Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Time-Resolving Quantum Measurement Enables Energy-Efficient, Large-Alphabet Communication

I.A. Burenkov1,2,*, M.V. Jabir2, A. Battou2, and S.V. Polyakov2,3,†

  • 1Department of Physics, Joint Quantum Institute, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA
  • 2National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA
  • 3Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA

  • *ivan.burenkov@gmail.com
  • spoly@nist.gov

PRX Quantum 1, 010308 – Published 21 September, 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.1.010308

Abstract

Information exchange requires a measurement of physical states. Because quantum measurements enable accuracy beyond the classical shot-noise limit, they are successfully used to develop measurement tools and applications. In particular, quantum-measurement-enhanced strategies are used for the discrimination of nonorthogonal coherent states. The efficient discrimination of these states is crucial for optical communication networks, that are now approaching the classical limits of the underlying physical systems. However, quantum-enhanced discrimination strategies demonstrated to date are based on legacy communication protocols designed for classical measurements and thus provide only a limited advantage. In our work, we use photon detection times readily available in quantum measurement, but not accessible by classical means. We measure and use these times to maximize our knowledge about faint nonorthogonal coherent states. We employ communication strategies designed to benefit most from this knowledge. This holistic approach in our experiment has resulted in the record low error rates in discrimination of multiple faint nonorthogonal coherent states carrying energy corresponding to just one photon per bit of transmitted information. We demonstrate successful discrimination of large alphabets of optical states (4M16) beyond the ideal classical shot-noise limit, showing the scalability of quantum-measurement-enabled communication. This experimental work explores unforeseen advantages of quantum measurement on one hand, and may help address the capacity crunch in modern optical networks caused by the exponential growth of data exchange on the other.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Popular Summary

Article Text

References (25)

  1. R. Landauer, Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process, IBM J. Res. Dev. 5, 183 (1961).
  2. Antoine Bérut, Artak Arakelyan, Artyom Petrosyan, Sergio Ciliberto, Raoul Dillenschneider, and Eric Lutz, Experimental verification of landauer’s principle linking information and thermodynamics, Nature 483, 187 (2012).
  3. Wojciech Hubert Zurek, Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 715 (2003).
  4. R. S. Kennedy, Quantum limits in interferometric measurements, Research Laboratory of Electronics, MIT, Technical Report (1972).
  5. S. J. Dolinar, Quantum limits in interferometric measurements, Research Laboratory of Electronics, MIT, Technical Report (1973).
  6. Roy S. Bondurant, Near-quantum optimum receivers for the phase-quadrature coherent-state channel, Opt. Lett. 18, 1896 (1993).
  7. Kenji Tsujino, Daiji Fukuda, Go Fujii, Shuichiro Inoue, Mikio Fujiwara, Masahiro Takeoka, and Masahide Sasaki, Sub-shot-noise-limit discrimination of on-off keyed coherent signals via a quantum receiver with a superconducting transition edge sensor, Opt. Express 18, 8107 (2010).
  8. Saikat Guha, Jonathan L. Habif, and M. Takeoka, Approaching helstrom limits to optical pulse-position demodulation using single photon detection and optical feedback, J. Mod. Opt. 58, 257 (2011).
  9. Kenji Tsujino, Daiji Fukuda, Go Fujii, Shuichiro Inoue, Mikio Fujiwara, Masahiro Takeoka, and Masahide Sasaki, Quantum Receiver Beyond the Standard Quantum Limit of Coherent Optical Communication, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 250503 (2011).
  10. K. Kato, M. Osaki, M. Sasaki, and O. Hirota, Quantum detection and mutual information for qam and psk signals, IEEE T. Commun. 47, 248 (1999).
  11. F. E. Becerra, J. Fan, G. Baumgartner, S. V. Polyakov, J. Goldhar, J. T. Kosloski, and A. Migdall, m-ary-state phase-shift-keying discrimination below the homodyne limit, Phys. Rev. A 84, 062324 (2011).
  12. Yuan Zuo, Ke Li, and Bing Zhu, 16-QAM quantum receiver with hybrid structure outperforming the standard quantum limit, MATEC Web Conf. 61, 06008 (2016).
  13. C. R. Müller and Ch Marquardt, A robust quantum receiver for phase shift keyed signals, New J. Phys. 17, 032003 (2015).
  14. F. E. Becerra, J. Fan, G. Baumgartner, J. Goldhar, J. T. Kosloski, and A. Migdall, Experimental demonstration of a receiver beating the standard quantum limit for multiple nonorthogonal state discrimination, Nat. Photon 7, 147 (2013).
  15. F. E. Becerra, J. Fan, and A. Migdall, Photon number resolution enables quantum receiver for realistic coherent optical communications, Nat. Photon 9, 48 (2015).
  16. M. T. DiMario and F. E. Becerra, Robust Measurement for the Discrimination of Binary Coherent States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 023603 (2018).
  17. Jian Chen, Jonathan L. Habif, Zachary Dutton, Richard Lazarus, and Saikat Guha, Optical codeword demodulation with error rates below the standard quantum limit using a conditional nulling receiver, Nat. Photonics 6, 374 (2012).
  18. I. A. Burenkov, O. V. Tikhonova, and S. V. Polyakov, Quantum receiver for large alphabet communication, Optica 5, 227 (2018).
  19. J. G. Proakis, Digital Communications, Electrical Engineering Series (Boston, MA, McGraw-Hill, 2001).
  20. H. Yuen, R. Kennedy, and M. Lax, Optimum testing of multiple hypotheses in quantum detection theory, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 21, 125 (1975).
  21. S. Ross, Introduction to Probability Models (New York, NY, Elsevier Science, 2007).
  22. PicoQuant, model Tau-SPAD-100, https://www.picoquant.com/products/category/photon-counting-detectors/tau-spad-single-photon-counting-module. Please note that certain commercial equipment, instruments or materials are identified in this paper to foster understanding. Such identification does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor does it imply that the materials or equipment identified are necessarily the best available for the purpose.
  23. N. P. Fox, Trap detectors and their properties, Metrologia 28, 197 (1991).
  24. Carl W. Helstrom, Quantum detection and estimation theory, J. Stat. Phys. 1, 231 (1969).
  25. A. S. Holevo, Capacity of a quantum communication channel, Probl. Peredachi Inform. (Problems Inform. Transm.) 15, 3 (1979).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation