Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Proton emission off nuclei induced by kaons in flight

V. K. Magas1,*, J. Yamagata-Sekihara2,3, S. Hirenzaki4, E. Oset3, and A. Ramos1

  • 1Departament d’Estructura i Constituents de la Materia, Universitat de Barcelona, Diagonal 647, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain
  • 2Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
  • 3Departamento de Física Teórica and IFIC, Centro Mixto Universidad de Valencia-CSIC Institutos de Investigación de Paterna, Apartado 22085, 46071 Valencia, Spain
  • 4Department of Physics, Nara Women’s University, Nara 630-8506, Japan

  • *vladimir@ecm.ub.es

Phys. Rev. C 81, 024609 – Published 24 February, 2010

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.81.024609

Abstract

We study the (K,p) reaction on nuclei with a 1 GeV/c momentum kaon beam, paying special attention to the region of emitted protons having kinetic energy above 600 MeV, which was used to claim a deeply attractive kaon nucleus optical potential. Our model describes the nuclear reaction in the framework of a local density approach and the calculations are performed following two different procedures: one is based on a many-body method using the Lindhard function and the other is based on a Monte Carlo simulation. The simulation method offers flexibility to account for processes other than kaon quasielastic scattering, such as K absorption by one and two nucleons, producing hyperons, and allows consideration of final-state interactions of the K, the p, and all other primary and secondary particles on their way out of the nucleus, as well as the weak decay of the produced hyperons into πN. We find a limited sensitivity of the cross section to the strength of the kaon optical potential. We also show a serious drawback in the experimental setup—the requirement for having, together with the energetic proton, at least one charged particle detected in the decay counter surrounding the target—as we find that the shape of the original cross section is appreciably distorted, to the point of invalidating the claims made in the experimental paper on the strength of the kaon nucleus optical.

Article Text

References (68)

  1. E. Friedman, A. Gal, and C. J. Batty, Nucl. Phys. A579, 518 (1994).
  2. D. B. Kaplan and A. E. Nelson, Phys. Lett. B175, 57 (1986).
  3. E. Friedman, A. Gal, J. Mares, and A. Cieply, Phys. Rev. C 60, 024314 (1999).
  4. E. Friedman and A. Gal, Phys. Rep. 452, 89 (2007).
  5. T. Muto, T. Maruyama, and T. Tatsumi, Phys. Rev. C 79, 035207 (2009).
  6. T. Maruyama, T. Tatsumi, T. Endo, and S. Chiba, Recent Res. Dev. Phys. 7, 1 (2006).
  7. T. Maruyama, T. Tatsumi, D. N. Voskresensky, T. Tanigawa, T. Endo, and S. Chiba, Phys. Rev. C 73, 035802 (2006).
  8. J. Mares, E. Friedman, and A. Gal, Phys. Lett. B606, 295 (2005).
  9. J. Mares, E. Friedman, and A. Gal, Nucl. Phys. A770, 84 (2006).
  10. D. Gazda, E. Friedman, A. Gal, and J. Mares, Phys. Rev. C 76, 055204 (2007).
  11. X. H. Zhong, L. Li, C. H. Cai, and P. Z. Ning, Commun. Theor. Phys. 41, 573 (2004).
  12. X. H. Zhong, G. X. Peng, L. Li, and P. Z. Ning, Phys. Rev. C 74, 034321 (2006).
  13. L. Dang, L. Li, X. H. Zhong, and P. Z. Ning, Phys. Rev. C 75, 068201 (2007).
  14. M. Lutz, Phys. Lett. B426, 12 (1998).
  15. A. Ramos and E. Oset, Nucl. Phys. A671, 481 (2000).
  16. J. Schaffner-Bielich, V. Koch, and M. Effenberger, Nucl. Phys. A669, 153 (2000).
  17. A. Cieply, E. Friedman, A. Gal, and J. Mares, Nucl. Phys. A696, 173 (2001).
  18. L. Tolos, A. Ramos, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. C 74, 015203 (2006).
  19. S. Hirenzaki, Y. Okumura, H. Toki, E. Oset, and A. Ramos, Phys. Rev. C 61, 055205 (2000).
  20. A. Baca, C. Garcia-Recio, and J. Nieves, Nucl. Phys. A673, 335 (2000).
  21. Y. Akaishi and T. Yamazaki, Phys. Rev. C 65, 044005 (2002).
  22. Y. Akaishi, A. Dote, and T. Yamazaki, Phys. Lett. B613, 140 (2005).
  23. E. Oset and H. Toki, Phys. Rev. C 74, 015207 (2006).
  24. T. Hyodo and W. Weise, Phys. Rev. C 77, 035204 (2008).
  25. T. Yamazaki and Y. Akaishi, Nucl. Phys. A792, 229 (2007).
  26. E. Oset, V. K. Magas, A. Ramos, and H. Toki, in Proceedings of the IX International Conference on Hypernuclear and Strange Particle Physics, Mainz (Germany), 10–14 October 2006, edited by J. Pochodzalla and Th. Walcher (Springer, Germany, 2007), p. 263.
  27. A. Ramos, V. K. Magas, E. Oset, and H. Toki, Nucl. Phys. A804, 219 (2008).
  28. N. V. Shevchenko, A. Gal, J. Mares, and J. Revai, Phys. Rev. C 76, 044004 (2007).
  29. A. Dote, T. Hyodo, and W. Weise, Nucl. Phys. A804, 197 (2008).
  30. Y. Ikeda and T. Sato, Phys. Rev. C 76, 035203 (2007).
  31. T. Yamazaki and Y. Akaishi, Phys. Rev. C 76, 045201 (2007).
  32. T. Suzuki et al., Phys. Lett. B597, 263 (2004).
  33. M. Agnello et al. (FINUDA Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 212303 (2005).
  34. M. Agnello et al. (FINUDA Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B654, 80 (2007).
  35. V. K. Magas, E. Oset, A. Ramos, and H. Toki, Phys. Rev. C 74, 025206 (2006); A. Ramos, V. K. Magas, E. Oset, and H. Toki, Eur. Phys. J. A 31, 684 (2007).
  36. V. K. Magas, E. Oset, A. Ramos, and H. Toki, arXiv:nucl-th/0611098.
  37. V. K. Magas, E. Oset, and A. Ramos, Phys. Rev. C 77, 065210 (2008); arXiv:0901.1086 [nucl-th]; arXiv:0901.3306 [nucl-th].
  38. T. Suzuki et al. (KEK-PS. E549 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 76, 068202 (2007).
  39. M. Sato et al., Phys. Lett. B659, 107 (2008).
  40. M. Agnello et al. (FINUDA Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. A 775, 35 (2006).
  41. S. Piano, presented at the 10th International Conference on Hypernuclear and Strange Particle Physics (Hyp X), “RICOTTI,” Tokai, Ibaraki, Japan, 14–18 September 2009.
  42. G. Bendiscioli et al., Nucl. Phys. A789, 222 (2007).
  43. T. Yamazaki et al., Hyperfine Interact. 193, 181 (2009).
  44. T. Kishimoto et al., Prog. Theor. Phys. 118, 181 (2007).
  45. O. Morimatsu and K. Yazaki, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 33, 679 (1994).
  46. J. Yamagata, H. Nagahiro, and S. Hirenzaki, Phys. Rev. C 74, 014604 (2006).
  47. J. Yamagata, H. Nagahiro, R. Kimura, and S. Hirenzaki, Phys. Rev. C 76, 045204 (2007).
  48. J. Yamagata-Sekihara, D. Jido, H. Nagahiro, and S. Hirenzaki, Phys. Rev. C 80, 045204 (2009).
  49. J. Yamagata and S. Hirenzaki, Eur. Phys. J. A 31, 255 (2007).
  50. W. M. Alberico, A. Molinari, T. W. Donnelly, E. L. Kronenberg, and J. W. Van Orden, Phys. Rev. C 38, 1801 (1988).
  51. A. Gil, J. Nieves, and E. Oset, Nucl. Phys. A627, 543 (1997).
  52. R. C. Carrasco, E. Oset, and L. L. Salcedo, Nucl. Phys. A541, 585 (1992).
  53. E. Oset, D. Strottman, H. Toki, and J. Navarro, Phys. Rev. C 48, 2395 (1993).
  54. M. Urban and J. Wambach, Phys. Rev. C 65, 067302 (2002).
  55. C. W. De Jager, H. De Vries, and C. De Vries, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 14, 479 (1974).
  56. E. Friedman, A. Gal, and J. Mares, Nucl. Phys. A761, 283 (2005).
  57. B. Conforto et al., Nucl. Phys. B105, 189 (1976).
  58. L. L. Salcedo, E. Oset, M. J. Vicente-Vacas, and C. Garcia-Recio, Nucl. Phys. A484, 557 (1988).
  59. R. C. Carrasco, M. J. Vicente Vacas, and E. Oset, Nucl. Phys. A570, 701 (1994).
  60. A. Gil, J. Nieves, and E. Oset, Nucl. Phys. A627, 599 (1997).
  61. A. Ramos, M. J. Vicente-Vacas, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. C 55, 735 (1997); 66, 039903(E) (2002).
  62. G. Garbarino, A. Parreno, and A. Ramos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 112501 (2003).
  63. T. Kishimoto (private communication).
  64. C. Amsler et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Lett. B667, 1 (2008); http://pdg.lbl.gov/.
  65. P. A. Katz, K. Bunnell, M. Derrick, T. Fields, L. G. Hyman, and G. Keyes, Phys. Rev. D 1, 1267 (1970).
  66. J. Cugnon, D. L’Hôte, and J. Vandermeulen, Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 111, 215 (1996).
  67. S. K. Singh and M. J. Vicente Vacas, Phys. Rev. D 74, 053009 (2006).
  68. V. K. Magas, J. Yamagata-Sekihara, S. Hirenzaki, E. Oset, and A. Ramos, arXiv:0911.2091 [nucl-th]; A. Ramos, V. K. Magas, J. Yamagata-Sekihara, S. Hirenzaki, and E. Oset, arXiv:0911.4841 [nucl-th]; E. Oset et al., arXiv:0912.3145 [nucl-th].

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation