- Access by Xinjiang University
Effect of Two-Body Correlations on Sum Rules for Nuclear Charge Monopole and Dipole Modes
Phys. Rev. C 8, 1981 – Published 1 December, 1973
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.8.1981
Abstract
We have evaluated energy- and non-energy-weighted sum rules ( and ) for the nuclear charge monopole and dipole modes. Sums are given for different intermediate isospins, using the method in which sums are split into isoscalar, vector, and tensor parts. This facilitates the separation of model-dependent quantities, and we particularly consider possible modifications of shell-model evaluations arising from correlations. Four important specific results are: (i) The shell-model value of in the dipole case is carefully calculated for , and is 30% larger than the observed value; this difference must arise from correlations. (ii) The previously suggested smallness of the isotensor part of is not general, but depends on using a shell-model wave function; it is shown theoretically and from experiment that the isotensor part may be large. (iii) The effects of correlations on can be displayed in a form requiring no new calculations (given published Tamm-Dancoff diagonalizations). (iv) There is a close relation between the charge-exchange part of in the dipole and monopole problems, so one can use data on the former to evaluate the latter; also, a connection with the effective charge and effective mass is shown.
References (31)
- A. M. Lane and A. Z. Mekjian, in Advances in Nuclear Physics (Plenum, New York, 1973), Vol. 7
- J. S. Levinger, Nuclear Photodisintegration (Oxford U. P., Oxford, 1960)
- M. Danos and E. G. Fuller, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 15, 29 (1965)
- [2], pp. 54, 55
- E. Hayward, B. F. Gibson, and J. S. O'Connell, Phys. Rev. C 5, 846 (1972) (p. 850)
- S. Fallieros and B. Goulard, Nucl. Phys. A147, 593 (1970)
- R. Ö. Akyüz and S. Fallieros, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 1016 (1971)
- R. Leonardi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 836 (1972)
- R. Leonardi and M. Rosa-Clot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 874 (1969)
- K. Okamoto, Phys. Rev. 166, 428 (1959)
- A. Veyssière, H. Beil, R. Bergère, F. Carlos, and A. Lepretre, Nucl. Phys. A159, 561 (1970)
- S. Kahana, H. C. Lee, and C. K. Scott, Phys. Rev. 180, 956 (1969)
- J. M. Soper, M. K. Pal, and A. P. Stamp, Harwell Report No. T.P. 148, 1964 (unpublished) J. M. Soper, private communication
- S. M. Perez, Phys. Lett. 33B, 317 (1970) unpublished private communication
- R. Bergère, H. Beil, and A. Veyssière, Nucl. Phys. A121, 463 (1968)
- G. E. Brown, J. A. Evans, and D. J. Thouless, Nucl. Phys. 24, 1 (1961)
- D. J. Thouless, Nucl. Phys. 22, 78 (1961)
- G. E. Brown and M. Bolsterli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 472 (1959)
- T. T. S. Kuo, J. Blomquist, and G. E. Brown, Phys. Lett. 31B, 93 (1970) private communication
- M. Kirson and L. Zamick, Phys. Lett. 31B, 160 (1961)
- V. Gillet, A. M. Green, and E. A. Sanderson, Nucl. Phys. 88, 321 (1965)
- A. Z. Mekjian, Nucl. Phys. 146, 288 (1970)
- H. Dahman, F. Dreyer, J. Staude, and H. H. Thies, Nucl. Phys. A164, 140 (1971) C. B. Dover and J. Hüfner, Phys. Lett. 32B, 253 (1970)
- E. M. Diener, J. F. Arnann, P. Paul, and J. D. Vergados, Phys. Rev. C 7, 705 (1973)
- J. D. Vergados and T. T. S. Kuo, Nucl. Phys. A186, 225 (1971) Phys. Lett. 35, 93 (1971)
- A. Bohr and B. Mottelson, Neutron Capture Gamma Ray Spectroscopy (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1969), p. 3
- J. I. Fujita and M. Hirata, Phys. Lett. 37B, 237 (1971)
- J. Van Vleck, Phys. Rev. 48, 367 (1935)
- G. E. Brown, J. H. Gunn, and P. Gould, Nucl. Phys. 46, 598 (1963)
- A. Z. Mekjian, Nucl. Phys. A146, 288 (1970)
- J. V. Noble, Phys. Lett. 35B, 140 (1971)