Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Featured in Physics
  • Rapid Communication
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Neutron negative central charge density: An inclusive-exclusive connection

Gerald A. Miller

John Arrington

  • Department of Physics, University of Washington Seattle, Washington 98195-1560, USA

  • Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA

Phys. Rev. C 78, 032201(R) – Published 9 September, 2008

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.78.032201

Abstract

Models of generalized parton distributions at zero skewness are used to relate the behavior of deep inelastic scattering quark distributions, evaluated at high x, to the transverse charge density evaluated at small distances. We obtain an interpretation of the recently obtained negative central charge density of the neutron. The d quarks dominate the neutron structure function for large values of Bjorken x, where the large momentum of the struck quark has a significant impact on determining the center of momentum and thus the “center” of the nucleon in the transverse position plane.

See Also

Journey to the Center of the Neutron

Don Monroe
Phys. Rev. Focus 22, 11 (2008)

Article Text

References (26)

  1. H. Gao, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 12, 1 (2003); Int. J. Mod. Phys. 12, 567(E) (2003).
  2. C. E. Hyde-Wright and K. de Jager, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 54, 217 (2004).
  3. C. F. Perdrisat, V. Punjabi, and M. Vanderhaeghen, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 59, 694 (2007).
  4. J. Arrington, C. D. Roberts, and J. M. Zanotti, J. Phys. G 34, S23 (2007).
  5. J. J. Kelly, Phys. Rev. C 66, 065203 (2002).
  6. G. A. Miller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 112001 (2007).
  7. J. J. Kelly, Phys. Rev. C 70, 068202 (2004).
  8. R. Bradford, A. Bodek, H. Budd, and J. Arrington, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 159, 127 (2006).
  9. G. A. Miller, E. Piasetzky, and G. Ron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 082002 (2008).
  10. X.-D. Ji, Phys. Rev. D 55, 7114 (1997).
  11. A. V. Radyushkin, Phys. Rev. D 56, 5524 (1997).
  12. J. B. Kogut and D. E. Soper, Phys. Rev. D 1, 2901 (1970).
  13. M. Diehl, Eur. Phys. J. C 25, 223 (2002).
  14. D. E. Soper, Phys. Rev. D 15, 1141 (1977).
  15. M. Burkardt, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 18, 173 (2003).
  16. M. Burkardt, Phys. Rev. D 62, 071503(R) (2000); 66, 119903(E) (2002).
  17. M. Diehl, Th. Feldmann, R. Jakob, and P. Kroll, Eur. Phys. J. C 39, 1 (2005).
  18. M. Guidal, M. V. Polyakov, A. V. Radyushkin, and M. Vanderhaeghen, Phys. Rev. D 72, 054013 (2005).
  19. S. Ahmad, H. Honkanen, S. Liuti, and S. K. Taneja, Phys. Rev. D 75, 094003 (2007).
  20. B. C. Tiburzi, W. Detmold, and G. A. Miller, Phys. Rev. D 70, 093008 (2004).
  21. J. Pumplin et al., JHEP 07 (2002) 012.
  22. G. A. Miller, B. M. K. Nefkens, and I. Slaus, Phys. Rep. 194, 1 (1990).
  23. G. A. Miller, Phys. Rev. C 57, 1492 (1998).
  24. J. T. Londergan and A. W. Thomas, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 41, 49 (1998).
  25. G. A. Miller, A. K. Opper, and E. J. Stephenson, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 56, 253 (2006).
  26. L. L. Foldy, Phys. Rev. 83, 688 (1951).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation