Precise determination of charge-dependent pion-nucleon-nucleon coupling constants
R. Navarro Pérez, J. E. Amaro, and E. Ruiz Arriola
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064001 (2017) - Published 19 June, 2017
S. Mallik, G. Chaudhuri, P. Das, and S. Das Gupta
Phys. Rev. C 95, 061601(R) (2017) - Published 22 June, 2017
The thermodynamic properties of nuclear matter can be probed by collisions between heavy nuclei at various energies, and then studying the resulting nuclear fragment distributions. The authors propose an observable which will indicate that nuclear matter has undergone a first-order liquid-gas phase transition. That observable is based on the total multiplicity of the fragmenting system (its first derivative) for collisions between heavy nuclei, and is directly accessible by experiments. It maximizes at the same energy as the specific heat, , which typically happens at any first-order phase transition. Other potential indicators of a phase transition are less indicative due to the long-range Coulomb interaction and the fact that the atomic nucleus has a finite size.
R. Broda, R. V. F. Janssens, Ł. W. Iskra, J. Wrzesinski, B. Fornal, M. P. Carpenter, C. J. Chiara, N. Cieplicka-Oryńczak, C. R. Hoffman, F. G. Kondev, W. Królas, T. Lauritsen, Zs. Podolyak, D. Seweryniak, C. M. Shand, B. Szpak, W. B. Walters, S. Zhu, and B. A. Brown
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064308 (2017) - Published 12 June, 2017
The nucleus Pb provides an iconic test of the nuclear shell model because its 82 protons and 126 neutrons are both magic numbers. When excited levels are discovered and characterized, this nucleus provides a means to investigate the mechanisms responsible for the generation of angular momentum and, ultimately, for the development of collectivity. This experiment is a tour de force that reveals extensive new information on Pb about high-angular-momentum states, isomeric states, and collective states of octupole nature; thus it serves as a showcase for shell-model descriptions. Many of the states explored show good overall agreement with theory, but others at the highest energies reveal discrepancies, pointing to the need for improved calculations. Above the highest-lying isomer transitions arising from yet higher spin levels could be identified in two separate experiments as displayed in the figure.
L. Coraggio, L. De Angelis, T. Fukui, A. Gargano, and N. Itaco
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064324 (2017) - Published 23 June, 2017
The authors tackle the important subject of nuclear matrix elements governing double- decay in a first-principles shell-model calculation. They derive the shell-model effective interaction and the Gamow-Teller transition operator from a realistic nucleon-nucleon interaction. The procedure is tested on the two-neutrino double- decays of Te and Xe for which experimental data exist. This test precedes an application to the neutrino double- decay of the same nuclei.
Scott McDonald, Chun Shen, François Fillion-Gourdeau, Sangyong Jeon, and Charles Gale
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064913 (2017) - Published 28 June, 2017
This work demonstrates that the “standard model” of heavy ion collisions, starting with initial-state fluctuations, followed by viscous hydrodynamic expansion, and concluding with conversion to hadrons that undergo rescattering and resonance decays, describes data at the highest LHC energy.
D. Hove, E. Garrido, P. Sarriguren, D. V. Fedorov, H. O. U. Fynbo, A. S. Jensen, and N. T. Zinner
Phys. Rev. C 95, 061301(R) (2017) - Published 1 June, 2017
M. Venhart et al.
Phys. Rev. C 95, 061302(R) (2017) - Published 5 June, 2017
B. Olaizola, L. M. Fraile, H. Mach, A. Poves, F. Nowacki, A. Aprahamian, J. A. Briz, J. Cal-González, D. Ghiţa, U. Köster, W. Kurcewicz, S. R. Lesher, D. Pauwels, E. Picado, D. Radulov, G. S. Simpson, and J. M. Udías
Phys. Rev. C 95, 061303(R) (2017) - Published 7 June, 2017
Y. Zhang and F. Iachello
Phys. Rev. C 95, 061304(R) (2017) - Published 7 June, 2017
A. P. Severyukhin, S. Åberg, N. N. Arsenyev, and R. G. Nazmitdinov
Phys. Rev. C 95, 061305(R) (2017) - Published 12 June, 2017
Chang Xu, G. Röpke, P. Schuck, Zhongzhou Ren, Y. Funaki, H. Horiuchi, A. Tohsaki, T. Yamada, and Bo Zhou
Phys. Rev. C 95, 061306(R) (2017) - Published 20 June, 2017
S. Mallik, G. Chaudhuri, P. Das, and S. Das Gupta
Phys. Rev. C 95, 061601(R) (2017) - Published 22 June, 2017
The thermodynamic properties of nuclear matter can be probed by collisions between heavy nuclei at various energies, and then studying the resulting nuclear fragment distributions. The authors propose an observable which will indicate that nuclear matter has undergone a first-order liquid-gas phase transition. That observable is based on the total multiplicity of the fragmenting system (its first derivative) for collisions between heavy nuclei, and is directly accessible by experiments. It maximizes at the same energy as the specific heat, , which typically happens at any first-order phase transition. Other potential indicators of a phase transition are less indicative due to the long-range Coulomb interaction and the fact that the atomic nucleus has a finite size.
M. Q. Buckner, C. Y. Wu, R. A. Henderson, B. Bucher, N. Wimer, A. Chyzh, T. A. Bredeweg, B. Baramsai, A. Couture, M. Jandel, S. Mosby, and J. L. Ullmann
Phys. Rev. C 95, 061602(R) (2017) - Published 30 June, 2017
Akinobu Doté, Takashi Inoue, and Takayuki Myo
Phys. Rev. C 95, 062201(R) (2017) - Published 15 June, 2017
Jianjun Fang, Helena Pais, Sagar Pratapsi, and Constança Providência
Phys. Rev. C 95, 062801(R) (2017) - Published 13 June, 2017
R. Navarro Pérez, J. E. Amaro, and E. Ruiz Arriola
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064001 (2017) - Published 19 June, 2017
N. Nica, J. C. Hardy, V. E. Iacob, T. A. Werke, C. M. Folden, III, K. Ofodile, and M. B. Trzhaskovskaya
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064301 (2017) - Published 2 June, 2017
T. Rząca-Urban, K. Sieja, W. Urban, M. Czerwiński, A. Blanc, M. Jentschel, P. Mutti, U. Köster, T. Soldner, G. de France, G. S. Simpson, and C. A. Ur
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064302 (2017) - Published 2 June, 2017
H. Naïdja, F. Nowacki, B. Bounthong, M. Czerwiński, T. Rząca-Urban, T. Rogiński, W. Urban, J. Wiśniewski, K. Sieja, A. G. Smith, J. F. Smith, G. S. Simpson, I. Ahmad, and J. P. Greene
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064303 (2017) - Published 2 June, 2017
Hiroyuki Koura and Satoshi Chiba
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064304 (2017) - Published 5 June, 2017
Myagmarjav Odsuren, Yuma Kikuchi, Takayuki Myo, Gonchigdorj Khuukhenkhuu, Hiroshi Masui, and Kiyoshi Katō
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064305 (2017) - Published 7 June, 2017
Matthew R. Hermes, Jorge Dukelsky, and Gustavo E. Scuseria
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064306 (2017) - Published 9 June, 2017
Tu Ya, Yan He, Zao-Chun Gao, Jia-Qi Wang, and Y. S. Chen
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064307 (2017) - Published 9 June, 2017
R. Broda, R. V. F. Janssens, Ł. W. Iskra, J. Wrzesinski, B. Fornal, M. P. Carpenter, C. J. Chiara, N. Cieplicka-Oryńczak, C. R. Hoffman, F. G. Kondev, W. Królas, T. Lauritsen, Zs. Podolyak, D. Seweryniak, C. M. Shand, B. Szpak, W. B. Walters, S. Zhu, and B. A. Brown
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064308 (2017) - Published 12 June, 2017
The nucleus Pb provides an iconic test of the nuclear shell model because its 82 protons and 126 neutrons are both magic numbers. When excited levels are discovered and characterized, this nucleus provides a means to investigate the mechanisms responsible for the generation of angular momentum and, ultimately, for the development of collectivity. This experiment is a tour de force that reveals extensive new information on Pb about high-angular-momentum states, isomeric states, and collective states of octupole nature; thus it serves as a showcase for shell-model descriptions. Many of the states explored show good overall agreement with theory, but others at the highest energies reveal discrepancies, pointing to the need for improved calculations. Above the highest-lying isomer transitions arising from yet higher spin levels could be identified in two separate experiments as displayed in the figure.
S. R. Lesher, C. Casarella, A. Aprahamian, L. M. Robledo, B. P. Crider, R. Ikeyama, I. R. Marsh, M. T. McEllistrem, E. E. Peters, F. M. Prados-Estévez, M. K. Smith, Z. R. Tully, J. R. Vanhoy, and S. W. Yates
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064309 (2017) - Published 12 June, 2017
K. Nomura, R. Rodríguez-Guzmán, and L. M. Robledo
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064310 (2017) - Published 13 June, 2017
E. H. Wang, J. H. Hamilton, A. V. Ramayya, Y. X. Liu, H. J. Li, A. C. Dai, W. Y. Liang, F. R. Xu, J. K. Hwang, S. H. Liu, N. T. Brewer, Y. X. Luo, J. O. Rasmussen, Y. Sun, S. J. Zhu, G. M. Ter-Akopian, and Yu. Ts. Oganessian
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064311 (2017) - Published 14 June, 2017
V. Singh, S. Sihotra, G. H. Bhat, J. A. Sheikh, M. Kaur, S. Kumar, K. Singh, J. Goswamy, S. Saha, J. Sethi, R. Palit, S. S. Malik, N. Singh, U. Garg, and D. Mehta
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064312 (2017) - Published 14 June, 2017
X. B. Wang and A. C. Hayes
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064313 (2017) - Published 15 June, 2017
Xin-Yi Wu, S. K. Ghorui, Long-Jun Wang, Yang Sun, Mike Guidry, and Philip M. Walker
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064314 (2017) - Published 16 June, 2017
Kosai Tanabe and Kazuko Sugawara-Tanabe
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064315 (2017) - Published 16 June, 2017
Tu Ya, Yong-Shou Chen, Zao-Chun Gao, Ling Liu, and Yong-Jing Chen
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064316 (2017) - Published 19 June, 2017
H. L. Crawford et al.
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064317 (2017) - Published 21 June, 2017
T. Baba and M. Kimura
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064318 (2017) - Published 22 June, 2017
Yoshiko Kanada-En'yo and Yuki Shikata
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064319 (2017) - Published 22 June, 2017
S. Biswas, R. Palit, J. Sethi, S. Saha, A. Raghav, U. Garg, Md. S. R. Laskar, F. S. Babra, Z. Naik, S. Sharma, A. Y. Deo, V. V. Parkar, B. S. Naidu, R. Donthi, S. Jadhav, H. C. Jain, P. K. Joshi, S. Sihotra, S. Kumar, D. Mehta, G. Mukherjee, A. Goswami, and P. C. Srivastava
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064320 (2017) - Published 22 June, 2017
P. R. John et al.
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064321 (2017) - Published 22 June, 2017
R. Caballero-Folch et al.
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064322 (2017) - Published 23 June, 2017
J. R. Cottle, Vandana Tripathi, B. A. Brown, B. Abromeit, J. M. Allmond, M. Anastasiou, L. T. Baby, J. S. Baron, P. D. Cottle, R. Dungan, T. C. Hensley, K. W. Kemper, R. S. Lubna, N. Rijal, E. Rubino, S. L. Tabor, P.-L. Tai, K. Villafana, and I. Wiedenhoever
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064323 (2017) - Published 23 June, 2017
L. Coraggio, L. De Angelis, T. Fukui, A. Gargano, and N. Itaco
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064324 (2017) - Published 23 June, 2017
The authors tackle the important subject of nuclear matrix elements governing double- decay in a first-principles shell-model calculation. They derive the shell-model effective interaction and the Gamow-Teller transition operator from a realistic nucleon-nucleon interaction. The procedure is tested on the two-neutrino double- decays of Te and Xe for which experimental data exist. This test precedes an application to the neutrino double- decay of the same nuclei.
Dennis Bonatsos, I. E. Assimakis, N. Minkov, Andriana Martinou, R. B. Cakirli, R. F. Casten, and K. Blaum
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064325 (2017) - Published 27 June, 2017
Dennis Bonatsos, I. E. Assimakis, N. Minkov, Andriana Martinou, S. Sarantopoulou, R. B. Cakirli, R. F. Casten, and K. Blaum
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064326 (2017) - Published 27 June, 2017
A. I. Morales et al.
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064327 (2017) - Published 29 June, 2017
P.-G. Reinhard and W. Nazarewicz
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064328 (2017) - Published 29 June, 2017
Ya-Juan Tian, Quan Liu, Tai-Hua Heng, and Jian-You Guo
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064329 (2017) - Published 30 June, 2017
Zhao-Wen Zhang and Lie-Wen Chen
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064330 (2017) - Published 30 June, 2017
N. W. Lwin, N. N. Htike, and K. Hagino
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064601 (2017) - Published 1 June, 2017
Deepak Kumar and Moumita Maiti
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064602 (2017) - Published 2 June, 2017
Ratnesh Pandey, S. Kundu, C. Bhattacharya, K. Banerjee, T. K. Rana, S. Manna, G. Mukherjee, J. K. Meena, A. Chaudhuri, T. Roy, Pratap Roy, Md. A. Asgar, V. Srivastava, A. Dey, M. Sinha, T. K. Ghosh, S. Bhattacharya, S. K. Pandit, K. Mahata, P. Patle, S. Pal, A. Shrivastava, and V. Nanal
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064603 (2017) - Published 5 June, 2017
Zhen Zhang and Che Ming Ko
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064604 (2017) - Published 7 June, 2017
A. P. D. Ramirez, J. R. Vanhoy, S. F. Hicks, M. T. McEllistrem, E. E. Peters, S. Mukhopadhyay, T. D. Harrison, T. J. Howard, D. T. Jackson, P. D. Lenzen, T. D. Nguyen, R. L. Pecha, B. G. Rice, B. K. Thompson, and S. W. Yates
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064605 (2017) - Published 9 June, 2017
J. Adam et al. (ALICE Collaboration )
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064606 (2017) - Published 12 June, 2017
K. P. Santhosh and P. V. Subha
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064607 (2017) - Published 12 June, 2017
Yoshiki Chazono, Kazuki Yoshida, and Kazuyuki Ogata
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064608 (2017) - Published 12 June, 2017
A. Gatera, T. Belgya, W. Geerts, A. Göök, F.-J. Hambsch, M. Lebois, B. Maróti, A. Moens, A. Oberstedt, S. Oberstedt, F. Postelt, L. Qi, L. Szentmiklósi, G. Sibbens, D. Vanleeuw, M. Vidali, and F. Zeiser
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064609 (2017) - Published 13 June, 2017
R. C. Johnson
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064610 (2017) - Published 13 June, 2017
K. P. Santhosh and V. Safoora
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064611 (2017) - Published 13 June, 2017
S. D. Clarke, B. M. Wieger, A. Enqvist, R. Vogt, J. Randrup, R. C. Haight, H. Y. Lee, B. A. Perdue, E. Kwan, C. Y. Wu, R. A. Henderson, and S. A. Pozzi
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064612 (2017) - Published 20 June, 2017
M. T. Senthil Kannan, Bharat Kumar, M. Balasubramaniam, B. K. Agrawal, and S. K. Patra
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064613 (2017) - Published 22 June, 2017
V. A. B. Zagatto, J. Lubian, L. R. Gasques, M. A. G. Alvarez, L. C. Chamon, J. R. B. Oliveira, J. A. Alcántara-Núñez, N. H. Medina, V. Scarduelli, A. Freitas, I. Padron, E. S. Rossi, Jr., and J. M. B. Shorto
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064614 (2017) - Published 28 June, 2017
E. Blain, A. Daskalakis, R. C. Block, and Y. Danon
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064615 (2017) - Published 30 June, 2017
Sean Gavin, George Moschelli, and Christopher Zin
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064901 (2017) - Published 12 June, 2017
J. Steinheimer, J. Aichelin, M. Bleicher, and H. Stöcker
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064902 (2017) - Published 12 June, 2017
Richard Lednicky, Sagdulla L. Lutpullaev, Kosim Olimov, Khusniddin K. Olimov, Alisher K. Olimov, and Bekhzod S. Yuldashev
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064903 (2017) - Published 14 June, 2017
S. Zhang, Y. G. Ma, J. H. Chen, W. B. He, and C. Zhong
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064904 (2017) - Published 14 June, 2017
Miki Sakaida, Masayuki Asakawa, Hirotsugu Fujii, and Masakiyo Kitazawa
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064905 (2017) - Published 14 June, 2017
Alina Czajka and Sangyong Jeon
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064906 (2017) - Published 14 June, 2017
Pingal Dasgupta, Rupa Chatterjee, and Dinesh K. Srivastava
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064907 (2017) - Published 15 June, 2017
Wagner M. Castilho, Wei-Liang Qian, Fernando G. Gardim, Yogiro Hama, and Takeshi Kodama
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064908 (2017) - Published 15 June, 2017
Javier L. Albacete, Hannah Petersen, and Alba Soto-Ontoso
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064909 (2017) - Published 19 June, 2017
Wojciech Broniowski and Adam Olszewski
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064910 (2017) - Published 21 June, 2017
Feng-lan Shao, Guo-jing Wang, Rui-qin Wang, Hai-hong Li, and Jun Song
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064911 (2017) - Published 23 June, 2017
Toshihiro Nonaka, Masakiyo Kitazawa, and ShinIchi Esumi
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064912 (2017) - Published 26 June, 2017
Scott McDonald, Chun Shen, François Fillion-Gourdeau, Sangyong Jeon, and Charles Gale
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064913 (2017) - Published 28 June, 2017
This work demonstrates that the “standard model” of heavy ion collisions, starting with initial-state fluctuations, followed by viscous hydrodynamic expansion, and concluding with conversion to hadrons that undergo rescattering and resonance decays, describes data at the highest LHC energy.
