).
  37. I. Carusotto, D. Gerace, H. E. Tureci, S. De Liberato, C. Ciuti, and A. İmamoǧlu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 033601 (2009).
  38. T. Esslinger, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 1, 129 (2010).
  39. F. Arute et al., Nature (London) 574, 505 (2019).
  40. J. Herrmann et al., Nat. Commun. 13, 4144 (2022).
  41. Y. Y. Gao, B. J. Lester, Y. Zhang, C. Wang, S. Rosenblum, L. Frunzio, L. Jiang, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021073 (2018).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation