Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Form of the effective interaction in harmonic-oscillator-based effective theory

W. C. Haxton*

  • Institute for Nuclear Theory and Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA

  • *haxton@phys.washington.edu

Phys. Rev. C 77, 034005 – Published 31 March, 2008

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.77.034005

Abstract

I explore the form of the effective interaction in harmonic-oscillator-based effective theory (HOBET) in leading order (LO) through next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order (NLO3). Because the included space in a HOBET (as in the shell model) is defined by the oscillator energy, both long-distance (low-momentum) and short-distance (high-momentum) degrees of freedom reside in the high-energy excluded space. A HOBET effective interaction is developed in which a short-range contact-gradient expansion, free of operator mixing and corresponding to a systematic expansion in nodal quantum numbers, is combined with an exact summation of the relative kinetic energy. By this means the very strong coupling of the included (P) and excluded (Q) spaces by the kinetic energy is removed. One finds a simple and rather surprising result, that the interplay of QT and QV is governed by a single parameter κ, the ratio of an observable, the binding energy |E|, to a parameter in the effective theory, the oscillator energy ω. Once the functional dependence on κ is identified, the remaining order-by-order subtraction of the short-range physics residing in Q becomes systematic and rapidly converging. Numerical calculations are used to demonstrate how well the resulting expansion reproduces the running of Heff from high scales to a typical shell-model scale of 8ω. At NLO3 various global properties of Heff are reproduced to a typical accuracy of 0.01%, or about 1 keV, at 8ω. Channel-by-channel variations in convergence rates are similar to those found in effective field theory approaches. The state dependence of the effective interaction has been a troubling problem in nuclear physics and is embodied in the energy dependence of Heff(|E|) in the Bloch-Horowitz formalism. It is shown that almost all of this state dependence is also extracted in the procedures followed here, isolated in the analytic dependence of Heff on κ. Thus there exists a simple, Hermitian Heff that can be use in spectral calculations. The existence of a systematic operator expansion for Heff, depending on a series of short-range constants augmented by κ, will be important to future efforts to determine the HOBET interaction directly from experiment, rather than from an underlying NN potential.

Article Text

References (15)

  1. S. C. Pieper and R. B. Wiringa, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 51, 53 (2001).
  2. S. Weinberg, Phys. Lett. B251, 288 (1990); Nucl. Phys. B363, 3 (1991); Phys. Lett. B295, 114 (1992).
  3. D. B. Kaplan, M. J. Savage, and M. B. Wise, Phys. Lett. B424, 390 (1998); S. R. Beane, P. F. Bedaque, W. C. Haxton, D. R. Philips, and M. J. Savage, in At the Frontier of Particle Physics–Handbook of QCD, Vol. 1 (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001), p. 133; P. Bedaque and U. Van Kolck, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 52, 339 (2002).
  4. R. B. Wiringa, V. G. J. Stoks, and R. Schiavilla, Phys. Rev. C 51, 38 (1995).
  5. W. C. Haxton and C.-L. Song, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5484 (2000); C. L. Song, Ph.D. thesis, University of Washington, 1998.
  6. W. C. Haxton and T. C. Luu, Nucl. Phys. A690, 15 (2001); Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 182503 (2002); T. C. Luu, S. Bogner, W. C. Haxton, and P. Navratil, Phys. Rev. C 70, 014316 (2004).
  7. S. Y. Lee and K. Suzuki, Phys. Lett. B91, 173 (1980); K. Suzuki and S. Y. Lee, Prog. Theor. Phys. 64, 2091 (1980).
  8. I. Talmi, Helv. Phys. Acta 25, 185 (1952).
  9. R. Haydock, J. Phys. A 7, 2120 (1974).
  10. T. Luu, Ph.D. thesis, University of Washington, 2003.
  11. P. Lepage, lectures given at the VIII Jorge Andre Swieca Summer School (Brazil, 1997), nucl-th/9706029/.
  12. P. Navratil and B. R. Barrett, Phys. Rev. C 57, 562 (1998); 59, 1906 (1999); P. Navratil, J. P. Vary, and B. R. Barrett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5728 (2000).
  13. T. T. S. Kuo and G. E. Brown, Nucl. Phys. A114, 241 (1968).
  14. A. Schwenk, G. E. Brown, and B. Friman, Nucl. Phys. A703, 745 (2002); A. Schwenk, J. Phys. G 31, S1273 (2005).
  15. M. Vallieres, T. K. Das, and H. T. Coelho, Nucl. Phys. A257, 389 (1976); also see G. Chen, Phys. Lett. A328, 123 (2004).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation