Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Effect of Two-Body Correlations on Sum Rules for Nuclear Charge Monopole and Dipole Modes

A. M. Lane

A. Z. Mekjian*

  • Theoretical Physics Division, Atomic Energy Research Establishment, Harwell, Didcot, Berkshire, England

  • Physics Department, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903

  • *Work supported in part by the National Science Foundation.

Phys. Rev. C 8, 1981 – Published 1 December, 1973

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.8.1981

Abstract

We have evaluated energy- and non-energy-weighted sum rules (N and M) for the nuclear charge monopole and dipole modes. Sums are given for different intermediate isospins, using the method in which sums are split into isoscalar, vector, and tensor parts. This facilitates the separation of model-dependent quantities, and we particularly consider possible modifications of shell-model evaluations arising from correlations. Four important specific results are: (i) The shell-model value of M in the dipole case is carefully calculated for Pb208, and is 30% larger than the observed value; this difference must arise from correlations. (ii) The previously suggested smallness of the isotensor part of M is not general, but depends on using a shell-model wave function; it is shown theoretically and from experiment that the isotensor part may be large. (iii) The effects of correlations on M can be displayed in a form requiring no new calculations (given published Tamm-Dancoff diagonalizations). (iv) There is a close relation between the charge-exchange part of N in the dipole and monopole problems, so one can use data on the former to evaluate the latter; also, a connection with the effective M1 charge and effective mass is shown.

References (31)

  1. A. M. Lane and A. Z. Mekjian, in Advances in Nuclear Physics (Plenum, New York, 1973), Vol. 7
  2. J. S. Levinger, Nuclear Photodisintegration (Oxford U. P., Oxford, 1960)
  3. M. Danos and E. G. Fuller, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 15, 29 (1965)
  4. [2], pp. 54, 55
  5. E. Hayward, B. F. Gibson, and J. S. O'Connell, Phys. Rev. C 5, 846 (1972) (p. 850)
  6. S. Fallieros and B. Goulard, Nucl. Phys. A147, 593 (1970)
  7. R. Ö. Akyüz and S. Fallieros, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 1016 (1971)
  8. R. Leonardi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 836 (1972)
  9. R. Leonardi and M. Rosa-Clot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 874 (1969)
  10. K. Okamoto, Phys. Rev. 166, 428 (1959)
  11. A. Veyssière, H. Beil, R. Bergère, F. Carlos, and A. Lepretre, Nucl. Phys. A159, 561 (1970)
  12. S. Kahana, H. C. Lee, and C. K. Scott, Phys. Rev. 180, 956 (1969)
  13. J. M. Soper, M. K. Pal, and A. P. Stamp, Harwell Report No. T.P. 148, 1964 (unpublished) J. M. Soper, private communication
  14. S. M. Perez, Phys. Lett. 33B, 317 (1970) unpublished private communication
  15. R. Bergère, H. Beil, and A. Veyssière, Nucl. Phys. A121, 463 (1968)
  16. G. E. Brown, J. A. Evans, and D. J. Thouless, Nucl. Phys. 24, 1 (1961)
  17. D. J. Thouless, Nucl. Phys. 22, 78 (1961)
  18. G. E. Brown and M. Bolsterli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 472 (1959)
  19. T. T. S. Kuo, J. Blomquist, and G. E. Brown, Phys. Lett. 31B, 93 (1970) private communication
  20. M. Kirson and L. Zamick, Phys. Lett. 31B, 160 (1961)
  21. V. Gillet, A. M. Green, and E. A. Sanderson, Nucl. Phys. 88, 321 (1965)
  22. A. Z. Mekjian, Nucl. Phys. 146, 288 (1970)
  23. H. Dahman, F. Dreyer, J. Staude, and H. H. Thies, Nucl. Phys. A164, 140 (1971) C. B. Dover and J. Hüfner, Phys. Lett. 32B, 253 (1970)
  24. E. M. Diener, J. F. Arnann, P. Paul, and J. D. Vergados, Phys. Rev. C 7, 705 (1973)
  25. J. D. Vergados and T. T. S. Kuo, Nucl. Phys. A186, 225 (1971) Phys. Lett. 35, 93 (1971)
  26. A. Bohr and B. Mottelson, Neutron Capture Gamma Ray Spectroscopy (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1969), p. 3
  27. J. I. Fujita and M. Hirata, Phys. Lett. 37B, 237 (1971)
  28. J. Van Vleck, Phys. Rev. 48, 367 (1935)
  29. G. E. Brown, J. H. Gunn, and P. Gould, Nucl. Phys. 46, 598 (1963)
  30. A. Z. Mekjian, Nucl. Phys. A146, 288 (1970)
  31. J. V. Noble, Phys. Lett. 35B, 140 (1971)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation