Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Two-Pion-Exchange Three-Body Force in Nuclear Matter

R. K. Bhaduri, Y. Nogami, and C. K. Ross

  • Physics Department, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Phys. Rev. C 2, 2082 – Published 1 December, 1970

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.2.2082

Abstract

The contribution of the two-pion-exchange three-nucleon force to the binding energy of nuclear matter is evaluated using the modified pion-mass method of Brown and Green and by the conventional potential approach. Using nonrelativistic formulas, the relation between the two methods is clarified. It is shown that the Brown-Green prescription, as given in their paper, is incorrect when a cutoff in the NN distance is applied and the modified pion mass is momentum dependent. When the correct prescription is used, the first-order contribution becomes sensitive to the pionic form factor chosen. Using the same form factor as used by Brown and Green, the contribution with an NN cutoff of 1 F is only about 0.1 MeV instead of 1.25-MeV repulsion per particle as quoted by them. Another form factor leads to about 0.5-MeV repulsion. The second-order contribution, including the cross terms involving the two-body one-pion-exchange potential and three-body forces, has been recalculated in the Brown-Green spirit after correcting for their earlier error. It is attractive, much larger than the first-order term, and is about the same for the two form factors used. The net effect of the two-pion-exchange three-body force is rather sensitive to the NN cutoff and is about a 4- to 8-MeV per particle attraction in nuclear matter, depending on the cutoff.

References (16)

  1. G. E. Brown and A. M. Green, Nucl. Phys. A137, 1 (1969)
  2. R. K. Bhaduri, B. A. Loiseau, and Y. Nogami, Nucl. Phys. B3, 380 (1967)
  3. B. A. Loiseau and Y. Nogami, Nucl. Phys. B2, 470 (1970) B. A. Loiseau, Ph. D. thesis, McMaster University, 1968 (unpublished)
  4. H. Miyazawa, Phys. Rev. 104, 1741 (1956) J. I. Fujita and H. Miyazawa, Progr. Theoret. Phys. (Kyoto) 17, 360 (1957) R. C. Smith and R. T. Sharp, Can. J. Phys. 38, 1154 (1960) F. M. Coury and W. M. Frank, Nucl. Phys. 46, 257 (1963) Q. Ho-Kim, Nuovo Cimento 44A, 1148 (1966)
  5. E. Satoh and Y. Nogami, Phys. Letters 23B, 243 (1970) Y. Nogami and E. Satoh, Nucl. Phys. B19, 93 (1970) B. A. Loiseau, B9, 169 (1969) G. Chanmugam, Phys. Rev. 186, 1384 (1969) S. R. Choudhury, Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 234 (1969) G. E. Brown, A. M. Green, and W. J. Gerace, Nucl. Phys. A115, 435 (1968) B. H. McKeller and R. Rajaramian, Phys. Rev. Letters 21, 450, 1030 (1968) B. H. McKellerR. RajaramianR. K. Bhaduri, Y. Nogami, P. H. Friesen, and E. L. Tomusiakibid., Ibid. 21, 1828 (1968) P. H. Friesen, M. Sc. thesis, University of Saskatchewan, 1968 (unpublished) R. K. Bhaduri, B. A. Loiseau, and Y. Nogami, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 44, 57 (1967) D. Kiang and Y. Nogami, Nuovo Cimento 51A, 858 (1967) G. Pask, Phys. Letters 25B, 78 (1967) E. M. Nyman, Phys. Rev. 159, 782 (1967) A. Gal, Phys. Rev. Letters 18, 568 (1967)
  6. R. K. Bhaduri, B. A. Loiseau, and Y. Nogami, Ann. Phys. (N. Y.) 44, 57 (1967)
  7. H. Hoshizaki and S. Machida, Progr. Theoret. Phys. (Kyoto) 24, 1325 (1960)
  8. Omitted endnote

  9. Omitted endnote

  10. [2,3]
  11. E. Ferrari and F. Selleri, Nuovo Cimento 21, 1028 (1961) ibid.27, 1450 (1963)
  12. H. P. Durr and H. Pilkuhn, Nuovo Cimento 40, 899 (1965)
  13. H. Euler, Z. Physik 105, 553 (1937)
  14. G. E. Brown, G. T. Schappert, and C. W. Wong, Nucl. Phys. 56, 191 (1965)
  15. T. Dahlblom, K. G. Fogel, B. Qvist, and A. Torn, Nucl. Phys. 56, 177 (1964)
  16. A. E. S. Green and T. Sawada, Rev. Mod. Phys. 39, 594 (1967)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation