- Access by Xinjiang University
Polarization Effects in the Isospin-Coupled Reaction Channels + and +
Phys. Rev. C 6, 366 – Published 1 July, 1972
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.6.366
Abstract
The analyzing-power and differential cross-section excitation functions for the reaction + have been measured at 150° in the energy range from 10.0 to 14.9 MeV, which spans the thresholds of the () quasi-elastic and quasi-inelastic reaction channels leading to the production of the analogs in of the target ground state and (1.46 MeV) excited state, respectively. A pronounced variation in the analyzing power is observed in the () exit channel at just the energy regions where charge-exchange coupling is expected to occur due to the opening of the quasi-elastic and quasi-inelastic channels. Somewhat less expected is the change in analyzing power observed in the elastic proton channel in the vicinity of the quasi-elastic and quasi-inelastic thresholds. Sharp resonance structures are observed in the analyzing-power and differential cross-section excitation functions for the () channel near the quasi-elastic and quasi-inelastic thresholds which are not readily observable in the elastic channel. The analyzing power for the () process has been measured at a number of energies in this region and found to be consistent with zero.
References (18)
- C. F. Moore, C. E. Watson, S. A. A. Zaidi, J. J. Kent, and J. G. Kulleck, Phys. Rev. Letters 17, 926 (1966)
- S. A. A. Zaidi and P. von Brentano, Phys. Letters 23, 466 (1966)
- T. Tamura and C. E. Watson, Phys. Letters 25B, 186 (1967)
- J. Zimányi and B. Gyarmati, Phys. Letters 27B, 120 (1968)
- R. Coker and T. Tamura, Phys. Rev. 182, 1277 (1969) H. Bledsoe, R. Coker, and T. Tamura, to be published
- A. M. Lane, Phys. Letters 33B, 274 (1970)
- J. Zimányi and J. P. Bondorf, Nucl. Phys. A146, 81 (1970) Rev. C 2, 1384 (1970)
- C. F. Moore, Phys. Letters 25B, 408 (1967) R. Heffner, C. Ling, N. Cue, and P. Richard, 26B, 150 (1968)
- W. R. Coker and C. F. Moore, Phys. Letters 25B, 271 (1967)
- R. A. Hinrichs, G. W. Phillips, J. G. Cramer, and H. Wieman, Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 301 (1969) Phys. Rev. C 4, 1366 (1971)
- L. S. Michelman, T. I. Bonner, and J. G. Kulleck, Phys. Letters 28B, 659 (1969)
- G. Clausnitzer, G. Graw, C. F. Moore, and K. Wienhard, Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 793 (1969)
- T. Tamura, private communication
- W. Haeberli, in Polarization Phenomena in Nuclear Reactions, edited by H. H. Barschall and W. Haeberli (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1971), p. 235
- E. Preikschat, G. Michel, G. W. Roth, J. G. Cramer, Jr., and W. G. Weitkamp, in Polarization Phenomena in Nuclear Reactions [14]), p. 832
- J. A. Nolen, Jr., G. C. Morrison, J. P. Schiffer, and N. Williams, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 12, 526 (1967) J. P. Bondorf, C. Ellegaard, J. Kantele, H. Lütken, and P. Vedelsby, Nucl. Phys. A101, 338 (1967)
- K. Wienhard and G. Graw, in Polarization Phenomena in Nuclear Reactions ([14]), p. 655
- C. F. Moore, S. A. A. Zaidi, and J. J. Kent, Phys. Rev. Letters 18, 345 (1967)