- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review C

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Microscopic theory of angular momentum distributions across the full range of fission fragments

Petar Marević*

Nicolas Schunck†

Marc Verriere‡

  • *Contact author: pmarevic@phy.hr
  • †Contact author: schunck1@llnl.gov
  • ‡Contact author: marc.verriere@cea.fr
PDF

Phys. Rev. C 113, 014612 – Published 28 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/yr2c-nvf3

Abstract

Modern nuclear theory provides qualitative insights into the fundamental mechanisms of nuclear fission and is increasingly capable of making reliable quantitative predictions. Most quantities of interest pertain to the primary fission fragments, whose subsequent decay is typically modeled using statistical reaction models. Consequently, a key objective of fission theory is to inform these models by predicting the initial conditions of the primary fragments. In this work, we employ a framework that combines joint angular momentum and particle number projection with time-dependent configuration mixing to calculate the angular momentum distributions of primary fragments. Focusing on the benchmark cases of neutron-induced fission of U235 and Pu239, we predict—for the first time—microscopic angular momentum distributions for all fragments observed in experiments. Our results reveal a pronounced sawtooth pattern in the average angular momentum as a function of fragment mass, consistent with recent measurements. Additionally, we observe substantial variations in angular momentum distributions along isobaric chains, indicating that commonly used empirical formulas lack sufficient accuracy. We also quantify a strong correlation between the angular momentum and the deformation of the fragments at scission, and a weak correlation in the magnitude of the angular momentum between fragment partners. The generated data will enable estimation of the impact of microscopic distributions on fission spectra, paving the way toward fission modeling based on microscopic inputs.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (96)