M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration )
Phys. Rev. C 95, 064914 (2017) - Published 28 June, 2017
D. Rimal et al. (The CLAS Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. C 95, 065201 (2017) - Published 1 June, 2017
Shota Ohnishi, Wataru Horiuchi, Tsubasa Hoshino, Kenta Miyahara, and Tetsuo Hyodo
Phys. Rev. C 95, 065202 (2017) - Published 6 June, 2017
B. Z. Kopeliovich, Iván Schmidt, and M. Siddikov
Phys. Rev. C 95, 065203 (2017) - Published 6 June, 2017
Mamiya Kawaguchi, Masayasu Harada, Shinya Matsuzaki, and Ruiwen Ouyang
Phys. Rev. C 95, 065204 (2017) - Published 9 June, 2017
J. Adamczewski-Musch et al. (HADES Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. C 95, 065205 (2017) - Published 12 June, 2017
Amruta Mishra and S. P. Misra
Phys. Rev. C 95, 065206 (2017) - Published 13 June, 2017
I. G. Aznauryan and V. D. Burkert
Phys. Rev. C 95, 065207 (2017) - Published 13 June, 2017
I. A. Qattan
Phys. Rev. C 95, 065208 (2017) - Published 14 June, 2017
P. G. Blunden and W. Melnitchouk
Phys. Rev. C 95, 065209 (2017) - Published 14 June, 2017
Byung-Geel Yu and Kook-Jin Kong
Phys. Rev. C 95, 065210 (2017) - Published 20 June, 2017
L. Roca and E. Oset
Phys. Rev. C 95, 065211 (2017) - Published 23 June, 2017
O. Lourenço, M. Dutra, and D. P. Menezes
Phys. Rev. C 95, 065212 (2017) - Published 27 June, 2017
Andrew P. Furmanski and Jan T. Sobczyk
Phys. Rev. C 95, 065501 (2017) - Published 5 June, 2017
J. E. Amaro, M. B. Barbaro, J. A. Caballero, A. De Pace, T. W. Donnelly, G. D. Megias, and I. Ruiz Simo
Phys. Rev. C 95, 065502 (2017) - Published 12 June, 2017
Nodoka Yamanaka, Taiichi Yamada, Emiko Hiyama, and Yasuro Funaki
Phys. Rev. C 95, 065503 (2017) - Published 23 June, 2017
Rana Nandi and Stefan Schramm
Phys. Rev. C 95, 065801 (2017) - Published 5 June, 2017
Wei-Hua Wang, Xi Huang, and Xiao-Ping Zheng
Phys. Rev. C 95, 065802 (2017) - Published 13 June, 2017
M. Fortin, S. S. Avancini, C. Providência, and I. Vidaña
Phys. Rev. C 95, 065803 (2017) - Published 14 June, 2017
Yong-Mei Wen and De-Hua Wen
Phys. Rev. C 95, 065804 (2017) - Published 30 June, 2017
Yeunhwan Lim and Jeremy W. Holt
Phys. Rev. C 95, 065805 (2017) - Published 30 June, 2017
G. Singh, Shubhchintak, and R. Chatterjee
Phys. Rev. C 95, 065806 (2017) - Published 30 June, 2017
Gong-Ming Yu, Yan-Bing Cai, Yun-De Li, and Jian-Song Wang
Phys. Rev. C 95, 069901 (2017) - Published 7 June, 2017
J.-M. Régis et al.
Phys. Rev. C 95, 069902 (2017) - Published 29 June, 2017