- Access by Xinjiang University
Muonic x-ray measurement for the nuclear charge distribution: The case of stable palladium isotopes
Phys. Rev. C 111, 034313 – Published 11 March, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.111.034313
Abstract
Background: The nuclear charge radius and distribution are the most fundamental quantities of the atomic nucleus. From the muonic transition energies, the absolute charge radius has been experimentally obtained, while there have been no established methods to discuss the distribution.
Purpose: The muonic transition energies for five palladium isotopes with a mass number , 105, 106, 108, and 110 were measured. The procedure to deduce the charge radii and the method to discuss the charge distribution from the muonic transition energies are proposed.
Method: The experiment was performed at the MuSIC-M1 beamline at Research Center for Nuclear Physics, Osaka University. A continuous muon beam impinged on the enriched palladium targets. Muonic x rays were measured by high-purity germanium detectors.
Results: The muonic transition energies up to transitions were determined for five palladium isotopes.
Conclusions: The root-mean-square charge radii are deduced assuming the two-parameter Fermi distribution. The charge distribution of the nucleus is discussed by employing the Barrett model. The muonic transition energies of the transitions are crucial for discussing both the charge radius and the charge distribution.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (41)
- G. Fricke, C. Bernhardt, K. Heilig, L. A. Schaller, L. Schellenberg, E. B. Shera, and C. W. de Jjager, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 60, 177 (1995).
- I. Angeli and K. Marinova, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 99, 69 (2013).
- M. Wakasugi et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. B 317, 668 (2013).
- T. Suda and H. Simon, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 96, 1 (2017).
- K. Tsukada, A. Enokizono, T. Ohnishi, K. Adachi, T. Fujita, M. Hara, M. Hori, T. Hori, S. Ichikawa, K. Kurita, K. Matsuda, T. Suda, T. Tamae, M. Togasaki, M. Wakasugi, M. Watanabe, and K. Yamada, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 262501 (2017).
- S. Terashima, H. Sakaguchi, H. Takeda, T. Ishikawa, M. Itoh, T. Kawabata, T. Murakami, M. Uchida, Y. Yasuda, M. Yosoi, J. Zenihiro, H. P. Yoshida, T. Noro, T. Ishida, S. Asaji, and T. Yonemura, Phys. Rev. C 77, 024317 (2008).
- J. Zenihiro, H. Sakaguchi, T. Murakami, M. Yosoi, Y. Yasuda, S. Terashima, Y. Iwao, H. Takeda, M. Itoh, H. P. Yoshida, and M. Uchida, Phys. Rev. C 82, 044611 (2010).
- P. Bergem, G. Piller, A. Rueetschi, L. A. Schaller, L. Schellenberg, and H. Schneuwly, Phys. Rev. C 37, 2821 (1988).
- R. Barrett, Phys. Lett. B 33, 388 (1970).
- P. Strasser, K. Nagamine, T. Matsuzaki, K. Ishida, Y. Matsuda, and M. Iwasaki, Nucl. Phys. B 149, 390 (2005).
- P. Strasser, A. Taniguchi, T. Matsuzaki, K. Ishida, Y. Matsuda, S. Ohya, M. Iwasaki, and K. Nagamine, Hyperfine Interact. 193, 121 (2009).
- R. Engfer, H. Schneuwly, J. Vuilleumier, H. Walter, and A. Zehnder, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 14, 509 (1974), nuclear charge and moment distributions.
- T. Hack, Ph.D. thesis, Institüt fur Kernphysik, KPH 10/89, Universitäte Mainz, 1989.
- D. F. Measday, Phys. Rep. 354, 243 (2001).
- H. Primakoff, Rev. Mod. Phys. 31, 802 (1959).
- E. Kolbe, K. Langanke, and P. Vogel, Phys. Rev. C 62, 055502 (2000).
- N. T. Zinner, K. Langanke, and P. Vogel, Phys. Rev. C 74, 024326 (2006).
- T. Marketin, N. Paar, T. Nikšić, and D. Vretenar, Phys. Rev. C 79, 054323 (2009).
- S. Cook, R. D'Arcy, A. Edmonds, M. Fukuda, K. Hatanaka, Y. Hino, Y. Kuno, M. Lancaster, Y. Mori, T. Ogitsu, H. Sakamoto, A. Sato, N. H. Tran, N. M. Truong, M. Wing, A. Yamamoto, and M. Yoshida, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 20, 030101 (2017).
- D. Tomono and A. Sato (private communication).
- K. Terada, T. Katabuchi, M. Mizumoto, T. Arai, T. Saito, M. Igashira, K. Hirose, S. Nakamura, A. Kimura, H. Harada, J. Hori, K. Kino, and Y. Kiyanagi, Prog. Nucl. Energy 82, 118 (2015), selected Papers from the Fourth International Symposium on Innovative Nuclear Energy Systems, INES-4 - Innovative Nuclear Science and Technology Post Fukushima - held at Ookayama campus of Tokyo Institute of Technology.
- H. Baba, T. Ichihara, T. Ohnishi, S. Takeuchi, K. Yoshida, Y. Watanabe, S. Ota, and S. Shimoura, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. A 616, 65 (2010).
- T. Suzuki, D. F. Measday, and J. P. Roalsvig, Phys. Rev. C 35, 2212 (1987).
- K. A. Olive et al. (Particle Data Group), Chinese Phys. C 38, 090001 (2014).
- I. Blair, H. Muirhead, T. Woodhead, and J. Woulds, Proc. Phys. Soc. 80, 938 (1962).
- M. Eckhause, R. T. Siegel, R. E. Welsh, and T. A. Filippas, Nucl. Phys. 81, 575 (1966).
- R. C. Barrett, Rep. Prog. Phys. 37, 1 (1974).
- E. Borie and G. A. Rinker, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 67 (1982).
- N. Michel, N. S. Oreshkina, and C. H. Keitel, Phys. Rev. A 96, 032510 (2017).
- K. T. Cheng, W. D. Sepp, W. R. Johnson, and B. Fricke, Phys. Rev. A 17, 489 (1978).
- H. H. Xie, T. Naito, J. Li, and H. Liang, Phys. Lett. B 846, 138232 (2023).
- K. W. Ford and G. A. Rinker, Phys. Rev. C 7, 1206 (1973).
- I. Angeli, Acta Physica Hungarica A Heavy Ion Physics 15, 87 (2002).
- Interacting plot of atomic nuclei and computed shapes, https://wwwnucl.ph.tsukuba.ac.jp/InPACS/.
- S. Ebata, T. Nakatsukasa, and T. Inakura, Phys. Rev. C 90, 024303 (2014).
- S. Ebata and T. Nakatsukasa, Phys. Scr. 92, 064005 (2017).
- J. Bartel, P. Quentin, M. Brack, C. Guet, and H.-B. Håkansson, Nucl. Phys. A 386, 79 (1982).
- L. B. v. d. Laan, PhD. Thesis, Amsterdam University, 1986.
- H. Kurasawa and T. Suzuki, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 113D01 (2019).
- H. De Vries, C. W. De Jager, and C. De Vries, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 36, 495 (1987).
- Reduction and resource recycling of high-level radioactive wastes through nuclear transmutation, http://www.jst.go.jp/impact/en/program08.html.