Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Featured in Physics
  • Open Access

Hydrodynamic Mechanism for Stable Spindle Positioning in Meiosis II Oocytes

Weida Liao and Eric Lauga*

  • *Contact author: e.lauga@damtp.cam.ac.uk

PRX Life 2, 043003 – Published 16 October, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXLife.2.043003

Abstract

Cytoplasmic streaming, the persistent flow of fluid inside a cell, induces intracellular transport, which plays a key role in fundamental biological processes. In meiosis II mouse oocytes (developing egg cells) awaiting fertilization, the spindle, which is the protein structure responsible for dividing genetic material in a cell, must maintain its position near the cell cortex (the thin actin network bound to the cell membrane) for many hours. However, the cytoplasmic streaming that accompanies this stable positioning would intuitively appear to destabilize the spindle position. Here, through a combination of numerical and analytical modeling, we reveal a hydrodynamic mechanism for stable spindle positioning beneath the cortical cap. We show that this stability depends critically on the spindle size and the active driving from the cortex and demonstrate that stable spindle positioning can result purely from a hydrodynamic suction force exerted on the spindle by the cytoplasmic flow. Our findings show that local fluid dynamic forces can be sufficient to stabilize the spindle, explaining robustness against perturbations not only perpendicular but also parallel to the cortex. Our results shed light on the importance of cytoplasmic streaming in mammalian meiosis.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

synopsis

Fluid Flow Anchors Intracellular Structure

Published 16 October, 2024

Theorists have developed a model to explain how a protein structure keeps its position while being buffeted by currents.

See more in Physics

Article Text

References (79)