  1. O. Hahn and F. Strassmann, Über den Nachweis und das verhalten der bei der Bestrahlung des Urans mittels Neutronen entstehenden Erdalkalimetalle, Naturwissenschaften 27, 11 (1939).
  2. L. Meitner and O. Frisch, Disintegration of uranium by neutrons: A new type of nuclear reaction, Nature (London) 143, 239 (1939).
  3. M. Bender, R. Bernard, G. Bertsch, S. Chiba, J. Dobaczewski, N. Dubray, S. A. Giuliani, K. Hagino, D. Lacroix, Z. Li, P. Magierski, J. Maruhn, W. Nazarewicz, J. Pei, S. Péru, N. Pillet, J. Randrup, D. Regnier, P.-G. Reinhard, L. M. Robledo et al., Future of nuclear fission theory, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 47, 113002 (2020).
  4. H. J. Krappe and K. Pomorski, Theory of Nuclear Fission (Springer, Berlin, 2012).
  5. Nuclear Fission: Theories, Experiments and Applications, edited by P. Talou and R. Vogt (Springer, Berlin, 2023).
  6. N. Schunck and L. M. Robledo, Microscopic theory of nuclear fission: A review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 116301 (2016).
  7. N. Schunck and D. Regnier, Theory of nuclear fission, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 125, 103963 (2022).
  8. A. Baran, M. Kowal, P.-G. Reinhard, L. Robledo, A. Staszczak, and M. Warda, Fission barriers and probabilities of spontaneous fission for elements with Z≥100, Nucl. Phys. A 944, 442 (2015).
  9. S. A. Giuliani, G. Martínez-Pinedo, and L. M. Robledo, Fission properties of superheavy nuclei for r-process calculations, Phys. Rev. C 97, 034323 (2018).
  10. J. Sadhukhan, Microscopic theory for spontaneous fission, Front. Phys. 8, 567171 (2020).
  11. H. Goutte, P. Casoli, and J.-F. Berger, Mass and kinetic energy distributions of fission fragments using the time dependent generator coordinate method, Nucl. Phys. A 734, 217 (2004).
  12. D. Regnier, N. Dubray, N. Schunck, and M. Verrière, Fission fragment charge and mass distributions in Pu239(n,f) in the adiabatic nuclear energy density functional theory, Phys. Rev. C 93, 054611 (2016).
  13. H. Tao, J. Zhao, Z. P. Li, T. Nikšić, and D. Vretenar, Microscopic study of induced fission dynamics of Th226 with covariant energy density functionals, Phys. Rev. C 96, 024319 (2017).
  14. J. Zhao, T. Nikšić, D. Vretenar, and S.-G. Zhou, Microscopic self-consistent description of induced fission dynamics: Finite-temperature effects, Phys. Rev. C 99, 014618 (2019).
  15. J. Zhao, J. Xiang, Z.-P. Li, T. Nikšić, D. Vretenar, and S.-G. Zhou, Time-dependent generator-coordinate-method study of mass-asymmetric fission of actinides, Phys. Rev. C 99, 054613 (2019).
  16. D. Regnier, N. Dubray, and N. Schunck, From asymmetric to symmetric fission in the fermium isotopes within the time-dependent generator-coordinate-method formalism, Phys. Rev. C 99, 024611 (2019).
  17. M. Verriere, N. Schunck, and T. Kawano, Number of particles in fission fragments, Phys. Rev. C 100, 024612 (2019).
  18. M. Verriere, N. Schunck, and D. Regnier, Microscopic calculation of fission product yields with particle-number projection, Phys. Rev. C 103, 054602 (2021).
  19. J. Zhao, T. Nikšić, and D. Vretenar, Time-dependent generator coordinate method study of fission: Dissipation effects, Phys. Rev. C 105, 054604 (2022).
  20. N. Schunck, M. Verriere, G. Potel Aguilar, R. C. Malone, J. A. Silano, A. P. D. Ramirez, and A. P. Tonchev, Microscopic calculation of fission product yields for odd-mass nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 107, 044312 (2023).
  21. B. Li, D. Vretenar, T. Nikšić, J. Zhao, P. W. Zhao, and J. Meng, Generalized time-dependent generator coordinate method for induced fission dynamics, Front. Phys. 19, 44201 (2024).
  22. B. Li, D. Vretenar, T. Nikšić, P. W. Zhao, and J. Meng, Microscopic model for yields and total kinetic energy in nuclear fission, Phys. Rev. C 111, L051302 (2025).
  23. W. Younes and D. Gogny, Nuclear scission and quantum localization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 132501 (2011).
  24. C. Simenel and A. S. Umar, Formation and dynamics of fission fragments, Phys. Rev. C 89, 031601(R) (2014).
  25. A. Bulgac, P. Magierski, K. J. Roche, and I. Stetcu, Induced fission of Pu240 within a real-time microscopic framework, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 122504 (2016).
  26. A. Bulgac, S. Jin, K. J. Roche, N. Schunck, and I. Stetcu, Fission dynamics of Pu240 from saddle to scission and beyond, Phys. Rev. C 100, 034615 (2019).
  27. G. Scamps, C. Simenel, and D. Lacroix, Superfluid dynamics of Fm258 fission, Phys. Rev. C 92, 011602(R) (2015).
  28. G. Scamps and C. Simenel, Impact of pear-shaped fission fragments on mass-asymmetric fission in actinides, Nature (London) 564, 382 (2018).
  29. B. Li, D. Vretenar, T. Nikšić, P. W. Zhao, and J. Meng, Time-dependent density functional theory study of induced-fission dynamics of Th226, Phys. Rev. C 110, 034302 (2024).
  30. Y. Qiang, J. Pei, and K. Godbey, Quantum entanglement in nuclear fission, Phys. Lett. B 861, 139248 (2025).
  31. J. N. Wilson, Angular momentum generation in nuclear fission, Nature (London) 590, 566 (2021).
  32. A. Bulgac, I. Abdurrahman, S. Jin, K. Godbey, N. Schunck, and I. Stetcu, Fission fragment intrinsic spins and their correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 142502 (2021).
  33. P. Marević, N. Schunck, J. Randrup, and R. Vogt, Angular momentum of fission fragments from microscopic theory, Phys. Rev. C 104, L021601 (2021).
  34. A. Bulgac, I. Abdurrahman, K. Godbey, and I. Stetcu, Fragment intrinsic spins and fragments’ relative orbital angular momentum in nuclear fission, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 022501 (2022).
  35. A. Bulgac, Angular correlation between the fission fragment intrinsic spins, Phys. Rev. C 106, 014624 (2022).
  36. G. Scamps, Microscopic description of the torque acting on fission fragments, Phys. Rev. C 106, 054614 (2022).
  37. G. Scamps and G. Bertsch, Generation, dynamics, and correlations of the fission fragments’ angular momenta, Phys. Rev. C 108, 034616 (2023).
  38. G. Scamps, I. Abdurrahman, M. Kafker, A. Bulgac, and I. Stetcu, Spatial orientation of the fission fragment intrinsic spins and their correlations, Phys. Rev. C 108, L061602 (2023).
  39. J. Randrup and R. Vogt, Generation of fragment angular momentum in fission, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 062502 (2021).
  40. I. Stetcu, A. E. Lovell, P. Talou, T. Kawano, S. Marin, S. A. Pozzi, and A. Bulgac, Angular momentum removal by neutron and γ-ray emissions during fission fragment decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 222502 (2021).
  41. J. Randrup, T. Døssing, and R. Vogt, Probing fission fragment angular momenta by photon measurements, Phys. Rev. C 106, 014609 (2022).
  42. J. Randrup, Coupled fission fragment angular momenta, Phys. Rev. C 106, L051601 (2022).
  43. T. Døssing, S. Åberg, M. Albertsson, B. G. Carlsson, and J. Randrup, Angular momentum in fission fragments, Phys. Rev. C 109, 034615 (2024).
  44. J. M. Verbeke, J. Randrup, and R. Vogt, Fission reaction event yield algorithm FREYA 2.0.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 222, 263 (2018).
  45. P. Talou, I. Stetcu, P. Jaffke, M. Rising, A. Lovell, and T. Kawano, Fission fragment decay simulations with the CGMF code, Comput. Phys. Commun. 269, 108087 (2021).
  46. Y. Abdelrahman, J. Durell, W. Gelletly, W. Phillips, I. Ahmad, R. Holzmann, R. Janssens, T. Khoo, W. Ma, and M. Drigert, Average spins of primary fission fragments, Phys. Lett. B 199, 504 (1987).
  47. O. Litaize, O. Serot, and L. Berge, Fission modeling with FIFRELIN, Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 177 (2015).
  48. W. E. Ormand, Monte Carlo hauser-feshbach computer code system to model nuclear reactions: YAHFC, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Technical Report No. LLNL-TR-824700 (1808762, 1038262), 2021 (unpublished).
  49. A. Koning, S. Hilaire, and S. Goriely, TALYS: Modeling of nuclear reactions, Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 131 (2023).
  50. H. R. Bowman, S. G. Thompson, J. C. D. Milton, and W. J. Swiatecki, Velocity and angular distributions of prompt neutrons from spontaneous fission of Cf252, Phys. Rev. 126, 2120 (1962).
  51. A. Gavron, Angular distribution of neutrons from fission fragments, Phys. Rev. C 13, 2562 (1976).
  52. J. S. Pringle and F. D. Brooks, Angular correlation of neutrons from spontaneous fission of Cf252, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1563 (1975).
  53. R. Vogt and J. Randrup, Improved modeling of photon observables with the event-by-event fission model FREYA, Phys. Rev. C 96, 064620 (2017).
  54. R. Vogt and J. Randrup, Angular momentum effects in fission, Phys. Rev. C 103, 014610 (2021).
  55. P. Ring and P. Schuck, The Nuclear Many-Body Problem, Texts and Monographs in Physics (Springer, Berlin, 2004).
  56. Energy Density Functional Methods for Atomic Nuclei, edited by N. Schunck, IOP Expanding Physics (IOP, Bristol, UK, 2019).
  57. W. Younes and D. Gogny, Microscopic calculation of Pu240 scission with a finite-range effective force, Phys. Rev. C 80, 054313 (2009).
  58. N. Dubray and D. Regnier, Numerical search of discontinuities in self-consistent potential energy surfaces, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 2035 (2012).
  59. M. Verriere and D. Regnier, The time-dependent generator coordinate method in nuclear physics, Front. Phys. 8, 233 (2020).
  60. M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions: With Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, Dover Books on Advanced Mathematics (Dover, New York, 1965).
  61. J. A. Sheikh, J. Dobaczewski, P. Ring, L. M. Robledo, and C. Yannouleas, Symmetry restoration in mean-field approaches, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 48, 123001 (2021).
  62. C. Simenel, Particle transfer reactions with the time-dependent Hartree-Fock theory using a particle number projection technique, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 192701 (2010).
  63. G. Scamps and D. Lacroix, Effect of pairing on one- and two-nucleon transfer below the Coulomb barrier: A time-dependent microscopic description, Phys. Rev. C 87, 014605 (2013).
  64. K. Sekizawa and K. Yabana, Particle-number projection method in time-dependent Hartree-Fock theory: Properties of reaction products, Phys. Rev. C 90, 064614 (2014).
  65. K. Sekizawa, Microscopic description of production cross sections including deexcitation effects, Phys. Rev. C 96, 014615 (2017).
  66. D. A. Varshalovich, A. N. Moskalev, and V. K. Khersonskii, Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum (World Scientific, Singapore, 1988).
  67. V. N. Fomenko, Projection in the occupation-number space and the canonical transformation, J. Phys. A: Gen. Phys. 3, 8 (1970).
  68. L. M. Robledo, Practical formulation of the extended Wick’s theorem and the Onishi formula, Phys. Rev. C 50, 2874 (1994).
  69. P. Marević and N. Schunck, Fission of Pu240 with symmetry-restored density functional theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 102504 (2020).
  70. L. M. Robledo, Particle number projection on a spatial domain, arXiv:2503.02696.
  71. W. Younes, D. M. Gogny, and J.-F. Berger, A Microscopic Theory of Fission Dynamics Based on the Generator Coordinate Method, Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer International, Cham, 2019), Vol. 950.
  72. D. Regnier, N. Dubray, M. Verrière, and N. Schunck, FELIX-2.0: New version of the finite element solver for the time dependent generator coordinate method with the Gaussian overlap approximation, Comput. Phys. Commun. 225, 180 (2018).
  73. P. Marević, N. Schunck, E. Ney, R. Navarro Pérez, M. Verriere, and J. O'Neal, Axially-deformed solution of the Skyrme-Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov equations using the transformed harmonic oscillator basis (IV) HFBTHO (v4.0): A new version of the program, Comput. Phys. Commun. 276, 108367 (2022).
  74. H. Goutte, J. F. Berger, P. Casoli, and D. Gogny, Microscopic approach of fission dynamics applied to fragment kinetic energy and mass distributions in U238, Phys. Rev. C 71, 024316 (2005).
  75. R. Bernard, H. Goutte, D. Gogny, and W. Younes, Microscopic and nonadiabatic Schrödinger equation derived from the generator coordinate method based on zero- and two-quasiparticle states, Phys. Rev. C 84, 044308 (2011).
  76. P. Carpentier, N. Pillet, D. Lacroix, N. Dubray, and D. Regnier, Construction of continuous collective energy landscapes for large amplitude nuclear many-body problems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 152501 (2024).
  77. J. Bartel, P. Quentin, M. Brack, C. Guet, and H.-B. Håkansson, Towards a better parametrisation of Skyrme-like effective forces: A critical study of the SkM force, Nucl. Phys. A 386, 79 (1982).
  78. J. Dobaczewski, W. Nazarewicz, and M. V. Stoitsov, Contact pairing interaction for the Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov calculations, in The Nuclear Many-Body Problem 2001, Nato Science Series, No. 53 (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2002), p. 181.
  79. N. Schunck, D. Duke, H. Carr, and A. Knoll, Description of induced nuclear fission with Skyrme energy functionals: Static potential energy surfaces and fission fragment properties, Phys. Rev. C 90, 054305 (2014).
  80. R. Müller, A. A. Naqvi, F. Käppeler, and F. Dickmann, Fragment velocities, energies, and masses from fast neutron induced fission of U235, Phys. Rev. C 29, 885 (1984).
  81. P. Geltenbort, F. Gönnenwein, and A. Oed, Precision measurements of mean kinetic energy release in thermal-neutron-induced fission of U233, U235 and Pu239, Radiat. Eff. 93, 57 (1986).
  82. G. Simon, J. Trochon, F. Brisard, and C. Signarbieux, Pulse height defect in an ionization chamber investigated by cold fission measurements, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 286, 220 (1990).
  83. S. Zeynalov, V. I. Furman, F. J. Hambsch, M. Florec, V. Y. Konovalov, V. A. Khryachkov, and Y. S. Zamyatnin, Investigation of mass-tke distributions of fission fragments from the U(n,f)235-reaction in resonances, in Proceedings of the 13th International Seminar on Interaction of Neutrons with Nuclei (ISINN-13) - Neutron Spectroscopy, Nuclear Structure, Related Topics (JINR, Dubna, 2006), Vol. 13, pp. 351–359.
  84. C. Romano, Y. Danon, R. Block, J. Thompson, E. Blain, and E. Bond, Fission fragment mass and energy distributions as a function of incident neutron energy measured in a lead slowing-down spectrometer, Phys. Rev. C 81, 014607 (2010).
  85. C. Wagemans, E. Allaert, A. Deruytter, R. Barthélémy, and P. Schillebeeckx, Comparison of the energy and mass characteristics of the Pu239(nth,f) and the Pu240(sf) fragments, Phys. Rev. C 30, 218 (1984).
  86. P. Schillebeeckx, C. Wagemans, A. Deruytter, and R. Barthélémy, Comparative study of the fragments’ mass and energy characteristics in the spontaneous fussion of Pu238, Pu240 and Pu242 and in the thermal-neutron-induced fission of Pu239, Nucl. Phys. A 545, 623 (1992).
  87. K. Nishio, Y. Nakagome, I. Kanno, and I. Kimura, Measurement of fragment mass dependent kinetic energy and neutron multiplicity for thermal neutron induced fission of plutonium-239, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 32, 404 (1995).
  88. C. Tsuchiya, Y. Nakagome, H. Yamana, H. Moriyama, K. Nishio, I. Kanno, K. Shin, and I. Kimura, Simultaneous measurement of prompt neutrons and fission fragments for Pu239(nth,f), J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 37, 941 (2000).
  89. O. Serot, A. Chebboubi, J. Nicholson, G. Kessedjian, O. Litaize, C. Sage, O. Meplan, M. Ramdhane, U. Köster, and Y. H. Kim, Angular momentum of doubly magic Sn132 fission product: Experimental and theoretical aspects, EPJ Web of Conf. 284, 04022 (2023).
  90. Z. Patel, P.-A. Söderström, Z. Podolyák, P. H. Regan, P. M. Walker, H. Watanabe, E. Ideguchi, G. S. Simpson, H. L. Liu, S. Nishimura, Q. Wu, F. R. Xu, F. Browne, P. Doornenbal, G. Lorusso, S. Rice, L. Sinclair, T. Sumikama, J. Wu, Z. Y. Xu et al., Isomer decay spectroscopy of Sm164 and Gd166: Midshell collectivity around N=100, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 262502 (2014).
  91. L. Satpathy and S. K. Patra, Shell overcomes repulsive nuclear force instability, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 30, 771 (2004).
  92. S. K. Ghorui, B. B. Sahu, C. R. Praharaj, and S. K. Patra, Examining the stability of Sm nuclei around N=100, Phys. Rev. C 85, 064327 (2012).
  93. R. Surman, J. Engel, J. R. Bennett, and B. S. Meyer, Source of the rare-earth element peak in r-process nucleosynthesis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1809 (1997).
  94. M. R. Mumpower, G. C. McLaughlin, and R. Surman, Formation of the rare-earth peak: Gaining insight into late-time r-process dynamics, Phys. Rev. C 85, 045801 (2012).
  95. G. F. Bertsch, T. Kawano, and L. M. Robledo, Angular momentum of fission fragments, Phys. Rev. C 99, 034603 (2019).
  96. P. Marević and N. Schunck, Microscopic angular momentum distributions in fragments for neutron-induced fission of U235 and Pu239, Zenodo (2025), 10.5281/zenodo.17303185.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. C 113, 014612– Published 28 January, 2026
  • Received 12 June 2025
  • Accepted 20 October 2025
Article part of CHORUS
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2026 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation