- Access by Xinjiang University
Quantum-Mechanical, Microscopic Brownian Motion
Phys. Rev. 145, 93 – Published 6 May, 1966
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.145.93
Abstract
Recently, the Fokker-Planck (F-P) equation, satisfied by the phase-space distribution function of a Brownian (B) particle, has been derived from the Liouville equation, satisfied by the phase-space distribution function of the composite system, B particle plus fluid. We have started from a strictly quantum-mechanical formulation of the problem, using a density-matrix description of the composite system, and have shown that in an appropriate classical limit the F-P equation results. To lowest order in , our technique gives the same expression for the friction coefficient obtained earlier from the Liouville equation. In principle it yields corrections to the F-P equation to all orders in . We have shown that for a uniform fluid, the quantum corrections to the F-P equation to first order in appear only as a shift in the friction coefficient. If the classical friction coefficient is replaced by , with an appropriate , then the F-P equation is given correctly to order . There is a difference in the mass dependence of and which suggests the existence of an isotope effect in the mobility of a particle moving through a quantum fluid. The technique employed in the derivation is to consider the expectation value of the density matrix of the system in a state in which the position and momentum of the particles are known with maximum accuracy (Kennard packet). This expectation value is an appropriate, positive, semiclassical phase-space distribution function. An appropriate equation is derived for , which to lowest order in is the Liouville equation. The remainder of the derivation is similar to the derivation in the classical case (a suitable projection technique is used).
References (19)
- S. Chandrasekhar, Rev. Mod. Phys. 15, 1 (1943)
- J. L. Lebowitz and E. Rubin, Phys. Rev. 131, 2381 (1963)
- P. Résibois and H. T. Davis, Physica 30, 1077 (1964)
- J. L. Lebowitz and P. Résibois, Phys. Rev. 139, A1101 (1965)
- J. McKenna and H. L. Frisch, Phys. Letters 19, 112 (1965) H. T. Davis, K. Hiroike, and S. A. Rice, J. Chem. Phys. 43, 2633 (1965)
- J. McKenna and H. L. Frisch, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 33, 156 (1965)
- K. Husimi, Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Japan 22, 264 (1940)
- J. R. Klauder, J. Math. Phys. 4, 1058 (1963) ibid.5, 177 (1964)
- J. McKenna and J. R. Klauder, J. Math. Phys. 5, 878 (1964)
- C. L. Mehta and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Phys. Rev. 138, B274 (1965)
- L. I. Schiff, Quantum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, 1955), p. 56
- E. P. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 40, 749 (1932)
- R. Zwanzig, Lectures in Theoretical Physics (Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York, 1961), Vol. 3, p. 106
- R. Zwanzig, J. Chem. Phys. 40, 2527 (1964)
- Sec. II in G. H. Weiss and A. A. Maradudin, J. Math. Phys. 3, 771 (1962)
Omitted endnote
- G. H. WeissA. A. MaradudinHandbook of Mathematical Functions, edited by M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun (U. S. Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D. C., 1964), Appl. Math. Ser. 55, p. 783
- I. I. Hirschman and D. V. Widder, The Convolution Transform (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1955), Chap. VIII
- L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifschitz, Statistical Physics (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Pennsylvania, 1958), p. 99