  1. J. H. Cartwright, O. Piro, and I. Tuval, Fluid dynamics in developmental biology: Moving fluids that shape ontogeny, HFSP J. 3, 77 (2009).
  2. S. Nonaka, S. Yoshiba, D. Watanabe, S. Ikeuchi, T. Goto, W. F. Marshall, and H. Hamada, De novo formation of left–right asymmetry by posterior tilt of nodal cilia, PLoS Biol. 3, e268 (2005).
  3. K. Yi, J. R. Unruh, M. Deng, B. D. Slaughter, B. Rubinstein, and R. Li, Dynamic maintenance of asymmetric meiotic spindle position through Arp2/3-complex-driven cytoplasmic streaming in mouse oocytes, Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 1252 (2011).
  4. B. Alberts, A. Johnson, J. Lewis, M. Raff, K. Roberts, and P. Walter, Molecular Biology of the Cell (Garland Science, New York, 2002).
  5. B. Mogessie, K. Scheffler, and M. Schuh, Assembly and positioning of the oocyte meiotic spindle, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 34, 381 (2018).
  6. S. Schmerler and G. M. Wessel, Polar bodies—More a lack of understanding than a lack of respect, Mol. Reprod. Dev. 78, 3 (2011).
  7. R. Li and D. F. Albertini, The road to maturation: Somatic cell interaction and self-organization of the mammalian oocyte, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 141 (2013).
  8. A. Mogilner and A. Manhart, Intracellular fluid mechanics: Coupling cytoplasmic flow with active cytoskeletal gel, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 50, 347 (2018).
  9. K. Luby-Phelps, Cytoarchitecture and physical properties of cytoplasm: Volume, viscosity, diffusion, intracellular surface area, Int. Rev. Cytol. 192, 189 (1999).
  10. S. Brunet and M.-H. Verlhac, Positioning to get out of meiosis: The asymmetry of division, Hum. Reprod. Update 17, 68 (2011).
  11. C. M. Dalton and J. Carroll, Biased inheritance of mitochondria during asymmetric cell division in the mouse oocyte, J. Cell Sci. 126, 2955 (2013).
  12. M. Almonacid, M.-É. Terret, and M.-H. Verlhac, Actin-based spindle positioning: New insights from female gametes, J. Cell Sci. 127, 477 (2014).
  13. R. Li, The art of choreographing asymmetric cell division, Dev. Cell 25, 439 (2013).
  14. A. Chaigne, M.-H. Verlhac, and M.-E. Terret, Spindle positioning in mammalian oocytes, Exp. Cell Res. 318, 1442 (2012).
  15. M. Webb, S. K. Howlett, and B. Maro, Parthenogenesis and cytoskeletal organization in ageing mouse eggs, Development 95, 131 (1986).
  16. N.-H. Kim, S. Ju Moon, R. S. Prather, and B. N. Day, Cytoskeletal alteration in aged porcine oocytes and parthenogenesis, Mol. Reprod. Dev. 43, 513 (1996).
  17. K. Yi and R. Li, Actin cytoskeleton in cell polarity and asymmetric division during mouse oocyte maturation, Cytoskeleton 69, 727 (2012).
  18. Y.-L. Miao, K. Kikuchi, Q.-Y. Sun, and H. Schatten, Oocyte aging: Cellular and molecular changes, developmental potential and reversal possibility, Hum. Reprod. Update 15, 573 (2009).
  19. P. Chugh and E. K. Paluch, The actin cortex at a glance, J. Cell Sci. 131, jcs186254 (2018).
  20. K. Yi, B. Rubinstein, J. R. Unruh, F. Guo, B. D. Slaughter, and R. Li, Sequential actin-based pushing forces drive meiosis I chromosome migration and symmetry breaking in oocytes, J. Cell Biol. 200, 567 (2013).
  21. K. Yi, B. Rubinstein, and R. Li, Symmetry breaking and polarity establishment during mouse oocyte maturation, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 368, 20130002 (2013).
  22. X. Duan, Y. Li, K. Yi, F. Guo, H. Wang, P.-H. Wu, J. Yang, D. B. Mair, E. A. Morales, P. Kalab, D. Wirtz, S. X. Sun, and R. Li, Dynamic organelle distribution initiates actin-based spindle migration in mouse oocytes, Nat. Commun. 11, 277 (2020).
  23. M. Schuh and J. Ellenberg, A new model for asymmetric spindle positioning in mouse oocytes, Curr. Biol. 18, 1986 (2008).
  24. A. Chaigne, C. Campillo, N. S. Gov, R. Voituriez, J. Azoury, C. Umaña-Diaz, M. Almonacid, I. Queguiner, P. Nassoy, C. Sykes, M.-H. Verlhac, and M.-E. Terret, A soft cortex is essential for asymmetric spindle positioning in mouse oocytes, Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 958 (2013).
  25. X. Duan and S.-C. Sun, Actin cytoskeleton dynamics in mammalian oocyte meiosis, Biol. Reprod. 100, 15 (2019).
  26. B. Xie, L. Zhang, H. Zhao, Q. Bai, Y. Fan, X. Zhu, Y. Yu, R. Li, X. Liang, Q.-Y. Sun, M. Li, and J. Qiao, Poly(ADP-ribose) mediates asymmetric division of mouse oocyte, Cell Res. 28, 462 (2018).
  27. A. S. Maddox, J. Azoury, and J. Dumont, Polar body cytokinesis, Cytoskeleton 69, 855 (2012).
  28. A. Chaigne, C. Campillo, N. S. Gov, R. Voituriez, C. Sykes, M.-H. Verlhac, and M.-E. Terret, A narrow window of cortical tension guides asymmetric spindle positioning in the mouse oocyte, Nat. Commun. 6, 6027 (2015).
  29. J. Azoury, K. W. Lee, V. Georget, P. Rassinier, B. Leader, and M.-H. Verlhac, Spindle positioning in mouse oocytes relies on a dynamic meshwork of actin filaments, Curr. Biol. 18, 1514 (2008).
  30. R. Niwayama, H. Nagao, T. S. Kitajima, L. Hufnagel, K. Shinohara, T. Higuchi, T. Ishikawa, and A. Kimura, Bayesian inference of forces causing cytoplasmic streaming in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos and mouse oocytes, PLoS ONE 11, e0159917 (2016).
  31. W. Lu and V. I. Gelfand, Go with the flow – bulk transport by molecular motors, J. Cell Sci. 136, jcs260300 (2023).
  32. S. Shamipour, S. Caballero-Mancebo, and C.-P. Heisenberg, Cytoplasm's got moves, Dev. Cell 56, 213 (2021).
  33. K. Alim, G. Amselem, F. Peaudecerf, M. P. Brenner, and A. Pringle, Random network peristalsis in Physarum polycephalum organizes fluid flows across an individual, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 13306 (2013).
  34. N. Kamiya, Physical and chemical basis of cytoplasmic streaming, Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. 32, 205 (1981).
  35. R. E. Goldstein and J.-W. van de Meent, A physical perspective on cytoplasmic streaming, Interface Focus 5, 20150030 (2015).
  36. N. S. Allen and R. D. Allen, Cytoplasmic streaming in green plants, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 7, 497 (1978).
  37. M. E. Quinlan, Cytoplasmic streaming in the Drosophila oocyte, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 32, 173 (2016).
  38. N. Klughammer, J. Bischof, N. D. Schnellbächer, A. Callegari, P. Lénárt, and U. S. Schwarz, Cytoplasmic flows in starfish oocytes are fully determined by cortical contractions, PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1006588 (2018).
  39. A. G. Gubieda, J. R. Packer, I. Squires, J. Martin, and J. Rodriguez, Going with the flow: insights from Caenorhabditis elegans zygote polarization, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 375, 20190555 (2020).
  40. J. Uraji, K. Scheffler, and M. Schuh, Functions of actin in mouse oocytes at a glance, J. Cell Sci. 131, jcs218099 (2018).
  41. A. Bourdais, B. Dehapiot, and G. Halet, Cofilin regulates actin network homeostasis and microvilli length in mouse oocytes, J. Cell Sci. 134, jcs259237 (2021).
  42. M. Pinot, V. Steiner, B. Dehapiot, B.-K. Yoo, F. Chesnel, L. Blanchoin, C. Kervrann, and Z. Gueroui, Confinement induces actin flow in a meiotic cytoplasm, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 11705 (2012).
  43. L. P. Cramer, Molecular mechanism of actin-dependent retrograde flow in lamellipodia of motile cells, Front. Biosci. 2, d260 (1997).
  44. P. Lappalainen, T. Kotila, A. Jégou, and G. Romet-Lemonne, Biochemical and mechanical regulation of actin dynamics, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 23, 836 (2022).
  45. A. Mogilner and G. Oster, Cell motility driven by actin polymerization, Biophys. J. 71, 3030 (1996).
  46. E. Guyon, J. P. Hulin, L. Petit, and C. D. Mitescu, Physical Hydrodynamics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2015).
  47. S. Kim and J. S. Karrila, Microhydrodynamics: Principles and Selected Applications (Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, MA, 1991).
  48. N. Raju and E. Meiburg, Dynamics of small, spherical particles in vortical and stagnation point flow fields, Phys. Fluids 9, 299 (1997).
  49. B. Ramarao and C. Tien, Aerosol deposition in two-dimensional laminar stagnation flow, J. Aerosol Sci. 20, 775 (1989).
  50. J.-Q. Zhong and J. Zhang, Dynamical states of a mobile heat blanket on a thermally convecting fluid, Phys. Rev. E 75, 055301(R) (2007).
  51. F. J. Longo and D.-Y. Chen, Development of cortical polarity in mouse eggs: Involvement of the meiotic apparatus, Dev. Biol. 107, 382 (1985).
  52. B. Maro, M. H. Johnson, M. Webb, and G. Flach, Mechanism of polar body formation in the mouse oocyte: An interaction between the chromosomes, the cytoskeleton and the plasma membrane, Development 92, 11 (1986).
  53. G. Halet and J. Carroll, Rac activity is polarized and regulates meiotic spindle stability and anchoring in mammalian oocytes, Dev. Cell 12, 309 (2007).
  54. A. Bourdais, B. Dehapiot, and G. Halet, MRCK activates mouse oocyte myosin II for spindle rotation and male pronucleus centration, J. Cell Biol. 222, e202211029 (2023).
  55. L. A. McGinnis, H. J. Lee, D. N. Robinson, and J. P. Evans, MAPK3/1 (ERK1/2) and myosin light chain kinase in mammalian eggs affect myosin-II function and regulate the metaphase II state in a calcium-and zinc-dependent manner, Biol. Reprod. 92, 146 (2015).
  56. K. H. Siller and C. Q. Doe, Spindle orientation during asymmetric cell division, Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 365 (2009).
  57. H.-Y. Wu, G. Kabacaoğlu, E. Nazockdast, H.-C. Chang, M. J. Shelley, and D. J. Needleman, Laser ablation and fluid flows reveal the mechanism behind spindle and centrosome positioning, Nat. Phys. 20, 157 (2024).
  58. D. Oriola, D. J. Needleman, and J. Brugués, The physics of the metaphase spindle, Annu. Rev. Biophys. 47, 655 (2018).
  59. G. Flé, E. Van Houten, G. Rémillard-Labrosse, G. FitzHarris, and G. Cloutier, Imaging the subcellular viscoelastic properties of mouse oocytes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2213836120 (2023).
  60. J. Najafi, S. Dmitrieff, and N. Minc, Size- and position-dependent cytoplasm viscoelasticity through hydrodynamic interactions with the cell surface, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2216839120 (2023).
  61. E. Nikalayevich, G. Letort, G. de Labbey, E. Todisco, A. Shihabi, H. Turlier, R. Voituriez, M. Yahiatene, X. Pollet-Villard, M. Innocenti, M. Schuh, M.-E. Terret, and M.-H. Verlhac, Aberrant cortex contractions impact mammalian oocyte quality, Dev. Cell 59, 841 (2024).
  62. B. Dehapiot, V. Carrière, J. Carroll, and G. Halet, Polarized Cdc42 activation promotes polar body protrusion and asymmetric division in mouse oocytes, Dev. Biol. 377, 202 (2013).
  63. C. J. Balzer, A. R. Wagner, L. A. Helgeson, and B. J. Nolen, Single-turnover activation of Arp2/3 complex by Dip1 may balance nucleation of linear versus branched actin filaments, Curr. Biol. 29, 3331 (2019).
  64. S.-Y. Lee, H.-S. Lee, E.-Y. Kim, J.-J. Ko, T. K. Yoon, W.-S. Lee, and K.-A. Lee, Thioredoxin-interacting protein regulates glucose metabolism and affects cytoplasmic streaming in mouse oocytes, PLoS ONE 8, e70708 (2013).
  65. S. Namgoong and N.-H. Kim, Roles of actin binding proteins in mammalian oocyte maturation and beyond, Cell Cycle 15, 1830 (2016).
  66. H.-H. Wang, Y. Zhang, F. Tang, M.-H. Pan, X. Wan, X.-H. Li, and S.-C. Sun, Rab23/Kif17 regulate meiotic progression in oocytes by modulating tubulin acetylation and actin dynamics, Development 146, dev171280 (2019).
  67. L. Liu, R. Oldenbourg, J. R. Trimarchi, and D. L. Keefe, A reliable, noninvasive technique for spindle imaging and enucleation of mammalian oocytes, Nat. Biotechnol. 18, 223 (2000).
  68. G. Coticchio, M. C. Guglielmo, D. F. Albertini, M. Dal Canto, M. Mignini Renzini, E. De Ponti, and R. Fadini, Contributions of the actin cytoskeleton to the emergence of polarity during maturation in human oocytes, Mol. Hum. Reprod. 20, 200 (2014).
  69. M. Deng, P. Suraneni, R. M. Schultz, and R. Li, The Ran GTPase mediates chromatin signaling to control cortical polarity during polar body extrusion in mouse oocytes, Dev. Cell 12, 301 (2007).
  70. S.-C. Sun, Z.-B. Wang, Y.-N. Xu, S.-E. Lee, X.-S. Cui, and N.-H. Kim, Arp2/3 complex regulates asymmetric division and cytokinesis in mouse oocytes, PLoS ONE 6, e18392 (2011).
  71. T. Totsuka and M. Ohsugi, Ca2+-driven cytoplasmic backflow secures spindle position in fertilized mouse eggs, bioRxiv (2024).
  72. H. Wang, Y. Li, J. Yang, X. Duan, P. Kalab, S. X. Sun, and R. Li, Symmetry breaking in hydrodynamic forces drives meiotic spindle rotation in mammalian oocytes, Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz5004 (2020).
  73. B. Dehapiot, R. Clément, A. Bourdais, V. Carrière, S. Huet, and G. Halet, RhoA- and Cdc42-induced antagonistic forces underlie symmetry breaking and spindle rotation in mouse oocytes, PLoS Biol. 19, e3001376 (2021).
  74. F. J. McNally, Mechanisms of spindle positioning, J. Cell Biol. 200, 131 (2013).
  75. M. K. Delgado and C. Cabernard, Mechanical regulation of cell size, fate, and behavior during asymmetric cell division, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 67, 9 (2020).
  76. M. Almonacid, M.-E. Terret, and M.-H. Verlhac, Control of nucleus positioning in mouse oocytes, Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 82, 34 (2018).
  77. M. Wasielak-Politowska and P. Kordowitzki, Chromosome segregation in the oocyte: what goes wrong during aging, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 2880 (2022).
  78. E. Babayev and F. E. Duncan, Age-associated changes in cumulus cells and follicular fluid: The local oocyte microenvironment as a determinant of gamete quality, Biol. Reprod. 106, 351 (2022).
  79. COMSOL Multiphysics 5.6 (COMSOL AB, Stockholm, Sweden).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation