- Editors' Suggestion
- Access by Xinjiang University
Eight-dimensional calculations of the third barrier in Th
Phys. Rev. C 87, 044308 – Published 8 April, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.87.044308
Abstract
We find the height of the third fission barrier and energy of the third minimum in Th using the macroscopic-microscopic model, which is very well tested in this region of nuclei. For the first time it is done on an eight-dimensional deformation hypercube. The dipole distortion is included among the shape variables to ensure that no important shapes are missed. The saddle point is found on a lattice containing more than points by the immersion water flow method. The shallow third minimum, MeV, agrees with the experimental data of Blons et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1749 (1975)]. This is in sharp contrast with the status of the third minima in U: their experimental depth of MeV contradicts all realistic theoretical predictions. We emphasize the importance of repeating the experiment on Th, by a technique similar to that used in the uranium nuclei, for settling the puzzle of the third minima in actinides.
Article Text
References (32)
- A. Krasznahorkay, in Handbook of Nuclear Chemistry (Springer Science+Business Media, New York, 2011), Chap. 5.
- J. Blons, C. Mazur, and D. Paya, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1749 (1975).
- J. Blons, C. Mazur, D. Paya, M. Ribrag, and H. Weigmann, Nucl. Phys. A 414, 1 (1984).
- J. Blons, B. Fabbre, C. Mazur, D. Paya, M. Ribrag, and Y. Petin, Nucl. Phys. A 477, 231 (1988).
- J. Blons, Nucl. Phys. A 502, 121c (1989).
- L. Csige et al., Phys. Rev. C 85, 054306 (2012).
- J. D. McDonnell, W. Nazarewicz, and J. A. Sheikh, in Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Fission and Fission Product Spectroscopy, 2009 (unpublished).
- J. D. McDonnell, Ph.D. thesis, University of Tennesse, 2012.
- J. D. McDonnell, W. Nazarewicz, and J. A. Sheikh, arXiv:1302.1165v1.
- M. Bender, Ph.D. thesis, Universitat Frankfurt, 1998; M. Bender, P-H. Heenen, and P-G. Reinhard, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 121 (2003).
- J. F. Berger, M. Girod, and D. Gogny, Nucl. Phys. A, 502, 85c (1989).
- L. Bonneau, P. Quentin, and D. Samsoen, Eur. Phys. J. A 21, 391 (2004).
- J.-P. Delaroche, M. Girod, H. Goutte, and J. Libert, Nucl. Phys. A 771, 103 (2006).
- T. Ichikawa, A. Iwamoto, P. Möller, and A. J. Sierk, Phys. Rev. C 86, 024610 (2012).
- S. Ćwiok, W. Nazarewicz, J.X. Saladin, W. Płóciennik, and A. Johnson, Phys. Lett. B 322, 304 (1994).
- W. Nazarewicz, S. Ćwiok, J. Dobaczewski, and J. X. Saladin, Acta Phys. Pol. B 26, 189 (1995).
- G. M. Ter-Akopian et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 32 (1996).
- A. Krasznahorkay et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2073 (1998).
- P. Möller and A. Iwamoto, Phys. Rev. C 61, 047602 (2000).
- M. Kowal and J. Skalski, Phys. Rev. C 85, 061302(R) (2012).
- P. Möller, D. G. Madland, A. J. Sierk, and A. Iwamoto, Nature 409, 485 (2001).
- P. Möller, A. J. Sierk, and A. Iwamoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 072501 (2004).
- S. Ćwiok, J. Dudek, W. Nazarewicz, J. Skalski, and T. Werner, Comput. Phys. Commun. 46, 379 (1987).
- P. Jachimowicz, M. Kowal, and J. Skalski, Phys. Rev. C 85, 034305 (2012).
- H. J. Krappe, J. R. Nix, and A. J. Sierk, Phys. Rev. C 20, 992 (1979).
- I. Muntian, Z. Patyk, and A. Sobiczewski, Acta Phys. Pol. B 32, 691 (2001).
- M. Kowal, P. Jachimowicz, and A. Sobiczewski, Phys. Rev. C 82, 014303 (2010).
- M. Kowal and J. Skalski, Phys. Rev. C 82, 054303 (2010).
- G. N. Smirenkin, IAEA Report INDC(CCP)-359, 1993 (unpublished), http://www-nds.iaea.org/RIPL-3/; A. Mamdouh, J. M. Pearson, M. Rayet, and F. Tondeur, Nucl. Phys. A 644, 389 (1998), http://www-nds.iaea.org/RIPL-2/.
- L. Csige et al., Phys. Rev. C 80, 011301(R) (2009).
- P. G. Thirolf and D. Habs, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 49, 325 (2002); P. G. Thirolf, D.Dc. thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen, 2003.
- P. G. Thirolf et al., EPJ Web Conf. 38, 08001 (2012).