- Access by Xinjiang University
Constraint-optimal driven allocation for scalable quantum error correction decoder scheduling
Phys. Rev. A 113, 042459 – Published 29 April, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/1zc1-wpjp
Abstract
Fault-tolerant quantum computing (FTQC) requires fast and accurate decoding of quantum error correction syndromes. However, in large-scale systems, the number of available decoders is much smaller than the number of logical qubits, leading to a fundamental resource shortage. To address this limitation, virtualized quantum decoder (VQD) architectures have been proposed to share a limited pool of decoders across multiple qubits. While the minimize longest undecoded sequence heuristic has been introduced as an effective scheduling policy within the VQD framework, its locally greedy decision-making structure limits its ability to consider global circuit structure, causing inefficiencies in resource balancing and limited scalability. In this work, we propose constraint-optimal driven allocation (CODA), an optimization-based scheduling algorithm that leverages global circuit structure to minimize the longest undecoded sequence length. Across 19 benchmark circuits, CODA achieves an average 74% reduction in the longest undecoded sequence length. Crucially, while the theoretical search space scales exponentially with circuit size, CODA effectively bypasses this combinatorial explosion. Our evaluation confirms that the scheduling time scales linearly with the number of qubits, determined by physical resource constraints rather than the combinatorial search space, ensuring robust scalability for large-scale FTQC systems. These results demonstrate that CODA provides a global optimization-based, scalable scheduling solution that enables efficient decoder virtualization in large-scale FTQC systems.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (65)
- P. W. Shor, Algorithms for quantum computation: Discrete logarithms and factoring, in Proceedings of the 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (ACM, New York, NY, 1994).
- A. Ekert and R. Jozsa, Quantum computation and Shor's factoring algorithm, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 733 (1996).
- L. K. Grover, A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search, in Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (ACM, New York, NY, 1996).
- M. Boyer, G. Brassard, P. Hoeyer, and A. Tapp, Tight bounds on quantum searching, Fortschr. Phys. 46, 493 (1998).
- S. Lloyd, Universal quantum simulators, Science 273, 1073 (1996).
- I. M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Quantum simulation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 153 (2014).
- F. Arute, K. Arya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, J. C. Bardin, R. Barends, R. Biswas, S. Boixo, F. G. S. L. Brandao, D. A. Buell, B. Burkett, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, R. Collins, W. Courtney, A. Dunsworth, E. Farhi, B. Foxen, A. Fowler, et al., Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor, Nature (London) 574, 505 (2019).
- C. D. Bruzewicz, J. Chiaverini, R. McConnell, and J. M. Sage, Trapped-ion quantum computing: Progress and challenges, Appl. Phys. Rev. 6, 021314 (2019).
- H.-S. Zhong, H. Wang, Y.-H. Deng, M.-C. Chen, L.-C. Peng, Y.-H. Luo, J. Qin, D. Wu, X. Ding, Y. Hu, P. Hu, X.-Y. Yang, W.-J. Zhang, H. Li, Y. Li, X. Jiang, L. Gan, G. Yang, L. You, Z. Wang, et al., Quantum computational advantage using photons, Science 370, 1460 (2020).
- M. Kjaergaard et al., Superconducting qubits: Current state of play, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 11, 369 (2020).
- J. K. C. Monroe, Scaling the ion trap quantum processor, Science 339, 1164 (2013).
- J. Preskill, Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond, Quantum 2, 79 (2018).
- A. G. Fowler et al., Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A 86, 032324 (2012).
- E. T. Campbell et al., Roads towards fault-tolerant universal quantum computation, Nature (London) 549, 172 (2017).
- D. Litinski, A game of surface codes, Quantum 3, 128 (2019).
- J. M. Gambetta et al., Building logical qubits in a superconducting quantum computing system, npj Quantum Inf. 3, 2 (2017).
- S. Krinner et al., Realizing repeated quantum error correction in a distance-three surface code, Nature (London) 605, 669 (2022).
- M. Sarovar, Detecting crosstalk errors in quantum information processors, Quantum Sci. Technol. 4, 321 (2020).
- D. Gottesman, Stabilizer codes and quantum error correction, Ph.D. thesis, Caltech, 1997.
- E. Dennis, Topological quantum memory, J. Math. Phys. 43, 4452 (2002).
- C. Chamberland, Building a fault-tolerant quantum computer using concatenated cat codes, PRX Quantum 3, 010329 (2022).
- Google Quantum AI and Collaborators, Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold, Nature (London) 638, 920 (2025).
- P. Das et al., A scalable decoder micro-architecture for fault-tolerant quantum computing, arXiv:2001.06598.
- X. Xue et al., Cmos-based cryogenic control of silicon quantum circuits, Nature (London) 593, 205 (2021).
- D. Camps, E. Rrapaj, K. Klymko, B. Austin, and N. J. Wright, Evaluation of the classical hardware requirements for large-scale quantum computations, in ISC High Performance 2024 Research Paper Proceedings (39th International Conference) (IEEE, Hamburg, Germany, 2024), pp. 1–12.
- S. Maurya and S. Tannu, Managing classical processing requirements for quantum error correction, arXiv:2406.17995.
- C. L. Liu and J. W. Layland, Scheduling algorithms for multiprogramming in a hard-real-time environment, J. ACM 20, 46 (1973).
- S. Bravyi and A. Kitaev, Universal quantum computation with ideal Clifford gates and noisy ancillas, Phys. Rev. A 71, 022316 (2005).
- C. Chamberland, P. Iyer, and D. Poulin, Fault-tolerant quantum computing in the Pauli or Clifford frame with slow error diagnostics, Quantum 2, 43 (2018).
- L. Skoric, D. E. Browne, K. M. Barnes, N. I. Gillespie, and E. T. Campbell, Parallel window decoding enables scalable fault tolerant quantum computation, Nat. Commun. 14, 7040 (2023).
- P. W. Shor, Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory, Phys. Rev. A 52, R2493 (1995).
- G. Q. AI, Exponential suppression of bit or phase errors with cyclic error correction, Nature (London) 595, 383 (2021).
- D. S. Wang, A. G. Fowler, A. M. Stephens, and L. C. L. Hollenberg, Threshold error rates for the toric and surface codes, Quantum Inf. Comput. 10, 456 (2010).
- M. B. Hastings, Decoding in hypergraph product codes, Quantum 5, 497 (2021).
- N. Delfosse and N. H. Nickerson, Almost-linear time decoding algorithm for topological codes, Quantum 5, 595 (2021).
- F. Battistel et al., Real-time decoding for fault-tolerant quantum computing: Progress, challenges and outlook, Nano Futures 7, 032003 (2023).
- N. P. Jouppi, C. Young, N. Patil, and D. Patterson, et al., In-datacenter performance analysis of a tensor processing unit, in Proceedings of the 44th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA) (ACM, New York, NY, 2017).
- K. Asanović, R. Bodík, B. C. Catanzaro, and J. J. G., et al., The landscape of parallel computing research: A view from berkeley, Tech. Rep. No. UCB/EECS-2006-183, University of California, Berkeley, 2006.
- P. Barham, B. Dragovic, K. Fraser, S. Hand, T. Harris, A. Ho, R. Neugebauer, I. Pratt, and A. Warfield, Xen and the art of virtualization, in Proceedings of the 19th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (SOSP) (ACM, New York, NY, 2003).
- R. Mijumbi, J. Serrat, J. L. Gorricho, N. Bouten, F. De Turck, and R. Boutaba, Network function virtualization: State-of-the-art and research challenges, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 18, 236 (2016).
- D. E. Knuth, The Art of Computer Programming, Vol. 3: Sorting and Searching (Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA, 1998).
- K. Marriott and P. J. Stuckey, Guide to Constraint Programming (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1998).
- Anonymous, 2025. Decoder Resource Estimator (DRE). Available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/decoder-resources-5EC4/.
- G. Watkins, H. M. Nguyen, K. Watkins, S. Pearce, H.-K. Lau, and A. Paler, A high performance compiler for very large scale surface code computations, Quantum Phys. 8, 1354 (2024).
- Google OR-Tools, CP-SAT solver, https://developers.google.com/optimization/cp/cp_solver.
- R. Wille, N. Quetschlich, L. Burgholzer, Mqt bench: Benchmarking software and design automation tools for quantum computing, Quantum 7, 1062 (2023).
- M. R. Garey and D. S. Johnson, Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness (W. H. Freeman, New York, NY, 1979).
- H. Robbins, A remark on Stirling's formula, Am. Math. Mon. 62, 26 (1955).
- J. Bausch et al., Learning high-accuracy error decoding for quantum processors, Nature (London) 635, 834 (2024).
- E. Charbon, Cryo-CMOS electronics for quantum computing applications, in Proceedings of the 49th European Solid-State Device Research Conference (ESSDERC) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2019), pp. 1–6.
- K. Liyanage, Y. Wu, A. Deters, and L. Zhong, Scalable Quantum Error Correction for Surface Codes using FPGA (IEEE Computer Society, 2023).
- S. Bravyi, A. W. Cross, J. M. Gambetta, D. Maslov, P. Rall, and T. J. Yoder, High-threshold and low-overhead fault-tolerant quantum memory, Nature (London) 627, 778 (2024).
- S. Maurya, T. Maurer, M. Bühler, D. Vandeth, and M. E. Beverland, FPGA-tailored algorithms for realtime decoding of quantum LDPC codes, arXiv:2511.21660 (2026).
- L. M. K. Vandersypen, H. Bluhm, J. S. Clarke, A. S. Dzurak, R. Ishihara, A. Morello, D. J. Reilly, L. R. Schreiber, and M. Veldhorst, Interfacing spin qubits in quantum dots and donors—Hot, dense, and coherent, npj Quantum Inf. 3, 34 (2017).
- L. Le Guevel, Cryogenic electronics for quantum engineering, Condensed Matter [cond-mat]. Université Grenoble Alpes, 2023.
- B. Patra, H. Homulle, E. Charbon, and D. J. Reilly, Cryogenic packaging and interconnect challenges for large-scale quantum processors, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2023), pp. 19.5.1–19.5.4.
- J. M. Hornibrook, J. I. Colless, I. D. Conway Lamb, S. J. Pauka, H. Lu, A. C. Gossard, J. D. Watson, G. C. Gardner, S. Fallahi, M. J. Manfra, and D. J. Reilly, Cryogenic control architecture for large-scale quantum computing, Phys. Rev. Appl. 3, 024010 (2015).
- S. Krinner, S. Storz, P. Kurpiers, P. Magnard, J. Heinsoo, R. Keller, J. Lütolf, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff, Engineering cryogenic setups for 100-qubit scale superconducting circuit systems, EPJ Quantum Technol. 6, 2 (2019).
- J. Wenner, Yi Yin, Erik Lucero, R. Barends, Yu Chen, B. Chiaro, J. Kelly, M. Lenander, Matteo Mariantoni, A. Megrant, C. Neill, P. J. J. O'Malley, D. Sank, A. Vainsencher, H. Wang, T. C. White, A. N. Cleland, and John M. Martinis, Excitation of superconducting qubits from hot nonequilibrium quasiparticles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 150502 (2013).
- C. Gidney and M. Ekerå, How to factor 2048 bit RSA integers in 8 hours using 20 million noisy qubits, Quantum 5, 433 (2021).
- J. C. Brennan, F. Barbosa, C. E. Mair, A. McDonald, R. M. Morris, R. Nash, J. O'Gorman, S. Patterson, J. Thompson, J. Vines, and J. M. Williams, Classical interfaces for controlling cryogenic quantum computing technologies, APL Quantum 2 (2025).
- I. Byun, J. Kim, D. Min, I. Nagaoka, K. Fukumitsu, I. Ishikawa, T. Tanimoto, M. Tanaka, K. Inoue, and J. Kim, XQsim: Modeling cross-technology control processors for 10+k qubit quantum computers, in Proceedings of the 49th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA) (ACM, New York, NY, 2022), pp. 994–1008.
- P. Das, C. A. Pattison, S. Manne, D. M. Carmean, K. M. Svore, M. P. da Silva, N. Delfosse, and T. A. Brun, AFS: Accurate, fast, and scalable error-decoding for fault-tolerant quantum computers, in Proceedings of the 28th IEEE International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2022), pp. 259–273.
- K. Zhang, J. Xu, F. Zhang, L. Kong, Z. Ji, and J. Chen, LATTE: A decoding architecture for quantum computing with temporal and spatial scalability, Quantum Phys. arXiv:2509.03954.
- K. Rosen, Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications (McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2019).